[QUOTE="0rbs"]
If you don't play, you lose 100 percent of the time.
br0kenrabbit
Wrong again...you simply maintain parity because you did not incur the expense of a ticket purchase.
Â
Â
oh rabbit you like taking the fun out of things!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
If you don't play, you lose 100 percent of the time.
br0kenrabbit
Wrong again...you simply maintain parity.
Â
Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0.Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0. lo_Pine
You can't lose a game you don't play.
To lose means you asserted a position (I will win) and failed.
[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0. br0kenrabbit
You can't lose a game you don't play.
To lose means you asserted a position (I will win) and failed.
Â
You're actually right on this. Â Good way of looking at it. Â
Â
You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.
Â
You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.
0rbs
Did the goats guts tell you that?
Â
[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0. br0kenrabbit
You can't lose a game you don't play.
To lose means you asserted a position (I will win) and failed.
"You can't lose a game if you don't play" is equally as valid as "you lose a game if you don't play." A lottery ticket costs $1 so the real question is how much does that $1 matter to the individual purchasing the lottery ticket?"You can't lose a game if you don't play" is equally as valid as "you lose a game if you don't play." A lottery ticket costs $1 so the real question is how much does that $1 matter to the individual purchasing the lottery ticket?lo_Pine
'You lose a game you don't play' is not valid logic.
'You can't lose a game you don't play' is entirely logical.
I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl, either.
Â
You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.
0rbs
You still haven't asked a question that makes logical sense.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
[QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.
0rbs
Did the goats guts tell you that?
Â
Â
You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.
Not one person understood what the fvck you meant Hence why you don't have an answer[QUOTE="0rbs"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
Did the goats guts tell you that?
Â
chaoscougar1
Â
You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.
Not one person understood what the fvck you meant Hence why you don't have an answerÂ
It's in the old testament. Â The question makes sense if you have faith.
[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] "You can't lose a game if you don't play" is equally as valid as "you lose a game if you don't play." A lottery ticket costs $1 so the real question is how much does that $1 matter to the individual purchasing the lottery ticket?br0kenrabbit
'You lose a game you don't play' is not valid logic.
'You can't lose a game you don't play' is entirely logical.
I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl, either.
"I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl" The validity of that statement is subjective. You have never played in a Superbowl because you never (to mention a few) 1. played football 2. played football but weren't good enough to make it into the pros 3. made it into the pros but didn't care enough to try hard enough to make it to the Superbowl.It's in the old testament. Â The question makes sense if you have faith.
0rbs
UFOs following in comet tails makes sense if you have faith, but it's still fvcking stupid.
"I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl" The validity of that statement is subjective. You have never played in a Superbowl because you never (to mention a few) 1. played football lo_Pine
Right.
I also never 1. played the lottery.
Not one person understood what the fvck you meant Hence why you don't have an answer[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="0rbs"]
Â
You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.
0rbs
Â
It's in the old testament. Â The question makes sense if you have faith.
Feel free to try and explain it to us heathens[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]"I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl" The validity of that statement is subjective. You have never played in a Superbowl because you never (to mention a few) 1. played football br0kenrabbit
Right.
I also never 1. played the lottery.
Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.this is an interesting observation, i would like to hear a rebuttal from some sort of theist... if we are made by a creator and are special and unique in the universe, what could all that space be for? according to one theist in this thread there is no aliens because they are not in his sacred book... is space and all the other planets in your book? why are they there? Theism doesn't mean that you believe that we are special and unique in the universe that specific line was aimed at one particular theist in this thread who claimed there is no aliens because they are not in the book. though i suspect it's just a troll.[QUOTE="MuD3"][QUOTE="RandoIphF"]On topic, if their is no intelligent life anywhere but here, it's an awful waste of space. Planets in the habitable zone of their stars are much, much more common than we ever previously imagined. (especially around red dwarf stars) Their has also been gas giants in that zone, which means the potential for their moons to harbor life as well, should they have any.themajormayor
Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.lo_Pine
Â
Win chance = 0
Lose chance = 0
Parity.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="lo_Pine"]Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.lo_Pine
Â
Win chance = 0
Lose chance = 0
Parity.
Ok... so what conditions of your response are you basing that off of?The condition that to lose something you must have either had it to begin with or maintained a position of the possibility of gain.
You can't lose a dollar you never had.
Â
Ok... so what conditions of your response are you basing that off of?[QUOTE="lo_Pine"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
Â
Win chance = 0
Lose chance = 0
Parity.
br0kenrabbit
The condition that to lose something you must have either had it to begin with or maintained a position of the possibility of gain.
You can't lose a dollar you never had.
Â
The chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket = EXACTLY 0. while The chance of winning the lottery when you a ticket is > 0. It might be .0000000000000001 but there is still a chance greater than 0. The question is still how much does $1 mean to you? Are you willing to gamble $1 for $10,000,000 or more, or would you rather buy a double cheeseburger?The chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket = EXACTLY 0. while The chance of winning the lottery when you a ticket is > 0. It might be .0000000000000001 but there is still a chance greater than 0. The question is still how much does $1 mean to you? Are you willing to gamble $1 for $10,000,000 or more, or would you rather buy a double cheeseburger?lo_Pine
The value of a dollar is irrelevant. If I don't participate, I don't lose.
[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]The chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket = EXACTLY 0. while The chance of winning the lottery when you a ticket is > 0. It might be .0000000000000001 but there is still a chance greater than 0. The question is still how much does $1 mean to you? Are you willing to gamble $1 for $10,000,000 or more, or would you rather buy a double cheeseburger?br0kenrabbit
The value of a dollar is irrelevant. If I don't participate, I don't lose.
If you don't participate then you are playing an entirely different game.Back on topic, nobody can understand gods language. Â Only god can.
0rbs
I do not read it in english. Â I read it in God's language.
0rbs
just gonna leave this here.
basically, your just talking out your ass.
If you don't participate then you are playing an entirely different game.lo_Pine
If you don't participate, you aren't playing at all. :?
[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] If you don't participate then you are playing an entirely different game.br0kenrabbit
If you don't participate, you aren't playing at all. :?
The original game was to buy or not to buy a lottery ticket for $1. If you choose not to participate, then you are not apart of that game.You guys, I swear. Â It must be a very sad existence to depend on something outside of yourself to give the world validation and meaning. Â And very restrictive. Â Dogma is not a wonderful thing. You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.[QUOTE="CecilChups"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] No it wouldn't. MirkoS77
The original game was to buy or not to buy a lottery ticket for $1.lo_Pine
That's not a game, that's a point-of-sale decision.
Not buying Pepsi products does not make me a Coke fan.
You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.CecilChups
The ones with vaginas are rather pleasant 3 weeks of the month.
I'll give you that 4th week though...wow.
[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]You guys, I swear. Â It must be a very sad existence to depend on something outside of yourself to give the world validation and meaning. Â And very restrictive. Â Dogma is not a wonderful thing. You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.[QUOTE="CecilChups"]CecilChups
That's just a sad outlook on life.
You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.[QUOTE="CecilChups"][QUOTE="MirkoS77"]You guys, I swear. Â It must be a very sad existence to depend on something outside of yourself to give the world validation and meaning. Â And very restrictive. Â Dogma is not a wonderful thing.
kerrman
That's just a sad outlook on life.
Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?CecilChups
Yup.
We threw atomic bombs on Japan because after a few years of global war, we didn't feel like taking their shit any more. Done and done.
Don't punch a guy in the back of the head if you don't want kicked in the nuts.
[QUOTE="CecilChups"]Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?br0kenrabbit
Yup.
We threw atomic bombs on Japan because after a few years of global war, we didn't feel like taking their shit any more. Done and done.
Don't punch a guy in the back of the head if you don't want kicked in the nuts.
You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="CecilChups"]Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?CecilChups
Yup.
We threw atomic bombs on Japan because after a few years of global war, we didn't feel like taking their shit any more. Done and done.
Don't punch a guy in the back of the head if you don't want kicked in the nuts.
You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet. hahahahahaha The tooth decay or the ornamental plate?You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.CecilChups
Check out, then.
Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?CecilChups
Humans are deep, open-minded, non-judgemental, non-superficial, and only two cities have been nuked since the atomic bomb has been created nearly 70 years ago, and that was to hasten the end of a horrific war that was continuing to create misery and hardship for a long time to come and to again bring peace.
Jesus, you seriously need to change your perspective. Â All of what you've said is true, but only half-true. Â What benefit does it do for you to view this the way you do?
There are so many other planets out there, many of which we have yet to discover. That the odds of there being no other life in the universe vastly outweigh the odds of us being alone.trick_man01Where did you get that from. What if you add all the planets out there but the chance of life was 3 times that. then us being here was complete luck and the odds was against us to exist so the chances of it happening again in a universe with such a low chance of life happening again is really low so we could be forever alone. Only when we encounter life we can start building a idea on what the maths are to have life on other planets. out of the trillions and trillions of planets you just guessing that another one is going to have life on it but what it the chance of life was 1 in trillions and trillions and trillions X 3 then its more likely there isn't life on other planets but if its 1 in a billion then there's loads of life in the universe. We don't know the odds of life yet and won't until we start encountering it if we ever do then we can start making educated guess's with how much of the universe has life in it and not just go there's a lot of planets and for no logical reason I'm going to believe there is life out there when in fact I have no clue. It would be nice yeah but no one of this earth can say if there is or not because we have nothing to base that off.
I would like to feel there is but I also don't think we have come across any in the history of the human race. We are the only planet that we know of that supports life and you often hear people saying that this means theres bound to be life on other planets because there is so many but how could you think that. Lets say there's 1 billion planets (I know there's a lot more) and we our one of them and we support life. What if the chances of life is 1 in 4 billion then the chances of us being here is complete luck and the chance of that happening again on the other planets is now more or less zero. I don't think we will be able to know or able to guess the amount of life through the universe until we come across our first new life. If would be nice to know we are not alone but what if the odds are greater then the amount of planets out there. we have no idea. ziggyww
Â
Well there is most certainly life on other planets, at least microbial life.
Â
if we are talking intelligent life, still probably a decent chance. Out of the hundreds of billions of difference species of life that have existed on earth... only one managed to rub 2 sticks together... so the odds are waning, but still likely.
Â
If we are talking intelligent alien life that have managed to overcome lightspeed limitations and are visiting earth in spacecrafts then accidently hit their turn signal so that rednecks can catch them on their camcorder... yea yur absolutely mental if you believe that nonsense.
[QUOTE="CecilChups"] You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.br0kenrabbit
Check out, then.
NahI wish I could. Except that our habital planet is 1 out of 10000000000000 of habitable planets [(1 of tens of thousands of billions) at least]. But odds like this are why people still pay $20 because they think 20 lottery chances will increase their odds of winning.[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
someone put this thread out of its misery
0rbs
Â
The lotto is a hoot. You just never know if you're going to win! Â Odds may be high, but by the numbers alone somebody HAS to eventually win.
You mean the odds were low. If odds are high, it means something is very likely.Nah[QUOTE="CecilChups"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
Check out, then.
0rbs
Â
People like you have no fundamental understanding of the world and just like to bitch.
Â
Just like yourself then!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment