I disagree, but even if i DID say that, you would still be completely unjustified in accusing me of being pro-illegal immigration. :| =Ninja-HippoAgain...should I dig up the posts you made in the last thread about illegal immigration?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I disagree, but even if i DID say that, you would still be completely unjustified in accusing me of being pro-illegal immigration. :| =Ninja-HippoAgain...should I dig up the posts you made in the last thread about illegal immigration?
If we put every business under investigation for illegal immigrant employment it might make a huge difference. We still aren't even doing a good job of keeping them out, instead of putting a few soldiers at the border we need put 10,000 or more.UbiquitousAeon
So what you are saying is only one side can do what they want while the others hands are tied and supposed to take it? Guess what....every country has hard luck stories. Doesn't mean you can successfully shovel them in another country and expect that country NOT to turn out the same as the countries immigrated from. If you are illegal....you get no sympathy from me for being caught. I hope it happens more.LJS9502_basicNice to see some clear-thinking posts in OT.:)
Again...should I dig up the posts you made in the last thread about illegal immigration? Way to dodge the point that your post was not justified. >_> I said nothing pro-illegal immigration in this thread. Therefore you quoting me saying you don't get why i'm PRO illegal immigration is completely unjustified, as i said nothing of the sort. Detract the issue to other threads by all means if you're not going to admit that.[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] I disagree, but even if i DID say that, you would still be completely unjustified in accusing me of being pro-illegal immigration. :| =LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] So you are denying all the other pro illegal immigration posts you've made?Ninja-HippoThis is simply a means of refusing to accept the fact that your response to my post was completely unjustified. :| Was my post pro-illegal immigration in any way whatsoever? No. So saying it was was wrong of you. I have discussed illegal immigration in the past extensively and in a variety of contexts ranging from racial profiling in immigration laws to the beliefs of the BNP in england. I am sympathetic to immigrants in many aspects but i would not consider myself PRO illegal immigration. And aside from that, i've said nothing PRO illegal immigration at all in this thread, which you refuse to accept. >_>My post was justified. You were deriding the attempt by the sheriff to remove illegal immigrants. Thus...the problem continues. And I recall you absolute disgust over the Arizona law that allowed suspects to be checked for status.
Way to dodge the point that your post was not justified. >_> I said nothing pro-illegal immigration in this thread. Therefore you quoting me saying you don't get why i'm PRO illegal immigration is completely unjustified, as i said nothing of the sort. Detract the issue to other threads by all means if you're not going to admit that. Ninja-HippoSo your opinion is not relevant?
Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
Hows about we take a step back from imposing points of view on people and just deal with what i actually said; that deporting people here and there will accomplish nothing and they need to decisively deal with the broader issues causing immigration. Remember that thread i made the other day about debating?[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]However, I've read your stance in many of the other threads of this nature...and you ALWAYS side with the illegal immigrants.MagnumPI
I don't compromise with intruders. Maybe we should start executing illegals on sight. Give them a reason to consider staying out. Because apparently they don't takeus seriously.
I think it would be interesting to see how much that deterred them...I think if illegals keep pouring in....we should take Mexico over. Solves the problem.....and it would end in the Mexican Territory being built up.Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
NightStalkerBX
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] So you are denying all the other pro illegal immigration posts you've made?Ninja-HippoThis is simply a means of refusing to accept the fact that your response to my post was completely unjustified. :| Was my post pro-illegal immigration in any way whatsoever? No. So saying it was was wrong of you. I have discussed illegal immigration in the past extensively and in a variety of contexts ranging from racial profiling in immigration laws to the beliefs of the BNP in england. I am sympathetic to immigrants in many aspects but i would not consider myself PRO illegal immigration. And aside from that, i've said nothing PRO illegal immigration at all in this thread, which you refuse to accept. >_>
Oh so it doesn't matter what you actually said. You just don't like the idea of someone disagreeing with you. Nothing needs to be this complicated.
The Arizona law is a bad law in my opinion. :| Is that all the evidence you're basing my supposed PRO illegal immigration stance on? I did not 'deride' anything. There was no contempt in my post. I said deporting people here and there is ineffective, and in the next post said they need to tackle the broader issues to stop immigration. That in absolutely no way whatsoever is PRO illegal immigration, is it? Address the point, not the person making it. This personal rampage is completely unjustified, and if you continue to insist that you calling my post PRO illegal immigration when it was nothing of the sort we likely have nothing left to discuss and i will take my leave to avoid de-railing the thread with a never-ending argument.My post was justified. You were deriding the attempt by the sheriff to remove illegal immigrants. Thus...the problem continues. And I recall you absolute disgust over the Arizona law that allowed suspects to be checked for status.
LJS9502_basic
I said deporting people here or there is not an effective means of addressing immigration. If you disagree with that, do so by all means. That's fine. What i was unhappy with was the post saying 'i don't get why you're pro illegal immigration' because i said nothing at all of that nature.Oh so it doesn't matter what you actually said. You just don't like the idea of someone disagreeing with you. Nothing needs to be this complicated.
MagnumPI
You see? Seems very reasonable to me.
I don't like this idea at all. Mexico does not need to become a bigger problem than it already is for the US.Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
NightStalkerBX
[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]I think if illegals keep pouring in....we should take Mexico over. Solves the problem.....and it would end in the Mexican Territory being built up.Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
LJS9502_basic
I dodn't think the U.S want Mexico. It's least valuable American Territory. Well in North America anyway.
I think if illegals keep pouring in....we should take Mexico over. Solves the problem.....and it would end in the Mexican Territory being built up.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]
Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
MagnumPI
I dodn't think the U.S want Mexico. It's least valuable American Territory. Well in North America anyway.
I realize the US doesn't want it.....but something does need to be done.[QUOTE="MagnumPI"]
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] I think if illegals keep pouring in....we should take Mexico over. Solves the problem.....and it would end in the Mexican Territory being built up.LJS9502_basic
I dodn't think the U.S want Mexico. It's least valuable American Territory. Well in North America anyway.
I realize the US doesn't want it.....but something does need to be done. Yes, the Mexicans needs to get their **** together, fire all the corrupt douche bags and instate a Tyrant who will kill all the drug dealers and bring back peace and prosperity to Mexico. Then they will stop flowing in, hopefully.I realize the US doesn't want it.....but something does need to be done.
LJS9502_basic
True, however it would be difficult at present, since we had all of the Democrats in Congress giving a standing ovation to the Mexican president for his comments on the Arizona immigration law.
Perhaps after November...some proactive border control will occur.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
I realize the US doesn't want it.....but something does need to be done.
topsemag55
True, however it would be difficult at present, since we had all of the Democrats in Congress giving a standing ovation to the Mexican president for his comments on the Arizona immigration law.
Perhaps after November...some proactive border control will occur.
The people in the US need to take their country back from the politicians.....out with incumbents....[QUOTE="topsemag55"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
I realize the US doesn't want it.....but something does need to be done.
LJS9502_basic
True, however it would be difficult at present, since we had all of the Democrats in Congress giving a standing ovation to the Mexican president for his comments on the Arizona immigration law.
Perhaps after November...some proactive border control will occur.
The people in the US need to take their country back from the politicians.....out with incumbents....Amen to that.:P
I don't like this idea at all. Mexico does not need to become a bigger problem than it already is for the US.[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]
Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
UbiquitousAeon
I understand it's an extreme, I was half-serious when I posted it. But the U.S. does need to do something proactive about Mexico, illegal immigration is but a tiny problem eminating from a country riddled with them. Boundless government corruption and drug cartels that get even more powerful as they continue to supply this country's insatiable drug addiction, those are the real problems. Millions of people live down there in fear because it seems that the law barely exists anymore and when they're desperate enough they'll cross, legally or illegally. If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it.
I don't like this idea at all. Mexico does not need to become a bigger problem than it already is for the US.[QUOTE="UbiquitousAeon"]
[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]
Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
NightStalkerBX
I understand it's an extreme, I was half-serious when I posted it. But the U.S. does need to do something proactive about Mexico, illegal immigration is but a tiny problem eminating from a country riddled with them. Boundless government corruption and drug cartels that get even more powerful as they continue to supply this country's insatiable drug addiction, those are the real problems. Millions of people live down there in fear because it seems that the law barely exists anymore and when they're desperate enough they'll cross, legally or illegally. If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it.
And since they are a bordering country....one wonders why not.[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"][QUOTE="UbiquitousAeon"] I don't like this idea at all. Mexico does not need to become a bigger problem than it already is for the US.
LJS9502_basic
I understand it's an extreme, I was half-serious when I posted it. But the U.S. does need to do something proactive about Mexico, illegal immigration is but a tiny problem eminating from a country riddled with them. Boundless government corruption and drug cartels that get even more powerful as they continue to supply this country's insatiable drug addiction, those are the real problems. Millions of people live down there in fear because it seems that the law barely exists anymore and when they're desperate enough they'll cross, legally or illegally. If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it.
And since they are a bordering country....one wonders why not.Now that I think about it, we should totally go in guns blazing.I don't like this idea at all. Mexico does not need to become a bigger problem than it already is for the US.[QUOTE="UbiquitousAeon"]
[QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]
Why don't we just annex Mexico and get this over with already? ~_~
At least then our southern border will only be half the size it currently is. >_>
NightStalkerBX
I understand it's an extreme, I was half-serious when I posted it. But the U.S. does need to do something proactive about Mexico, illegal immigration is but a tiny problem eminating from a country riddled with them. Boundless government corruption and drug cartels that get even more powerful as they continue to supply this country's insatiable drug addiction, those are the real problems. Millions of people live down there in fear because it seems that the law barely exists anymore and when they're desperate enough they'll cross, legally or illegally. If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it.
This is one of the broader issues that the government would do well to tackle. Mexico clearly needs help, whether they'll admit it or not, the drug cartels seem to have more power than the government. Until Mexico is a more tolerable place to live people will go to any lengths to get out.If there were no illegal immigrants then the guys who get paid to find and prosecute them would be out of a job. =3I don't like this at all. People shouldn't be demeaned and treated this way just because they are not from this country. Legality of being in this country and being employed is not an issue in my eyes. If the US fixed it's economy there would be more jobs for people. If Mexico was 'fixed' they would have no reason to come here. Simply going after one "illegal" at a time is not going to solve the "problem".
Loco_Live
Good. Did they fine Sizzler (I couldn't find reference to it in the article)? That would be even better. mattbbplI imagine they'll be in for a hefty fine. The law is pretty strict on hiring illegal immigrants for obvious reasons.
This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishfat_robI agree with this sentiment but apparently that makes you PRO illegal immigration. :roll:
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishmattbbplIf what aspects? Border patrol? Fining businesses hiring them? Deporting those who immigrate here illegally? I'm just not sure where you're coming from. The number of "illegals" has exploded in this country since we started building the fence and beefing up security. The "problem" of illegal immigration has gotten worse since we've started taking tougher measures to stop it. Instead of focusing on "stopping" illegal immigration, lets focus on creating a better path to citizenship (or a better worker program) that allows people who want to work in America to come here. We're just wasting money with this authoritarian response, cause the problem has only gotten worse. The get tough stance has done a better job of keeping illegals in than keeping illegals out.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="NightStalkerBX"]And since they are a bordering country....one wonders why not.Now that I think about it, we should totally go in guns blazing.I understand it's an extreme, I was half-serious when I posted it. But the U.S. does need to do something proactive about Mexico, illegal immigration is but a tiny problem eminating from a country riddled with them. Boundless government corruption and drug cartels that get even more powerful as they continue to supply this country's insatiable drug addiction, those are the real problems. Millions of people live down there in fear because it seems that the law barely exists anymore and when they're desperate enough they'll cross, legally or illegally. If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it.
UbiquitousAeon
"If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it."
Problem is, IF we do that we'll be ridiculed by other countries. Oh, the United States is Trying to Take back MExico, Blah Blah Blah. :evil:
I think we're kidding ourselves if we think Obama will EVER do something like this anyways.
This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishfat_robInstead of deriding attempts to fix the problem....why not come up with suggestions?
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishfat_robIf what aspects? Border patrol? Fining businesses hiring them? Deporting those who immigrate here illegally? I'm just not sure where you're coming from. The number of "illegals" has exploded in this country since we started building the fence and beefing up security. The "problem" of illegal immigration has gotten worse since we've started taking tougher measures to stop it. Instead of focusing on "stopping" illegal immigration, lets focus on creating a better path to citizenship (or a better worker program) that allows people who want to work in America to come here. We're just wasting money with this authoritarian response, cause the problem has only gotten worse. The get tough stance has done a better job of keeping illegals in than keeping illegals out. I don't know why you used quotes around the word "problem" since it seems pretty clear that illegal immigration is a problem. As for resolved the problem why letting anyone and everyone migrate here legally, that doesn't really solve the problem - it only removes the term "illegal" from the equation. I can't think of a single developed country that doesn't have yearly immigration caps to protect it's own populace. In fact, the raising and lowering of those caps are significant bartering chips regarding foreign affairs.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishLJS9502_basicInstead of deriding attempts to fix the problem....why not come up with suggestions?
Agreed. Between the military stationed here (not all are in Iraq or Afghanistan), Reserves, National Guard, modern technology, and ground-penetrating radar (to detect tunnels), we have enough to almost shut down the border completely. We can also hire more Customs and Border Patrol agents, and expand the rules of engagement.
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishLJS9502_basicInstead of deriding attempts to fix the problem....why not come up with suggestions? work on better ways for people who want to work in America to come here legally. I don't know of any specific plans, but it's obvious that the "keep 'em out" approach isn't working.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishfat_robInstead of deriding attempts to fix the problem....why not come up with suggestions? work on better ways for people who want to work in America to come here legally. I don't know of any specific plans, but it's obvious that the "keep 'em out" approach isn't working. Yes but economics has a lot to do with how many legal immigrants the country can sustain....hence why it takes some time. Mexico is not the only country that has people seeking to immigrate....and the economy cannot sustain unlimited growth.
Edit; and keeping them out would work...but you'd have to get tough. It can be done but not with kid gloves.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]This whole authoritarian response to illegal immigration is rubishfat_robInstead of deriding attempts to fix the problem....why not come up with suggestions? work on better ways for people who want to work in America to come here legally. I don't know of any specific plans, but it's obvious that the "keep 'em out" approach isn't working. It's not working because we aren't doing a good job at it, partially thanks to Mr. Obama.
[QUOTE="Loco_Live"]If there were no illegal immigrants then the guys who get paid to find and prosecute them would be out of a job. =3 Law enforcement has enough other jobs to do....this has overtaxed the system.I don't like this at all. People shouldn't be demeaned and treated this way just because they are not from this country. Legality of being in this country and being employed is not an issue in my eyes. If the US fixed it's economy there would be more jobs for people. If Mexico was 'fixed' they would have no reason to come here. Simply going after one "illegal" at a time is not going to solve the "problem".
Jaguar_Shade
work on better ways for people who want to work in America to come here legally. I don't know of any specific plans, but it's obvious that the "keep 'em out" approach isn't working. Yes but economics has a lot to do with how many legal immigrants the country can sustain....hence why it takes some time. Mexico is not the only country that has people seeking to immigrate....and the economy cannot sustain unlimited growth.[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Instead of deriding attempts to fix the problem....why not come up with suggestions?LJS9502_basic
Edit; and keeping them out would work...but you'd have to get tough. It can be done but not with kid gloves.
:| economics has everything to do with illegal immigration. Whether it be the drug trade or the illegal workers. And the only way the "keep them out" approach will work is if we go Soviet Russia on the Mexican border. And even then, I bet people will find a way into the country. Fact is, the number of illegals has swelled since we started building the fence.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yes but economics has a lot to do with how many legal immigrants the country can sustain....hence why it takes some time. Mexico is not the only country that has people seeking to immigrate....and the economy cannot sustain unlimited growth.[QUOTE="fat_rob"] work on better ways for people who want to work in America to come here legally. I don't know of any specific plans, but it's obvious that the "keep 'em out" approach isn't working. fat_rob
Edit; and keeping them out would work...but you'd have to get tough. It can be done but not with kid gloves.
:| economics has everything to do with illegal immigration. Whether it be the drug trade or the illegal workers. And the only way the "keep them out" approach will work is if we go Soviet Russia on the Mexican border. And even then, I bet people will find a way into the country. Fact is, the number of illegals has swelled since we started building the fence.Uh..did you not notice what I said.:|"If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it."
Problem is, IF we do that we'll be ridiculed by other countries. Oh, the United States is Trying to Take back MExico, Blah Blah Blah. :evil:
I think we're kidding ourselves if we think Obama will EVER do something like this anyways.
Snipes_2
I'm not entirely sure about that. Alot of countries complain because we're off intervening in countries on the other side of the globe so they get worried, etc. Mexico is in "our neighborhood" so I don't really see much of a basis for criticism, especially when it seems like their problems are increasingly becoming our problems.
And I don't know about Obama, I don't agree with him on alot, I think he's an overly-idealistic and very politically correct president, but I think he's starting to realize the realities of the presidency, idealism doesn't translate all too well to the job. Whether he'll do something abput Mexico, I guess we'll just have to wait and see, I would like to see him call Calderon out on alot of crap for starters though.
:| economics has everything to do with illegal immigration. Whether it be the drug trade or the illegal workers. And the only way the "keep them out" approach will work is if we go Soviet Russia on the Mexican border. And even then, I bet people will find a way into the country. Fact is, the number of illegals has swelled since we started building the fence.Uh..did you not notice what I said.:| opps :P I thought you said doesn't, my bad :lol:[QUOTE="fat_rob"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yes but economics has a lot to do with how many legal immigrants the country can sustain....hence why it takes some time. Mexico is not the only country that has people seeking to immigrate....and the economy cannot sustain unlimited growth.
Edit; and keeping them out would work...but you'd have to get tough. It can be done but not with kid gloves.
LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Uh..did you not notice what I said.:| opps :P I thought you said doesn't, my bad :lol: It's okay. I sometimes read posts too fast myself.:P[QUOTE="fat_rob"] :| economics has everything to do with illegal immigration. Whether it be the drug trade or the illegal workers. And the only way the "keep them out" approach will work is if we go Soviet Russia on the Mexican border. And even then, I bet people will find a way into the country. Fact is, the number of illegals has swelled since we started building the fence.fat_rob
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]
"If ever there was a case for why the US should intervene in a country, Mexico is it."
Problem is, IF we do that we'll be ridiculed by other countries. Oh, the United States is Trying to Take back MExico, Blah Blah Blah. :evil:
I think we're kidding ourselves if we think Obama will EVER do something like this anyways.
NightStalkerBX
I'm not entirely sure about that. Alot of countries complain because we're off intervening in countries on the other side of the globe so they get worried, etc. Mexico is in "our neighborhood" so I don't really see much of a basis for criticism, especially when it seems like their problems are increasingly becoming our problems.
And I don't know about Obama, I don't agree with him on alot, I think he's an overly-idealistic and very politically correct president, but I think he's starting to realize the realities of the presidency, idealism doesn't translate all too well to the job. Whether he'll do something abput Mexico, I guess we'll just have to wait and see, I would like to see him call Calderon out on alot of crap for starters though.
I think Countries will complain no Matter what the United States does. As for Obama, I still doubt he'll Ever do anything to help the situation.I think Countries will complain no Matter what the United States does. As for Obama, I still doubt he'll Ever do anything to help the situation. Snipes_2
Vote out all of the Democrats in Congress, then watch the Federal Deficit drop by more than half, as ObamaCare will be repealed (for starters):P
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]I think Countries will complain no Matter what the United States does. As for Obama, I still doubt he'll Ever do anything to help the situation. topsemag55
Vote out all of the Democrats in Congress, then watch the Federal Deficit drop by more than half, as ObamaCare will be repealed.
I can vote in November. Definitely going straight across Republican :twisted:[QUOTE="topsemag55"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]I think Countries will complain no Matter what the United States does. As for Obama, I still doubt he'll Ever do anything to help the situation. Snipes_2
Vote out all of the Democrats in Congress, then watch the Federal Deficit drop by more than half, as ObamaCare will be repealed.
I can vote in November. Definitely going straight across Republican :twisted:*gives Snipes_2 high-five*
Damn I like this guy.:lol:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment