Iran threatens USA

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#151 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

imaps3fanboy

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#152 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

WitIsWisdom

Unless a serious war where a serious evil is in this world and a serious war is occuring, Canada, Germany, Poland, South Korea, and Pakistan may just give us supplies and send a few troops.

India has always had military ties with the Soviet Union, and now Russia. Many of their military supplies are Russian. Besides, I don't think India would jump in, unless China really did something.

I can see the UK and Israel really jumping in with us.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

WitIsWisdom

Canada- Nope, we are a peacekeeping army. Thats why we refused to into Iraq.

UK-Maybe, if it broke out into a world war, i bet the EU would dodge this bullet

Germany- do you really want the germans to get excited with their guns again?!

Japan- Has no Army due to WW2 restrictions

France- no way in hell

Poland- might send supplys, but won't fight

South Korea- No, they wouldn't risk weakening their border with North Korea to fight in a place they have no interest in

India- most likley will attack pakistan than help you

Pakistan- most liley will attack India than help you

Please, go on.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#154 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

imaps3fanboy

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

Don't undersetimate India's military. They are very strong and well trained. They have the third biggest military in size too.

Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

SgtKevali

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Yeah, but he is saying it like they are going to be a massive help, when in fact, they would have very little impact, unless they gave us aid.

edit: Excluding India. They are powerful.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Thats for peace keeping reasons only.
Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

taj7575

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

Don't undersetimate India's military. They are very strong and well trained. They have the third biggest military in size too.

I don't know if they would help us or not though.
Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#158 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!lordreaven

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Thats for peace keeping reasons only.

So?

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#159 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

Canada- Nope, we are a peacekeeping army. Thats why we refused to into Iraq.

UK-Maybe, if it broke out into a world war, i bet the EU would dodge this bullet

Germany- do you really want the germans to get excited with their guns again?!

Japan- Has no Army due to WW2 restrictions

France- no way in hell

Poland- might send supplys, but won't fight

South Korea- No, they wouldn't risk weakening their border with North Korea to fight in a place they have no interest in

India- most likley will attack pakistan than help you

Pakistan- most liley will attack India than help you

Please, go on.

lordreaven

Hmmm...I guess you've never heard of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, of which Canada is a member. If the US is attacked, Canada, like most of the European Union, is obliged to come to our aid. It's a treaty obligation, you know.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!imaps3fanboy

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Yeah, but he is saying it like they are going to be a massive help, when in fact, they would have very little impact, unless they gave us aid.

All they would do is give you supplies, but no military help.
Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#161 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!imaps3fanboy

Don't undersetimate India's military. They are very strong and well trained. They have the third biggest military in size too.

I don't know if they would help us or not though.

They won't. That's not to say they will help the other side either. They wouldn't be on either side.

Avatar image for Dylan_11
Dylan_11

11296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Dylan_11
Member since 2005 • 11296 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!imaps3fanboy

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Yeah, but he is saying it like they are going to be a massive help, when in fact, they would have very little impact, unless they gave us aid.

edit: Excluding India. They are powerful.

They would have very little impact because.....?
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="dkrustyklown"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Canada- Nope, we are a peacekeeping army. Thats why we refused to into Iraq.

UK-Maybe, if it broke out into a world war, i bet the EU would dodge this bullet

Germany- do you really want the germans to get excited with their guns again?!

Japan- Has no Army due to WW2 restrictions

France- no way in hell

Poland- might send supplys, but won't fight

South Korea- No, they wouldn't risk weakening their border with North Korea to fight in a place they have no interest in

India- most likley will attack pakistan than help you

Pakistan- most liley will attack India than help you

Please, go on.

Hmmm...I guess you've never heard of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, of which Canada is a member. If the US is attacked, Canada, like most of the European Union, is obliged to come to our aid. It's a treaty obligation, you know.

I know of the treaty, but Since this scenario involves the US attacking Iran, the treaty becomes void. And i'm pretty sure most european countrys would rather sit it out than fight again.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#164 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="Bluestorm-Kalas"]I think that if you American's end up getting yourself nuked, you better not let it cross the northern border into Canada. I like my life, and I'm only 15 miles out of the border.UserBane

They only have 20% or so enriched uranium, they aren't even close

Besides wat do you Canadians have to lose? Meese?

That, all of our prized beavers, and our thousands of pounds of weed.
Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

10459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#165 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 10459 Posts

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

imaps3fanboy

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

You must not know a whole lot about history of warfare or military strengths huh? Oh, and I figured you would have said Japan before mentioning any of the others seeing as though we hold the power to reinact military power in Japan anytime we wish. All the other countries I listed add numbers, and many of the countries I listed have special forces and training that the countries you think are so powerful counldnt even imagine. Canada has some of the highest trained special forces in the world. India and Pakistan add another important aspect numbers. Do you even know anything about Poland or South Korea? France also has a formidable force even though they always mange to get their ass kicked. Oh, and on another note Russia would probably side with the US if WW3 broke out, not Iran.

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#166 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

What else is new? I don't think they're actually stupid or crazy enough to try a direct assault on the US. They wouldn't last long.

Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts
[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"]

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

You do know that there are brave Canadian, Polish, and French soldiers helping out in Afghanistan.

Dylan_11

Yeah, but he is saying it like they are going to be a massive help, when in fact, they would have very little impact, unless they gave us aid.

edit: Excluding India. They are powerful.

They would have very little impact because.....?

All of those countries, except india, are small, meaning their military's would probably not have a whole lot of people.
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

I know of the treaty, but Since this scenario involves the US attacking Iran, the treaty becomes void. And i'm pretty sure most european countrys would rather sit it out than fight again.lordreaven

Oh, well that makes a little more sense, but I was under the impression that the scenario involved Iran attacking the US. I didn't realize that there was a side conversation.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

If push came to shove we would have help from a lot of other countries including Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, France, Poland, South Korea, India, Pakistan... should I go on?

Canada?! France?! Poland?! India?! Pakistan?! Are you kidding me?!

You must not know a whole lot about history of warfare or military strengths huh? Oh, and I figured you would have said Japan before mentioning any of the others seeing as though we hold the power to reinact military power in Japan anytime we wish. All the other countries I listed add numbers, and many of the countries I listed have special forces and training that the countries you think are so powerful counldnt even imagine. Canada has some of the highest trained special forces in the world. India and Pakistan add another important aspect numbers. Do you even know anything about Poland or South Korea? France also has a formidable force even though they always mange to get their ass kicked. Oh, and on another note Russia would probably side with the US if WW3 broke out, not Iran.

As you sated with the NATO treaty, Russia and Iran have one with eachother too, whcih is binding as well. but its only for defensive purposes, as with the NATO treaty.
Avatar image for Dylan_11
Dylan_11

11296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Dylan_11
Member since 2005 • 11296 Posts

[QUOTE="Dylan_11"][QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] Yeah, but he is saying it like they are going to be a massive help, when in fact, they would have very little impact, unless they gave us aid.

edit: Excluding India. They are powerful.

imaps3fanboy

They would have very little impact because.....?

All of those countries, except india, are small, meaning their military's would probably not have a whole lot of people.

Quality over quantity.

Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="Dylan_11"]They would have very little impact because.....?Dylan_11

All of those countries, except india, are small, meaning their military's would probably not have a whole lot of people.

Quality over quantity.

Point taken.
Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

10459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#172 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 10459 Posts

If a war of that magnitude broke out many treaties would be broken. So, all of you flag burning hippies can run for the borders if it comes down to it. Oh, and after the dust settles and the US is still standing keep you asses where you ran off to. Oh, and whoever said anything about the US attacking Iran first? Like the Government cant cover that crap up... lol. Do you really think Canada wouldnt be onboard with the US if **** hit the fan and the US got attacked? LOL you guys crack me up...

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] I know of the treaty, but Since this scenario involves the US attacking Iran, the treaty becomes void. And i'm pretty sure most european countrys would rather sit it out than fight again.dkrustyklown

Oh, well that makes a little more sense, but I was under the impression that the scenario involved Iran attacking the US. I didn't realize that there was a side conversation.

Nope, Iran threatend retaliation if attacked. And if Iran is attacked, russias treaty with Iran activates and automaticly declares war with whoever attcked them. And if was the US attacking first, the nato treaty becomes void even if russia joins. As teh US is considered the attacker.
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

All of those countries, except india, are small, meaning their military's would probably not have a whole lot of people.imaps3fanboy

Why do you say that France is small? It's a country of 62 million people with an advanced military. I wouldn't regard France as "small".

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

I can't believe this has reached 9 pages. Iran threatens us and other powers all the time. This isn't exactly major news.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

If a war of that magnitude broke out many treaties would be broken. So, all of you flag burning hippies can run for the borders if it comes down to it. Oh, and after the dust settles and the US is still standing keep you asses where you ran off to. Oh, and whoever said anything about the US attacking Iran first? Like the Government cant cover that crap up... lol. Do you really think Canada wouldnt be onboard with the US if **** hit the fan and the US got attacked? LOL you guys crack me up...

WitIsWisdom
The article staes Iran would retaliate if attacked, not go on the offensive. Please read OP.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

I can't believe this has reached 9 pages. Iran threatens us and other powers all the time. This isn't exactly major news.

Pirate700
Very true. The only reason i joined the topic was to remind what would happen if the US went on the offensive, or if Israel went of the offensive.
Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] All of those countries, except india, are small, meaning their military's would probably not have a whole lot of people.dkrustyklown

Why do you say that France is small? It's a country of 62 million people with an advanced military. I wouldn't regard France as "small".

They won't fight a war with us though, I shouldn't of said that they are small, my bad.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I can't believe this has reached 9 pages. Iran threatens us and other powers all the time. This isn't exactly major news.

lordreaven

Very true. The only reason i joined the topic was to remind what would happen if the US went on the offensive, or if Israel went of the offensive.

What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I can't believe this has reached 9 pages. Iran threatens us and other powers all the time. This isn't exactly major news.

Very true. The only reason i joined the topic was to remind what would happen if the US went on the offensive, or if Israel went of the offensive.

What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

That is true as iran had no treatys 10 years ago and would have been ocupied very quickly. However since they have that treaty with russia they are obviosly trying to get irsaerl to attack them to pull russia into the fight. Clever little buggers, eh?
Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#181 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]

I can't believe this has reached 9 pages. Iran threatens us and other powers all the time. This isn't exactly major news.

Pirate700

Very true. The only reason i joined the topic was to remind what would happen if the US went on the offensive, or if Israel went of the offensive.

What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

They shouldn't be kissing our butts. Look to the past of Iran; we screwed them over. Now it's worse that they have Israel to worry about.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] Very true. The only reason i joined the topic was to remind what would happen if the US went on the offensive, or if Israel went of the offensive.taj7575

What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

They shouldn't be kissing our butts. Look to the past of Iran; we screwed them over. Now it's worse that they have Israel to worry about.

Yes they should be. If we are the reason they are still around you bet they should.

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#183 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

Nope, Iran threatend retaliation if attacked. And if Iran is attacked, russias treaty with Iran activates and automaticly declares war with whoever attcked them. And if was the US attacking first, the nato treaty becomes void even if russia joins. As teh US is considered the attacker.lordreaven

Well, I don't think that the US would attack Iran first. However, lets just say that the US wanted to attack Iran. I imagine that before doing so, the US would try to get its ducks in a row by convincing the Russians and Chinese to void any mutual protection agreements with Iran. It would take some incentives, but would be possible. Sure, China buys a lot of oil from Iran, and they would hate to lose out on that, but they also know that they can continue purchasing oil from other sources. Without its own domestic source of oil, China is at the mercy of the sea lanes, which the US navy could effectively shut down. China's economy still depends heavily on the US consumer market. China would have to weigh several costs. On the one hand, they can come to Iran's defense, which would mean they would lose access to practically all of the world's oil (no pipelines going into China) and they would lose access to the US market. On the other hand, they can sacrifice Iran and buy oil from other sources while continuing to export to the US. I don't think that it is a difficult decision from a Chinese perspective.

Russia would be the tough one to convince. Russia has plenty of oil and would need a hefty incentive (although the mere fact that an attack on Iran would shut down the trade in neareastern oil might be enough, since the price of crude would skyrocket and Russia would have much to gain from such an event).

I think that it all comes down to just how committed the Russians and Chinese are to Iran. Are they willing to fight WW3 for Iran? I don't think that they are.

Avatar image for Lockedge
Lockedge

16765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 Lockedge
Member since 2002 • 16765 Posts

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

Pirate700

They shouldn't be kissing our butts. Look to the past of Iran; we screwed them over. Now it's worse that they have Israel to worry about.

Yes they should be. If we are the reason they are still around you bet they should.

They would only be that reason because the US screwed them over and got them on the path to where they are now. Otherwise they likely would have been something of an ally, with a fully functional democracy and secular laws.
Avatar image for Osaka-06
Osaka-06

781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Osaka-06
Member since 2010 • 781 Posts

I don't know what to make of this whole Iran vs. the US feud. I mean, the Americans are always acting arrogant and cocky when someone threatens them, but when the **** hits the fan and they get bombed (9/11 for starters), they whine for ages.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#186 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

Pirate700

They shouldn't be kissing our butts. Look to the past of Iran; we screwed them over. Now it's worse that they have Israel to worry about.

Yes they should be. If we are the reason they are still around you bet they should.

We shouldnt even be in this situation with Iran in the first place, and the fact that Israel even considers this, considering Iran is as much of a threat as a fly shows you really shows you how nice these countries' are eh? Again, I hate defending Iran, but they are the ones getting screwed over here.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#187 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

I don't know what to make of this whole Iran vs. the US feud. I mean, the Americans are always acting arrogant and cocky when someone threatens them, but when the **** hits the fan and they get bombed (9/11 for starters), they whine for ages.

Osaka-06

....What do you mean?

Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts

I don't know what to make of this whole Iran vs. the US feud. I mean, the Americans are always acting arrogant and cocky when someone threatens them, but when the **** hits the fan and they get bombed (9/11 for starters), they whine for ages.

Osaka-06

So many things wrong. First of all we didn't get bombed in 9/11 Lol.. 2nd of all we didn't whine about it. 3rd of all. Us and the U.N are constantly trying to get a treaty or whatnot signed with Iran. We are not cocky and arrogant, and next time give examples.

Avatar image for Osaka-06
Osaka-06

781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Osaka-06
Member since 2010 • 781 Posts
[QUOTE="Osaka-06"]

I don't know what to make of this whole Iran vs. the US feud. I mean, the Americans are always acting arrogant and cocky when someone threatens them, but when the **** hits the fan and they get bombed (9/11 for starters), they whine for ages.

imaps3fanboy
So many things wrong. First of all we didn't get bombed in 9/11 Lol.. 2nd of all we didn't whine about it. 3rd of all. Us and the U.N are constantly trying to get a treaty or whatnot signed with Iran. We are not cocky and arrogant, and next give examples.

Bombed...attacked. Call it what you want. Ehm, yes you did...really bad. And all I have to do is to look in this thread for the attitude I mentioned. Yo ucan see several examples of this on the first page. I wouldn't normally consider that valid examples of America's attitude if it wasn't for the fact that every single American I've met in real life have had the exact same opinion and cocky attitude in regards to Iran, North Korea and other suchs problems.
Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#190 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="Osaka-06"]

I don't know what to make of this whole Iran vs. the US feud. I mean, the Americans are always acting arrogant and cocky when someone threatens them, but when the **** hits the fan and they get bombed (9/11 for starters), they whine for ages.

Osaka-06

So many things wrong. First of all we didn't get bombed in 9/11 Lol.. 2nd of all we didn't whine about it. 3rd of all. Us and the U.N are constantly trying to get a treaty or whatnot signed with Iran. We are not cocky and arrogant, and next give examples.

Bombed...attacked. Call it what you want. Ehm, yes you did...really bad. And all I have to do is to look in this thread for the attitude I mentioned. Yo ucan see several examples of this on the first page. I wouldn't normally consider that valid examples of America's attitude if it wasn't for the fact that every single American I've met in real life have had the exact same opinion and cocky attitude in regards to Iran, North Korea and other suchs problems.

Of course we, as you say, "whined" about it...Our country got attacked. What did you want us to do? "Oh gee, two of the biggest buildings in the world were taken down in once of the biggest cities in the world, lets just forget about it..". 9/11 was not a joke. Go watch some videos, maybe you'll learn a bit about what happened and how big the situation actually was..

Yes, some Americans are ignorant about other countries. This thread shows a big part of it. But the fact is you will find that in every country. Saying all Americans ignorant is pathetic and completely wrong. The problem with some Americans is that they don't look to the past, or are just completely ignorant to some areas that they don't get along with. That happens with every country, especially when it's a country we are known not to get along with...Some people will just naturally have a bad opinion.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] Nope, Iran threatend retaliation if attacked. And if Iran is attacked, russias treaty with Iran activates and automaticly declares war with whoever attcked them. And if was the US attacking first, the nato treaty becomes void even if russia joins. As teh US is considered the attacker.dkrustyklown

Well, I don't think that the US would attack Iran first. However, lets just say that the US wanted to attack Iran. I imagine that before doing so, the US would try to get its ducks in a row by convincing the Russians and Chinese to void any mutual protection agreements with Iran. It would take some incentives, but would be possible. Sure, China buys a lot of oil from Iran, and they would hate to lose out on that, but they also know that they can continue purchasing oil from other sources. Without its own domestic source of oil, China is at the mercy of the sea lanes, which the US navy could effectively shut down. China's economy still depends heavily on the US consumer market. China would have to weigh several costs. On the one hand, they can come to Iran's defense, which would mean they would lose access to practically all of the world's oil (no pipelines going into China) and they would lose access to the US market. On the other hand, they can sacrifice Iran and buy oil from other sources while continuing to export to the US. I don't think that it is a difficult decision from a Chinese perspective.

Russia would be the tough one to convince. Russia has plenty of oil and would need a hefty incentive (although the mere fact that an attack on Iran would shut down the trade in neareastern oil might be enough, since the price of crude would skyrocket and Russia would have much to gain from such an event).

I think that it all comes down to just how committed the Russians and Chinese are to Iran. Are they willing to fight WW3 for Iran? I don't think that they are.

I agree, the US would be smart to try to make Russia (i'm not sure if China has a treaty) void the treaty by renweing it so there are effective loopholes that Russia would be able exploit, like only requiring X amount of supplies instead of Military force in which Russia could only send outadted equipment that would give them a prodit and avoid war. but it also depends if Russia would be willing to play ball and what would they recieve in return. China would be Tougher to convince cause they have a need for Iran (oil) and a Need for the US (consumer market and they are buying US debt), i suppose china could threaten the US of wanting them to pay their debt before they go to war (which would stop it in its tracks). Its very complicated with China.
Avatar image for Osaka-06
Osaka-06

781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 Osaka-06
Member since 2010 • 781 Posts

[QUOTE="Osaka-06"][QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] So many things wrong. First of all we didn't get bombed in 9/11 Lol.. 2nd of all we didn't whine about it. 3rd of all. Us and the U.N are constantly trying to get a treaty or whatnot signed with Iran. We are not cocky and arrogant, and next give examples. taj7575

Bombed...attacked. Call it what you want. Ehm, yes you did...really bad. And all I have to do is to look in this thread for the attitude I mentioned. Yo ucan see several examples of this on the first page. I wouldn't normally consider that valid examples of America's attitude if it wasn't for the fact that every single American I've met in real life have had the exact same opinion and cocky attitude in regards to Iran, North Korea and other suchs problems.

Of course we, as you say, "whined" about it...Our country got attacked. What did you want us to do? "Oh gee, two of the biggest buildings in the world were taken down in once of the biggest cities in the world, lets just forget about it..". 9/11 was not a joke. Go watch some videos, maybe you'll learn a bit about what happened and how big the occasion actually was..

Yes, some Americans are ignorant about other countries. This thread shows a big part of it. But the fact is you will find that in every country. Saying all Americans ignorant is pathetic and completely wrong. The problem with some Americans is that they don't look to the past, or are just completely ignorant to some areas that they don't get along with. That happens with every country, especially when it's a country we are known not to get along with...Some people will just naturally have a bad opinion.

That's not what I'm saying though. What I have a problem with is the act of saying "lol, bring it on" and "lol they can't do anything" and then whine when they actually manage to pull some crap off. This is EXACTLY what happened before 9/11. Bin Laden released a declaration of war on the US, and the Americans didn't take him seriously AT ALL, Bill Clinton even 't. had the chance of taking him out and didn't. I hate to say that "you're asking for it" because it doesn't describe the situation entierly, but I'm struggling to find a better phrase.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]What's ironic is Iran should be kissing our butts. We're the only reason Israel hasn't destroyed them a long time ago.

They shouldn't be kissing our butts. Look to the past of Iran; we screwed them over. Now it's worse that they have Israel to worry about.

Yes they should be. If we are the reason they are still around you bet they should.

I have to disagree there pirate. Iran is a Sovereign nation and dosn't need to suck up to nobody. Expecting them to suck up would be ignorant and foolish. However i acn gureenty one thing though. Iran would NEVER Nuke Israel, why? Becuase Israel holds some of Islams holyist places. Its foolish to believe a theocracy would would destroy their own holy places.
Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#194 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

[QUOTE="Osaka-06"] Bombed...attacked. Call it what you want. Ehm, yes you did...really bad. And all I have to do is to look in this thread for the attitude I mentioned. Yo ucan see several examples of this on the first page. I wouldn't normally consider that valid examples of America's attitude if it wasn't for the fact that every single American I've met in real life have had the exact same opinion and cocky attitude in regards to Iran, North Korea and other suchs problems.Osaka-06

Of course we, as you say, "whined" about it...Our country got attacked. What did you want us to do? "Oh gee, two of the biggest buildings in the world were taken down in once of the biggest cities in the world, lets just forget about it..". 9/11 was not a joke. Go watch some videos, maybe you'll learn a bit about what happened and how big the occasion actually was..

Yes, some Americans are ignorant about other countries. This thread shows a big part of it. But the fact is you will find that in every country. Saying all Americans ignorant is pathetic and completely wrong. The problem with some Americans is that they don't look to the past, or are just completely ignorant to some areas that they don't get along with. That happens with every country, especially when it's a country we are known not to get along with...Some people will just naturally have a bad opinion.

That's not what I'm saying though. What I have a problem with is the act of saying "lol, bring it on" and "lol they can't do anything" and then whine when they actually manage to pull some crap off. This is EXACTLY what happened before 9/11. Bin Laden released a declaration of war on the US, and the Americans didn't take him seriously AT ALL, Bill Clinton even 't. had the chance of taking him out and didn't. I hate to say that "you're asking for it" because it doesn't describe the situation entierly, but I'm struggling to find a better phrase.

Theres no doubt that we could've prevented this (We actually could've prevented this all the way back to the end of the Soviet Afghan war..We left the Mujahedin to do what they want), but to say that that day wasn't a big deal is wrong.

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#195 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

They shouldn't be kissing our butts. Look to the past of Iran; we screwed them over. Now it's worse that they have Israel to worry about.

lordreaven

Yes they should be. If we are the reason they are still around you bet they should.

I have to disagree there pirate. Iran is a Sovereign nation and dosn't need to suck up to nobody. Expecting them to suck up would be ignorant and foolish. However i acn gureenty one thing though. Iran would NEVER Nuke Israel, why? Becuase Israel holds some of Islams holyist places. Its foolish to believe a theocracy would would destroy their own holy places.

Iran would never nuke them anyway...In reality Iran is very scared of Isreal...And like I've said a million times, Israel is the threat to Iran.

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#196 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

Iran would NEVER Nuke Israel, why? Becuase Israel holds some of Islams holyist places. Its foolish to believe a theocracy would would destroy their own holy places.lordreaven

I don't know about that. Iran could opt for low to medium yield nukes focused on the coast near Tel Aviv. That could significantly reduce Israel's population while leaving the holy sites intact.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] Iran would NEVER Nuke Israel, why? Becuase Israel holds some of Islams holyist places. Its foolish to believe a theocracy would would destroy their own holy places.dkrustyklown

I don't know about that. Iran could opt for low to medium yield nukes focused on the coast near Tel Aviv. That could significantly reduce Israel's population while leaving the holy sites intact.

True, but a conventional army would be far more effective (as some of might know, i bekieve nukes are obsolete). And the shockwave would do structural damage to these building to seeing as they are using post roman designs. It all depends how it goes down as there are to many possibilites to comprehend.
Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#198 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

I think that if you American's end up getting yourself nuked, you better not let it cross the northern border into Canada. I like my life, and I'm only 15 miles out of the border.Bluestorm-Kalas

Duck and cover, dude. Did you know that at the time of my post, you're one away from 10,000 posts? Hopefull you'll get to have your post party before a haze of radioactive muck moves into your country from the south.

Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#200 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

Don't they have something else better to do?magicalclick

They're having some stability issues and lashing out against the West is just a way to attempt to distract the population from internal problems. I'm not sure if the people are falling for it. They lash out so often that everyone is growing numb to it.