Oj was actually innocent if you remeber the case vs George Zimmerman who actually was confirmed to have killed Treyvon Martin.[QUOTE="XBOunity"]
You know its not popular to say, because it is true, but you had alot of people of color applauding the OJ verdict because of the circumstances.   Enough of the lack of equality, if you have a bone to pick, pick it with the Justice system, nothing else.
no-scope-AK47
In sanford black life is cheap even if you are a black gun owner with a CCW and you shoot a white person you have a 97 percent chance of being convicted. When they kept the case there I knew it was a big problem. Then that dumb fat bitch says creepy ass cracker and I knew that was the end of the case. She was the last person to talk to him and heard GZ out of breath run up and grab TM before the phone went dead. However when she a black woman was in a racist town and had the nerve to say cracka.
I would suggest that if there was a black jury and a witness dropped the n bomb it would have a similar impact. Also her inability to act normal under cross did not help. The OJ case they could not prove he was even there and under the nails was not his DNA. He also was stripped naked and did not have a nick on him. Also who could forget the little glove that could not fit OJ.
OJ was only found "not guilty" because the jury had no idea how DNA evidence works, they impeached the lead detective as a racist despite having a black girlfriend, and the judge sucked the defense team's dicks to look good on camera. OJ himself practically confessed in his book, and the only reason he didn't go back to trial and end up in prison because of double jeopardy. He owed every penny he made to Fred Goldman (the father of one of the victims) because he was sued to oblivion for causing the death of Ron Goldman (in other words, murdering him).Meanwhile, Zimmerman owned up to his role. He never claimed that he didn't shoot Martin. The two are not equivalent.
Log in to comment