How dangerous is weed really?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]It's dangerous to the brain and lungs. TonyDanzaFan
No.

Yes. Inhaling any sort of smoke is dangerous to your lungs. And it can cause depression and memory problems.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/marijuana-smoking-does-not-harm-lungs-study-finds/
Avatar image for Spitfirer
Spitfirer

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Spitfirer
Member since 2007 • 2088 Posts

If you're an idiot, press Alt and F4 at the same time, or click the X in the top-righthand corner of your internet browser.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

Alcohol is MUCH worse then marijuana. People die from alcohol related illness everyday. You never hear of anybody dieing from being a pot head.

DeX2010

2 Things 1) Alcohol is legal, weed is not(Medically it is in the US but thats not the point) 2) You can die as a consequence of being so high you don't know what the f*ck your doing.

So you're saying you have to be half-retarded for weed to be dangerous? :|

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15076 Posts

If you're 100% that it's weed and only weed, not so much. Although that would depend on the individual.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

[QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] No.themajormayor
Yes. Inhaling any sort of smoke is dangerous to your lungs. And it can cause depression and memory problems.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/marijuana-smoking-does-not-harm-lungs-study-finds/

A lot of people use dutches/other paper to roll the weed in. That in fact is not good for the lungs. But weed, itself, is fine.

Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#157 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]

Marijuana studies are pretty biased (both ways) and **** anyone that tells you we "understand" the brain and drug interactions in general. We just have ideas and beliefs about them, man.

Necrifer

Sh!t...yes.

I was very wrong.

Once again, I like to say things.

It's really dumb because I already knew all of this. :(

Whoops, I was wrong again. I shouldn't say I "knew", rather, I was aware of this.

You have a massive chip on your shoulder. Need to chill.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]It's dangerous to the brain and lungs. TonyDanzaFan
No.

Yes. Inhaling any sort of smoke is dangerous to your lungs. And it can cause depression and memory problems.

*exacerbate and there are ways you can get high without smoking
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#159 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
its only dangerous if your name is Jandurin.
Avatar image for nicksonman
nicksonman

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#160 nicksonman
Member since 2009 • 1221 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]It's dangerous to the brain and lungs. TonyDanzaFan
No.

Yes. Inhaling any sort of smoke is dangerous to your lungs. And it can cause depression and memory problems.

If it's in moderation, the benefits far outweigh the costs in my opinion.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
its only dangerous if your name is Jandurin. Allicrombie
._.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]

Hell I had mates who used to bang up vodka when they had nothing else :P

Jandurin

What?

People acquire the addiction to shooting up itself - they'll bang anything up given the chance. Hell I remember a mate giving all her downers away as they weren't jellies i.e. she couldn't whack em in her arm, bless the liddle darling!

Avatar image for lensflare15
lensflare15

6652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 lensflare15
Member since 2010 • 6652 Posts

I think the smoke that you inhale is dangerous...

Avatar image for Bucked20
Bucked20

6651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Bucked20
Member since 2011 • 6651 Posts
If you can smoke weed while driving it can't be that dangerous
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
On a scale of 1-10 dangerouses, it's at like -1chaoscougar1
I'd say like a 3. Causes cancer(inhaling carbon monoxide.)
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]On a scale of 1-10 dangerouses, it's at like -1Fightingfan
I'd say like a 3. Causes cancer(inhaling carbon monoxide.)

True, and 'tis unwise to place weed upon a pedastal as for every yin there's a yang

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]On a scale of 1-10 dangerouses, it's at like -1poptart

I'd say like a 3. Causes cancer(inhaling carbon monoxide.)

True, and 'tis unwise to place weed upon a pedastal as for every yin there's a yang

It also releases THC into the brain, and that can't be good in abundance.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
If you can smoke weed while driving it can't be that dangerous Bucked20
:lol:

People acquire the addiction to shooting up itself - they'll bang anything up given the chance. Hell I remember a mate giving all her downers away as they weren't jellies i.e. she couldn't whack em in her arm, bless the liddle darling!

poptart
cripes
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="poptart"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"] I'd say like a 3. Causes cancer(inhaling carbon monoxide.)Fightingfan

True, and 'tis unwise to place weed upon a pedastal as for every yin there's a yang

It also releases THC into the brain, and that can't be good in abundance.

"also"? That's like, it.
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="poptart"]

True, and 'tis unwise to place weed upon a pedastal as for every yin there's a yang

Jandurin

It also releases THC into the brain, and that can't be good in abundance.

"also"? That's like, it.

You don't know the affects of pain killers on the brain, I could get into wayy more detail, but the issue doesn't really apply to me. Simply speaking, Weed < Tobacco.

*In terms of overall health issues/hazards.

Avatar image for LazySloth718
LazySloth718

2345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 LazySloth718
Member since 2011 • 2345 Posts

Anything that you burn and take into your lungs is harmful.

You think you don't get lung cancer from smoking pot?

Ultimately all intoxicants are abusable, and they are ok in moderation.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#172 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yes. Inhaling any sort of smoke is dangerous to your lungs. And it can cause depression and memory problems.TonyDanzaFan
I feel like I'm in the '90's again. Why is it that those opposed to something are almost always the ones incredibly behind the times in terms of information regarding that thing? News flash: marijuana is a wonder drug that is only illegal because it would destroy the oil and pharmaceutical corporations and the government couldn't tax it. There are so many benefits to the ingestion of THC (smoking it is becoming primitive and inefficient) that it would be stupid to keep it illegal. But here we are, in the 21st century, where people are constantly looking for "greener" (environmentally friendly) and more natural ways of fixing problems with their health, and have at their fingertips, a gift from the gods that has practically innumerable uses and applications, grows naturally almost anywhere where a plant can grow, kept from them because of an antiquated sense of "social moral fibre" and big corporations looking to make money off of suffering (the best treatments for serious diseases cost more than most people can realistically afford). Why are we not using marijuana as an OTC pain killer? Acetamenophine, naproxen sodium, ibuprofin and ASA cause liver damage. Vicodin, morphine and other opioids (derived from opium, which is the source of heroin) are highly addictive and cost $1.50/pill on the street. What does marijuana do? Makes you hungry while it relieves you of your pain. And those other things are legal because they don't cause mild hallucinations, which according to the US government is bad for society (nearly all Schedule I drugs are harmless hallucinogens). It is a form of thought control. The government doesn't want people thinking in weird new ways, contemplating their existence. They want people to conform to the status quo, and live their lives as slaves to the corporate machine, rabbiting their lives away until they die. [/hippie rant] There is no justifiable, legal or ethical reason to keep marijuana illegal (*the most* illegal no less). Period. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a goddamn idiot. The amount of suffering it has relieved for cancer patients on chemo alone should be justification enough to make it accessible to anyone, anywhere. -- I read a study recently about marijuana being used to treat Auto-Immune Hepatitis, a disease my girlfriend is suffering from, and it not only fixing the immune system's problem has identifying the liver as an invader, slowly and painfully killing it, cell-by-cell, but it being able to HEAL the damaged liver tissue, something no current drug can do in the case of AIH. And what medication is she taking? Prednisone and Imuron... the former being a cortico-steroid that makes her extremely succeptable to viruses and bacterial infections (because it suppresses her immune system), but causes severe weight gain... AND, if taken for too long a time or in too high a dose, can cause liver damage! And why can she not get medical marijuana? Because no hepatic-focused specialists have experience treating it in that method, as it is largely misunderstood (she can't self-medicate because it might conflict with her current drug regime). This grinds my gears to no end, and ignoramuses like yourself are only furthering the misconceptions that keep marijuana illegal for no real reason.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]Yes. Inhaling any sort of smoke is dangerous to your lungs. And it can cause depression and memory problems.foxhound_fox
I feel like I'm in the '90's again. Why is it that those opposed to something are almost always the ones incredibly behind the times in terms of information regarding that thing? News flash: marijuana is a wonder drug that is only illegal because it would destroy the oil and pharmaceutical corporations and the government couldn't tax it. There are so many benefits to the ingestion of THC (smoking it is becoming primitive and inefficient) that it would be stupid to keep it illegal. But here we are, in the 21st century, where people are constantly looking for "greener" (environmentally friendly) and more natural ways of fixing problems with their health, and have at their fingertips, a gift from the gods that has practically innumerable uses and applications, grows naturally almost anywhere where a plant can grow, kept from them because of an antiquated sense of "social moral fibre" and big corporations looking to make money off of suffering (the best treatments for serious diseases cost more than most people can realistically afford). Why are we not using marijuana as an OTC pain killer? Acetamenophine, naproxen sodium, ibuprofin and ASA cause liver damage. Vicodin, morphine and other opioids (derived from opium, which is the source of heroin) are highly addictive and cost $1.50/pill on the street. What does marijuana do? Makes you hungry while it relieves you of your pain. And those other things are legal because they don't cause mild hallucinations, which according to the US government is bad for society (nearly all Schedule I drugs are harmless hallucinogens). It is a form of thought control. The government doesn't want people thinking in weird new ways, contemplating their existence. They want people to conform to the status quo, and live their lives as slaves to the corporate machine, rabbiting their lives away until they die. [/hippie rant] There is no justifiable, legal or ethical reason to keep marijuana illegal (*the most* illegal no less). Period. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a goddamn idiot. The amount of suffering it has relieved for cancer patients on chemo alone should be justification enough to make it accessible to anyone, anywhere. -- I read a study recently about marijuana being used to treat Auto-Immune Hepatitis, a disease my girlfriend is suffering from, and it not only fixing the immune system's problem has identifying the liver as an invader, slowly and painfully killing it, cell-by-cell, but it being able to HEAL the damaged liver tissue, something no current drug can do in the case of AIH. And what medication is she taking? Prednisone and Imuron... the former being a cortico-steroid that makes her extremely succeptable to viruses and bacterial infections (because it suppresses her immune system), but causes severe weight gain... AND, if taken for too long a time or in too high a dose, can cause liver damage! And why can she not get medical marijuana? Because no hepatic-focused specialists have experience treating it in that method, as it is largely misunderstood (she can't self-medicate because it might conflict with her current drug regime). This grinds my gears to no end, and ignoramuses like yourself are only furthering the misconceptions that keep marijuana illegal for no real reason.

No offence, but reading 'holier than thou' views on marijuana does indeed make me feel like I'm a student back int 90s again :P

Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#174 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
would depend on how much you smoke really and if your an addictive person frankly all kinds of conditions are important in such a question
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#175 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
No offence, but reading 'holier than thou' views on marijuana does indeed make me feel like I'm a student back int 90s again :Ppoptart
What of what I said is an "holier than thou" view? I personally have little interest in using marijuana anymore (it can facilitate states of mind I look to achieve, but it is not necessary to achieve them)... I am merely advocating a safe, natural and commercially non-viable alternative to aid those suffering ailments that are often over-medicated, causing in many cases more suffering (I am specifically referring to opioid addiction).
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]No offence, but reading 'holier than thou' views on marijuana does indeed make me feel like I'm a student back int 90s again :Pfoxhound_fox
What of what I said is an "holier than thou" view? I personally have little interest in using marijuana anymore (it can facilitate states of mind I look to achieve, but it is not necessary to achieve them)... I am merely advocating a safe, natural and commercially non-viable alternative to aid those suffering ailments that are often over-medicated, causing in many cases more suffering (I am specifically referring to opioid addiction).

Well......... y'know - the 'wonder drug' reference to start with and little objective critique regarding recreational use. Don't get me wrong it's medicinal qualities I'm sure are well documented as per your post. It just reminded me of the HWA (hippies with attitude) kind of view that was oh-so-90s.

Avatar image for LazySloth718
LazySloth718

2345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 LazySloth718
Member since 2011 • 2345 Posts

I think people just enjoy their pot, and make up bullschit to rationalize it.

Basically it's illegal because govt doesn't want the whole population killing their brain cells.

Go talk to some people who smoked pot for decades.

They are gone.

It's like talking to a mentally retarded person.

That said, hey it's your brain, I think everything should be legal, let people kill themselves if they want.

Just don't be pushing that "socialism" on me, because I don't want to pay for your food stamps and welfare.

If you ruin your life that's your problem.

Don't be asking me for healthcare benefits to cure your lung cancer from the "harmless pot."

I kept clean and did what I was supposed to do.

You didn't.

So no we're not gonna be sharing a common national wallet. I don't want to work hard to support tossers.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#178 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Well......... y'know - the 'wonder drug' reference to start with and little objective critique regarding recreational use. Don't get me wrong it's medicinal qualities I'm sure are well documented as per your post. It just reminded me of the HWA (hippies with attitude) kind of view that was oh-so-90s.poptart
Well, it kind of *is* a wonder drug. As the years go by, more and more studies keep coming out, showing another benefit to THC and cannaboids. It almost drives me insane that it is still illegal.
Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

[QUOTE="poptart"]Well......... y'know - the 'wonder drug' reference to start with and little objective critique regarding recreational use. Don't get me wrong it's medicinal qualities I'm sure are well documented as per your post. It just reminded me of the HWA (hippies with attitude) kind of view that was oh-so-90s.foxhound_fox
Well, it kind of *is* a wonder drug. As the years go by, more and more studies keep coming out, showing another benefit to THC and cannaboids. It almost drives me insane that it is still illegal.

Well I do concur that it should be legal too - although I admit I'm not fully au fait with it's medinal qualities bar the well documented ones. I just think in the context of recreation it should be treated a little 'well, this is what you'll get out of it, but this is the downside if you choose to blow through life in a kind of pot bubble'.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#180 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Well I do concur that it should be legal too - although I admit I'm not fully au fait with it's medinal qualities bar the well documented ones. I just think in the context of recreation it should be treated a little 'well, this is what you'll get out of it, but this is the downside if you choose to blow through life in a kind of pot bubble'.poptart
Recreational use is definitely a whole other issue. Though, fortunately, weed isn't like alcohol, causing a loss of inhibitions, increased aggressiveness and loss of the ability to feel pain in greater-than-moderate doses. Weed just makes one pass out and wake up really hungry. I think legality of recreational use should be approached in the same way alcohol and tobacco are: not till one is an adult, and there are limits on when and where one can partake.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

Someone who isn't me has been smoking it nearly every day for the past couple years straight. Let me say that its dangers depends heavily on the person using it. Is it addictive? Yes. Addictive in the same way that you can be addicted to videogames, music, movies, or entertainment in general. Chemically it isn't addictive in the least. I don't consider it too expensive of a drug either. You could be considered a heavy user and spend no more than $40 a week, an amount that many people often exceed on a week's worth of morning coffee. I've always thought that inhaling anything other than air is not good for your lungs, but new studies have indicated that its effects are negligible (or even beneficial).

From what I can now see, the most dangerous thing about it is that it's illegal.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#182 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]

Someone who isn't me has been smoking it nearly every day for the past couple years straight. Let me say that its dangers depends heavily on the person using it. Is it addictive? Yes. Addictive in the same way that you can be addicted to videogames, music, movies, or entertainment in general. Chemically it isn't addictive in the least. I don't consider it too expensive of a drug either. You could be considered a heavy user and spend no more than $40 a week, an amount that many people often exceed on a week's worth of morning coffee. I've always thought that inhaling anything other than air is not good for your lungs, but new studies have indicated that its effects are negligible (or even beneficial).

From what I can now see, the most dangerous thing about it is that it's illegal.

I agree with this post. The problem is when it's combined with rolling papers, not the drug itself. If you use glass pipes, bubblers, bongs, or hookas, it's fine. There's also vaporizers if you want to use those and even cellulose papers.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#183 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]

Someone who isn't me has been smoking it nearly every day for the past couple years straight. Let me say that its dangers depends heavily on the person using it. Is it addictive? Yes. Addictive in the same way that you can be addicted to videogames, music, movies, or entertainment in general. Chemically it isn't addictive in the least. I don't consider it too expensive of a drug either. You could be considered a heavy user and spend no more than $40 a week, an amount that many people often exceed on a week's worth of morning coffee. I've always thought that inhaling anything other than air is not good for your lungs, but new studies have indicated that its effects are negligible (or even beneficial).

From what I can now see, the most dangerous thing about it is that it's illegal.

I agree with this post. The problem is when it's combined with rolling papers, not the drug itself. If you use glass pipes, bubblers, bongs, or hookas, it's fine. There's also vaporizers if you want to use those and even cellulose papers.

I completely forgot about vaporizers, cutting out the arguable "most dangerous" aspect of the whole thing. They aren't cheap though! :P
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#184 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"][QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]

Someone who isn't me has been smoking it nearly every day for the past couple years straight. Let me say that its dangers depends heavily on the person using it. Is it addictive? Yes. Addictive in the same way that you can be addicted to videogames, music, movies, or entertainment in general. Chemically it isn't addictive in the least. I don't consider it too expensive of a drug either. You could be considered a heavy user and spend no more than $40 a week, an amount that many people often exceed on a week's worth of morning coffee. I've always thought that inhaling anything other than air is not good for your lungs, but new studies have indicated that its effects are negligible (or even beneficial).

From what I can now see, the most dangerous thing about it is that it's illegal.

I agree with this post. The problem is when it's combined with rolling papers, not the drug itself. If you use glass pipes, bubblers, bongs, or hookas, it's fine. There's also vaporizers if you want to use those and even cellulose papers.

I completely forgot about vaporizers, cutting out the arguable "most dangerous" aspect of the whole thing. They aren't cheap though! :P

Never had one. I heard they can be expensive.
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#185 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
I dunno, I know a few guys who are over 50 and have smoked weed every day, all day since they were 8 years old. They now have to brain cells to speak of and have trouble even forming a coherent thought.
Avatar image for darthkaiser
Darthkaiser

12447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#186 Darthkaiser
Member since 2006 • 12447 Posts
and have trouble even forming a coherent thought.Allicrombie
Even when they're not on other galaxies?
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#187 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
I dunno, I know a few guys who are over 50 and have smoked weed every day, all day since they were 8 years old. They now have to brain cells to speak of and have trouble even forming a coherent thought.Allicrombie
50? 2012-50=1960s They must have done a lot more than that. Then again, starting at 8 probably didn't help anything.
Avatar image for Spitfirer
Spitfirer

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Spitfirer
Member since 2007 • 2088 Posts

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#189 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

Spitfirer
We just went over this.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#190 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
I dunno, I know a few guys who are over 50 and have smoked weed every day, all day since they were 8 years old. They now have to brain cells to speak of and have trouble even forming a coherent thought.Allicrombie
Kind of like the trouble you're having forming a correct sentence? :P I kid, I kid.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#191 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

Spitfirer
Where did you read this good sir?
Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

I dunno, I know a few guys who are over 50 and have smoked weed every day, all day since they were 8 years old. They now have to brain cells to speak of and have trouble even forming a coherent thought.Allicrombie
uhhh i think the problem is that they started smoking when they were 8 (if that is even true, you could be lying about that). if someone starts smoking when they're 8, of course they're going to be f*cked up

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

Spitfirer

but you see, what you fail to realize is that people who smoke, don't really give a sh*t if it's unhealthy, or else they wouldn't be smoking

Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#194 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts

I mean compared to cigarretes and alcohol? I think cigarettes and alcohol is maybe worse or something?

themajormayor

You ended your post with "or something". So you lose.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#195 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
[QUOTE="needled24-7"]

[QUOTE="Spitfirer"]

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

but you see, what you fail to realize is that people who smoke, don't really give a sh*t if it's unhealthy, or else they wouldn't be smoking

Not really. I knew people who did care. They liked smoking, they just didn't want the bad stuff with it.
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#196 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
[QUOTE="Allicrombie"]I dunno, I know a few guys who are over 50 and have smoked weed every day, all day since they were 8 years old. They now have to brain cells to speak of and have trouble even forming a coherent thought.KHAndAnime
Kind of like the trouble you're having forming a correct sentence? :P I kid, I kid.

ha, damn. I gotta stop sniffing paint.
Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

[QUOTE="needled24-7"]

[QUOTE="Spitfirer"]

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

BranKetra

but you see, what you fail to realize is that people who smoke, don't really give a sh*t if it's unhealthy, or else they wouldn't be smoking

Not really. I knew people who did care. They liked smoking, they just didn't want the bad stuff with it.

ah, well most of the people i know that smoke weed don't worry about the health effects :P just like to get high. but who could blame them? not me

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#198 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Never had one. I heard they can be expensive.BranKetra
They start at $100 (for portable ones) and the good ones usually go for $250-300. It is definitely not the kind of an investment a casual smoker would make, but would be worth it in the long run (a lot of people pay that much for an elaborate bong).
Avatar image for Spitfirer
Spitfirer

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 Spitfirer
Member since 2007 • 2088 Posts

[QUOTE="Spitfirer"] Where did you read this good sir?KHAndAnime

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2419713.stm

In addition:

The average heart rate increases from 20 - 100% for three hours after use, inceasing risk of a heart attack dramatically. (http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/infofacts/marijuana)

Then there's anxiety, paranioa and schitzophrenia. It is known to cause panic attacks and induce the latter. There are many nonpro-marijuana sites that can confirm this.

And those who claim it's not addictive are godawfully mindnumbingly stupid.

[QUOTE="Spitfirer"]

Apparently, smoking three joints of pure weed a day is equivalent to smoking twenty cigarettes on your lungs. I'd say the cancer risk is fairly potent.

needled24-7

but you see, what you fail to realize is that people who smoke, don't really give a sh*t if it's unhealthy, or else they wouldn't be smoking

No, I don't fail to realise that. I was just making a point on topic i.e. discussing the dangers of weed, not those who smoke it.

Duh.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

No, I don't fail to realise that. I was just making a point on topic i.e. discussing the dangers of weed, not those who smoke it.

Duh.

Spitfirer

fair enough then :)