is religion the main reason women today are second class?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kraychik
kraychik

2433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 kraychik
Member since 2009 • 2433 Posts
[QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

Men went out to hunt and explore, women stayed back. they were often lead by a male figure.

-Sun_Tzu-
Actually none of that is true. And I agree completely, religion is a reflection of society, but religion has a purpose - to maintain the status quo. It would've been a lot easier for people throughout history to support gender equality if the conventional wisdom wasn't that an all-powerful sky wizard (or sky wizards depending on the culture) desired a patriarchal society. That's an extraordinarily powerful tool of persuasion.

From what I remember in Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel", women indeed did the gathering while men did the hunting. Bear in mind that this is pre-agricultural humanity. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the women (gatherers) tended to be more productive in terms of time invested compared to calories harvested - gathering isn't as hit-or-miss as hunting.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

Men went out to hunt and explore, women stayed back. they were often lead by a male figure.

kraychik
Actually none of that is true. And I agree completely, religion is a reflection of society, but religion has a purpose - to maintain the status quo. It would've been a lot easier for people throughout history to support gender equality if the conventional wisdom wasn't that an all-powerful sky wizard (or sky wizards depending on the culture) desired a patriarchal society. That's an extraordinarily powerful tool of persuasion.

From what I remember in Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel", women indeed did the gathering while men did the hunting. Bear in mind that this is pre-agricultural humanity. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the women (gatherers) tended to be more productive in terms of time invested compared to calories harvested - gathering isn't as hit-or-miss as hunting.

And many men gathered while many women hunted. Studies of modern hunter-gatherer societies and archaeological evidence contradict the commonly held belief that these nomadic societies exhibited rigid gender roles.
Avatar image for kraychik
kraychik

2433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 kraychik
Member since 2009 • 2433 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="kraychik"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Actually none of that is true. And I agree completely, religion is a reflection of society, but religion has a purpose - to maintain the status quo. It would've been a lot easier for people throughout history to support gender equality if the conventional wisdom wasn't that an all-powerful sky wizard (or sky wizards depending on the culture) desired a patriarchal society. That's an extraordinarily powerful tool of persuasion.

From what I remember in Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel", women indeed did the gathering while men did the hunting. Bear in mind that this is pre-agricultural humanity. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the women (gatherers) tended to be more productive in terms of time invested compared to calories harvested - gathering isn't as hit-or-miss as hunting.

And many men gathered while many women hunted. Studies of modern hunter-gatherer societies and archaeological evidence contradict the commonly held belief that these nomadic societies exhibited rigid gender roles.

What I've read is not compatible with what you're saying. I think you're making this stuff up as you go along, frankly.
Avatar image for lilasianwonder
lilasianwonder

5982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 lilasianwonder
Member since 2007 • 5982 Posts
Maybe in some regions of the world.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="kraychik"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="kraychik"] From what I remember in Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel", women indeed did the gathering while men did the hunting. Bear in mind that this is pre-agricultural humanity. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the women (gatherers) tended to be more productive in terms of time invested compared to calories harvested - gathering isn't as hit-or-miss as hunting.

And many men gathered while many women hunted. Studies of modern hunter-gatherer societies and archaeological evidence contradict the commonly held belief that these nomadic societies exhibited rigid gender roles.

What I've read is not compatible with what you're saying. I think you're making this stuff up as you go along, frankly.

I really don't know what you are reading then. Jared Diamond himself describes hunter-gather societies as egalitarian, and he makes no real references to gender roles when discussing economic specialization (or the lack thereof) in these societies.
Avatar image for GrayF0X786
GrayF0X786

4185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#206 GrayF0X786
Member since 2012 • 4185 Posts

no, Religion is not the reason.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Well religion doesn't help the situation. Above all else religion was historically used to control others and make the members of the religion powerful. The fact that all major religions are led by men is obviously a factor.

Avatar image for StRaItJaCkEt36
StRaItJaCkEt36

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 StRaItJaCkEt36
Member since 2011 • 551 Posts
It may be a factor, but it would be very hard to show that it's the main one.
Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#209 Planeforger  Online
Member since 2004 • 20125 Posts

And, just letting you know, the common "scientific, objective" view is that religion developed BECAUSE of their culture, not the other way around. Religions are reflections of the society. You're mixing cause and effect.kingkong0124

Out of interest, where did you get that from?
I haven't heard of there being a common view about any of this, just a jumble of chicken-egg arguments, codevelopment theories, and (somewhat convincing) suggestions that the emergence of religion is strongly linked to the development of language skills in our evolving brains.

Not that it really makes a difference here, since these are never unilateral influences - even if you're going to presume that 'culture' came first, it would be completely unrealistic to assume that religion doesn't subsequently re-shape the group's culture, and so on.

Back to the topic though...I really don't see how we can lump all religions together on this one. But it does seem like the most popular ones out there (Christianity, Islam, etc) have certainly played a large part in entrenching women into subordinate roles in society.

They're not the only cause, but they don't (or didn't?) help.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#210 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

For a forum which many people talk of as being too liberal there seems a healthy dose of "men over women" sh*t going on on this thread.

Avatar image for JoeRatz16
JoeRatz16

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 JoeRatz16
Member since 2008 • 697 Posts

The reason women are often treated as second class citizens is quite simple: men are generally physically stronger and have historically monopolized military roles (partly because their stronger, partly because small societies can't afford to lose a lot of women in battle because that could seriously imperial the population).

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#212 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

For a forum which many people talk of as being too liberal there seems a healthy dose of "men over women" sh*t going on on this thread.

Master_Live
Quite a few liberals I know hold sexist beliefs, actually.
Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

No. If you had History on college you will know that it's Humanity fault not religion fault.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#214 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

No it is not. Actually a lot of religions have done things that have helped women. For instance, Islam which is usually portrayed as anti-woman, banned the practice of burying girl babies alive that was practiced in pre-Islamic Arabia. Likewise Christianity prohibited infanticide and exposure (leaving a baby outside to die) which were things that mostly harmed female babies.

"Finally, however, with the Edict of Milan--which legalized the practice of Christianity--Christian leaders began to exert their influence on the Roman emperors regarding infanticide. Immediately after his conversion, Constantine--the first Christian Emperor--enacted two measures targeting the problem of infanticide: 1) Constantine provided funds out of the imperial treasury for parents over burdened with children; and 2) Constantine gave all the rights of property of exposed infants to those who saved and supported them. But more generally, Constantine broadened the scope of imperial charity and provided assistance for the poor and needy. "He also acknowledged the new ideal of charity. Previous emperors had encouraged schemes to support small numbers of children in less favored families, the future recruits for their armies. Constantine gave funds to the churches to support the poor, the widow and orphans." And according to Robin L. Fox, the church used those funds for charity. "Swollen by the Emperor's gifts, it helped the old, the infirm, and the destitute." Fox, op. cit., page 668.

Although the church, with the assistance of the government, was working to address many of the causes of infanticide, it continued to pressure Rome for a ban on infanticide. Bishop Basil of Caesarea argued persistently and persuasively for such a ban. Finally, he convinced Emperor Valentinian (364-375 CE)--a Christian--to outlaw the practice of infanticide in the Roman Empire. Finally, infanticide was banned."

Actually, the countries in which women have the most rights, The U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, are historically and predominantly Christian countries. Contrast that to China, an officially atheist and Communist country, where they have a big problem with sex-selective abortions (i.e. where fetuses are aborted because they are female) and forced abortions and forced sterilizations because of the one child-policy.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#215 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

I don't know, but maybe some of you may find this article pertinent to this discussion.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Religion by itself doesn't do very much. Imagine walking into a crowd of people saying that a deity gave you a book and you are now to be worshipped, I bet you wouldn't get very far. Religon is a set of rules just like laws but they have no power without pointy bits of metal to enforce them.
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts

For a forum which many people talk of as being too liberal there seems a healthy dose of "men over women" sh*t going on on this thread.

Master_Live
Yeah, that's a misunderstanding. Most of OT is not liberal.
Avatar image for Heisenderp
Heisenderp

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 Heisenderp
Member since 2011 • 815 Posts

Actually, the countries in which women have the most rights, The U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, are historically and predominantly Christian countries.whipassmt

Europe and Canada are predominantly Christian? :lol:

Avatar image for kraychik
kraychik

2433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 kraychik
Member since 2009 • 2433 Posts

[QUOTE="kraychik"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] And many men gathered while many women hunted. Studies of modern hunter-gatherer societies and archaeological evidence contradict the commonly held belief that these nomadic societies exhibited rigid gender roles. -Sun_Tzu-
What I've read is not compatible with what you're saying. I think you're making this stuff up as you go along, frankly.

I really don't know what you are reading then. Jared Diamond himself describes hunter-gather societies as egalitarian, and he makes no real references to gender roles when discussing economic specialization (or the lack thereof) in these societies.

Jared Diamond may have said that the early hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian, but I do remember him stating that hunting was generally a male-exclusive activity. It's not that difficult to realize why that was likely the case - the different physical stature of men as well as the pregnancy and nursing of women. This doesn't contradict the assertion that these early social structures were egalitarian.

Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#220 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]Actually, the countries in which women have the most rights, The U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, are historically and predominantly Christian countries.Heisenderp

Europe and Canada are predominantly Christian? :lol:

Someone should answer this.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="Heisenderp"]

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]Actually, the countries in which women have the most rights, The U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, are historically and predominantly Christian countries.Palantas

Europe and Canada are predominantly Christian? :lol:

Someone should answer this.

Depends on how you define Christian but

a

Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts

No it is not. Actually a lot of religions have done things that have helped women. For instance, Islam which is usually portrayed as anti-woman, banned the practice of burying girl babies alive that was practiced in pre-Islamic Arabia. Likewise Christianity prohibited infanticide and exposure (leaving a baby outside to die) which were things that mostly harmed female babies.

"Finally, however, with the Edict of Milan--which legalized the practice of Christianity--Christian leaders began to exert their influence on the Roman emperors regarding infanticide. Immediately after his conversion, Constantine--the first Christian Emperor--enacted two measures targeting the problem of infanticide: 1) Constantine provided funds out of the imperial treasury for parents over burdened with children; and 2) Constantine gave all the rights of property of exposed infants to those who saved and supported them. But more generally, Constantine broadened the scope of imperial charity and provided assistance for the poor and needy. "He also acknowledged the new ideal of charity. Previous emperors had encouraged schemes to support small numbers of children in less favored families, the future recruits for their armies. Constantine gave funds to the churches to support the poor, the widow and orphans." And according to Robin L. Fox, the church used those funds for charity. "Swollen by the Emperor's gifts, it helped the old, the infirm, and the destitute." Fox, op. cit., page 668.

Although the church, with the assistance of the government, was working to address many of the causes of infanticide, it continued to pressure Rome for a ban on infanticide. Bishop Basil of Caesarea argued persistently and persuasively for such a ban. Finally, he convinced Emperor Valentinian (364-375 CE)--a Christian--to outlaw the practice of infanticide in the Roman Empire. Finally, infanticide was banned."

Actually, the countries in which women have the most rights, The U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, are historically and predominantly Christian countries. Contrast that to China, an officially atheist and Communist country, where they have a big problem with sex-selective abortions (i.e. where fetuses are aborted because they are female) and forced abortions and forced sterilizations because of the one child-policy.

whipassmt
Pretty much on point right here.
Avatar image for Optical_Order
Optical_Order

5100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 Optical_Order
Member since 2008 • 5100 Posts

[QUOTE="Palantas"]

[QUOTE="Heisenderp"]

Europe and Canada are predominantly Christian? :lol:

themajormayor

Someone should answer this.

Depends on how you define Christian but

a

am i going colorblind

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#224 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts
I have 2 things to say: 1st: was the "Women always seem to come as Number 2" comment a pun? 2nd: 72 is the ancient Roman number for God. Was it intentional that you put that in there?
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#225 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

am i going colorblind

Optical_Order
i thought the all shades of blue thing was stupid at first, but i guess it's better to contrast the concentration/density of christianity.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="Palantas"]

Someone should answer this.

Optical_Order

Depends on how you define Christian but

a

am i going colorblind

I guess or maybe you need to adjust your PC color settings.
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#227 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
I have 2 things to say: 1st: was the "Women always seem to come as Number 2" comment a pun? 2nd: 72 is the ancient Roman number for God. Was it intentional that you put that in there?Kevlar101
1. no, but i did think about that after i typed it :P 2. 72 virgins is what muslims receive when they pass... which brings up another question. do female muslims get 72 male virgins? seems kinda slutty
Avatar image for Skarwolf
Skarwolf

2718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#228 Skarwolf
Member since 2006 • 2718 Posts

I wouldn't say women, I'd say most muslim countries are 2nd / 3rd and worse class based on their religion. Women who allow it and stay there enable it. If they don't like it they should leave.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

I do remember him stating that hunting was generally a male-exclusive activity.

kraychik
If he said that then he's wrong.
Avatar image for kingkong0124
kingkong0124

8329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 kingkong0124
Member since 2012 • 8329 Posts
[QUOTE="kraychik"]

I do remember him stating that hunting was generally a male-exclusive activity.

-Sun_Tzu-
If he said that then he's wrong.

Jared Diamond knows what he's talking about, lol. Arguably one of the most influential historians of our time.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="kraychik"]

I do remember him stating that hunting was generally a male-exclusive activity.

-Sun_Tzu-
If he said that then he's wrong.

I wouldn't think women were hunting when pregnant and after having babies.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="kraychik"]

I do remember him stating that hunting was generally a male-exclusive activity.

kingkong0124
If he said that then he's wrong.

Jared Diamond knows what he's talking about, lol. Arguably one of the most influential historians of our time.

Doesn't make him any less wrong.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] If he said that then he's wrong. -Sun_Tzu-
Jared Diamond knows what he's talking about, lol. Arguably one of the most influential historians of our time.

Doesn't make him any less wrong.

Oh yeah?