[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]
[QUOTE="thegerg"]Here's a piece of advice: don't tell others what to do if you don't want them to do the same. It comes off as petty and childish.
Anywho, we all have some "posting deficiencies" now and then. Your deficiencies in this thread, though, have been that you contradict yourself quite a bit and that you post things you don't really mean (or maybe it's just that you change your mind after you hit the "submit" button). These deficiencies make it difficult to take your arguments seriously.
thegerg
You don't have any room to call anybody petty and childish as you are purposefully trying to annoy with your posts as is typical of you. Also, you are the one that were being pendantic about the equal rights term for no good reason. If that is not childish, I don't what is.
Also, I didn't tell you what to do. I just said that before you try to tell me how to post, you should actually post something constructive that's not a useless nitpcik.
I didn't contradict myself at all. You're just being hopelessly pendantic about my posts. Notice that it is only you that has this problem? Nobody else is anal about my posts and other people's posts. Just you. Other people can read between the lines.
I clarified myself and you should be able to accept that. But you insist on trying to start an e-fight for no good reason.
Here are a few examples from this very thread of you telling others what to do:
"Seriously, grow up and stop trying to irritate people."
"you should actually post something constructive"
"So, again, go ahead and use the word if you want."
"prepare to face the consequences"
"Come at correct or don't come at me at all."
"Look it up in the dictionary"
Again, don't tell others what to do if you don't want to be told what to do.
Your response clearly contradicted itself. You later tried to explain the contradiction away, but it remains.
I'll admit that the first one was an example of me telling others what to do, but you took the others ones out of context is the most dishonest way possible. I said look it up in the dictionary simply as a way of saying "if you look it up, you'll see I'm right"; I was not telling him what to do. "Prepare to face the consequences" meant that words bring consequences and you'll clearly see that by looking at the post; I wasn't telling him what to do in the context of the post. "Go ahead and use the word if you want" is NOT telling anybody what to do. At all. You're either being very dishonest, or you're not understanding those quotes, or you're being very anal about them, or you're scraping the bottom of the barrel.
I'll grant the "come at me correct", but it was a response to you telling me what to do first. Seriously, it's clear you wanted to pick a fight with me, and that was my response.
As far as the contadiction is concerned, it's not a contradiction at all. You were just being pendantic as it seems to come natural to you. My position was always that color and intent both are a form of context in varying situations. If you actually read my posts and absorbed their meaning instead of being anal in the most borish way possible, you'd see that. I fail to see why you need to start an e-fight when my position can be easily figured out by reading all my posts. What is the point?
I'm going to go ahead and tell you what to do by saying: stop being dishonest. It is an ugly trait. And if you are not being dishonest, stop being pendantic in a way that makes you look dishonest.
Log in to comment