It seems the US government thinks the war on drugs is more important than...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EmpCom
EmpCom

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 EmpCom
Member since 2005 • 3451 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"]In Portugal, all drugs have been decriminalized and the rates of drug use have either stayed the same or actually dropped off a bit. http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.htmlTopTierHustler

Decriminalization is not the same thing as legalization. Not by a long shot, and the fact that many people on here can't tell the difference is flat out scary.

Qft and i bet portugal still goes after the drug traffickers
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

Hard drugs cause many many many problems in society, from economics to funding terrorism to general population health.

TopTierHustler

And many of those problems are exacerbated, if not outright caused by drug prohibition.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] yes, if you abuse them. just like if you abuse alcohol you may hurt someone or drive drunk

I think you may have a little too rosy of an outlook on some drugs.

Well, some drugs are highly addictive, yes, but so is nicotine, vicodin, etc and no one is really b*tching about that. Some drugs are dangerous/deadly, yes, but so are alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, etc. Furthermore, if we were to regulate the drugs, we could "clean" it up and make it more pure. However, I'm not dumb enough to think that the stigma attached to drugs such as meth and heroin will go away anytime soon so I will settle for decriminalization.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"]In Portugal, all drugs have been decriminalized and the rates of drug use have either stayed the same or actually dropped off a bit. http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.htmlTopTierHustler

Decriminalization is not the same thing as legalization. Not by a long shot, and the fact that many people on here can't tell the difference is flat out scary.

You're right, legalization is superior because it would take the profits from the drug trade entirely out of the hands of the cartels.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"]In Portugal, all drugs have been decriminalized and the rates of drug use have either stayed the same or actually dropped off a bit. http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.htmlTopTierHustler

Decriminalization is not the same thing as legalization. Not by a long shot, and the fact that many people on here can't tell the difference is flat out scary.

I already know your position. You want a nanny state and I oppose that.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

Hard drugs cause many many many problems in society, from economics to funding terrorism to general population health.

Rhazakna

And many of those problems are exacerbated, if not outright caused by drug prohibition.

no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

Hard drugs cause many many many problems in society, from economics to funding terrorism to general population health.

TopTierHustler

And many of those problems are exacerbated, if not outright caused by drug prohibition.

no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

How so?
Avatar image for Abbeten
Abbeten

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Abbeten
Member since 2012 • 3140 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] yes, if you abuse them. just like if you abuse alcohol you may hurt someone or drive drunk

I think you may have a little too rosy of an outlook on some drugs.

Well, some drugs are highly addictive, yes, but so is nicotine, vicodin, etc and no one is really b*tching about that. Some drugs are dangerous/deadly, yes, but so are alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, etc. Furthermore, if we were to regulate the drugs, we could "clean" it up and make it more pure. However, I'm not dumb enough to think that the stigma attached to drugs such as meth and heroin will go away anytime soon so I will settle for decriminalization.

I mostly mean drugs like PCP, which induce violence at a much much higher rate that things like alcohol or caffeine. I'm not entirely sure that legalization of drugs like that would necessarily be the best route. I'm NOT in favor of sending addicts to jail for life sentences or anything, though.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"]In Portugal, all drugs have been decriminalized and the rates of drug use have either stayed the same or actually dropped off a bit. http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.htmll4dak47

Decriminalization is not the same thing as legalization. Not by a long shot, and the fact that many people on here can't tell the difference is flat out scary.

I already know your position. You want a nanny state and I oppose that.

I want to live in a functioning society, increasing hard drug use would only create more use and cause more problems.

I'm aware that you're not too bright and can't tell the difference, but here, I'll help you.

No country has ever tried full legalization in the modern world, and you are oblivious to that, and going by how people obviously have no self control within this society, use would obviously go up.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Abbeten"] I think you may have a little too rosy of an outlook on some drugs.

Well, some drugs are highly addictive, yes, but so is nicotine, vicodin, etc and no one is really b*tching about that. Some drugs are dangerous/deadly, yes, but so are alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, etc. Furthermore, if we were to regulate the drugs, we could "clean" it up and make it more pure. However, I'm not dumb enough to think that the stigma attached to drugs such as meth and heroin will go away anytime soon so I will settle for decriminalization.

I mostly mean drugs like PCP, which induce violence at a much much higher rate that things like alcohol or caffeine. I'm not entirely sure that legalization of drugs like that would necessarily be the best route. I'm NOT in favor of sending addicts to jail for life sentences or anything, though.

Alcohol makes people more violent, though. I don't know if it's higher than the rate of pcp, but I get where you're coming from. We just really need to overhaul our drug policy and focus on the really sh*tty, harmful ones.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

And many of those problems are exacerbated, if not outright caused by drug prohibition.

l4dak47

no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

How so?

Hard drugs are extremely addictive, and extremely dangerous. With no legal buffer, use would obviously go up and sellers would be free to push these drugs without repercussions.

Can you imagine a world where it's legal to advertise heroin and coke on television? I really don't want to.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]Decriminalization is not the same thing as legalization. Not by a long shot, and the fact that many people on here can't tell the difference is flat out scary.

TopTierHustler

I already know your position. You want a nanny state and I oppose that.

I want to live in a functioning society, increasing hard drug use would only create more use and cause more problems.

I'm aware that you're not too bright and can't tell the difference, but here, I'll help you.

No country has ever tried full legalization in the modern world, and you are oblivious to that, and going by how people obviously have no self control within this society, use would obviously go up.

But prohibition does not prevent people from using drugs and it only funds the criminal organizations.
Avatar image for Abbeten
Abbeten

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Abbeten
Member since 2012 • 3140 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] Well, some drugs are highly addictive, yes, but so is nicotine, vicodin, etc and no one is really b*tching about that. Some drugs are dangerous/deadly, yes, but so are alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, etc. Furthermore, if we were to regulate the drugs, we could "clean" it up and make it more pure. However, I'm not dumb enough to think that the stigma attached to drugs such as meth and heroin will go away anytime soon so I will settle for decriminalization.

I mostly mean drugs like PCP, which induce violence at a much much higher rate that things like alcohol or caffeine. I'm not entirely sure that legalization of drugs like that would necessarily be the best route. I'm NOT in favor of sending addicts to jail for life sentences or anything, though.

Alcohol makes people more violent, though. I don't know if it's higher than the rate of pcp, but I get where you're coming from. We just really need to overhaul our drug policy and focus on the really sh*tty, harmful ones.

It does, but it takes a LOT more and is still less likely to drive someone to mortal violence than a modest dose of PCP. It basically comes down to the fact that it's much easier to experiment with alcohol without any harmful effects to others than it is to experiment with drugs like PCP.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

Hard drugs cause many many many problems in society, from economics to funding terrorism to general population health.

TopTierHustler

And many of those problems are exacerbated, if not outright caused by drug prohibition.

no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

Rehab is a complete waste of money if you don't want to get better. It can only work if you want it to. Legalization would not cause more problems at all. If you legalized drugs, the cartels would be out out of business, and there's no evidence to suggest that use would go up by any significant percent. As long as you keep drugs illegal, you are in effect supporting the continuation of some of the most violent criminal organizations in the world
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

TopTierHustler

How so?

Hard drugs are extremely addictive, and extremely dangerous. With no legal buffer, use would obviously go up and sellers would be free to push these drugs without repercussions.

Can you imagine a world where it's legal to advertise heroin and coke on television? I really don't want to.

If nicotine(as addictive as heroin) can be freely sold, then there's no excuse for heroin and coke not being sold. Also, why would you think that dealers would be able to freely push it? If the drugs were regulated, the sellers would have to follow regulations and age restrictions much like tobacco and alcohol sellers do now. Furthermore, drugs being regulated would actually make it harder for the youth to get it.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Abbeten"] I mostly mean drugs like PCP, which induce violence at a much much higher rate that things like alcohol or caffeine. I'm not entirely sure that legalization of drugs like that would necessarily be the best route. I'm NOT in favor of sending addicts to jail for life sentences or anything, though.

Alcohol makes people more violent, though. I don't know if it's higher than the rate of pcp, but I get where you're coming from. We just really need to overhaul our drug policy and focus on the really sh*tty, harmful ones.

It does, but it takes a LOT more and is still less likely to drive someone to mortal violence than a modest dose of PCP. It basically comes down to the fact that it's much easier to experiment with alcohol without any harmful effects to others than it is to experiment with drugs like PCP.

I understand, but making it illegal doesn't really stop people from taking it. So, what can we do?
Avatar image for TheCommoner
TheCommoner

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 TheCommoner
Member since 2012 • 45 Posts
Oh booo hoo, meth should never be legalized...Our government's war on drugs is justified... Other than maybe the prosecution for marijuana... Cigarettes and Alcohol should be banned before Marijuana.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
Oh booo hoo, meth should never be legalized...Our government's war on drugs is justified... Other than maybe the prosecution for marijuana... Cigarettes and Alcohol should be banned before Marijuana. TheCommoner
What do you consider a drug to be a drug?
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] I already know your position. You want a nanny state and I oppose that. l4dak47

I want to live in a functioning society, increasing hard drug use would only create more use and cause more problems.

I'm aware that you're not too bright and can't tell the difference, but here, I'll help you.

No country has ever tried full legalization in the modern world, and you are oblivious to that, and going by how people obviously have no self control within this society, use would obviously go up.

But prohibition does not prevent people from using drugs and it only funds the criminal organizations.

and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCommoner"]Oh booo hoo, meth should never be legalized...Our government's war on drugs is justified... Other than maybe the prosecution for marijuana... Cigarettes and Alcohol should be banned before Marijuana. l4dak47
What do you consider a drug to be a drug?

He's either a troll or an idiot. Anyone who's open to the idea of reinforcing alcohol prohibition is either a troll, or shockingly ignorant of history. Either way, do not feed.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

TopTier is all kinds of cute.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
Oh booo hoo, meth should never be legalized...Our government's war on drugs is justified... Other than maybe the prosecution for marijuana... Cigarettes and Alcohol should be banned before Marijuana. TheCommoner
Boo hoo? I wonder if you even read the article.
Avatar image for TheCommoner
TheCommoner

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 TheCommoner
Member since 2012 • 45 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCommoner"]Oh booo hoo, meth should never be legalized...Our government's war on drugs is justified... Other than maybe the prosecution for marijuana... Cigarettes and Alcohol should be banned before Marijuana. l4dak47
What do you consider a drug to be a drug?

It is not drugs... It is the danger to the human race we must prevent. Soda, junk food, alcohol, etc. should be purged for the betterment of society.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]I want to live in a functioning society, increasing hard drug use would only create more use and cause more problems.

I'm aware that you're not too bright and can't tell the difference, but here, I'll help you.

No country has ever tried full legalization in the modern world, and you are oblivious to that, and going by how people obviously have no self control within this society, use would obviously go up.

TopTierHustler

But prohibition does not prevent people from using drugs and it only funds the criminal organizations.

and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

Regulations. It's why it's harder to get alcohol than it is to get weed. Let me ask you this, then. Are there any drugs you would be willing to legalize?
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#76 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TheCommoner"]Oh booo hoo, meth should never be legalized...Our government's war on drugs is justified... Other than maybe the prosecution for marijuana... Cigarettes and Alcohol should be banned before Marijuana. TheCommoner
What do you consider a drug to be a drug?

It is not drugs... It is the danger to the human race we must prevent. Soda, junk food, alcohol, etc. should be purged for the betterment of society.

Going by that logic, we should also ban cars, trees, almost everything in this world to prevent "danger" to the human race.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Have no problem with there being a war on drugs for toxic substances likes heroin, cocaine, and meth. In terms of the article, it's pretty funny to me how the US spends all this money on "defense" yet stuff like human trafficking is still out there.

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

And many of those problems are exacerbated, if not outright caused by drug prohibition.

Rhazakna

no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

Rehab is a complete waste of money if you don't want to get better. It can only work if you want it to. Legalization would not cause more problems at all. If you legalized drugs, the cartels would be out out of business, and there's no evidence to suggest that use would go up by any significant percent. As long as you keep drugs illegal, you are in effect supporting the continuation of some of the most violent criminal organizations in the world

How does that make any sense at all? Do you think if coke was legalized tommorow those cartels would just say "well, we have alot of resources, money, manpower and a huge businesslike network, but let's call it quits despite that"

No, they're going to move into other areas of criminality like sex slavery or theft. Or maybe they'll go legit, after all, they've already got the market cornered, and their formally illegal product is now illegal. Those damn cops aren't cutting into their profits anymore. What should they use that saved money on? How about pushing those same extremelly addictive drugs on people.

and really? wouldn't go up at all? We've already established that as a culture this country has huge issues with self control, why do you think people wouldn't try it? You're addicted with one use, so that's no good.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]I want to live in a functioning society, increasing hard drug use would only create more use and cause more problems.

I'm aware that you're not too bright and can't tell the difference, but here, I'll help you.

No country has ever tried full legalization in the modern world, and you are oblivious to that, and going by how people obviously have no self control within this society, use would obviously go up.

TopTierHustler

But prohibition does not prevent people from using drugs and it only funds the criminal organizations.

and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] But prohibition does not prevent people from using drugs and it only funds the criminal organizations. l4dak47

and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

Regulations. It's why it's harder to get alcohol than it is to get weed. Let me ask you this, then. Are there any drugs you would be willing to legalize?

marijuana with regulation, probably a few other soft ones, but none come to mind.

No it's not harder to get alcohol that pot.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#81 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

TopTierHustler

Regulations. It's why it's harder to get alcohol than it is to get weed. Let me ask you this, then. Are there any drugs you would be willing to legalize?

marijuana with regulation, probably a few other soft ones, but none come to mind.

No it's not harder to get alcohol that pot.

Yes it is until you're of legal age, ofc.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]no, alot of the problems caused by the war on drugs have been in how users have been treated; putting them in jail and turning them into hardened criminals for minor crimes, rather than putting them in rehab which can fix them.

Decriminalization would fix problems, legalizing would cause more.

TopTierHustler

Rehab is a complete waste of money if you don't want to get better. It can only work if you want it to. Legalization would not cause more problems at all. If you legalized drugs, the cartels would be out out of business, and there's no evidence to suggest that use would go up by any significant percent. As long as you keep drugs illegal, you are in effect supporting the continuation of some of the most violent criminal organizations in the world

How does that make any sense at all? Do you think if coke was legalized tommorow those cartels would just say "well, we have alot of resources, money, manpower and a huge businesslike network, but let's call it quits despite that"

No, they're going to move into other areas of criminality like sex slavery or theft. Or maybe they'll go legit, after all, they've already got the market cornered, and their formally illegal product is now illegal. Those damn cops aren't cutting into their profits anymore. What should they use that saved money on? How about pushing those same extremelly addictive drugs on people.

and really? wouldn't go up at all? We've already established that as a culture this country has huge issues with self control, why do you think people wouldn't try it? You're addicted with one use, so that's no good.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Legalization would stop cartels because they would be outcompeted by legitimate firms, who wouldn't have to deal in violence to sell drugs. Do you know anything about the history of prohibition? Because the gangs stopped bootlegging after it was legalized. You're right that gangs will find some other way to make money, but legalizing drugs would destroy a huge revenue source. Some organization would simply cease to exist, others would downsize completely. The Russian Mob couldn't have the international organization it has if it weren't for the drug trade. WHy do you want to keep such a profitable market in the hands of criminals and not businesses? The only knowledge you have from drugs is clearly from propaganda. There's no such thing as a drug that you get addicted to after one use. That's horsesh*t they feed you in elementary school.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] But prohibition does not prevent people from using drugs and it only funds the criminal organizations. Rhazakna

and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.

Even if they didn't, Companies that would step in to sell it legally would basically be doing the same work. Differene being is that they are free to advertise and push the drugs that are extremely addictive all they want and there would be no problem.

Gez, imagine people handling out samples of coke. People would use it once and would be addicted for the rest of their lives, and with advertising becoming creepier in how companies are doing it now adays, I have no doubts shady things would go on.

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#84 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"] Rehab is a complete waste of money if you don't want to get better. It can only work if you want it to. Legalization would not cause more problems at all. If you legalized drugs, the cartels would be out out of business, and there's no evidence to suggest that use would go up by any significant percent. As long as you keep drugs illegal, you are in effect supporting the continuation of some of the most violent criminal organizations in the worldRhazakna

How does that make any sense at all? Do you think if coke was legalized tommorow those cartels would just say "well, we have alot of resources, money, manpower and a huge businesslike network, but let's call it quits despite that"

No, they're going to move into other areas of criminality like sex slavery or theft. Or maybe they'll go legit, after all, they've already got the market cornered, and their formally illegal product is now illegal. Those damn cops aren't cutting into their profits anymore. What should they use that saved money on? How about pushing those same extremelly addictive drugs on people.

and really? wouldn't go up at all? We've already established that as a culture this country has huge issues with self control, why do you think people wouldn't try it? You're addicted with one use, so that's no good.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Legalization would stop cartels because they would be outcompeted by legitimate firms, who wouldn't have to deal in violence to sell drugs. Do you know anything about the history of prohibition? Because the gangs stopped bootlegging after it was legalized. You're right that gangs will find some other way to make money, but legalizing drugs would destroy a huge revenue source. Some organization would simply cease to exist, others would downsize completely. The Russian Mob couldn't have the international organization it has if it weren't for the drug trade. WHy do you want to keep such a profitable market in the hands of criminals and not businesses? The only knowledge you have from drugs is clearly from propaganda. There's no such thing as a drug that you get addicted to after one use. That's horsesh*t they feed you in elementary school.

 mah n*gga
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

TopTierHustler
So I suppose raising public awareness is just useless, right? That never works.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] Regulations. It's why it's harder to get alcohol than it is to get weed. Let me ask you this, then. Are there any drugs you would be willing to legalize?l4dak47

marijuana with regulation, probably a few other soft ones, but none come to mind.

No it's not harder to get alcohol that pot.

Yes it is until you're of legal age, ofc.

Did you have any Friends in Highschool/college? All you have to do is ask somebody who is 21+ to buy alcohol for you and you're good. Just meet somebody of age or know a Friend of a Friend, it's pretty strait forward.

Or just go to a liquor store, I always see those creepy guys hanging outside of them buying alcohol for kids for money.

With marijuana you have to find a buyer.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

TopTierHustler

There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.

Even if they didn't, Companies that would step in to sell it legally would basically be doing the same work. Differene being is that they are free to advertise and push the drugs that are extremely addictive all they want and there would be no problem.

Gez, imagine people handling out samples of coke. People would use it once and would be addicted for the rest of their lives, and with advertising becoming creepier in how companies are doing it now adays, I have no doubts shady things would go on.

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

Why do you keep assuming that drug dealers will be free to do w/e they want once it's legalized. They will have regulations like tobacco and alcohol sellers do and this claim of yours that people get addicted after only one use is false.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

ghoklebutter

So I suppose raising public awareness is just useless, right? That never works.

Obviously it doesn't when it comes to issues of self control.

and what would public awareness do? Everybody with a brain knows that hard drugs are extremely bad for you.

I can only imagine "Injecting a chemical into my bloodstream that causes a spike in blood pressure and heart rate is bad for me? I had no idea. Thank god for the gamespot white knights otherwise I'd have no idea"

Do you get the joke?

[spoiler] I was talking about coke [/spoiler]

[spoiler] and you knew what I was talking about before you read the spoiler, just like everybody else, and there lies my point, public awareness wouldn't do anything [/spoiler]

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]marijuana with regulation, probably a few other soft ones, but none come to mind.

No it's not harder to get alcohol that pot.

TopTierHustler

Yes it is until you're of legal age, ofc.

Did you have any Friends in Highschool/college? All you have to do is ask somebody who is 21+ to buy alcohol for you and you're good. Just meet somebody of age or know a Friend of a Friend, it's pretty strait forward.

Or just go to a liquor store, I always see those creepy guys hanging outside of them buying alcohol for kids for money.

With marijuana you have to find a buyer.

You'd think, but no. People don't want to risk buying a minor alcohol because it can put them in trouble and why should they care? they can get their own alcohol. With weed, it's different. Drug dealers don't care about your age and since no one can buy weed legally, they all go towards the drug dealer. It took me less than 30 minutes to find a weed dealer and much, much longer to get a relatively stable and consistent supplier of alcohol.
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]and legalization allows those criminal organizations to come out of the shadows and go legit. How is that better? If anything, that's going to allow them to grow faster and push drugs in ways they weren't previously able to, like through advertising.

And actually, the war on drugs has prevented people from using drugs, after 9/11, the gov't cracking down on airport security has made it almost impossible to sneak Ectasy into this country, and as a result, E use is way down.

Like I've said Legalization =/= decriminalization. I actually fully support testing decriminalization in this country, science says it works, and case studies do too. It's worth a shot if nothing else. You do need to do some reading to understand the difference.

TopTierHustler

There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.

Even if they didn't, Companies that would step in to sell it legally would basically be doing the same work. Differene being is that they are free to advertise and push the drugs that are extremely addictive all they want and there would be no problem.

Gez, imagine people handling out samples of coke. People would use it once and would be addicted for the rest of their lives, and with advertising becoming creepier in how companies are doing it now adays, I have no doubts shady things would go on.

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

So you want to maintain a system of violence, that is ruining the lives of people all over the world, in order to make sure that people don't make the choice of putting a substance into their own bodies? You're so ignorant of the reality of the drug, and it's people like you who keep the madness going, It's very simple, do you want criminal cartels who are ruining people's lives in Central and SOuth America to stay as profitable and powerful as they are now? Or do you want to take that profit and that market out of the hands of criminals, and create millions of legitimate, legal jobs in the process? Oh yeah, you know absolutely nothing about cocaine. Look up the study the WHO did on it, and then look up what lengths the US government went to to supress it. Please educate yourself before forming opinions that advocate and defend some of the worst, most violent organization on the planet (on both sides of the prohibition coin).
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

TopTierHustler

So I suppose raising public awareness is just useless, right? That never works.

Obviously it doesn't when it comes to issues of self control.

and what would public awareness do? Everybody with a brain knows that hard drugs are extremely bad for you.

I can only imagine "Injecting a chemical into my bloodstream that causes a spike in blood pressure and heart rate is bad for me? I had no idea. Thank god for the gamespot white knights otherwise I'd have no idea"

Do you get the joke?

[spoiler] I was talking about coke [/spoiler]

[spoiler] and you knew what I was talking about before you read the spoiler, just like everybody else, and there lies my point, public awareness wouldn't do anything [/spoiler]

Citing a statistic about obesity rates does nothing to counter my point; you're completely oversimplifying the problem of obesity. Moreover, you seem to have a very narrow conception of raising public awareness; your making that argument is proof of that.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
Also, TopTierHustler, you keep bringing up the point about the ubiquitous lack of self-control in the US. First of all, that's most likely an overstatement; there are a lot of people who lack self-control, but there are also quite a few who do have it. Second, the lack of self-control is most likely a sociocultural problem - at least on a significant level - so my point still stands. The consequences of legalization that you predict are in no way inevitable.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"] There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.l4dak47

Even if they didn't, Companies that would step in to sell it legally would basically be doing the same work. Differene being is that they are free to advertise and push the drugs that are extremely addictive all they want and there would be no problem.

Gez, imagine people handling out samples of coke. People would use it once and would be addicted for the rest of their lives, and with advertising becoming creepier in how companies are doing it now adays, I have no doubts shady things would go on.

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

Why do you keep assuming that drug dealers will be free to do w/e they want once it's legalized. They will have regulations like tobacco and alcohol sellers do and this claim of yours that people get addicted after only one use is false.

actually many people do get addicted with one use.

Hard drugs are in a completely differenct league in both danger and additive properties, it's no correct to even compare those. There's no reason to think that use wouldn't go up. Hard drugs are far more addictive than cigarettes, I'd think if anything, rates would be even higher, and 25% of americans already smoke. Can you imagine if 25% of Americans started having heart and liver problems by their late 20s that we wouldn't expect 'till a persons mid 70's?

We already have precedent for how integrated into society an extremely addictive drug can become and all the problems it can cause, so why assume those problems wouldn't occur for an even more addictive drug that gives better effects.

What we don't have precedent for is full legalization, like I've said, there's never been a country in the developed world to try such a thing. Why would you have such a dangerous experiment in the u.s.?

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

Also, TopTierHustler, you keep bringing up the point about the ubiquitous lack of self-control in the US. First of all, that's most likely an overstatement; there are a lot of people who lack self-control, but there are also quite a few who do have it. Second, the lack of self-control is most likely a sociocultural problem - at least on a significant level - so my point still stands. The consequences of legalization that you predict are in no way inevitable.ghoklebutter
but use would still likely widen from it's thin demographic already.

Like I've said we have precedent for most people not having self control. Turning over an addicting chemical to those people would have obvious consequences.

Look at smoking. Even knowing the consequences, many people still choose to do it.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
Also, TopTierHustler, you keep bringing up the point about the ubiquitous lack of self-control in the US. First of all, that's most likely an overstatement; there are a lot of people who lack self-control, but there are also quite a few who do have it. Second, the lack of self-control is most likely a sociocultural problem - at least on a significant level - so my point still stands. The consequences of legalization that you predict are in no way inevitable.ghoklebutter
Even if he was exactly right, that doesn't matter. People should be free to poison their bodies if they wish. It may lead to a world where more people do hard drugs, but there are no drug cartels, and addicts don't have to be worried about dying because of poisons in the drug. Also, the cost would fall tremendously, so addicts wouldn't have to be homeless because of their habit. There's literally no good argument against legalization, and that's not something I usually say about issues.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] So I suppose raising public awareness is just useless, right? That never works.ghoklebutter

Obviously it doesn't when it comes to issues of self control.

and what would public awareness do? Everybody with a brain knows that hard drugs are extremely bad for you.

I can only imagine "Injecting a chemical into my bloodstream that causes a spike in blood pressure and heart rate is bad for me? I had no idea. Thank god for the gamespot white knights otherwise I'd have no idea"

Do you get the joke?

[spoiler] I was talking about coke [/spoiler]

[spoiler] and you knew what I was talking about before you read the spoiler, just like everybody else, and there lies my point, public awareness wouldn't do anything [/spoiler]

Citing a statistic about obesity rates does nothing to counter my point; you're completely oversimplifying the problem of obesity. Moreover, you seem to have a very narrow conception of raising public awareness; your making that argument is proof of that.

no I haven't, like with cigarettes controlling weight it a matter of self control which enough people obviously lack for hard drugs to be dangerous.

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Also, TopTierHustler, you keep bringing up the point about the ubiquitous lack of self-control in the US. First of all, that's most likely an overstatement; there are a lot of people who lack self-control, but there are also quite a few who do have it. Second, the lack of self-control is most likely a sociocultural problem - at least on a significant level - so my point still stands. The consequences of legalization that you predict are in no way inevitable.Rhazakna
Even if he was exactly right, that doesn't matter. People should be free to poison their bodies if they wish. It may lead to a world where more people do hard drugs, but there are no drug cartels, and addicts don't have to be worried about dying because of poisons in the drug. Also, the cost would fall tremendously, so addicts wouldn't have to be homeless because of their habit. There's literally no good argument against legalization, and that's not something I usually say about issues.

the drugs themselves are poison. That's a pretty good argument.

A couple more.

-increased medical costs for everybody.

-stress caused on people's families of addicts.

-increased mortality rate.

-drop in progress for workers.

-children would suffer as money goes to drugs that should go to them.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#98 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]Obviously it doesn't when it comes to issues of self control.

and what would public awareness do? Everybody with a brain knows that hard drugs are extremely bad for you.

I can only imagine "Injecting a chemical into my bloodstream that causes a spike in blood pressure and heart rate is bad for me? I had no idea. Thank god for the gamespot white knights otherwise I'd have no idea"

Do you get the joke?

[spoiler] I was talking about coke [/spoiler]

[spoiler] and you knew what I was talking about before you read the spoiler, just like everybody else, and there lies my point, public awareness wouldn't do anything [/spoiler]

TopTierHustler

Citing a statistic about obesity rates does nothing to counter my point; you're completely oversimplifying the problem of obesity. Moreover, you seem to have a very narrow conception of raising public awareness; your making that argument is proof of that.

no I haven't, like with cigarettes controlling weight it a matter of self control which enough people obviously lack for hard drugs to be dangerous.

Again, you're oversimplifying the issue here. Quitting smoking is chiefly based on self-control; eradicating obesity, however, depends on more things than simple self-control. It's pretty much comparing apples and oranges.
Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

[QUOTE="Rhazakna"] There's no evidence to suggest that drug cartels would "go legit". They would be outcompeted immediately and ran out of business. Bootleggers didn't continue to sell alcohol after prohibition was ended. Even if you're right, if they went legit and entered the now legal drug market, the violence associated with the drug trade would still disappear. There's no reason to think the trade and sale of drugs is inherently violent, it's not. It's because drugs are sold exclusively on the black market that there's violence. Legalize it and that stops, even if the cartels somehow manage to stay in business (which there's no reason to think they will). You have no argument here, I hope you realize.Rhazakna

Even if they didn't, Companies that would step in to sell it legally would basically be doing the same work. Differene being is that they are free to advertise and push the drugs that are extremely addictive all they want and there would be no problem.

Gez, imagine people handling out samples of coke. People would use it once and would be addicted for the rest of their lives, and with advertising becoming creepier in how companies are doing it now adays, I have no doubts shady things would go on.

Actually any selling of these hard drugs would still cause problems, violence might go done, but imagine the spike in heart attacks if cocain was legalized. It would balance out at best.

So you want to maintain a system of violence, that is ruining the lives of people all over the world, in order to make sure that people don't make the choice of putting a substance into their own bodies? You're so ignorant of the reality of the drug, and it's people like you who keep the madness going, It's very simple, do you want criminal cartels who are ruining people's lives in Central and SOuth America to stay as profitable and powerful as they are now? Or do you want to take that profit and that market out of the hands of criminals, and create millions of legitimate, legal jobs in the process? Oh yeah, you know absolutely nothing about cocaine. Look up the study the WHO did on it, and then look up what lengths the US government went to to supress it. Please educate yourself before forming opinions that advocate and defend some of the worst, most violent organization on the planet (on both sides of the prohibition coin).

and the increase in deaths do to the increase in the use of drugs would more than make up for the deaths from the cartels.

Avatar image for Nick3306
Nick3306

3429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Nick3306
Member since 2007 • 3429 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]Also, TopTierHustler, you keep bringing up the point about the ubiquitous lack of self-control in the US. First of all, that's most likely an overstatement; there are a lot of people who lack self-control, but there are also quite a few who do have it. Second, the lack of self-control is most likely a sociocultural problem - at least on a significant level - so my point still stands. The consequences of legalization that you predict are in no way inevitable.Rhazakna
There's literally no good argument against legalization, and that's not something I usually say about issues.

The amount of balls it takes to make this statement when you yourself know that it wrong is ridiculous. The fact that kids could get their hands on them is a good argument in itself.