Do u feel bad for eating meat

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="k_smoove"]Nope. It's part of nature. I just ate a corn dog.Super_Socialist

nature is anything you can naturally do, until we violate the laws of physics we are doing things that are natural.

Even then, if you can violate physics, obviously our idea of physics would be wrong.

i suppose its natural, but at the same time cannibalism isnt exactly healthy.

well technically you dont. but if were talking about the law of the jungle then i suppose youd have every right to try.

we dont decide, we just figure them out.

We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Yongying

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

Sometimes,Im going to become a Vegan.

Wolf-avatar

I'm totally as passionate as you are about helping and protecting animals, but I dont see whats wrong with benefiting with something that will happen anyway. Just because I stop eating meat, doesnt mean they will stop killing animals. This is why I dont feel bad, since I know it will happen anyway, I may as well gain the benefits from it.

Not that its bad to feel bad for eating it.

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Super_Socialist

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

[QUOTE="markop2003"]nope, if that chicken had the chance it'ld go straight for my neck, i'm saving my own life by eating it :PYongying

it would depend on the cat, if it was a stray then sure, otherwise it's someone's propertyalso it would depend if it was a threat or not

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Super_Socialist

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

Not to mention that "Nature" isn't an entity. Nature consists of individual organisms or groups of organisms acting in their own interests.

[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Yongying

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

[QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"]

Sometimes,Im going to become a Vegan.

Myrkan

I'm totally as passionate as you are about helping and protecting animals, but I dont see whats wrong with benefiting with something that will happen anyway. Just because I stop eating meat, doesnt mean they will stop killing animals. This is why I dont feel bad, since I know it will happen anyway, I may as well gain the benefits from it.

Not that its bad to feel bad for eating it.

[QUOTE="Myrkan"][QUOTE="Wolf-avatar"]

Sometimes,Im going to become a Vegan.

Yongying

I'm totally as passionate as you are about helping and protecting animals, but I dont see whats wrong with benefiting with something that will happen anyway. Just because I stop eating meat, doesnt mean they will stop killing animals. This is why I dont feel bad, since I know it will happen anyway, I may as well gain the benefits from it.

Not that its bad to feel bad for eating it.

Do you grow your own crops?

[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Yongying

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we're just as much 'nature' as anything is.

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.markop2003

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

Hamburgers are delicious.supercubedude64

Indeed.

No. God gave us animals so that we could eat them.Lansdowne5

[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Yongying

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Super_Socialist

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

This also accounts for what I realized long ago that ended my doubt of the morality of being carnivorous.

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Super_Socialist

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Yongying

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

I dont think were negatively changing the earth The earth is all about survival of the fittest, and we jsut so happen to be that. We dominate, and everything else around us changes. That is nature. not hippie rhetoric.

How appropriate it is that I changed my avatar and sig to depict the dhampir Vampire Hunter D on the same day we speak of the consumption of flesh.Zentrenius

Vampire Hunter D is THE OWNAGE!

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Super_Socialist

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

I dont think were negatively changing the earth The earth is all about survival of the fittest, and we jsut so happen to be that. We dominate, and everything else around us changes. That is nature. not hippie rhetoric.

Yup. You're my clone. Well, in that case, I shall have to kill you. There can only be one!

Yup. You're my clone. Well, in that case, I shall have to kill you. There can only be one!

Zentrenius

if that was a highlander refrence, then i think its time to que the music. That music would be queen.

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Super_Socialist

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

I dont think were negatively changing the earth The earth is all about survival of the fittest, and we jsut so happen to be that. We dominate, and everything else around us changes. That is nature. not hippie rhetoric.

[QUOTE="Zentrenius"]How appropriate it is that I changed my avatar and sig to depict the dhampir Vampire Hunter D on the same day we speak of the consumption of flesh.Yongying

Vampire Hunter D is THE OWNAGE!

As is Ryu. Especially with Volf's Scythe. Ryu knows how to use it so much better.

[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"] We don't figure them out, we interpretate them in any way we find more conveniant for us humans, but not in the conveniance of nature iteself.Zentrenius

no, we figure them out and nature has no "conveniance" or need.

As a matter of fact, nature could do a whole lot better without us.

Nature doesn't need us, but we need nature.

we are part of nature so ofcorse we need it, if there was no nature then thre'ld be no humans

those animals arent intelligent enough to do it intentionally, even thought they do pollute. i mean if an animal urinates into a river that would count as pollution

wars happen all the time, even with other animals. ever watch the discovery channel? lol

we arent destroying the earth, were just changing it for our own benefit.

I dont think were negatively changing the earth The earth is all about survival of the fittest, and we jsut so happen to be that. We dominate, and everything else around us changes. That is nature. not hippie rhetoric.

Yup. You're my clone. Well, in that case, I shall have to kill you. There can only be one!

[QUOTE="Zentrenius"]

Yup. You're my clone. Well, in that case, I shall have to kill you. There can only be one!

Super_Socialist

if that was a highlander refrence, then i think its time to que the music. That music would be queen.

Here we are! Born to the kings, we're the princes of the universe!

Same goes to you :(Yongying

Why? Save a cow, kill a human?

[QUOTE="Yongying"]Same goes to you :(Zentrenius

Why? Save a cow, kill a human?

nope, i love meat...

meat-eating animals love meat too =/

but yah XD just had some mexican "gorditas" with chicharron and beans :3 daaaaaamn good stuff

[QUOTE="Zentrenius"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"]Same goes to you :(Yongying

Why? Save a cow, kill a human?

I thought you were implying that I needed to die.

Humans are animals, Lions are animals and eat meat, sharks are animals and they eat meat, Gorrillas are animals and they eat meat and vegetables/fruit.
I don't see why I shouldn't eat meat when it's a part of nature to do so for some animals.
Treflis

Uh, gorrillas are herbivores. They eat foliage. Just for the record.

[QUOTE="Yongying"][QUOTE="Zentrenius"]

[QUOTE="Yongying"]Same goes to you :(Zentrenius

Why? Save a cow, kill a human?

I thought you were implying that I needed to die.