They can still have some Hard Labor though, maybe 5-10 years. Snipes_2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bfe/78bfe21516a74a897e7357097de399f70461fe02" alt=""
Not something I want to do...
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="taj7575"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"] Who said they get any food? ;) Hard Labor would work, Prison is not a pretty thing. I don't think they would want to come back after staying there with Hard Labor. Snipes_2
You can't torture prisoners and keep them away from food. This isn't China. We must be living in different countries..
Lol, I was joking about the food. That's why I put a emote next to it :P They can still have some Hard Labor though, maybe 5-10 years.Thats too much, and again, not worth it. If we put every illegal in jail, our jails would overpopulate and it's a waste of time.
Lol, I was joking about the food. That's why I put a emote next to it :P They can still have some Hard Labor though, maybe 5-10 years.[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="taj7575"]
You can't torture prisoners and keep them away from food. This isn't China. We must be living in different countries..
taj7575
Thats too much, and again, not worth it. If we put every illegal in jail, our jails would overpopulate and it's a waste of time.
Not in my opinion.@ #1) The child has the right to be an American citizen because he/she was born in the USA. When my brother was born neither one of my parents were US citizens but they were legal citizens. Now they have dual citizenship from Portugal and USA.
EDIT: I agree with #2
So what....illegal is illegal. If someone poor stole your car and all your money would you be fine with it?LJS9502_basicI wouldn't be ok with it, but i wouldn't agree with them being sent to a hard labor camp for ten years over my frickin' car.
My position is that it should not be illegal in the first place, so what sense would it make for me to want a harsher punishment? I think that if the process of being granted citizenship was made easier, then actually it would be easier to weed out the serious criminals also, since they'd presumably be the only ones trying to SNEAK in.StopThePressesSociety has a right to make laws regarding how one behaves in said society. If you don't wish to follow them....find another place where you like the laws or is uninhabited. But you cannot drain society just because you want to do so. Citzenship isn't easier because the country cannot sustain unlimited growth. Unless you wish to backslide into a third world country.
If you don't wish to follow them....find another place where you like the laws...LJS9502_basicUh...what if they don't grant me citizenship? :lol:
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] If you don't wish to follow them....find another place where you like the laws...StopThePressesUh...what if they don't grant me citizenship? :lol:Hence the uninhabited portion of my response which you cut out.....;)
Society has a right to make laws regarding how one behaves in said society. If you don't wish to follow them....find another place where you like the laws or is uninhabited. But you cannot drain society just because you want to do so. Citzenship isn't easier because the country cannot sustain unlimited growth. Unless you wish to backslide into a third world country. If this where the way the world actually worked we wouldn't bother electing representatives to our legislature and we wouldn't bother having ombudsmen. People can absolutely disagree with the law. That's why we have elections.[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]My position is that it should not be illegal in the first place, so what sense would it make for me to want a harsher punishment? I think that if the process of being granted citizenship was made easier, then actually it would be easier to weed out the serious criminals also, since they'd presumably be the only ones trying to SNEAK in.LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] If you don't wish to follow them....find another place where you like the laws...LJS9502_basicUh...what if they don't grant me citizenship? :lol:Hence the uninhabited portion of my response which you cut out.....;) Obviously I don't want to live somewhere uninhabited. What is left that is uninhabited anyway? Just some tiny crappy islands.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Society has a right to make laws regarding how one behaves in said society. If you don't wish to follow them....find another place where you like the laws or is uninhabited. But you cannot drain society just because you want to do so. Citzenship isn't easier because the country cannot sustain unlimited growth. Unless you wish to backslide into a third world country. If this where the way the world actually worked we wouldn't bother electing representatives to our legislature and we wouldn't bother having ombudsmen. People can absolutely disagree with the law. That's why we have elections. That too.[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]My position is that it should not be illegal in the first place, so what sense would it make for me to want a harsher punishment? I think that if the process of being granted citizenship was made easier, then actually it would be easier to weed out the serious criminals also, since they'd presumably be the only ones trying to SNEAK in.Ninja-Hippo
So you want the benefits of society but don't want to follow their rules as how to run said society? Seems a double standard TBH....LJS9502_basicIf the government tomorrow decided that anyone who listens to the Cure should be fined $10 per minute of Cure records listened to, would you pack your stuff up and move to another country or continue listening to the Cure and take to these very boards to complain at how unfair and unreasonable a law that is?
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Hence the uninhabited portion of my response which you cut out.....;)LJS9502_basicObviously I don't want to live somewhere uninhabited. What is left that is uninhabited anyway? Just some tiny crappy islands.So you want the benefits of society but don't want to follow their rules as how to run said society? Seems a double standard TBH.... How is saying that I think a law should be changed a "double standard"? Was it a double standard when people protested for the right of women to vote? Just because you don't agree with me does not make it a double standard.
[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]So you want the benefits of society but don't want to follow their rules as how to run said society? Seems a double standard TBH....LJS9502_basicHow is saying that I think a law should be changed a "double standard"? Was it a double standard when people protested for the right of women to vote? Just because you don't agree with me does not make it a double standard. Changing the law is a detriment to society. You have to provide for the citizens first....and allow for proper immigration which doesn't tip the balance. You are basically advocating anyone who wants to live in any country should have that right.....but that does drain society. Drains society how? If someone moves out of the country, does that boost society?
meh, its hypocritical to say we need to get rid of all illegal immigrants when this country was founded on it. i dont people realize how hard people in mexico have it and most dont have the money to get over here legally. who am i to deny someone trying to make a better life for themselves?mems_1224You are incorrect sir. The country was founded by LEGAL immigrants. I don't understand why so many people can't distinguish between legal immigrants and illegal aliens.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]meh, its hypocritical to say we need to get rid of all illegal immigrants when this country was founded on it. i dont people realize how hard people in mexico have it and most dont have the money to get over here legally. who am i to deny someone trying to make a better life for themselves?UT_WrestlerYou are incorrect sir. The country was founded by LEGAL immigrants. I don't understand why so many people can't distinguish between legal immigrants and illegal aliens. Legal immigrants? The Europeans straight up deeboed the land from the native americans :lol:
[QUOTE="UT_Wrestler"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]meh, its hypocritical to say we need to get rid of all illegal immigrants when this country was founded on it. i dont people realize how hard people in mexico have it and most dont have the money to get over here legally. who am i to deny someone trying to make a better life for themselves?fat_robYou are incorrect sir. The country was founded by LEGAL immigrants. I don't understand why so many people can't distinguish between legal immigrants and illegal aliens. Legal immigrants? The Europeans straight up deeboed the land from the native americans :lol: The US wasn't even a country at that time, there was no centralized government and no such thing as a legal or illegal immigrant. I was referring to post-revolutionary war America.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="UT_Wrestler"] You are incorrect sir. The country was founded by LEGAL immigrants. I don't understand why so many people can't distinguish between legal immigrants and illegal aliens.UT_WrestlerLegal immigrants? The Europeans straight up deeboed the land from the native americans :lol: The US wasn't even a country at that time, there was no centralized government and no such thing as a legal or illegal immigrant. I was referring to post-revolutionary war America. So you don't think the native americans had a system to govern bringing new people into the community? laff Just cause the system of government was NOTHING like ours does not mean that there was no system of laws or rules. Not to mention the agreements the Europeans entered into with the native americans, and then proceeded to violate. lol if there was an arbitration around during that time, we'd have lost big time.
Any prosperity that a country enjoys has been obtained through past and existing citizens. Therefore current citizens should be able to decide what standards should be applied to people wishing to enter their country and benefit from that prosperity. The only way to accomplish this, in my opinion, is through closely guarded physical barriers and strict pathways to citizenship.
man . . . that's kinda libertarian of you . . .Any prosperity that a country enjoys has been obtained through past and existing citizens. Therefore current citizens should be able to decide what standards should be applied to people wishing to enter their country and benefit from that prosperity. The only way to accomplish this, in my opinion, is through closely guarded physical barriers and strict pathways to citizenship.
espoac
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]So you don't think the native americans had a system to govern bringing new people into the community?AHUGECAT
Did they?
Yes. Regardless, the Native Americans were, at the very least, sovereign governments/countries. The euros were trespassing and violating sovereignty by merely being on the land without the native americans permission.[QUOTE="UT_Wrestler"]As cool as that sounds, there's 2 problems. 1. That would cost hundreds of billions of dollars, 2. it does nothing about the ones that are already hereairshocker
The Border Patrol isn't doing the job assigned to them. They don't have enough personnel, and they don't have the equipment. Making a separate branch of the military will solve all of that. I'd much rather them spend the billions on this than the billions on broken legislation.
We can use your options for the ones that are already here.
I don't know what You're talking about. Border control is awesome the way it is.[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]So you don't think the native americans had a system to govern bringing new people into the community?fat_rob
Did they?
Yes. Regardless, the Native Americans were, at the very least, sovereign governments/countries. The euros were trespassing and violating sovereignty by merely being on the land without the native americans permission.Lets not forget the annexation of Texas, which was part of Mexico, fill the state with Americans and get them to declare sovereignty.
Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Annexation
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I'd go for deportation rather than jail which is a further drain on taxpayers....LJS9502_basicI don't think Deportation is a deterrence though. They can just come right back. Which is why I called for the businesses to be punished and border patrol tightened up. If we have to build a Berlin wall down there...then so be it. Yeah, Doubt that will happen under Obama though.
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Here's how you end the illegal immigration problem; open borders.-Sun_Tzu-No. Just no. Worst idea ever. Reason being? Well it is step one to killing a country.....
I have an even simpler plan. Create a new branch of the military called the Border Guard. Give them two bases along the border in Texas, one in AZ, one in NM, and one in CA. Use airborne personnel as response forces, and ground vehicle-borne personnel as patrols. And the major thing...use a USAF predator drone detachment for every base.
Our border would be secure in no time.
As cool as that sounds, there's 2 problems. 1. That would cost hundreds of billions of dollars, 2. it does nothing about the ones that are already here 3. No one wants to clean up dead bodies...Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment