[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]who really is the youngest person to ever live ? Â
wis3boi
lol what lol
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]who really is the youngest person to ever live ? Â
wis3boi
lol what lol
LOL[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="MuD3"]according to one theist in this thread there is no aliens because they are not in his sacred book... 0rbs
Â
Bible never changes. Science proves itself wrong over and over, and yet you people call it facts.
The bible says that the earth is flat I guess it's true y'all! Wheres my tin foil?[QUOTE="brucewayne69"]Orbs do you believe in evolution? 0rbs
Â
Â
I believe in adaption to enviroment. Â
Â
Bible doesn't believe the earth is flat, that's taken out of context.
So you do believe in evolution? Good.Bible doesn't believe the earth is flat, that's taken out of context.
0rbs
The Bible calls the Earth a 'circle' (Hebrew: chuwg). A circle is flat. If it wasn't, it'd be a sphere (Hebrew: Dur).
Pretty self-explanatory.
Â
[QUOTE="ShaineTheNerd"]Its all good Don't fret too much Just try and educate yourself on the topic a little more :) I knew there is an immeasurable amount of planets in existence far beyond what technology can see. I remember being flabbergasted when I first learned of this as a young kid, because I thought there were only nine planets all my pre-teen youth. I just didn't really feel like I had to say more than "hundreds". I just forgot how the Internet rolls these days. Say something of the color crimson is red and you'll receive hate mail and death-threat tweets.I RUINED EVERYTHING! I AM SO SORRY, INTERNET! OH NO, I SAID THERE WERE HUNDREDS OF PLANETS OUT THERE WHEN I REALLY SHOULD HAVE SAID BILLIONS, NAH TRILLIONS, NAH QUADRILLIONS! I'M SO STUPID FOR NOT BREAKING DOWN THE WHOLE **** STUDY ON SPACE! AAAAAH MAN, I'M SO SORRY GUYS! AAAAAH, HOW CAN I LIVE WITH MYSELF!
chaoscougar1
Ignore them, some people can't be saved!..[QUOTE="rastotm"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
stop lying
0rbs
Â
 god is good brother
Â
My grandson brought up a good point.  People keep trying to say that micro-organisms are alien life.  If so I have a whole bunch of aliens in my bath tub.  Might as well call roswell up and tell them they have competition!  Man it scares me that people aren't free thinkers. Â
Calling BS on your having a grandson
You are 20 tops
And if they are microorganisms that originated on this planet, probs wouldn't make em alien life aye
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="ShaineTheNerd"]Its all good Don't fret too much Just try and educate yourself on the topic a little more :) I knew there is an immeasurable amount of planets in existence far beyond what technology can see. I remember being flabbergasted when I first learned of this as a young kid, because I thought there were only nine planets all my pre-teen youth. I just didn't really feel like I had to say more than "hundreds". I just forgot how the Internet rolls these days. Say something of the color crimson is red and you'll receive hate mail and death-threat tweets. A few people corrected your inaccuracy Seems like the only one overreacting/taking it too seriously is you You made an incorrect comment, it was corrected Get over itI RUINED EVERYTHING! I AM SO SORRY, INTERNET! OH NO, I SAID THERE WERE HUNDREDS OF PLANETS OUT THERE WHEN I REALLY SHOULD HAVE SAID BILLIONS, NAH TRILLIONS, NAH QUADRILLIONS! I'M SO STUPID FOR NOT BREAKING DOWN THE WHOLE **** STUDY ON SPACE! AAAAAH MAN, I'M SO SORRY GUYS! AAAAAH, HOW CAN I LIVE WITH MYSELF!
ShaineTheNerd
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Bible doesn't believe the earth is flat, that's taken out of context.
br0kenrabbit
The Bible calls the Earth a 'circle' (Hebrew: chuwg). A circle is flat. If it wasn't, it'd be a sphere (Hebrew: Dur).
Pretty self-explanatory.
Â
Â
You are not a bible historian. Â Please do not use your uneducated approach at interpreting it.
Â
You are not a bible historian. Â Please do not use your uneducated approach at interpreting it.
0rbs
I've got 20 years into Bible research. And by Bible I mean Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic...you know...the languages it was written in that aren't English?
You cannot 'research' the Bible in English. Too much lost in translation.
Â
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
You are not a bible historian. Â Please do not use your uneducated approach at interpreting it.
br0kenrabbit
I've got 20 years into Bible research. And by Bible I mean Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic...you know...the languages it was written in that aren't English?
You cannot 'research' the Bible in English. Too much lost in translation.
Â
Â
Bible was written in gods language, sorry to disappoint.
Bible was written in gods language, sorry to disappoint.
0rbs
Hahahaha....
You do know "Gods Language" is a euphemism for the English Language, right?
lolololalalala :lol:
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
You are not a bible historian. Â Please do not use your uneducated approach at interpreting it.
0rbs
I've got 20 years into Bible research. And by Bible I mean Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic...you know...the languages it was written in that aren't English?
You cannot 'research' the Bible in English. Too much lost in translation.
Â
Â
Bible was written in gods language, sorry to disappoint.
hahahahahahaha Nice[QUOTE="0rbs"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
I've got 20 years into Bible research. And by Bible I mean Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic...you know...the languages it was written in that aren't English?
You cannot 'research' the Bible in English. Too much lost in translation.
Â
chaoscougar1
Â
Bible was written in gods language, sorry to disappoint.
hahahahahahaha NiceÂ
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
hahahahahahaha Nice[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
Bible was written in gods language, sorry to disappoint.
0rbs
Â
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
neither *are And they aren't suppose to be funny They're suppose to be arousing[QUOTE="0rbs"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] hahahahahahaha Nicechaoscougar1
Â
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
neither *are And they aren't suppose to be funny They're suppose to be arousingÂ
Neither is*. Â When you have "either" or "neither" it's not treated as plural.
Â
You kids need to take more english classes.
neither *are And they aren't suppose to be funny They're suppose to be arousing[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
0rbs
Â
Neither is*. Â When you have "either" or "neither" it's not treated as plural.
Â
You kids need to take more english classes.
You said 'those' so the subject is plural. Therefore: are is correct.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] neither *are And they aren't suppose to be funny They're suppose to be arousingbr0kenrabbit
Â
Neither is*. Â When you have "either" or "neither" it's not treated as plural.
Â
You kids need to take more english classes.
You said 'those' so the subject is plural. Therefore: are is correct.
Â
when "either" or "neither" is involved it's no longer plural. Â Man you kids these days.
Â
Â
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/sv_agr.htm
Â
number 4.
[QUOTE="0rbs"][QUOTE="rastotm"] Ignore them, some people can't be saved!..
MrPraline
Â
 god is good brother
Â
My grandson brought up a good point.  People keep trying to say that micro-organisms are alien life.  If so I have a whole bunch of aliens in my bath tub.  Might as well call roswell up and tell them they have competition!  Man it scares me that people aren't free thinkers. Â
What is so hard to grasp about the concept of "alien", as in extra-terrestrial? And ROFL "free thinker".Seriously. Â The irony.[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
Neither is*. Â When you have "either" or "neither" it's not treated as plural.
Â
You kids need to take more english classes.
0rbs
You said 'those' so the subject is plural. Therefore: are is correct.
Â
when "either" or "neither" is involved it's no longer plural. Â Man you kids these days.
Â
Â
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/sv_agr.htm
Â
number 4.
Â
Try again.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
You said 'those' so the subject is plural. Therefore: are is correct.
br0kenrabbit
Â
when "either" or "neither" is involved it's no longer plural. Â Man you kids these days.
Â
Â
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/sv_agr.htm
Â
number 4.
Â
Try again.
The word neither or either was not used there. Â For somebody who studies language, you are terrible at english.
Â
You edited out the example that was wrong. Â I applaud you for that. Â But the word "nor" was not used, with conjoins. Â
Â
Just admit you were wrong.Â
The word neither or either was not used there. Â For somebody who studies language, you are terrible at english.
0rbs
Straight from the link, boy:
Plural Verb with a Plural Element
If the pairings either/or or neither/nor form part of the subject of a verb and at least one of the elements is plural, then the verb must be plural too.Â
Examples: Neither the lawyer nor the detectives are able to follow the sequence
of events.
"lawyer" (singular - i.e., one person), "detectives" (plural - i.e., more than
one person), "are" (plural - i.e., not "is") There were neither cakes nor ice-cream at the party.
Neither the firemen nor the policemen know him.
(i.e., not "knows")
Either the budgies or the cat has to go.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
The word neither or either was not used there. Â For somebody who studies language, you are terrible at english.
br0kenrabbit
Straight from the link, boy:
Plural Verb with a Plural Element
If the pairings either/or or neither/nor form part of the subject of a verb and at least one of the elements is plural, then the verb must be plural too.Â
Examples: Neither the lawyer nor the detectives are able to follow the sequence
of events.
"lawyer" (singular - i.e., one person), "detectives" (plural - i.e., more than
one person), "are" (plural - i.e., not "is") There were neither cakes nor ice-cream at the party.
Neither the firemen nor the policemen know him.
(i.e., not "knows")
Either the budgies or the cat has to go.
Â
Notice every example that has a green check has nor in there, which conjoins?Â
You're embarassing yourself. Â Nor was never used.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
The word neither or either was not used there. Â For somebody who studies language, you are terrible at english.
0rbs
Straight from the link, boy:
Plural Verb with a Plural Element
If the pairings either/or or neither/nor form part of the subject of a verb and at least one of the elements is plural, then the verb must be plural too.Â
Examples: Neither the lawyer nor the detectives are able to follow the sequence
of events.
"lawyer" (singular - i.e., one person), "detectives" (plural - i.e., more than
one person), "are" (plural - i.e., not "is") There were neither cakes nor ice-cream at the party.
Neither the firemen nor the policemen know him.
(i.e., not "knows")
Either the budgies or the cat has to go.
Â
Notice every example that has a green check has nor in there, which conjoins?Â
You're embarassing yourself. Â Nor was never used.
Doesn't matter, your subject (noun and pronoun) is plural, therefore: are.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
Straight from the link, boy:
Plural Verb with a Plural Element
If the pairings either/or or neither/nor form part of the subject of a verb and at least one of the elements is plural, then the verb must be plural too.Â
Examples:Neither the lawyer nor the detectives are able to follow the sequence
of events.
"lawyer" (singular - i.e., one person), "detectives" (plural - i.e., more than
one person), "are" (plural - i.e., not "is")There were neither cakes nor ice-cream at the party.
Neither the firemen nor the policemen know him.
(i.e., not "knows")
Either the budgies or the cat has to go.
br0kenrabbit
Â
Notice every example that has a green check has nor in there, which conjoins?Â
You're embarassing yourself. Â Nor was never used.
Doesn't matter, your subject (noun and pronoun) is plural, therefore: are.
Â
No, because conjoins change that.
Â
Anyways, I know i'm right. The examples prove it.
Â
My point is that gods language is not meant to be understood by everybody, so people picking and choosing scriptures are in the wrong.
Â
No, because conjoins change that.
0rbs
Nope. You said:
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
'Those' and 'Sinners' are both plural elements, therefore you use a plural verb.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
No, because conjoins change that.
br0kenrabbit
Nope. You said:
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
'Those' and 'Sinners' are both plural elements, therefore you use a plural verb.
Â
incorrect. Â
Â
Done arguing with somebody who cannot admit when they are clearly wrong. Â
Â
Back on topic, nobody can understand gods language. Â Only god can.
My point is that gods language is not meant to be understood by everybody, so people picking and choosing scriptures are in the wrong.
0rbs
If you've only ever read the English Bible, you've not read The Bible.
There's quite a bit of difference. The whole 'hell' fiasco, for instance.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
No, because conjoins change that.
0rbs
Nope. You said:
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
'Those' and 'Sinners' are both plural elements, therefore you use a plural verb.
Â
incorrect. Â
Â
Done arguing with somebody who cannot admit when they are clearly wrong. Â
Â
Back on topic, nobody can understand gods language. Â Only god can.
What are you, 13?
You're not a very good troll. Try harder.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
My point is that gods language is not meant to be understood by everybody, so people picking and choosing scriptures are in the wrong.
br0kenrabbit
If you've only ever read the English Bible, you've not read The Bible.
There's quite a bit of difference. The whole 'hell' fiasco, for instance.
Â
I do not read it in english. Â I read it in God's language.
Â
I do not read it in english. Â I read it in God's language.
0rbs
Â
Does God talk to you directly or do your just rely on reading goat guts?
Since you have "studied" the bible. Â Can you tell me who the youngest person to ever live was?
0rbs
Your statement makes no sense. When born, everyone is just as young as any other born: 0days, 0months, 0years. You don't get any younger than that.
Perfect English, then try asking your question again.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Since you have "studied" the bible. Â Can you tell me who the youngest person to ever live was?
br0kenrabbit
Your statement makes no sense. When born, everyone is just as young as any other born: 0days, 0months, 0years. You don't get any younger than that.
Perfect English, then try asking your question again.
Â
Since you have "studied" the bible. Â Can you tell me who the youngest person to ever live was?
*hint* it's an easy one. Â Think old testament.Â
I wish I could. Except that our habital planet is 1 out of 10000000000000 of habitable planets [(1 of tens of thousands of billions) at least]. But odds like this are why people still pay $20 because they think 20 lottery chances will increase their odds of winning.someone put this thread out of its misery
wis3boi
Since you have "studied" the bible. Â Can you tell me who the youngest person to ever live was?
*hint* it's an easy one. Â Think old testament.Â
0rbs
Rephrase your question so it actually makes sense. You may as well be asking who the deadest person who ever died was.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
No, because conjoins change that.
0rbs
Nope. You said:
It's not funny and neither is those sinners in your signature.
'Those' and 'Sinners' are both plural elements, therefore you use a plural verb.
Â
incorrect. Â
Â
Done arguing with somebody who cannot admit when they are clearly wrong. Â
Â
Back on topic, nobody can understand gods language. Â Only god can.
hahahahahahaha
I wish I could. Except that our habital planet is 1 out of 10000000000000 of habitable planets [(1 of tens of thousands of billions) at least]. But odds like this are why people still pay $20 because they think 20 lottery chances will increase their odds of winning.[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
someone put this thread out of its misery
lo_Pine
Â
The lotto is a hoot. You just never know if you're going to win! Â Odds may be high, but by the numbers alone somebody HAS to eventually win.
I wish I could. Except that our habital planet is 1 out of 10000000000000 of habitable planets [(1 of tens of thousands of billions) at least]. But odds like this are why people still pay $20 because they think 20 lottery chances will increase their odds of winning.[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
someone put this thread out of its misery
0rbs
Â
The lotto is a hoot. You just never know if you're going to win!
It's a hoot because all you know is you can't win if you don't play. But 20 out of 200,000,000 is statistically as likely to win as 1 out of 200,000,000.[QUOTE="0rbs"][QUOTE="lo_Pine"] I wish I could. Except that our habital planet is 1 out of 10000000000000 of habitable planets [(1 of tens of thousands of billions) at least]. But odds like this are why people still pay $20 because they think 20 lottery chances will increase their odds of winning.
lo_Pine
Â
The lotto is a hoot. You just never know if you're going to win!
It's a hoot because all you know is you can't win if you don't play. But 20 out of 200,000,000 is statistically as likely to win as 1 out of 200,000,000.If you don't play, you lose 100 percent of the time.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment