[QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"]
[QUOTE="Pices"] Please tell me that you're joking. The Wii can do better graphics than what the Xbox and GC have donepainguy1
Please tell me that you know the Wii's GPU is 10Mhz slower than the Xbox's, its CPU is 4Mhz slower, and the Wii only has 24MB more of system RAM than the original Xbox
Everyone acts like Trey had a billion years to make this
Guess what guys, Trey has probably spent a year at max porting this, seems to have everything from the original in except the good graphics, and also they are probably working on COD 7 on Wii, PS2, PS3, 360, PC for 2010 already. And since the Wii COD versions are different from PS2 versions that means Trey is making a port of COD4 to the Wii, building a COD7 for PS2, building a COD7 for 360/PS3, building a COD7 for Wii and building a COD7 for PC all at the same time.
I'd say making a port that is everybit as good as the original, minus what we all knew would be compromised (graphicsm resolution, some physics areas) isn't bad at all and this will sell 1 million + in the next year and get a A/AA score while being the best online Wii game out until, well until Trey releases a COD next year
Just because the GPU is 10 mhz slower doesnt mean its worse, and its actually 10mhz faster. remember we are talking about console architecture here not PC. The wiis Ram uses a system similar to DDR3 giving its 88mb preformance similar 278mb. Mario galaxy could never be stored on 88mb of DDR. The GC's CPU was 300mhz slower than the xbox's 730mhz, but it had a powerPC architecture making it preform like an 800mhz intel 3 compared to a 730mhz intel the xbox used & it has shorter pipelines than the xbox's CPU which allows data to be proccesed faster.. The wii's CPu uses the same powerPC architecture at around 730mhz and because it has a powerPC design & is a much newer build as well as faster FBS & shorter pipeline it is similar to 1.1ghz. On top of that it has more than 2x as much cache. The wii's GPU is also mroe powerful than the xbox's mainly because it has a faster clock speed, more VRam & uses a GDDR3 system similar to DDR2. the GPU also has a coproccesor called starlet that adds another 200mhz for both GPU functions & CPU functions. Take all this into consideration and the Wii is 30% or more powerful than the xbox 1. You cannot just use sheer numbers to determine preformance. You need to take the architecture into consideration aswell. Treyarch & Activision have no excuse for making the game look the way it does. The wii is perfectly capable of advanced shader effects seen on other consoles. The functions would take about 10 miniutes extra to program for aslong as the engine has a proper design. Stop misleading people. I suggest you do some reading. If the GC was just as powerful as the xbox than the wii is surely more powerful. John Carmack siad that if teh GC had more Ram Doom 3 could have been put on the GC and would be comparable to the xbox version.
hey darth-psycho, remember when i said i doubt anyone else gets what you say when you start comparing hardware specs? i'm sorry :lol: 
*points at paper-like textures*
*points at big contrast, slight blur and "watery" colors*
Log in to comment