Whether it actually was a threat is not relevant, they thought it was. Hitler thought jews were a threat, but obviously they weren't, they never even had issues with people before that. What you fail to realize is What we say can indeed be applied to religious leaders, its all human nature to do these things. I really see nothing here exclusive to atheism, or what this has to do at all with the topic. Religions start conquest of other religions, of atheists, of cultures all throughout history and vice versa. Atheism is not a hivemind or a collective. It has no leaders, books, rules, establishments, or anything. Nothing is done in the name of atheism.[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] K again the same pathetic excuse. The same could be said with the opposing case where a religion is in power. How about some consistency? And secondly no Judaism didn't have any power to threaten the established government or politicsthemajormayor
I know there are no leaders, books etc. But Atheism is still something. And people have killed for that something. And of course it's not exclusive to Atheism I never said so. I am saying religion can't be blamed or lack of religion. Human nature alone is to blame in this case.
No atheism is not something, in fact its a complete lack of something.. And yes religion can blamed if we are going to have people declare absolutes in suggesting "Oh thats not Christianity's fault its the person who twisted it" Or any religion for that matter. You tell me this what is the correct message? Because if we look at this historically we have millions of different view points that seem to be just as certain in declaring the will of god.. Who the hell are you to know what Christianity truely is? Its what you your self personally believe in, not any one elses.
Log in to comment