[QUOTE="blackregiment"] [QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]
No doubt, by the way, you'll be able to explain what 'faith' you're referring to, and why it is faith. ;)
Funky_Llama
Faith is an integral part of everything we do in life. For example, when you eat a bowl of cereal, you have faith that there is not a chemical that could be harmful to your body in the cereal that may have found its way into it during its manufacture, you have faith that there is not deadly bacteria in the milk. Do you do lab tests on these items to test their purity before you eat them? No, you eat them in faith that they are not harmful. The same can be said for hundreds of things you do each day in "faith".
When we speak of faith in the spiritual realm, the important thing is the object of our faith. Followers of Christ put their faith in Him. They trust in His Word and eternal promises. They receive confirmation of God's truth from the Holy Spirit that indwells them and experience positive changes in their lives by obedience to God's Word. They have a personal relationship with Christ. Â
In your faith of naturalism, you place your faith in the words of fallen man, the interpretations and speculations of scientists regarding observations about our natural world. You put your faith in them, that their words and speculations are true and unbiased, and are not tainted by their worldview. You are trusting in their interpretations, that they are telling you the whole truth, that they are not withholding evidence that contradicts the dogma they are putting forth. Science by a self-imposed definition, limits its exploration to the natural world. God is supernatural. outside of the natural world, yet many scientists have tried to morph themselves and speculate on metaphysical things such as the existence of God. Science cannot and will not ever be able to "disprove" the existence of God, yet many pseudo scientists try to so that they can feel "intellectually fulfilled" in their rejection of God and His truth. Â
In summary, followers of Christ put their faith in Him, His Word, their personal relationship with Him, and the testimony and power of the Holy Spirit working in their lives to perfect them towards righteousness.    Â
Followers of the religion of naturalism put their faith and trust in the words of man. They reject God, a spirit outside of the natural world, based on metaphysical conclusions by fallen man under the guise of pseudo science. Â
There is only one truth, God's truth and as has been the case in the past and will continue to be the case in the future, scientific discoveries will conform to God's truth. Â
Psa 118:8Â Itis better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.
Nope... I don't claim to know for certain that the bowl of cereal is not poisonous. But if I didn't eat food, I'd die; so I take the tiny risk and eat it.Nor do I have faith in science, because, again, a core element of the scientific method is the admission that you can't be certain; that's why scientific findings are often extensively peer-reviewed.
Quite simply... how could I possibly have faith in anything when I don't claim to be certain of anything? I don't claim that God doesn't exist; I don't know either way. So how could there be faith involved there?
I wasn't implying that you "know for certain" that the cereal is not harmful. The point I was making was that you must have faith that it is not. Eating it without extensive testing requires faith.
I think that part of the problem, and I am not specifically referring to you, is that many people confuse practical science with forensic science.Â
It is difficult for us to be 100 percent certain of anything. We will all always have doubts at times. When deciding on the accuracy of historical event, we must examine all of the evidence we can get our hands on. We must critically analyze that evidence and think critically and reasonably about that evidence and come to our own conclusion based on the preponderance of the evidence. That is why I always tell people to examine the evidence for themselves. People should not just depend on what others say, if they are going to be intellectually honest with themselves, they must examine as much evidence as they can get their hands on. Â
In regards to your last statement, you have faith in the fact that you "don't know" and I presume that also means that you have faith that you "can't know" since you feel that you cannot know anything with 100% certainty. That is how faith is involved.Â
At some point, we must have faith in everything we believe, not blind faith, but faith based on an open and honest examination all of the evidence. Â
Log in to comment