Iranian woman will be whipped 99 times for being in a photo with no veil

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#151 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]North Koreans aren't perpetrating terrorist attacks all over the world, nor do they have a book that preaches the destruction of every human being less radical than Osama bin Laden.

Metal_Mario99

You have never read anything about Islam. What bin Laden fails to acknowledge is that both suicide and the murdering of innocents are explicitly illegal according to the Qur'an.

Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Quaran states that "whoever kills a person, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he had killed all men."

Verse 33 goes on to state that "the only punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is that they should be murdered".

Clearly the Quaran justifies murdering anybody who is against Allah and Muhammed (to Muslims, waging war means to draw an unflattering caricature of Muhammed). As for making mischief in the land? I shudder to think, but I'm sure that that particular caveat is being used right now to justify killing...well, anyone they want to, really.

Read verse 33 again, you missed the requirement about WAGING WAR.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Sajo7"] You have never read anything about Islam. What bin Laden fails to acknowledge is that both suicide and the murdering of innocents are explicitly illegal according to the Qur'an.

Sajo7

Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Quaran states that "whoever kills a person, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he had killed all men."

Verse 33 goes on to state that "the only punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is that they should be murdered".

Clearly the Quaran justifies murdering anybody who is against Allah and Muhammed (to Muslims, waging war means to draw an unflattering caricature of Muhammed). As for making mischief in the land? I shudder to think, but I'm sure that that particular caveat is being used right now to justify killing...well, anyone they want to, really.

Read verse 33 again, you missed the requirement about WAGING WAR.

Um...no, I addressed that. To Muslims, waging war doesn't necessarily mean raising a military and going off to fight a bloody battle on a big, wide open field. They consider "war" to be anything that puts Islam in a dubious light. The Danish cartoonists were at war with Islam, for example.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#153 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]North Koreans aren't perpetrating terrorist attacks all over the world, nor do they have a book that preaches the destruction of every human being less radical than Osama bin Laden.

Metal_Mario99

You have never read anything about Islam. What bin Laden fails to acknowledge is that both suicide and the murdering of innocents are explicitly illegal according to the Qur'an.

Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Quaran states that "whoever kills a person, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he had killed all men."

Verse 33 goes on to state that "the only punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is that they should be murdered".

Clearly the Quaran justifies murdering anybody who is against Allah and Muhammed (to Muslims, waging war means to draw an unflattering caricature of Muhammed). As for making mischief in the land? I shudder to think, but I'm sure that that particular caveat is being used right now to justify killing...well, anyone they want to, really.

As for that verse, mischief is a bad translation. It's more like wickedness, such as forcing people out of their homes and harming others. The death penalty is voluntary, anyway. Waging war does not mean drawing pictures. It means what it looks like. There is no difference of opinion here.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#154 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"][QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

At least you admit they're on a level you have to stoop to.

Metal_Mario99

We are talking about Islam, not Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Saudia Arabia and Iran are the way they are because of Islam.

Just out of curiosity, what would YOU do about Islam? Whats your plan? You obviously think it's evil so what do you think should be done?

Avatar image for MattDistillery
MattDistillery

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#155 MattDistillery
Member since 2010 • 969 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] Maybe, but it's still the truth. We can use as many words as we want, but in the end, we need to improve ourselves before we can improve Islam's image. Actions speak louder than words.Metal_Mario99

The fools of your religion can be seen in every other belief or ethos, Muslim news stories just sell more.

Oh, absolutely. Just the other day I heard about a bunch of Christians who blew up three thousand people in London, and I wondered to myself, "Why isn't this getting any attention?"

Well in Northern Ireland more people died in 'the troubles' than were killed in 9/11 and the thing was funded to a large extend by American Catholics.......

Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#156 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]Read verse 33 again, you missed the requirement about WAGING WAR.Metal_Mario99

Um...no, I addressed that. To Muslims, waging war doesn't necessarily mean raising a military and going off to fight a bloody battle on a big, wide open field. They consider "war" to be anything that puts Islam in a dubious light. The Danish caroonists were at war with Islam, for example.

An expert on Muslim culture eh? Sounds like a really bad excuse for extremists.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Sajo7"] We are talking about Islam, not Saudi Arabia and Iran.Pixel-Pirate

Saudia Arabia and Iran are the way they are because of Islam.

Just out of curiosity, what would YOU do about Islam? Whats your plan? You obviously think it's evil so what do you think should be done?

The only thing that could be done would be to annihilate them. But since I'm not a Muslim, I don't believe in the annihilation of entire groups of people. Because I'm a tolerant Westerner who doesn't desire mass slaughter as the answer to something.

So, there's nothing we can do about them, I'm afraid.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#158 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
]

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]Read verse 33 again, you missed the requirement about WAGING WAR.Metal_Mario99

Um...no, I addressed that. To Muslims, waging war doesn't necessarily mean raising a military and going off to fight a bloody battle on a big, wide open field. They consider "war" to be anything that puts Islam in a dubious light. The Danish caroonists were at war with Islam, for example.

There is no room for opinion here. Waging war means waging war. In Surah 60, it is said that Muslims should be friends with the people who don't persecute them for their religion and drive them out of their homes.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#159 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

Saudia Arabia and Iran are the way they are because of Islam.

Metal_Mario99

Just out of curiosity, what would YOU do about Islam? Whats your plan? You obviously think it's evil so what do you think should be done?

The only thing that could be done would be to annihilate them. But since I'm not a Muslim, I don't believe in the annihilation of entire groups of people. Because I'm a tolerant Westerner who doesn't desire mass slaughter as the answer to something.

So, there's nothing we can do about them, I'm afraid.

So you have no plan. You just want it to magically dissapear, or possibly genocide?

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

][QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]Read verse 33 again, you missed the requirement about WAGING WAR.ghoklebutter

Um...no, I addressed that. To Muslims, waging war doesn't necessarily mean raising a military and going off to fight a bloody battle on a big, wide open field. They consider "war" to be anything that puts Islam in a dubious light. The Danish caroonists were at war with Islam, for example.

There is no room for opinion here. Waging war means waging war. In Surah 60, it is said that Muslims should be friends with the people who don't persecute them for their religion and drive them out of their homes.

Really? Because Chapter 3,verse 28 says "Let not the believers take the disbelievers for friends rather than believers. And whoever does this has no connection with Allah - except that you guard yourselves against them."

And Chapter 5, verse 51 says, "O you who believe, take not the Jews and Christians for friends. They are friends of each other. And whoever amongst you takes them for friends he is indeed one of them. Surely Allah guides not the unjust people."

Sounds right neighborly of ya.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#162 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

The only thing that could be done would be to annihilate them. But since I'm not a Muslim, I don't believe in the annihilation of entire groups of people. Because I'm a tolerant Westerner who doesn't desire mass slaughter as the answer to something.

So, there's nothing we can do about them, I'm afraid.

Metal_Mario99

So you have no plan. You just want it to magically dissapear, or possibly genocide?

I said no to genocide.

Considering your clear insults, I suppose I shouldn't take you serious.

And you said no to genocide basically on your morals. You made it rather clear you'd like to be able to wipe them off the planet.

Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#163 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts
99? Why not make it a 100?(joking) That's some dumb court.alexside1
Is it bad that thats what i thought at first? Stupid punishment tho for a stupid crime.
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

The only thing that could be done would be to annihilate them. But since I'm not a Muslim, I don't believe in the annihilation of entire groups of people. Because I'm a tolerant Westerner who doesn't desire mass slaughter as the answer to something.

So, there's nothing we can do about them, I'm afraid.

Metal_Mario99

So you have no plan. You just want it to magically dissapear, or possibly genocide?

I said no to genocide, dumbass.

Get off your high horse. Religion isnt the issue. Religion is the excuse that is made by the extremsts, but it doesnt reflect the actual doctrine of them. Just like genocide, there are many different reasons why people kill people, not because of religion, it has more to deal with a cultural issue. When you say that religion is the problem, you are not getting to the actual issue.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#165 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

Um...no, I addressed that. To Muslims, waging war doesn't necessarily mean raising a military and going off to fight a bloody battle on a big, wide open field. They consider "war" to be anything that puts Islam in a dubious light. The Danish caroonists were at war with Islam, for example.

Metal_Mario99

There is no room for opinion here. Waging war means waging war. In Surah 60, it is said that Muslims should be friends with the people who don't persecute them for their religion and drive them out of their homes.

Really? Because Chapter 3,verse 28 says "Let not the believers take the disbelievers for friends rather than believers. And whoever does this has no connection with Allah - except that you guard yourselves against them."

And Chapter 5, verse 51 says, "O you who believe, take not the Jews and Christians for friends. They are friends of each other. And whoever amongst you takes them for friends he is indeed one of them. Surely Allah guides not the unjust people."

Sounds right neighborly of ya.

Friends is also an inaccurate translation. The first verse is talking about leaders. Muslims should be led by Muslims, and others should be led by people of their religion or lack thereof. As for the second verse: those are the Jews and Christians who mock and make fun of Islam. But to not befriend them does not mean be injust and hostile towards them.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

So you have no plan. You just want it to magically dissapear, or possibly genocide?

Pixel-Pirate

I said no to genocide.

Considering your clear insults, I suppose I shouldn't take you serious.

And you said no to genocide basically on your morals. You made it rather clear you'd like to be able to wipe them off the planet.

If you're a moral relativist, then it's easy to see why you don't understand that morals are a big part of what makes a person. Yes, it's because I'm a moral person that I do not advocate genocide. If somebody offered me the opportunity to nuke the Middle East and get clean away with it, I would still say no, because I have morals. That's more than you can say for the terrorists, or the millions of Muslims who won't speak or act against them.

Avatar image for Joshywaa
Joshywaa

10991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#167 Joshywaa
Member since 2002 • 10991 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

Saudia Arabia and Iran are the way they are because of Islam.

Metal_Mario99

Just out of curiosity, what would YOU do about Islam? Whats your plan? You obviously think it's evil so what do you think should be done?

The only thing that could be done would be to annihilate them. But since I'm not a Muslim, I don't believe in the annihilation of entire groups of people. Because I'm a tolerant Westerner who doesn't desire mass slaughter as the answer to something.

So, there's nothing we can do about them, I'm afraid.

Those words together made me lol.

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajo7"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]North Koreans aren't perpetrating terrorist attacks all over the world, nor do they have a book that preaches the destruction of every human being less radical than Osama bin Laden.

Metal_Mario99

You have never read anything about Islam. What bin Laden fails to acknowledge is that both suicide and the murdering of innocents are explicitly illegal according to the Qur'an.

Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Quaran states that "whoever kills a person, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he had killed all men."

Verse 33 goes on to state that "the only punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is that they should be murdered".

Clearly the Quaran justifies murdering anybody who is against Allah and Muhammed (to Muslims, waging war means to draw an unflattering caricature of Muhammed). As for making mischief in the land? I shudder to think, but I'm sure that that particular caveat is being used right now to justify killing...well, anyone they want to, really.

Religion is religion. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.' " -- 1 Samuel 15:3 And go take a good look at Deuteronomy 20. God is behind Christians when they go to war, and encourages them to enslave the cites that offer peace, and slaughter those that fight back. God supports war against the enemies of Christians. How is that any different to what you put from the Quran? And since you gave yourself the power to speak on behalf of all Muslims and how they interpret enemies and war, I'll go ahead and do the same. To Christians, enemies are abortion clinics and homosexuals, so the Bible is encouraging christians to slaughter all of them. The Bible is OBVIOUSLY the source for the abortion clinic bombers right?

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Sajo7"] You have never read anything about Islam. What bin Laden fails to acknowledge is that both suicide and the murdering of innocents are explicitly illegal according to the Qur'an.

dk00111

Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Quaran states that "whoever kills a person, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he had killed all men."

Verse 33 goes on to state that "the only punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is that they should be murdered".

Clearly the Quaran justifies murdering anybody who is against Allah and Muhammed (to Muslims, waging war means to draw an unflattering caricature of Muhammed). As for making mischief in the land? I shudder to think, but I'm sure that that particular caveat is being used right now to justify killing...well, anyone they want to, really.

Religion is religion. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.' " -- 1 Samuel 15:3 And go take a good look at Deuteronomy 20. God is behind Christians when they go to war, and encourages them to enslave the cites that offer peace, and slaughter those that fight back. Since God supports war against the enemies of Christians, how is that any different to what you put from the Quran. And since you gave yourself the power to speak on behalf of all Muslims and how they interpret enemies and war, I'll go ahead and do the same. To Christians, enemies are abortion clinics and homosexuals, so the Bible is encouraging christians to slaughter all of them. The Bible is OBVIOUSLY the source for the abortion clinic bombers right?

That happened in the Old Testament. Many things were done in the Old Testament because it was the beginning of civilization. But to get to the main point, religion doesnt condone the extreme killings that you all are reffering to.

Avatar image for godwhydoibother
godwhydoibother

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 godwhydoibother
Member since 2010 • 139 Posts
[QUOTE="gaming25"] That happened in the Old Testament. Many things were done in the Old Testament because it was the beginning of civilization.

...God was commanding his people to do them. :|
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

As for the second verse: those are the Jews and Christians who mock and make fun of Islam. But to not befriend them does not mean be injust and hostile towards them.ghoklebutter

I didn't see any such distinction made in the text.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#173 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] As for the second verse: those are the Jews and Christians who mock and make fun of Islam. But to not befriend them does not mean be injust and hostile towards them.Metal_Mario99

I didn't see any such distinction made in the text.

There is such distinction in the original Arabic text.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Sajo7"] You have never read anything about Islam. What bin Laden fails to acknowledge is that both suicide and the murdering of innocents are explicitly illegal according to the Qur'an.

dk00111

Chapter 5, Verse 32 of the Quaran states that "whoever kills a person, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he had killed all men."

Verse 33 goes on to state that "the only punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is that they should be murdered".

Clearly the Quaran justifies murdering anybody who is against Allah and Muhammed (to Muslims, waging war means to draw an unflattering caricature of Muhammed). As for making mischief in the land? I shudder to think, but I'm sure that that particular caveat is being used right now to justify killing...well, anyone they want to, really.

Religion is religion. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.' " -- 1 Samuel 15:3 And go take a good look at Deuteronomy 20. God is behind Christians when they go to war, and encourages them to enslave the cites that offer peace, and slaughter those that fight back. God supports war against the enemies of Christians. How is that any different to what you put from the Quran? And since you gave yourself the power to speak on behalf of all Muslims and how they interpret enemies and war, I'll go ahead and do the same. To Christians, enemies are abortion clinics and homosexuals, so the Bible is encouraging christians to slaughter all of them. The Bible is OBVIOUSLY the source for the abortion clinic bombers right?

As I already pointed out (and as you Muslim apologists always fail to grasp), Christianity has gotten over its barbaric, unenlightened phase. Islam hasn't.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#175 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts
Good ol' Theocracy strikes again.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] As for the second verse: those are the Jews and Christians who mock and make fun of Islam. But to not befriend them does not mean be injust and hostile towards them.ghoklebutter

I didn't see any such distinction made in the text.

There is such distinction in the original Arabic text.

Pics or it didn't happen.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts
[QUOTE="godwhydoibother"][QUOTE="gaming25"] That happened in the Old Testament. Many things were done in the Old Testament because it was the beginning of civilization.

...God was commanding his people to do them. :|

I know, but what is your point?
Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#178 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
I'm sorry but I can't find it in the Sharia law to whip a women 99 times for not wearing a veil, I mean seriously Iran?
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="godwhydoibother"][QUOTE="gaming25"] That happened in the Old Testament. Many things were done in the Old Testament because it was the beginning of civilization.gaming25
...God was commanding his people to do them. :|

I know, but what is your point?

His point (no matter how grossly inaccurate) is that Christianity is equivalent in atrocity and barbarism to Islam simply because Christians used to kill people too.

Avatar image for Joshywaa
Joshywaa

10991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#180 Joshywaa
Member since 2002 • 10991 Posts

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

The only thing that could be done would be to annihilate them. But since I'm not a Muslim, I don't believe in the annihilation of entire groups of people. Because I'm a tolerant Westerner who doesn't desire mass slaughter as the answer to something.

So, there's nothing we can do about them, I'm afraid.

Metal_Mario99

Those words together made me lol.

Your idiocy makes me lol.

Thank you for giving some sort of justification to my lols.

Avatar image for godwhydoibother
godwhydoibother

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 godwhydoibother
Member since 2010 • 139 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="godwhydoibother"]...God was commanding his people to do them. :|Metal_Mario99

I know, but what is your point?

His point (no matter how grossly inaccurate) is that Christianity is equivalent in atrocity and barbarism to Islam simply because Christians used to kill people too.

No it wasn't.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

Those words together made me lol.

Joshywaa

Your idiocy makes me lol.

Thank you for giving some sort of justification to my lols.

So you admit you had no justification before.

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] I know, but what is your point?godwhydoibother

His point (no matter how grossly inaccurate) is that Christianity is equivalent in atrocity and barbarism to Islam simply because Christians used to kill people too.

No it wasn't.

Good.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#184 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

I didn't see any such distinction made in the text.

Metal_Mario99

There is such distinction in the original Arabic text.

Pics or it didn't happen.

How am I supposed to show you if you don't even know Arabic? Here's a summary: The first verse is about choosing a non-Muslim over a Muslim in leadership and protection. The second verse is about befriending those who mock and make fun of Islam, and the same message from the first verse is also stated. And suppose befriending them is forbidden. They still should not be dealt with unjustly or harmed if they don't harm the Muslims.
Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] There is such distinction in the original Arabic text.ghoklebutter

Pics or it didn't happen.

How am I supposed to show you if you don't even know Arabic? Here's a summary: The first verse is about choosing a non-Muslim over a Muslim in leadership and protection. The second verse is about befriending those who mock and make fun of Islam, and the same message from the first verse is also stated. And suppose befriending them is forbidden. They still should not be dealt with unjustly or harmed if they don't harm the Muslims.

Well, at least I have your word for it, right?

Avatar image for Joshywaa
Joshywaa

10991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#186 Joshywaa
Member since 2002 • 10991 Posts

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

Your idiocy makes me lol.

Metal_Mario99

Thank you for giving some sort of justification to my lols.

So you admit you had no justification before.

Not really, you called yourself a tolerant westerner, i kinda challenged it, and then you called me an idiot.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="godwhydoibother"]...God was commanding his people to do them. :|Metal_Mario99

I know, but what is your point?

His point (no matter how grossly inaccurate) is that Christianity is equivalent in atrocity and barbarism to Islam simply because Christians used to kill people too.

We are talking about the present.
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#188 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

Pics or it didn't happen.

Metal_Mario99

How am I supposed to show you if you don't even know Arabic? Here's a summary: The first verse is about choosing a non-Muslim over a Muslim in leadership and protection. The second verse is about befriending those who mock and make fun of Islam, and the same message from the first verse is also stated. And suppose befriending them is forbidden. They still should not be dealt with unjustly or harmed if they don't harm the Muslims.

Well, at least I have your word for it, right?

Since you are so invested in exposing the big bad Muslims, you could at least know the language of the Qur'an. :wink:
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#190 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

Pics or it didn't happen.

Metal_Mario99

How am I supposed to show you if you don't even know Arabic? Here's a summary: The first verse is about choosing a non-Muslim over a Muslim in leadership and protection. The second verse is about befriending those who mock and make fun of Islam, and the same message from the first verse is also stated. And suppose befriending them is forbidden. They still should not be dealt with unjustly or harmed if they don't harm the Muslims.

Well, at least I have your word for it, right?

To be honest, I'm not a scholar and I could just be deluded, so take my words with a grain of salt. This is just how most Muslims interpret those verses. Even if Islam is truly an evil religion, though, at least most Muslims interpret it differently.
Avatar image for Joshywaa
Joshywaa

10991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#191 Joshywaa
Member since 2002 • 10991 Posts

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

So you admit you had no justification before.

Metal_Mario99

Not really, you called yourself a tolerant westerner, i kinda challenged it, and then you called me an idiot.

If you challenge the fact that Western civilization has become extremely tolerant, then you are an idiot.

Perhaps you should note that i was referring to YOU.

Not "Western Civilization"

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] How am I supposed to show you if you don't even know Arabic? Here's a summary: The first verse is about choosing a non-Muslim over a Muslim in leadership and protection. The second verse is about befriending those who mock and make fun of Islam, and the same message from the first verse is also stated. And suppose befriending them is forbidden. They still should not be dealt with unjustly or harmed if they don't harm the Muslims.Sajo7

Well, at least I have your word for it, right?

Since you are so invested in exposing the big bad Muslims, you could at least know the language of the Qur'an. :wink:

Oh, good. You're back. I was starting to miss your boundless wisdom and insight as to why Islam has absolutely nothing to do with the evil governments of Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

Not really, you called yourself a tolerant westerner, i kinda challenged it, and then you called me an idiot.

Joshywaa

If you challenge the fact that Western civilization has become extremely tolerant, then you are an idiot.

Perhaps you should note that i was referring to YOU.

Not "Western Civilization"

That's also idiotic. To be tolerant means that you tolerate something. And I tolerate Islam.

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#194 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

Barbaric... but I'm not surprised by the middle east anymore, its easily believable.

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#195 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts

As I already pointed out (and as you Muslim apologists always fail to grasp), Christianity has gotten over its barbaric, unenlightened phase. Islam hasn't.

Metal_Mario99

Ah I see. Veryenlightened and unbarbaricindeed. Just because you see the average non-extremist Christian here in America and the extremist Muslims in the media, doesn't mean that's how it works. Extremist Christianity still exists, and it's every bit as filthy and disgusting as Extremist Islam.

And please do tell, when did this enlightenment of Christianity occur?

Last time I remember, 50 years ago there were Christians out in the streets violently protesting desegregation. One of their reasons was that blacks had been cursed by God and were therefore inferior and sinful so they should be seperated from the superior whites. Religion is a powerful tool.

Avatar image for Joshywaa
Joshywaa

10991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#196 Joshywaa
Member since 2002 • 10991 Posts

[QUOTE="Joshywaa"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

If you challenge the fact that Western civilization has become extremely tolerant, then you are an idiot.

Metal_Mario99

Perhaps you should note that i was referring to YOU.

Not "Western Civilization"

That's also idiotic. To be tolerant means that you tolerate something. And I tolerate Islam.

Whatever floats your boat, sunshine ;)

Avatar image for -Y2J-
-Y2J-

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 -Y2J-
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts
in an alternate reality, you know if cia didnt overthrow mossadegh and that whole shah of iran stuff, i wonder what iran would have been like now?
Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#198 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts
[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] I know, but what is your point?gaming25

His point (no matter how grossly inaccurate) is that Christianity is equivalent in atrocity and barbarism to Islam simply because Christians used to kill people too.

We are talking about the present.

So God has changed his stance on war?
Avatar image for Grand242154
Grand242154

412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 Grand242154
Member since 2010 • 412 Posts

I got 99 problems but a whip ain't one.

kidsmelly

Hit me!

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

Last time I remember, 50 years ago there were Christians out in the streets violently protesting desegregation. One of their reasons was that blacks had been cursed by God and were therefore inferior and sinful so they should be seperated from the superior whites. Religion is a powerful tool.

dk00111

So, you're saying that fifty years ago, some Christians got together and said some hurtful things?

Yeah, you're right, that's totally equivalent to Muslims slaughtering innocent people all over the world en masse every day of the week.