What's even worse is the Race and Ethnics section.If you guys think religion wars is bad here come to the Religion section of Yahoo Answers and you'll crack up seeing how blantant the insults are there.
ad1x2
Yahoo Answers is /B/'s step sister.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What's even worse is the Race and Ethnics section.If you guys think religion wars is bad here come to the Religion section of Yahoo Answers and you'll crack up seeing how blantant the insults are there.
ad1x2
Yahoo Answers is /B/'s step sister.
[QUOTE="dangamit"]where did you get the idea that randomness ends in chaos? Within chaos, orderly system develop.BossPerson[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="dangamit"]Random events end in CHAOS. If the big bang, revolution etc were random, we would not be here. You can believe whatever you want though, I couldn't care less.where did you get the idea that randomness ends in chaos? Within chaos, orderly system develop. Chaos-->order isn't that a law of thermodynamics?
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]I don't believe in god because there's no evidence that he exists, not because of the big bang. Same reason I don't believe in unicorns.[QUOTE="tjricardo089"]
The big bang didn't create the universe, god did. Nothing + Nothing =/= Something
To prove a religious person wrong you have to prove your theories that make you not believe in Him.
PS2_ROCKS
You don't have to believe in the bang bang to be an atheists.
"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy. No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.[QUOTE="dangamit"]Random events end in CHAOS. Blue-Sky
Why? What exactly about our universe is organized?
For one, the sheer predictability of the universe on a macro level via the laws of physics. Not sure why this is ever brought up in religion threads, though.
And plus that's not even what the law of cause and effect states.
That's the first law of thermodynamics.
[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I don't believe in god because there's no evidence that he exists, not because of the big bang. Same reason I don't believe in unicorns."The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy. No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so. My question to you is what would it take [for you to believe]?
You don't have to believe in the bang bang to be an atheists.
chrisrooR
yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cycleBossPerson
notsureifsrs.jpg
As an athiest, I accept that we simply don't know.
Why are christians so arrogant as to put forth an argument that people have to believe something?
As an athiest, I accept that we simply don't know.
Why are christians so arrogant as to put forth an argument that people have to believe something?
CaveJohnson1
Your kind are pretty arrogant too as well to be fair.
[QUOTE="BossPerson"]yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cyclecoolbeans90
notsureifsrs.jpg
something like that?????? ............i just wanted to sound smart :([QUOTE="coolbeans90"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]yea murphy's law states "anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" or anything that can happen will happen. This is how all systems in the universe develop from galaxies forming to the water cycleBossPerson
notsureifsrs.jpg
something like that?????? ............i just wanted to sound smart :( lol :lol:[think of it for a sec, if it is saying that anything that can happen will happen, then all creation is will be an illusion since theists always cite the "order" of things as a reason for gods existence. With the laws of thermodynamics, we can know that given enough time everything that is possible will eventually happen, thus we can deduce that it is only a matter of time before every possible system is developed with the assumption that the variables stay the same.
actually disregard what i previously said about thermodynamics or murphys law. After some minutes on wikipedia i realize I had no idea what i was talking about
I'm not sure if TC is trolling Atheists by trying to use this as "proof", or trolling Christians by using the thumbs down as "proof".
Either way, TC, you are dumb and I hate you.
I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."the_plan_manAnd you think that argument makes Bill right?
Yeah TC is pretty dumb. I'd vote for him in the "Users you'd like to see banned" thread.I'm not sure if TC is trolling Atheists by trying to use this as "proof", or trolling Christians by using the thumbs down as "proof".
Either way, TC, you are dumb and I hate you.
SPYDER0416
[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."NicksonmanAnd you think that argument makes Bill right? Bill O reiley can't even win a rap battle, Let alone a battle of wits
[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."NicksonmanAnd you think that argument makes Bill right? Yes, if you hear the extended statement. He goes on to say the moon causes it, and so on and so forth, and that even with an infinite state of matter, God can still exist.
[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]I don't believe in god because there's no evidence that he exists, not because of the big bang. Same reason I don't believe in unicorns."The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy. No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.You don't have to believe in the bang bang to be an atheists.
chrisrooR
Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"][QUOTE="the_plan_man"]I think atheists will never be "right," because of Bill O' Reily's argument, "tide goes in, tide goes out."the_plan_manAnd you think that argument makes Bill right? Yes, if you hear the extended statement. He goes on to say the moon causes it, and so on and so forth, and that even with an infinite state of matter, God can still exist. Ok, that argument doesn't make Bill right. Just letting you know.
The way I see it is if a deistic God exists, that's really not much different than God not existing at all. It's just making a categorical argument that the cause of the universe should be called "God." Well I believe in a great architect (I'm Catholic but I believe in a more deistic God because everything can be explained by something other than "God did it") because to me it makes more sense that universe was created but I'm no expert.[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]
[QUOTE="ChampionoChumps"] Well if an entity was eternal then it wouldn't be constricted by time so it simply always has been because it does not follow time. Also there really isn't a point in arguing this stuff. Richard Dawkins said a strong case could be made for a deistic God and he is the champion of atheists (that's a joke but what he says is true) so it basically falls onto what you believe.ChampionoChumps
Edit: Also to me there has to be an entity outside of the universe that has absolutely no limits (and yes I realize that that is a limit) but it cannot be compreheded by our measly breains. We'll see eventually, or maybe not lol.
But even if there is some great deistic architect, so what? How is that any different from there being no architect but some other means to creation? The difference between deism and atheism is so insignificant that it really isn't a meaningful distinction.No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.the_plan_man
Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."
The biggest issue in debates like this is a Christian can't prove God exists and an atheist can't prove that God doesn't exist. It would be nice to just leave it there but we know that's not going to happen. Especially with the Internet giving someone a keyboard to hide behind. Radical Christians can be just as annoying as militant atheists.
that video was retarded. the only instance that conversation would ever happen is in a youtube video.
[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"] No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.ad1x2
Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."
The biggest issue in debates like this is a Christian can't prove God exists and an atheist can't prove that God doesn't exist. It would be nice to just leave it there but we know that's not going to happen. Especially with the Internet giving someone a keyboard to hide behind. Radical Christians can be just as annoying as militant atheists.
If it can't be proven and can't be disproven, do you believe in it?No, it's not. But the burden of proof lies in the person claiming to know God exists. Sort of like if I stated that a purple hippo orbits a planet in a far region of the cosmos. The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate that what I'm saying is truthful, or can at least be tested to be so.[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"] "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" - Gin Rummy.the_plan_man
Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."
I never called anyone stupid. And where did I mention anything about the individual claiming non-existence? I'm addressing the problem with those who claim existence. I also have a problem with those that claim God is non-existent. Personally, I believe that the existence of such a thing is beyond our own capacity to understand the Universe. How can anyone form an opinion so strong on one side. Earth is incredibly small when looked at relative to the size of the observable Universe. I tend towards the idea that there really is no overarching 'reason' for existence, and that we are simply the product of our particular environment and initial conditions. We are all animals, and follow a similar set of daily activities.
I'll let Richard Feynman take it from here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRmbwczTC6E
If it can't be proven and can't be disproven, do you believe in it?Nicksonman
Varies based on what it is. Fact of the matter is I can't even prove Zeus never existed but it's not something I would argue in a Christian church. I just think these debates always end up the same way. Christian says God is real, atheist comes behind him and says he's a moron, and they fight back and forth. Or vice versa, with an atheist saying God isn't real and a Christian coming in saying he's insulting or closed-minded. It really wouldn't surprise me if that Youtube video was staged just to make fun of religious people.
The difference is that theories are just theories. Any scientist knows that theories can be proven wrong and aren't 100% fact.
In religion, if you don't completely 100% believe it, you go to hell.
Philosophical approaches aren't making a good argument here. Try again theists.
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]If it can't be proven and can't be disproven, do you believe in it?ad1x2
Varies based on what it is. Fact of the matter is I can't even prove Zeus never existed but it's not something I would argue in a Christian church. I just think these debates always end up the same way. Christian says God is real, atheist comes behind him and says he's a moron, and they fight back and forth. Or vice versa, with an atheist saying God isn't real and a Christian coming in saying he's insulting or closed-minded. It really wouldn't surprise me if that Youtube video was staged just to make fun of religious people.
Ok well I wouldn't say it varies. To me, it's a clear "no, I wouldn't believe it". Cause let's face it, you can make up ANYTHING and it can't be disproven. The fairies in my undies created the universe. You can't prove it and you can't disprove it. Believe it?[QUOTE="Just-Breathe"]
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]
If god's not real then why does the tide come in and out?
GOD - 3
ATHEISTS - 0
Wolf-Man2006
Dinosaurs? Pics or it didn't happen.
GOD - 4
ATHEISTS - 0
What about America, GOD'S country?
GOD - 5
ATHEISTS - -5
God - 6
Atheist - -6
A atheist is just someone who doesn't believe in a god, you don't have to believe the big bang theroy, as its not a group of people who share the same beliefs, its just the name to describe an attitude towards religion and god.
Yes, it is. The burder of proof is also on atheists who believe they "know" god doesn't exist; he must prove the non-existense of God, before calling everyone who does "stupid."
the_plan_man
There is a giant purple alien dinosaur lobster orbiting the earth, prove me wrong.
Exactly this. Theories can be disputed, and if no evidence is given to support a theory it usually wont be around very long, if at all. In religion, a God doesn't need any evidence. If someone disputes the existence of a god, you as a person are questioned about your "faith" Faith meaning a belief in something that isn't even based on proof of that thing having existed or happened.The difference is that theories are just theories. Any scientist knows that theories can be proven wrong and aren't 100% fact.
In religion, if you don't completely 100% believe it, you go to hell.
Philosophical approaches aren't making a good argument here. Try again theists.
Pikdum
quantum theory. However the main problem and from what I believe is that science isn't that easy to understand. For example quantum theory is a real headscratcher and with relatively (depending on your knowledge lol) difficult mathematical equations that can only really talk about such things as quantum theory since english itself doesnt surfice, however to lesser educated people, something like:I don't believe in God, but I also don't believe in the big bang theory. How the hell can scientists know what happened billions of years ago? The truth is we will probably never know how the universes came to be.
omus101
for alot of people is obviously easier to understand. If I asked a christian what or why god made us in atoms they would have no reply asside from "thats what god did". For example if we all believed that god was the be all and end all we would still be in the dark ages imo. From my understanding believeing in god is ironically small minded. Of course its just my opinion :P
Exactly this. Theories can be disputed, and if no evidence is given to support a theory it usually wont be around very long, if at all. In religion, a God doesn't need any evidence. If someone disputes the existence of a god, you as a person are questioned about your "faith" Faith meaning a belief in something that isn't even based on proof of that thing having existed or happened. Science tends not have "absolutes" because it works on the premsis that everything can be proven wrong. However its ironic that religious people say that science isnt 100% yet there are constant religios wars going on and millions of people can not decide who is right and what actually happened. Also its funny how as things become more increasingly obvious because of advancement in science such as there are no heavens above or hell below that all of a sudden these things are "not visible while you are alive and appear after death" xD. I mean the rapture is a great piece of religious nonsense. But of course believeing and going through life without quesioning ANYTHING is a very easy way to go.[QUOTE="Pikdum"]
The difference is that theories are just theories. Any scientist knows that theories can be proven wrong and aren't 100% fact.
In religion, if you don't completely 100% believe it, you go to hell.
Philosophical approaches aren't making a good argument here. Try again theists.
Nibroc420
The question that still hasn't been answered for me has nothing to do with existence of a god, but why someone would want to follow a god in the first place? Why is a god even a good thing? Why is the Bible or any holy book even a good thing? NicksonmanThink of it kinda like God is your boss and the holy book of choice is the company handbook. Now think of it in terms of trying to stay employed, getting a promotion at the end of it.
[QUOTE="Nicksonman"]The question that still hasn't been answered for me has nothing to do with existence of a god, but why someone would want to follow a god in the first place? Why is a god even a good thing? Why is the Bible or any holy book even a good thing? AirGuitarist87Think of it kinda like God is your boss and the holy book of choice is the company handbook. Now think of it in terms of trying to stay employed, getting a promotion at the end of it. ROFL that's brilliant. :lol:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment