Do you believe in alien life?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 0rbs
0rbs

1947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 0rbs
Member since 2007 • 1947 Posts

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If you don't play, you lose 100 percent of the time.

br0kenrabbit

Wrong again...you simply maintain parity because you did not incur the expense of a ticket purchase.

 

 

oh rabbit you like taking the fun out of things!

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#252 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

If you don't play, you lose 100 percent of the time.

br0kenrabbit

Wrong again...you simply maintain parity.

 

Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#253 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0. lo_Pine

You can't lose a game you don't play.

To lose means you asserted a position (I will win) and failed.

Avatar image for 0rbs
0rbs

1947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 0rbs
Member since 2007 • 1947 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0. br0kenrabbit

You can't lose a game you don't play.

To lose means you asserted a position (I will win) and failed.

 

You're actually right on this.  Good way of looking at it.  

 

You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#255 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

 

You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.

0rbs

Did the goats guts tell you that?

 

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#256 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] Parity is subjective. Not playing absolutely and undeniably gives a player the chance of 0 of winning. While playing at least once gives the player at least a chance of winning > 0. br0kenrabbit

You can't lose a game you don't play.

To lose means you asserted a position (I will win) and failed.

"You can't lose a game if you don't play" is equally as valid as "you lose a game if you don't play." A lottery ticket costs $1 so the real question is how much does that $1 matter to the individual purchasing the lottery ticket?
Avatar image for 0rbs
0rbs

1947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 0rbs
Member since 2007 • 1947 Posts

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

 

You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.

br0kenrabbit

Did the goats guts tell you that?

 

 

You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#258 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

"You can't lose a game if you don't play" is equally as valid as "you lose a game if you don't play." A lottery ticket costs $1 so the real question is how much does that $1 matter to the individual purchasing the lottery ticket?lo_Pine

'You lose a game you don't play' is not valid logic.

'You can't lose a game you don't play' is entirely logical.

I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl, either.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#259 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

 

You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.

0rbs

You still haven't asked a question that makes logical sense.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#260 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

 

You were wrong about every single other thing in this thread, but this one you win.

0rbs

Did the goats guts tell you that?

 

 

You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.

Not one person understood what the fvck you meant Hence why you don't have an answer
Avatar image for 0rbs
0rbs

1947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 0rbs
Member since 2007 • 1947 Posts

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

Did the goats guts tell you that?

 

chaoscougar1

 

You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.

Not one person understood what the fvck you meant Hence why you don't have an answer

 

It's in the old testament.  The question makes sense if you have faith.

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#262 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] "You can't lose a game if you don't play" is equally as valid as "you lose a game if you don't play." A lottery ticket costs $1 so the real question is how much does that $1 matter to the individual purchasing the lottery ticket?br0kenrabbit

'You lose a game you don't play' is not valid logic.

'You can't lose a game you don't play' is entirely logical.

I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl, either.

"I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl" The validity of that statement is subjective. You have never played in a Superbowl because you never (to mention a few) 1. played football 2. played football but weren't good enough to make it into the pros 3. made it into the pros but didn't care enough to try hard enough to make it to the Superbowl.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#263 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

It's in the old testament.  The question makes sense if you have faith.

0rbs

UFOs following in comet tails makes sense if you have faith, but it's still fvcking stupid.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#264 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

"I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl" The validity of that statement is subjective. You have never played in a Superbowl because you never (to mention a few) 1. played football lo_Pine

Right.

I also never 1. played the lottery.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#265 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="0rbs"]

 

You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.

0rbs

Not one person understood what the fvck you meant Hence why you don't have an answer

 

It's in the old testament.  The question makes sense if you have faith.

Feel free to try and explain it to us heathens
Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#266 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]"I've never played in a Superbowl, but I've never lost a Superbowl" The validity of that statement is subjective. You have never played in a Superbowl because you never (to mention a few) 1. played football br0kenrabbit

Right.

I also never 1. played the lottery.

Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.
Avatar image for MuD3
MuD3

2192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 MuD3
Member since 2011 • 2192 Posts

[QUOTE="MuD3"][QUOTE="RandoIphF"]On topic, if their is no intelligent life anywhere but here, it's an awful waste of space. Planets in the habitable zone of their stars are much, much more common than we ever previously imagined. (especially around red dwarf stars) Their has also been gas giants in that zone, which means the potential for their moons to harbor life as well, should they have any.themajormayor

this is an interesting observation, i would like to hear a rebuttal from some sort of theist... if we are made by a creator and are special and unique in the universe, what could all that space be for? according to one theist in this thread there is no aliens because they are not in his sacred book... is space and all the other planets in your book? why are they there?

Theism doesn't mean that you believe that we are special and unique in the universe

that specific line was aimed at one particular theist in this thread who claimed there is no aliens because they are not in the book. though i suspect it's just a troll.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#268 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.lo_Pine

 

Win chance = 0

Lose chance = 0

Parity.

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#269 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.br0kenrabbit

 

Win chance = 0

Lose chance = 0

Parity.

Ok... so what conditions of your response are you basing that off of?
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#270 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]Then the chance of you winning is absolutely 0. As opposed to someone who buys 1 lottery ticket.lo_Pine

 

Win chance = 0

Lose chance = 0

Parity.

Ok... so what conditions of your response are you basing that off of?

The condition that to lose something you must have either had it to begin with or maintained a position of the possibility of gain.

You can't lose a dollar you never had.

 

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#271 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

 

Win chance = 0

Lose chance = 0

Parity.

br0kenrabbit

Ok... so what conditions of your response are you basing that off of?

The condition that to lose something you must have either had it to begin with or maintained a position of the possibility of gain.

You can't lose a dollar you never had.

 

The chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket = EXACTLY 0. while The chance of winning the lottery when you a ticket is > 0. It might be .0000000000000001 but there is still a chance greater than 0. The question is still how much does $1 mean to you? Are you willing to gamble $1 for $10,000,000 or more, or would you rather buy a double cheeseburger?
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#272 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

The chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket = EXACTLY 0. while The chance of winning the lottery when you a ticket is > 0. It might be .0000000000000001 but there is still a chance greater than 0. The question is still how much does $1 mean to you? Are you willing to gamble $1 for $10,000,000 or more, or would you rather buy a double cheeseburger?lo_Pine

The value of a dollar is irrelevant. If I don't participate, I don't lose.

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#273 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]The chances of winning the lottery without buying a ticket = EXACTLY 0. while The chance of winning the lottery when you a ticket is > 0. It might be .0000000000000001 but there is still a chance greater than 0. The question is still how much does $1 mean to you? Are you willing to gamble $1 for $10,000,000 or more, or would you rather buy a double cheeseburger?br0kenrabbit

The value of a dollar is irrelevant. If I don't participate, I don't lose.

If you don't participate then you are playing an entirely different game.
Avatar image for konvikt_17
konvikt_17

22378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#274 konvikt_17
Member since 2008 • 22378 Posts

Back on topic, nobody can understand gods language.  Only god can.

0rbs

I do not read it in english.  I read it in God's language.

0rbs

just gonna leave this here.

basically, your just talking out your ass.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#275 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

If you don't participate then you are playing an entirely different game.lo_Pine

If you don't participate, you aren't playing at all. :?

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#276 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"] If you don't participate then you are playing an entirely different game.br0kenrabbit

If you don't participate, you aren't playing at all. :?

The original game was to buy or not to buy a lottery ticket for $1. If you choose not to participate, then you are not apart of that game.
Avatar image for kerrman
kerrman

2904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#277 kerrman
Member since 2003 • 2904 Posts

Of course. It's silly to not believe something else is out there.

Avatar image for CecilChups
CecilChups

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 CecilChups
Member since 2013 • 205 Posts

[QUOTE="CecilChups"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] No it wouldn't. MirkoS77

You guys, I swear.  It must be a very sad existence to depend on something outside of yourself to give the world validation and meaning.  And very restrictive.  Dogma is not a wonderful thing.

You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#279 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

The original game was to buy or not to buy a lottery ticket for $1.lo_Pine

That's not a game, that's a point-of-sale decision.

Not buying Pepsi products does not make me a Coke fan.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#280 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.CecilChups

The ones with vaginas are rather pleasant 3 weeks of the month.

I'll give you that 4th week though...wow.

Avatar image for kerrman
kerrman

2904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#281 kerrman
Member since 2003 • 2904 Posts

[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]

[QUOTE="CecilChups"]CecilChups

You guys, I swear.  It must be a very sad existence to depend on something outside of yourself to give the world validation and meaning.  And very restrictive.  Dogma is not a wonderful thing.

You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.

That's just a sad outlook on life.

Avatar image for CecilChups
CecilChups

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 CecilChups
Member since 2013 • 205 Posts

[QUOTE="CecilChups"][QUOTE="MirkoS77"]You guys, I swear.  It must be a very sad existence to depend on something outside of yourself to give the world validation and meaning.  And very restrictive.  Dogma is not a wonderful thing.

kerrman

You know what else isn't wonderful? Human beings.

That's just a sad outlook on life.

Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#283 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?CecilChups

Yup.

We threw atomic bombs on Japan because after a few years of global war, we didn't feel like taking their shit any more. Done and done.

Don't punch a guy in the back of the head if you don't want kicked in the nuts.

Avatar image for CecilChups
CecilChups

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 CecilChups
Member since 2013 • 205 Posts

[QUOTE="CecilChups"]Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?br0kenrabbit

Yup.

We threw atomic bombs on Japan because after a few years of global war, we didn't feel like taking their shit any more. Done and done.

Don't punch a guy in the back of the head if you don't want kicked in the nuts.

You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.
Avatar image for trick_man01
trick_man01

11441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#285 trick_man01
Member since 2003 • 11441 Posts
There are so many other planets out there, many of which we have yet to discover. That the odds of there being no other life in the universe vastly outweigh the odds of us being alone.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#286 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="CecilChups"]Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?CecilChups

Yup.

We threw atomic bombs on Japan because after a few years of global war, we didn't feel like taking their shit any more. Done and done.

Don't punch a guy in the back of the head if you don't want kicked in the nuts.

You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.

hahahahahaha The tooth decay or the ornamental plate?
Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#287 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18078 Posts

You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.CecilChups

Check out, then.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#288 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17966 Posts

Human are shallow, closed minded, judgemental, superficial and we throw atomic bombs on cities just to get them back for revenge without thinking of the innocent people who just want to live their lives and hold their loved ones. Am I wrong?CecilChups

Humans are deep, open-minded, non-judgemental, non-superficial, and only two cities have been nuked since the atomic bomb has been created nearly 70 years ago, and that was to hasten the end of a horrific war that was continuing to create misery and hardship for a long time to come and to again bring peace.

Jesus, you seriously need to change your perspective.  All of what you've said is true, but only half-true.  What benefit does it do for you to view this the way you do?

Avatar image for RandoIphF
RandoIphF

271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#289 RandoIphF
Member since 2013 • 271 Posts
[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] No it wouldn'tthemajormayor

Yes it would. :)

No it wouldn't.

Yes, it would.
Avatar image for ziggyww
ziggyww

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 ziggyww
Member since 2012 • 907 Posts
I would like to feel there is but I also don't think we have come across any in the history of the human race. We are the only planet that we know of that supports life and you often hear people saying that this means theres bound to be life on other planets because there is so many but how could you think that. Lets say there's 1 billion planets (I know there's a lot more) and we our one of them and we support life. What if the chances of life is 1 in 4 billion then the chances of us being here is complete luck and the chance of that happening again on the other planets is now more or less zero. I don't think we will be able to know or able to guess the amount of life through the universe until we come across our first new life. If would be nice to know we are not alone but what if the odds are greater then the amount of planets out there. we have no idea.
Avatar image for ziggyww
ziggyww

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 ziggyww
Member since 2012 • 907 Posts
There are so many other planets out there, many of which we have yet to discover. That the odds of there being no other life in the universe vastly outweigh the odds of us being alone.trick_man01
Where did you get that from. What if you add all the planets out there but the chance of life was 3 times that. then us being here was complete luck and the odds was against us to exist so the chances of it happening again in a universe with such a low chance of life happening again is really low so we could be forever alone. Only when we encounter life we can start building a idea on what the maths are to have life on other planets. out of the trillions and trillions of planets you just guessing that another one is going to have life on it but what it the chance of life was 1 in trillions and trillions and trillions X 3 then its more likely there isn't life on other planets but if its 1 in a billion then there's loads of life in the universe. We don't know the odds of life yet and won't until we start encountering it if we ever do then we can start making educated guess's with how much of the universe has life in it and not just go there's a lot of planets and for no logical reason I'm going to believe there is life out there when in fact I have no clue. It would be nice yeah but no one of this earth can say if there is or not because we have nothing to base that off.
Avatar image for BeardMaster
BeardMaster

1686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#292 BeardMaster
Member since 2012 • 1686 Posts

I would like to feel there is but I also don't think we have come across any in the history of the human race. We are the only planet that we know of that supports life and you often hear people saying that this means theres bound to be life on other planets because there is so many but how could you think that. Lets say there's 1 billion planets (I know there's a lot more) and we our one of them and we support life. What if the chances of life is 1 in 4 billion then the chances of us being here is complete luck and the chance of that happening again on the other planets is now more or less zero. I don't think we will be able to know or able to guess the amount of life through the universe until we come across our first new life. If would be nice to know we are not alone but what if the odds are greater then the amount of planets out there. we have no idea. ziggyww

 

Well there is most certainly life on other planets, at least microbial life.

 

if we are talking intelligent life, still probably a decent chance. Out of the hundreds of billions of difference species of life that have existed on earth... only one managed to rub 2 sticks together... so the odds are waning, but still likely.

 

If we are talking intelligent alien life that have managed to overcome lightspeed limitations and are visiting earth in spacecrafts then accidently hit their turn signal so that rednecks can catch them on their camcorder... yea yur absolutely mental if you believe that nonsense.

Avatar image for PsychoLemons
PsychoLemons

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 PsychoLemons
Member since 2011 • 3183 Posts

We're not alone, I'll give you that.

http://htwins.net/scale2/

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#294 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
I believe in the Holy Games that are Mass Effect.
Avatar image for ShaineTheNerd
ShaineTheNerd

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 ShaineTheNerd
Member since 2012 • 1578 Posts
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="ShaineTheNerd"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"] Its all good Don't fret too much Just try and educate yourself on the topic a little more :)

I knew there is an immeasurable amount of planets in existence far beyond what technology can see. I remember being flabbergasted when I first learned of this as a young kid, because I thought there were only nine planets all my pre-teen youth. I just didn't really feel like I had to say more than "hundreds". I just forgot how the Internet rolls these days. Say something of the color crimson is red and you'll receive hate mail and death-threat tweets.

A few people corrected your inaccuracy Seems like the only one overreacting/taking it too seriously is you You made an incorrect comment, it was corrected Get over it

Oh yeah?!!! You think I'm overreacting, buddy?! You THINK I NEED TO GET OVER IT?!!!!! Okay. Have good day, everyone.
Avatar image for CecilChups
CecilChups

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#296 CecilChups
Member since 2013 • 205 Posts

[QUOTE="CecilChups"] You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.br0kenrabbit

Check out, then.

Nah
Avatar image for brucewayne69
brucewayne69

2864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 brucewayne69
Member since 2012 • 2864 Posts

[QUOTE="lo_Pine"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

someone put this thread out of its misery

0rbs

I wish I could. Except that our habital planet is 1 out of 10000000000000 of habitable planets [(1 of tens of thousands of billions) at least]. But odds like this are why people still pay $20 because they think 20 lottery chances will increase their odds of winning.

 

The lotto is a hoot. You just never know if you're going to win!  Odds may be high, but by the numbers alone somebody HAS to eventually win.

You mean the odds were low. If odds are high, it means something is very likely.
Avatar image for 0rbs
0rbs

1947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#298 0rbs
Member since 2007 • 1947 Posts

[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

[QUOTE="CecilChups"] You're a prime example of my point about human beings being a plaque to the planet.CecilChups

Check out, then.

Nah

 

People like you have no fundamental understanding of the world and just like to bitch.

Avatar image for MonoSilver
MonoSilver

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#299 MonoSilver
Member since 2013 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="CecilChups"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

Check out, then.

0rbs

Nah

 

People like you have no fundamental understanding of the world and just like to bitch.

 

Just like yourself then!

Avatar image for 0rbs
0rbs

1947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#300 0rbs
Member since 2007 • 1947 Posts

[QUOTE="0rbs"]

[QUOTE="CecilChups"] NahMonoSilver

 

People like you have no fundamental understanding of the world and just like to bitch.

 

Just like yourself then!

 

You still haven't told me who the youngest person to ever live was.