[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"] There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.l4dak47
Even if they didn't, Companies that would step in to sell it legally would basically be doing the same work. Differene being is that they are free to advertise and push the drugs that are extremely addictive all they want and there would be no problem.Gez, imagine people handling out samples of coke. People would use it once and would be addicted for the rest of their lives, and with advertising becoming creepier in how companies are doing it now adays, I have no doubts shady things would go on.
Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.
Why do you keep assuming that drug dealers will be free to do w/e they want once it's legalized. They will have regulations like tobacco and alcohol sellers do and this claim of yours that people get addicted after only one use is false. actually many people do get addicted with one use.Hard drugs are in a completely differenct league in both danger and additive properties, it's no correct to even compare those. There's no reason to think that use wouldn't go up. Hard drugs are far more addictive than cigarettes, I'd think if anything, rates would be even higher, and 25% of americans already smoke. Can you imagine if 25% of Americans started having heart and liver problems by their late 20s that we wouldn't expect 'till a persons mid 70's?
We already have precedent for how integrated into society an extremely addictive drug can become and all the problems it can cause, so why assume those problems wouldn't occur for an even more addictive drug that gives better effects.
What we don't have precedent for is full legalization, like I've said, there's never been a country in the developed world to try such a thing. Why would you have such a dangerous experiment in the u.s.?
Log in to comment