atheists proved wrong

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SaintWalrus
SaintWalrus

1715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 SaintWalrus
Member since 2011 • 1715 Posts

If you guys think religion wars is bad here come to the Religion section of Yahoo Answers and you'll crack up seeing how blantant the insults are there.

ad1x2

What's even worse is the Race and Ethnics section.

Yahoo Answers is /B/'s step sister.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="dangamit"]where did you get the idea that randomness ends in chaos? Within chaos, orderly system develop.BossPerson
[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="dangamit"]Random events end in CHAOS. If the big bang, revolution etc were random, we would not be here. You can believe whatever you want though, I couldn't care less.

where did you get the idea that randomness ends in chaos? Within chaos, orderly system develop.

Chaos-->order isn't that a law of thermodynamics?
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#153 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="tjricardo089"]

The big bang didn't create the universe, god did. Nothing + Nothing =/= Something

To prove a religious person wrong you have to prove your theories that make you not believe in Him.

PS2_ROCKS

I don't believe in god because there's no evidence that he exists, not because of the big bang. Same reason I don't believe in unicorns.

You don't have to believe in the bang bang to be an atheists.

"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.

No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="dangamit"]Random events end in CHAOS. Blue-Sky

Why? What exactly about our universe is organized?

For one, the sheer predictability of the universe on a macro level via the laws of physics. Not sure why this is ever brought up in religion threads, though.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="dangamit"] [QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="dangamit"]Random events end in CHAOS. If the big bang, revolution etc were random, we would not be here. You can believe whatever you want though, I couldn't care less.

where did you get the idea that randomness ends in chaos? Within chaos, orderly system develop.

Chaos-->order isn't that a law of thermodynamics?

yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cycle
Avatar image for SaintWalrus
SaintWalrus

1715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 SaintWalrus
Member since 2011 • 1715 Posts

The absence of evidence to disprove the belief, is not evidence of its existence - Russels teapot

Avatar image for DocDelicious
DocDelicious

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#157 DocDelicious
Member since 2011 • 410 Posts
That video is crap. It's just circular reasoning and doesn't prove anything. And the current theory is that the big bang was caused by the collision of two universes within the multiverse. Another theory is that it was caused by the collision of two dimensional planes.
Avatar image for SaintWalrus
SaintWalrus

1715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 SaintWalrus
Member since 2011 • 1715 Posts

And plus that's not even what the law of cause and effect states.

That's the first law of thermodynamics.

Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts

[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I don't believe in god because there's no evidence that he exists, not because of the big bang. Same reason I don't believe in unicorns.

You don't have to believe in the bang bang to be an atheists.

chrisrooR
"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.

No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.

My question to you is what would it take [for you to believe]?

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cycleBossPerson

notsureifsrs.jpg

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

As an athiest, I accept that we simply don't know.

Why are christians so arrogant as to put forth an argument that people have to believe something?

Avatar image for Ilovegames1992
Ilovegames1992

14221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#162 Ilovegames1992
Member since 2010 • 14221 Posts

As an athiest, I accept that we simply don't know.

Why are christians so arrogant as to put forth an argument that people have to believe something?

CaveJohnson1

Your kind are pretty arrogant too as well to be fair.

Avatar image for Spitfirer
Spitfirer

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Spitfirer
Member since 2007 • 2088 Posts

Why are christians so arrogant as to put forth an argument that people have to believe something?

CaveJohnson1

Christians aren't the only people that do it.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cyclecoolbeans90

notsureifsrs.jpg

something like that?????? ............i just wanted to sound smart :(
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cycleBossPerson

notsureifsrs.jpg

something like that?????? ............i just wanted to sound smart :(

lol :lol:
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[think of it for a sec, if it is saying that anything that can happen will happen, then all creation is will be an illusion since theists always cite the "order" of things as a reason for gods existence. With the laws of thermodynamics, we can know that given enough time everything that is possible will eventually happen, thus we can deduce that it is only a matter of time before every possible system is developed with the assumption that the variables stay the same.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

actually disregard what i previously said about thermodynamics or murphys law. After some minutes on wikipedia i realize I had no idea what i was talking about

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts
We don't know. That's the answer. And anyone who claims to know is an idiot. However, the God idea is highly unlikely. And "thank God" it is unlikely. I can't think of a worse situation to be in than to spend an eternity with a celestial dictator who not only monitored your every movement 24 hours per day while on Earth, but when you died, the misery and supervision continued even more. But thankfully, there's very little chance that I'll see you all again in some theme park, one nice, one nasty. There's very little evidence of that at all. If you talk about possibilities, sure, the God thing is possible. But I'd rather talk about probabilities, whereby the God thing is higly unlikely.
Avatar image for the_plan_man
the_plan_man

1664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 the_plan_man
Member since 2011 • 1664 Posts
I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out." Although many people refute that, and answer "gravity" then that begs the question where the moon came from, and so on and so forth. And even if there is an infinite state of matter in the universe, it doesn't mean it can't co-exist with God.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#170 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

I'm not sure if TC is trolling Atheists by trying to use this as "proof", or trolling Christians by using the thumbs down as "proof".

Either way, TC, you are dumb and I hate you.

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#171 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts
I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."the_plan_man
And you think that argument makes Bill right?
Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#172 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts

I'm not sure if TC is trolling Atheists by trying to use this as "proof", or trolling Christians by using the thumbs down as "proof".

Either way, TC, you are dumb and I hate you.

SPYDER0416
Yeah TC is pretty dumb. I'd vote for him in the "Users you'd like to see banned" thread.
Avatar image for SaintWalrus
SaintWalrus

1715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 SaintWalrus
Member since 2011 • 1715 Posts
[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."Nicksonman
And you think that argument makes Bill right?

Bill O reiley can't even win a rap battle, Let alone a battle of wits
Avatar image for the_plan_man
the_plan_man

1664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 the_plan_man
Member since 2011 • 1664 Posts
[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."Nicksonman
And you think that argument makes Bill right?

Yes, if you hear the extended statement. He goes on to say the moon causes it, and so on and so forth, and that even with an infinite state of matter, God can still exist.
Avatar image for the_plan_man
the_plan_man

1664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 the_plan_man
Member since 2011 • 1664 Posts

[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I don't believe in god because there's no evidence that he exists, not because of the big bang. Same reason I don't believe in unicorns.

You don't have to believe in the bang bang to be an atheists.

chrisrooR

"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.

No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.

Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#176 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"][QUOTE="the_plan_man"]I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."the_plan_man
And you think that argument makes Bill right?

Yes, if you hear the extended statement. He goes on to say the moon causes it, and so on and so forth, and that even with an infinite state of matter, God can still exist.

Ok, that argument doesn't make Bill right. Just letting you know.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="ChampionoChumps"] Well if an entity was eternal then it wouldn't be constricted by time so it simply always has been because it does not follow time. Also there really isn't a point in arguing this stuff. Richard Dawkins said a strong case could be made for a deistic God and he is the champion of atheists (that's a joke but what he says is true) so it basically falls onto what you believe.ChampionoChumps

The way I see it is if a deistic God exists, that's really not much different than God not existing at all. It's just making a categorical argument that the cause of the universe should be called "God."

Well I believe in a great architect (I'm Catholic but I believe in a more deistic God because everything can be explained by something other than "God did it") because to me it makes more sense that universe was created but I'm no expert.

Edit: Also to me there has to be an entity outside of the universe that has absolutely no limits (and yes I realize that that is a limit) but it cannot be compreheded by our measly breains. We'll see eventually, or maybe not lol.

But even if there is some great deistic architect, so what? How is that any different from there being no architect but some other means to creation? The difference between deism and atheism is so insignificant that it really isn't a meaningful distinction.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#178 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.the_plan_man

No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.

Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."

The biggest issue in debates like this is a Christian can't prove God exists and an atheist can't prove that God doesn't exist. It would be nice to just leave it there but we know that's not going to happen. Especially with the Internet giving someone a keyboard to hide behind. Radical Christians can be just as annoying as militant atheists.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

that video was retarded. the only instance that conversation would ever happen is in a youtube video.

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts

[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"] No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.ad1x2

Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."

The biggest issue in debates like this is a Christian can't prove God exists and an atheist can't prove that God doesn't exist. It would be nice to just leave it there but we know that's not going to happen. Especially with the Internet giving someone a keyboard to hide behind. Radical Christians can be just as annoying as militant atheists.

If it can't be proven and can't be disproven, do you believe in it?
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#182 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.the_plan_man

No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.

Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."

I never called anyone stupid. And where did I mention anything about the individual claiming non-existence? I'm addressing the problem with those who claim existence. I also have a problem with those that claim God is non-existent. Personally, I believe that the existence of such a thing is beyond our own capacity to understand the Universe. How can anyone form an opinion so strong on one side. Earth is incredibly small when looked at relative to the size of the observable Universe. I tend towards the idea that there really is no overarching 'reason' for existence, and that we are simply the product of our particular environment and initial conditions. We are all animals, and follow a similar set of daily activities.

I'll let Richard Feynman take it from here...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRmbwczTC6E

Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#183 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
A link isn't going to convert me.
Avatar image for Big_Pecks
Big_Pecks

5973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#184 Big_Pecks
Member since 2010 • 5973 Posts

http://i.imgur.com/lpNV6.jpg

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#186 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts

http://i.imgur.com/lpNV6.jpg

Big_Pecks
I'm converted.
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#187 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

If it can't be proven and can't be disproven, do you believe in it?Nicksonman

Varies based on what it is. Fact of the matter is I can't even prove Zeus never existed but it's not something I would argue in a Christian church. I just think these debates always end up the same way. Christian says God is real, atheist comes behind him and says he's a moron, and they fight back and forth. Or vice versa, with an atheist saying God isn't real and a Christian coming in saying he's insulting or closed-minded. It really wouldn't surprise me if that Youtube video was staged just to make fun of religious people.

Avatar image for Pikdum
Pikdum

2244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Pikdum
Member since 2010 • 2244 Posts

The difference is that theories are just theories. Any scientist knows that theories can be proven wrong and aren't 100% fact.

In religion, if you don't completely 100% believe it, you go to hell.

Philosophical approaches aren't making a good argument here. Try again theists.

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#189 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts

[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]If it can't be proven and can't be disproven, do you believe in it?ad1x2

Varies based on what it is. Fact of the matter is I can't even prove Zeus never existed but it's not something I would argue in a Christian church. I just think these debates always end up the same way. Christian says God is real, atheist comes behind him and says he's a moron, and they fight back and forth. Or vice versa, with an atheist saying God isn't real and a Christian coming in saying he's insulting or closed-minded. It really wouldn't surprise me if that Youtube video was staged just to make fun of religious people.

Ok well I wouldn't say it varies. To me, it's a clear "no, I wouldn't believe it". Cause let's face it, you can make up ANYTHING and it can't be disproven. The fairies in my undies created the universe. You can't prove it and you can't disprove it. Believe it?
Avatar image for omus101
omus101

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 omus101
Member since 2006 • 1392 Posts

I don't believe in God, but I also don't believe in the big bang theory. How the hell can scientists know what happened billions of years ago? The truth is we will probably never know how the universes came to be.

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#191 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21700 Posts

[QUOTE="Just-Breathe"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

If god's not real then why does the tide come in and out?

GOD - 3

ATHEISTS - 0

Wolf-Man2006

Dinosaurs? Pics or it didn't happen.

GOD - 4

ATHEISTS - 0

What about America, GOD'S country?

GOD - 5

ATHEISTS - -5

Jesusland

God - 6

Atheist - -6

Avatar image for Legacy-of-Todd
Legacy-of-Todd

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 Legacy-of-Todd
Member since 2011 • 539 Posts

A atheist is just someone who doesn't believe in a god, you don't have to believe the big bang theroy, as its not a group of people who share the same beliefs, its just the name to describe an attitude towards religion and god.

Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."

the_plan_man

There is a giant purple alien dinosaur lobster orbiting the earth, prove me wrong.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#193 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

The difference is that theories are just theories. Any scientist knows that theories can be proven wrong and aren't 100% fact.

In religion, if you don't completely 100% believe it, you go to hell.

Philosophical approaches aren't making a good argument here. Try again theists.

Pikdum

Exactly this. Theories can be disputed, and if no evidence is given to support a theory it usually wont be around very long, if at all. In religion, a God doesn't need any evidence. If someone disputes the existence of a god, you as a person are questioned about your "faith" Faith meaning a belief in something that isn't even based on proof of that thing having existed or happened.

Avatar image for Bloodseeker23
Bloodseeker23

8338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#194 Bloodseeker23
Member since 2008 • 8338 Posts
Funny vid is funny :)
Avatar image for o0squishy0o
o0squishy0o

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#195 o0squishy0o
Member since 2007 • 2802 Posts

I don't believe in God, but I also don't believe in the big bang theory. How the hell can scientists know what happened billions of years ago? The truth is we will probably never know how the universes came to be.

omus101

quantum theory. However the main problem and from what I believe is that science isn't that easy to understand. For example quantum theory is a real headscratcher and with relatively (depending on your knowledge lol) difficult mathematical equations that can only really talk about such things as quantum theory since english itself doesnt surfice, however to lesser educated people, something like:

for alot of people is obviously easier to understand. If I asked a christian what or why god made us in atoms they would have no reply asside from "thats what god did". For example if we all believed that god was the be all and end all we would still be in the dark ages imo. From my understanding believeing in god is ironically small minded. Of course its just my opinion :P

Avatar image for o0squishy0o
o0squishy0o

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#196 o0squishy0o
Member since 2007 • 2802 Posts

[QUOTE="Pikdum"]

The difference is that theories are just theories. Any scientist knows that theories can be proven wrong and aren't 100% fact.

In religion, if you don't completely 100% believe it, you go to hell.

Philosophical approaches aren't making a good argument here. Try again theists.

Nibroc420

Exactly this. Theories can be disputed, and if no evidence is given to support a theory it usually wont be around very long, if at all. In religion, a God doesn't need any evidence. If someone disputes the existence of a god, you as a person are questioned about your "faith" Faith meaning a belief in something that isn't even based on proof of that thing having existed or happened.

Science tends not have "absolutes" because it works on the premsis that everything can be proven wrong. However its ironic that religious people say that science isnt 100% yet there are constant religios wars going on and millions of people can not decide who is right and what actually happened. Also its funny how as things become more increasingly obvious because of advancement in science such as there are no heavens above or hell below that all of a sudden these things are "not visible while you are alive and appear after death" xD. I mean the rapture is a great piece of religious nonsense. But of course believeing and going through life without quesioning ANYTHING is a very easy way to go.
Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#198 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts
The question that still hasn't been answered for me has nothing to do with existence of a god, but why someone would want to follow a god in the first place? Why is a god even a good thing? Why is the Bible or any holy book even a good thing?
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#199 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
The question that still hasn't been answered for me has nothing to do with existence of a god, but why someone would want to follow a god in the first place? Why is a god even a good thing? Why is the Bible or any holy book even a good thing? Nicksonman
Think of it kinda like God is your boss and the holy book of choice is the company handbook. Now think of it in terms of trying to stay employed, getting a promotion at the end of it.
Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#200 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]The question that still hasn't been answered for me has nothing to do with existence of a god, but why someone would want to follow a god in the first place? Why is a god even a good thing? Why is the Bible or any holy book even a good thing? AirGuitarist87
Think of it kinda like God is your boss and the holy book of choice is the company handbook. Now think of it in terms of trying to stay employed, getting a promotion at the end of it.

ROFL that's brilliant. :lol: