This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

The cells become human in a matter of months.

Silver_Dragon17
Unless of course you abort them. In which case they go the way of most gamete cells.
Avatar image for Abigorus
Abigorus

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#102 Abigorus
Member since 2006 • 877 Posts
[QUOTE="Abigorus"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="Abigorus"]

I wouldn't want to be a son of a rapist.

Edit: Forgot to quote, this was directed to Silver Dragon17.

Silver_Dragon17

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

Just don't tell the kid or the adopting parents and the kid never has to know.

Not if she aborts it when it's just a heap of cells. But, that's where opinions start flowing, yes?

The cells become human in a matter of months.

This debate can't really go further. I'm pro-choice either way. Peace.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#103 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

The cells become human in a matter of months.

quiglythegreat

Unless of course you abort them. In which case they go the way of most gamete cells.

And when you abort them, you end the life of a child to be.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

Silver_Dragon17
If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?
Avatar image for Choga
Choga

2377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 Choga
Member since 2006 • 2377 Posts
[QUOTE="Choga"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Choga"]

Sentience refers to possession of sensory organs, the ability to feel or perceive, not necessarily including the faculty of self-awareness. YOU don;t understand the word.

quiglythegreat

No, I was not the one confusing it with 'sapieness'. The word necessarily includes awareness and perception.

Sapience* - get it right. Sentience DOES NOT include the faculty of selfawareness. One does not HAVE to perceive in order to be sentient. It refers to the ability to feel OR perceive.

Dude, you will lose this argument. Go to a dictionary. It has the connotation of perception and awareness. It isn't about physically feeling something at all.

Sentient - 1) having the power of perception by the senses; conscious.

2) characterized by sensation and consciousness.

For something to have the power of perception by the senses, it needs sensory organs :D

For something to have sensation, it needs sensory organs :D

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#106 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts

This debate can't really go further. I'm pro-choice either way. Peace.

Abigorus

Oh, it can go a helluva lot further (this isn't my first abortion argument) but if you want to leave, I understand.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

The cells become human in a matter of months.

Silver_Dragon17

Unless of course you abort them. In which case they go the way of most gamete cells.

And when you abort them, you end the life of a child to be.

Whenever you practice abstinence, you're ending the lives of about 300 million children-to-be.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

The cells become human in a matter of months.

Silver_Dragon17

Unless of course you abort them. In which case they go the way of most gamete cells.

And when you abort them, you end the life of a child to be.

See, this argument fails because it says that every egg ever should be fertilized and if this fails to happen it is the equivelent of murder.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#109 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

CptJSparrow

If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?

And that makes a difference, how? Why don't we go ahead and kill people in their sleep, because they won't be aware of it.

Oh wait. . .

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

Silver_Dragon17

If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?

And that makes a difference, how? Why don't we go ahead and kill people in their sleep, because they won't be aware of it.

Oh wait. . .

That's a bit contradictory. The person sleeping had a chance at life...furthermore it's murder.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#111 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

The cells become human in a matter of months.

quiglythegreat

Unless of course you abort them. In which case they go the way of most gamete cells.

And when you abort them, you end the life of a child to be.

See, this argument fails because it says that every egg ever should be fertilized and if this fails to happen it is the equivelent of murder.

No it doesn't.:|

A sperm cell or an egg, if left alone, will just sit around for a while and die. No big deal. But a fertilized egg will grow and become a human being. Big deal.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

Sentient - 1) having the power of perception by the senses; conscious.

2) characterized by sensation and consciousness.

For something to have the power of perception by the senses, it needs sensory organs :D

For something to have sensation, it needs sensory organs :D

Choga
Aye, perhaps it's implied a bit, a bit, but my original explanation of the word was correct. Yours was not. Sentience is about perception and awareness and although this is facilitated by have senses, sensory organs do not mean that something is sentient. Do not try to talk your way out of this; this was what you originally claimed the word to be. I see you hit a dictionary.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#113 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

CptJSparrow

If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?

And that makes a difference, how? Why don't we go ahead and kill people in their sleep, because they won't be aware of it.

Oh wait. . .

That's a bit contradictory. The person sleeping had a chance at life...furthermore it's murder.

And the unborn baby also had a chance of live. . . .

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

The cells become human in a matter of months.

Silver_Dragon17

Unless of course you abort them. In which case they go the way of most gamete cells.

And when you abort them, you end the life of a child to be.

See, this argument fails because it says that every egg ever should be fertilized and if this fails to happen it is the equivelent of murder.

No it doesn't.:|

A sperm cell or an egg, if left alone, will just sit around for a while and die. No big deal. But a fertilized egg will grow and become a human being. Big deal.

It has the potential to one day become a human being if fertilization occurs.:| The point is, they're a possible genetic combination and thus a possible human being, which will never be born. This is the equivalent of abortion.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

No it doesn't.:|

A sperm cell or an egg, if left alone, will just sit around for a while and die. No big deal. But a fertilized egg will grow and become a human being. Big deal.

Silver_Dragon17
I can't help but feel you trumping up the importance of fertilization is linked to your values regarding sex itself. Am I right or an over presumptuous jerk as well as a plain jerk?
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

Silver_Dragon17

If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?

And that makes a difference, how? Why don't we go ahead and kill people in their sleep, because they won't be aware of it.

Oh wait. . .

That's a bit contradictory. The person sleeping had a chance at life...furthermore it's murder.

And the unborn baby also had a chance of live. . . .

You contradict your original statement. Which is it?
Avatar image for Domingo1093
Domingo1093

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Domingo1093
Member since 2005 • 195 Posts

Clearly in favor of it. The woman has the right to choose. The ones saying that this is a murder always make me laugh. They really don t know of what they talking about...

Avatar image for Choga
Choga

2377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 Choga
Member since 2006 • 2377 Posts
[QUOTE="Choga"]

Sentient - 1) having the power of perception by the senses; conscious.

2) characterized by sensation and consciousness.

For something to have the power of perception by the senses, it needs sensory organs :D

For something to have sensation, it needs sensory organs :D

quiglythegreat

Aye, perhaps it's implied a bit, a bit, but my original explanation of the word was correct. Yours was not. Sentience is about perception and awareness and although this is facilitated by have senses, sensory organs do not mean that something is sentient. Do not try to talk your way out of this; this was what you originally claimed the word to be. I see you hit a dictionary.

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#119 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts

It has the potential to one day become a human being if fertilization occurs.:| The point is, they're a possible genetic combination and thus a possible human being, which will never be born. This is the equivalent of abortion.CptJSparrow

No it isn't.

A sperm cell has potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

An egg has the potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

A sperm cell combined with an egg is guaranteed to become a human

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

Choga
Terri Schiavo.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#121 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

CptJSparrow

If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?

And that makes a difference, how? Why don't we go ahead and kill people in their sleep, because they won't be aware of it.

Oh wait. . .

That's a bit contradictory. The person sleeping had a chance at life...furthermore it's murder.

And the unborn baby also had a chance of live. . . .

You contradict your original statement. Which is it?

My original statement was that I don't want to die before I have a chance to live. How does that contradict me saying that an unborn baby has a chance to live?

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
I am against men making decisions that will affect women.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] It has the potential to one day become a human being if fertilization occurs.:| The point is, they're a possible genetic combination and thus a possible human being, which will never be born. This is the equivalent of abortion.Silver_Dragon17

No it isn't.

A sperm cell has potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

An egg has the potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

A sperm cell combined with an egg is guaranteed to become a human

It's not guaranteed. Ever hear of a miscarriage?:| You're still missing the point that the sperm who failed to unite with the egg is a lost genetic possibility, and therefore a lost human being.
Avatar image for Choga
Choga

2377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 Choga
Member since 2006 • 2377 Posts
[QUOTE="Choga"]

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

quiglythegreat

Terri Schiavo.

To be sentient, something must perceive by the senses. To do so, something must posses sensory organs.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

I wouldn't want to die before I had a chance to live.:|

Silver_Dragon17

If you did, you wouldn't have any way of knowing, now wouldn't you?

And that makes a difference, how? Why don't we go ahead and kill people in their sleep, because they won't be aware of it.

Oh wait. . .

That's a bit contradictory. The person sleeping had a chance at life...furthermore it's murder.

And the unborn baby also had a chance of live. . . .

You contradict your original statement. Which is it?

My original statement was that I don't want to die before I have a chance to live. How does that contradict me saying that an unborn baby has a chance to live?

Because you're dying as an unborn baby. I'm arguing for abortion, remember? The sleeping person has lived (has experienced higher emotions, has thought, has questioned, has learned...the unborn fetus has done none of these). The baby had a possibility to live, however it didn't.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#126 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] It has the potential to one day become a human being if fertilization occurs.:| The point is, they're a possible genetic combination and thus a possible human being, which will never be born. This is the equivalent of abortion.CptJSparrow

No it isn't.

A sperm cell has potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

An egg has the potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

A sperm cell combined with an egg is guaranteed to become a human

It's not guaranteed. Ever hear of a miscarriage?:| You're still missing the point that the sperm who failed to unite with the egg is a lost genetic possibility, and therefore a lost human being.

A miscarriage is sad, but natural.

I know your point, but it's not true. A sperm will never become a human unless it fertalizes an egg that will also never become a human unless it is fertilized. They have the potential, but they are not human, nor will they be unless they mix for nine months, so when a sperm cell or egg dies it is nature, not murder.

Avatar image for Balimi
Balimi

1599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Balimi
Member since 2007 • 1599 Posts
I ****ing hate kids, so I'm all for it.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#128 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts

Because you're dying as an unborn baby. I'm arguing for abortion, remember? The sleeping person has lived (has experienced higher emotions, has thought, has questioned, has learned...the unborn fetus has done none of these). The baby had a possibility to live, however it didn't.CptJSparrow

I would not want to die as an unborn baby. BEFORE I HAD A CHANCE.

Okay, so killing a sleeping baby is fine, as long as it hasn't woken up since it was born?

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] It has the potential to one day become a human being if fertilization occurs.:| The point is, they're a possible genetic combination and thus a possible human being, which will never be born. This is the equivalent of abortion.Silver_Dragon17

No it isn't.

A sperm cell has potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

An egg has the potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

A sperm cell combined with an egg is guaranteed to become a human

It's not guaranteed. Ever hear of a miscarriage?:| You're still missing the point that the sperm who failed to unite with the egg is a lost genetic possibility, and therefore a lost human being.

A miscarriage is sad, but natural.

I know your point, but it's not true. A sperm will never become a human unless it fertalizes an egg that will also never become a human unless it is fertilized. They have the potential, but they are not human, nor will they be unless they mix for nine months, so when a sperm cell or egg dies it is nature, not murder.

I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Choga"]

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

Choga

Terri Schiavo.

To be sentient, something must perceive by the senses. To do so, something must posses sensory organs.

Sentience is based on perception. Sensory organs do not mean sentience. I am done with you.
Avatar image for Atrus
Atrus

10422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Atrus
Member since 2002 • 10422 Posts

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

Choga

It doesn't. There are conditions such as HSAN disorders which leave people incapable of feeling pain, in fact one of the James Bond movies played off of this theme to create a bad guy for Bond to fight with. In humans, the ability to sense does not imply they possess sensation. The important aspect of sentient beings is cognitive brain function without which means that a person as you know them is dead and all that's left is a biological doll.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] Because you're dying as an unborn baby. I'm arguing for abortion, remember? The sleeping person has lived (has experienced higher emotions, has thought, has questioned, has learned...the unborn fetus has done none of these). The baby had a possibility to live, however it didn't.Silver_Dragon17

I would not want to die as an unborn baby. BEFORE I HAD A CHANCE.

Okay, so killing a sleeping baby is fine, as long as it hasn't woken up since it was born?

No, the baby can feel pain at that point. A fetus less than 8 weeks old can not.
Avatar image for Choga
Choga

2377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 Choga
Member since 2006 • 2377 Posts
[QUOTE="Choga"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="Choga"]

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

quiglythegreat

Terri Schiavo.

To be sentient, something must perceive by the senses. To do so, something must posses sensory organs.

Sentience is based on perception. Sensory organs do not mean sentience. I am done with you.

So you lose because for something to perceive it needs sensory organs.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#134 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] It has the potential to one day become a human being if fertilization occurs.:| The point is, they're a possible genetic combination and thus a possible human being, which will never be born. This is the equivalent of abortion.CptJSparrow

No it isn't.

A sperm cell has potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

An egg has the potential to become a human being, but alone, it never will.

A sperm cell combined with an egg is guaranteed to become a human

It's not guaranteed. Ever hear of a miscarriage?:| You're still missing the point that the sperm who failed to unite with the egg is a lost genetic possibility, and therefore a lost human being.

A miscarriage is sad, but natural.

I know your point, but it's not true. A sperm will never become a human unless it fertalizes an egg that will also never become a human unless it is fertilized. They have the potential, but they are not human, nor will they be unless they mix for nine months, so when a sperm cell or egg dies it is nature, not murder.

I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.

No it is not. Abortion is terminating a pregnancy already in progress, in otherwords, a developing human. A sperm dieing or an egg dieing is just nature setting its course, making room for more life, etc. How does this equal abortion in any way?

And just because it is legal doesn't mean it's not killing. Like I said before, if it will so much as become a human, it should live.

Avatar image for Choga
Choga

2377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#135 Choga
Member since 2006 • 2377 Posts
[QUOTE="Choga"]

Sensory organs DOES mean that something is sentient, because sensory organs allow something to perceive by the sense, and posses sensation.

Atrus

It doesn't. There are conditions such as HSAN disorders which leave people incapable of feeling pain, in fact one of the James Bond movies played off of this theme to create a bad guy for Bond to fight with. In humans, the ability to sense does not imply they possess sensation. The important aspect of sentient beings is cognitive brain function without which means that a person as you know them is dead and all that's left is a biological doll.

Those conditions are genetic disorders, they are unfortunate irregularities. Unless a fetus has this genetic disorder, than it is sentient because its sensory organs allow it to have sensation. I was watching a National Geographic documentary, where they had twins in the womb. They responded to each other's touches, which implies they have sensation.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#136 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] Because you're dying as an unborn baby. I'm arguing for abortion, remember? The sleeping person has lived (has experienced higher emotions, has thought, has questioned, has learned...the unborn fetus has done none of these). The baby had a possibility to live, however it didn't.CptJSparrow

I would not want to die as an unborn baby. BEFORE I HAD A CHANCE.

Okay, so killing a sleeping baby is fine, as long as it hasn't woken up since it was born?

No, the baby can feel pain at that point. A fetus less than 8 weeks old can not.

How do we know this? Is there some sort of test that harms babies and sees if it reacts?

Besides, the inability to feel it doesn't make it any better.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts

Sentience refers to possession of sensory organs,

Choga
This is what you said. This is not how I view the word and I've made it clear how I do.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.Silver_Dragon17

No it is not. Abortion is terminating a pregnancy already in progress, in otherwords, a developing human. A sperm dieing or an egg dieing is just nature setting its course, making room for more life, etc. How does this equal abortion in any way?

And just because it is legal doesn't mean it's not killing. Like I said before, if it will so much as become a human, it should live.

It's equivalent because the person will never be born. In the case of the sperm, it will never even exist (fertilization hasn't occurred). This is the same concept, only divided by our different opinions of the morality of the situation. You said 'murder,' not 'killing.' Just correcting your legal terms. >.>
Avatar image for Choga
Choga

2377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 Choga
Member since 2006 • 2377 Posts
[QUOTE="Choga"]

Sentience refers to possession of sensory organs,

quiglythegreat

This is what you said. This is not how I view the word and I've made it clear how I do.

How you view the word is irrelevant. That is how science defines it, and that is the definition.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] No, the baby can feel pain at that point. A fetus less than 8 weeks old can not.Silver_Dragon17

How do we know this? Is there some sort of test that harms babies and sees if it reacts?

Besides, the inability to feel it doesn't make it any better.

It's known because we know that it will react to the stimulus of pain.:| 'Better' here is relative.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#141 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.CptJSparrow

No it is not. Abortion is terminating a pregnancy already in progress, in otherwords, a developing human. A sperm dieing or an egg dieing is just nature setting its course, making room for more life, etc. How does this equal abortion in any way?

And just because it is legal doesn't mean it's not killing. Like I said before, if it will so much as become a human, it should live.

It's equivalent because the person will never be born. In the case of the sperm, it will never even exist (fertilization hasn't occurred). This is the same concept, only divided by our different opinions of the morality of the situation. QUOTE]

But it is not stopping a development already in progress. It only keeps a child from being born because it keeps a child from developing. That is not abortion. Abortion is when a child already in the process of development, who will eventually grow arms, legs, a personality, a life, is killed by unnaturally stopping the pregnancy with man-made objects and procedures.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#142 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] No, the baby can feel pain at that point. A fetus less than 8 weeks old can not.CptJSparrow

How do we know this? Is there some sort of test that harms babies and sees if it reacts?

Besides, the inability to feel it doesn't make it any better.

It's known because we know that it will react to the stimulus of pain.:| 'Better' here is relative.

How do we know they can't feel pain? Do they perform some kind of test I have never heard of to see if it responds to the stimulous of pain? Or do they go "Well, if it cries out when we cut of its head, we'll know"?

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.Silver_Dragon17

No it is not. Abortion is terminating a pregnancy already in progress, in otherwords, a developing human. A sperm dieing or an egg dieing is just nature setting its course, making room for more life, etc. How does this equal abortion in any way?

And just because it is legal doesn't mean it's not killing. Like I said before, if it will so much as become a human, it should live.

It's equivalent because the person will never be born. In the case of the sperm, it will never even exist (fertilization hasn't occurred). This is the same concept, only divided by our different opinions of the morality of the situation.

But it is not stopping a development already in progress. It only keeps a child from being born because it keeps a child from developing. That is not abortion. Abortion is when a child already in the process of development, who will eventually grow arms, legs, a personality, a life, is killed by unnaturally stopping the pregnancy with man-made objects and procedures.

On the other hand, the other human will never be born. As the less than 8-week-old fetus doesn't have any of the things you mentioned, I see no difference. When you practice abstinence, you're murdering 300 possible people, and it isn't just in Sparta. These people will never be born; never have a chance to feel as we feel; never think. If abortion is wrong, it is wrong to let any sperm and egg go without fertilization. It's simply murder.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] No, the baby can feel pain at that point. A fetus less than 8 weeks old can not.Silver_Dragon17

How do we know this? Is there some sort of test that harms babies and sees if it reacts?

Besides, the inability to feel it doesn't make it any better.

It's known because we know that it will react to the stimulus of pain.:| 'Better' here is relative.

How do we know they can't feel pain? Do they perform some kind of test I have never heard of to see if it responds to the stimulous of pain? Or do they go "Well, if it cries out when we cut of its head, we'll know"?

How do we know that the nervous system processes stimuli? Do we cut off their head and see if they can still scream and twitch? No, you monitor the central nervous system to know if it has a reaction to the stimulus of pain. The 8 week old fetus does not. It's the equivalent of killing a bacterium: the stimulus will always get the same response, and there is no thinking or storing of information involved, therefore the fetus has no idea what's coming.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#145 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.CptJSparrow

No it is not. Abortion is terminating a pregnancy already in progress, in otherwords, a developing human. A sperm dieing or an egg dieing is just nature setting its course, making room for more life, etc. How does this equal abortion in any way?

And just because it is legal doesn't mean it's not killing. Like I said before, if it will so much as become a human, it should live.

It's equivalent because the person will never be born. In the case of the sperm, it will never even exist (fertilization hasn't occurred). This is the same concept, only divided by our different opinions of the morality of the situation.

But it is not stopping a development already in progress. It only keeps a child from being born because it keeps a child from developing. That is not abortion. Abortion is when a child already in the process of development, who will eventually grow arms, legs, a personality, a life, is killed by unnaturally stopping the pregnancy with man-made objects and procedures.

On the other hand, the other human will never be born. As the less than 8-week-old fetus doesn't have any of the things you mentioned, I see no difference. When you practice abstinence, you're murdering 300 possible people, and it isn't just in Sparta. These people will never be born; never have a chance to feel as we feel; never think. If abortion is wrong, it is wrong to let any sperm and egg go without fertilization. It's simply murder.

The other human will never be born because the other human will never exist. The difference is one doesn't exist at all, while the other does. A growing and developing child deserves the chance to live. If the human does not exist, then it cannot be killed, and if it cannot be killed, then there's no way it can equal murder.

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#146 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts

How do we know that the nervous system processes stimuli? Do we cut off their head and see if they can still scream and twitch? No, you monitor the central nervous system to know if it has a reaction to the stimulus of pain. The 8 week old fetus does not. It's the equivalent of killing a bacterium: the stimulus will always get the same response, and there is no thinking or storing of information involved, therefore the fetus has no idea what's coming.CptJSparrow

I cannot believe you just compared a human fetus to bacteria.

I ask again: Even though we can monitor the nervous system, how do we know the kid can't feel pain? For us to know, the kid would have to be put in a painful situation, and then we monitor what happens. What situation is the kid put in to monitor the pain it is (or isn't) feeling?

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

The other human will never be born because the other human will never exist. The difference is one doesn't exist at all, while the other does. A growing and developing child deserves the chance to live. If the human does not exist, then it cannot be killed, and if it cannot be killed, then there's no way it can equal murder.

Silver_Dragon17
It will never grow into a human or feel anything, just as the fetus won't. If you practice abstinence, you're killing. If you practice abortion, you're killing. It is also not guaranteed that the fetus will be born, now is it? Your stance on this is based solely on the fact that you believe there is some sanctity in the unborn child, in the life. There you go with the murder word again. I'll repeat myself: It's not against the law, so it is not murder. It's only murder in your eyes because you value it. I don't think you can speak for the people who get abortions, which is why there should not be any absolute morality to the situation, therefore abortion should remain legal.
Avatar image for Atrus
Atrus

10422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Atrus
Member since 2002 • 10422 Posts

Those conditions are genetic disorders, they are unfortunate irregularities. Unless a fetus has this genetic disorder, than it is sentient because its sensory organs allow it to have sensation. I was watching a National Geographic documentary, where they had twins in the womb. They responded to each other's touches, which implies they have sensation.

Choga

The example was to show that sense and sensation are two different things. Babies also develop a falling down sensation, however we have to still be aware that these might also be autonomous responses. It's not that I'm advocating a liberalized approach to the data, as conservatism suggests it's better to assume that the ability to sense is where sensation starts, however it has to be clear that sense does not mean sensation.

People who suffer various conditions are proof positive of this as are people who are brain dead. The body is a biological tool that is only as relevent as the brain that controls it.

Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts

[QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] How do we know that the nervous system processes stimuli? Do we cut off their head and see if they can still scream and twitch? No, you monitor the central nervous system to know if it has a reaction to the stimulus of pain. The 8 week old fetus does not. It's the equivalent of killing a bacterium: the stimulus will always get the same response, and there is no thinking or storing of information involved, therefore the fetus has no idea what's coming.Silver_Dragon17

I cannot believe you just compared a human fetus to bacteria.

I ask again: Even though we can monitor the nervous system, how do we know the kid can't feel pain? For us to know, the kid would have to be put in a painful situation, and then we monitor what happens. What situation is the kid put in to monitor the pain it is (or isn't) feeling?

The fetus is somehow more special than the bacteria? Do explain this one to me.:| It is not experiencing pain because there is NO RESPONSE to the stimulus. Therefore, it has no clue what is happening. In order to test the fetus' development of its nervous system, one simply has to use EEG's, and then poke it or something. If there is no response, it can't feel pain.
Avatar image for killtactics
killtactics

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 killtactics
Member since 2004 • 5957 Posts
[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"] I'm aware that it won't become a human being unless it fertilizes the egg. That's exactly the point. It hasn't, therefore it's the equivalent of abortion because that genetic combination never occurred. As a side note, murder is the unlawful killing of one human being by another. Abortion isn't illegal in most U.S. states.CptJSparrow

No it is not. Abortion is terminating a pregnancy already in progress, in otherwords, a developing human. A sperm dieing or an egg dieing is just nature setting its course, making room for more life, etc. How does this equal abortion in any way?

And just because it is legal doesn't mean it's not killing. Like I said before, if it will so much as become a human, it should live.

It's equivalent because the person will never be born. In the case of the sperm, it will never even exist (fertilization hasn't occurred). This is the same concept, only divided by our different opinions of the morality of the situation.

But it is not stopping a development already in progress. It only keeps a child from being born because it keeps a child from developing. That is not abortion. Abortion is when a child already in the process of development, who will eventually grow arms, legs, a personality, a life, is killed by unnaturally stopping the pregnancy with man-made objects and procedures.

On the other hand, the other human will never be born. As the less than 8-week-old fetus doesn't have any of the things you mentioned, I see no difference. When you practice abstinence, you're murdering 300 possible people, and it isn't just in Sparta. These people will never be born; never have a chance to feel as we feel; never think. If abortion is wrong, it is wrong to let any sperm and egg go without fertilization. It's simply murder.

yes not having sex is as much murder as me kicking a pregnant women till the fetus is destroyed........:| i gatta say i love your spin...