Obama Declares support for same-sex marriage.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Oh... the irony. kingkong0124

If you are resorting to typing skill to insult someone, you must really be grasping at straws.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Indeed. It's quite clear you haven't read the bible. The ultimate irony.DroidPhysX

Don't really care tbh.

He's not focusing on jobs thats for sure. All for the votes sadly.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Indeed. It's quite clear you haven't read the bible. The ultimate irony.

jimkabrhel

If you are resorting to typing skill to insult someone, you must really be grasping at straws.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Good comeback. I love your subtle attack on the Bible by not capitalizing it during the sentence, which clearly denotes that you think it's unimportant. I've seen you do this multiple times with other things as well. Or maybe it was unintentional? Maybe it's your troubled subconscious showing? kingkong0124

If you are resorting to typing skill to insult someone, you must really be grasping at straws.

Look at your own post. You made several mistakes typing, so you have no reason to fault anyone for typing or grammar.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

If you are resorting to typing skill to insult someone, you must really be grasping at straws.

jimkabrhel

Look at your own post. You made several mistakes typing, so you have no reason to fault anyone for typing or grammar.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Because protecting marriage is truly a liberal concept. But, I think you should still vote for Romney regardless of your political viewpoint. Romney has the House and basically half the Senate. He can actually get sh*t done, unlike Mr. Obama who lacks bipartisan leadership skills. kingkong0124

You've never actually read the Bible have you?

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Good comeback. I love your subtle attack on the Bible by not capitalizing it during the sentence, which clearly denotes that you think it's unimportant. I've seen you do this multiple times with other things as well. Or maybe it was unintentional? Maybe it's your troubled subconscious showing? kingkong0124

If you are resorting to typing skill to insult someone, you must really be grasping at straws.

Seriously? Who gives a f*ck? I sincerely doubt he's trying to offend you by not capitalizing the B in Bible lol. I forget to capitalize it too sometimes.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] This is happening repeatedly from this guy. I don't know if English is his second language or it's just that he didn't pay attention during grammar lessons.I'm going to go with none of the above and say that he's clearly doing this on purpose.

kingkong0124

Look at your own post. You made several mistakes typing, so you have no reason to fault anyone for typing or grammar.

Buddy boy?:lol: How old are you? 50?

My point was that being a hypocrite isn't going to gain you support for other arguments.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

>that moment when i think kingkong is username

mfw

maybe i am chasing ghosts again

kingkong0124

>implying familiarity with the term 'username'

oh my

suspicions further affirmed

If you are real: Church and state, bruv.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] How does one protect marriage? I mean, personally i draw some of my marriage views from the bible. You know, rapists marrying rape victim, men having 3 wives, etc. That's the marriage we should truly protect. The ones from the Bible.worlock77

You've never actually read the Bible have you?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] And we do. Sorry, the Bible does not contain anything like that. Next time, I'd suggest go to a preacher, who has really extensively studied the Bible, and consult him about it. He'll set you straight. Good job ignoring the last bit as well, you know I'm objectively right, but your bias is covering up your thought process.

kingkong0124

You've never actually read the Bible have you?

Where does it say that polygamy is explicited condemned?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] And we do. Sorry, the Bible does not contain anything like that. Next time, I'd suggest go to a preacher, who has really extensively studied the Bible, and consult him about it. He'll set you straight. Good job ignoring the last bit as well, you know I'm objectively right, but your bias is covering up your thought process.

kingkong0124

You've never actually read the Bible have you?

Everything he pointed out is, in fact, allowed by God at various points in the Bible. And sorry, but it's not my job to educate you on your holy book.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

>that moment when i think kingkong is username

mfw

maybe i am chasing ghosts again

coolbeans90

>implying familiarity with the term 'username'

oh my

suspicions further affirmed

If you are real: Church and state, bruv.

Yeah, some of you guys are pretty much taking Biblical quotes out of context. When you look at it without trying to cherry pick, it's crystal clear that it's not what you guys make it out to be.Amazon-Blight

So where is the condemnation for multiply wives or men marrying the women they've raped?

Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely not effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Aren't you Christian as well? Man up and defend your religion. I can't think you believe people like droidphysx are making better arguments than me.kingkong0124

>implying familiarity with the term 'username'

oh my

suspicions further affirmed

If you are real: Church and state, bruv.

Losing argument?

Make up most absurd argument you can think of.

Good tatic bro.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

>implying familiarity with the term 'username'

oh my

suspicions further affirmed

If you are real: Church and state, bruv.

worlock77

Losing argument?

Make up most absurd argument you can think of.

Good tatic bro.

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Aren't you Christian as well? Man up and defend your religion. I can't think you believe people like droidphysx are making better arguments than me.kingkong0124

>implying familiarity with the term 'username'

oh my

suspicions further affirmed

If you are real: Church and state, bruv.

Erm, cannibalism hasn't been banned for reasons pertaining to tradition.

[QUOTE="Amazon-Blight"]Yeah, some of you guys are pretty much taking Biblical quotes out of context. When you look at it without trying to cherry pick, it's crystal clear that it's not what you guys make it out to be.kingkong0124

The only agenda I have is attempting to argue against ignorance and misinformation.

TRADITION!

1. - Messages cannot be blank. Ensure your post contains non-whitespace characters and does not consist solely of formatted or quoted text.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

>implying familiarity with the term 'username'

oh my

suspicions further affirmed

If you are real: Church and state, bruv.

coolbeans90

Erm, cannibalism hasn't been banned for reasons pertaining to tradition.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] I agree with church and state seperation. But do you think we should allow cannibalism? It's been a tradition in all Western civilized nations throughout history that cannibalism is not permitted, often by religion. So do you agree we should give civil liberties to cannibals, avoiding tradition that has been with us for hundreds of years?

kingkong0124

Losing argument?

Make up most absurd argument you can think of.

Good tatic bro.

Yes. Clearly I'm saying that I want to give people the liberty to engage in cannibalism. F*ckwit.

Very exciting news! I'm glad that there are still politicians out there that support equality for everyone.

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Losing argument?

Make up most absurd argument you can think of.

Good tatic bro.

worlock77

Yes. Clearly I'm saying that I want to give people the liberty to engage in cannibalism. F*ckwit.

[QUOTE="Amazon-Blight"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"] These guys have an agenda of trying to pick verses from religious texts and attract others on this forum to atheism. I know several people who have converted to atheism simply because of delusion like this. kingkong0124

The Bible specifically condemns adultery, a practice which is typical in our society. Polygamy is not officially condemned in the Bible, and no longer has legal status. Not every moral argument arises from the Bible. And not every moral argument from the Bible is still followed today.

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

SkullCrusher04

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

SkullCrusher04

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] It's true. You want to give cannibals civil liberties? kingkong0124

Yes. Clearly I'm saying that I want to give people the liberty to engage in cannibalism. F*ckwit.

Christ, you can't even keep up with a coherant argument.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="Amazon-Blight"] Pretty sad to be honest. I could easily convert people to away from any religion I want if I cherry picked quotes to my advantage. jimkabrhel

The Bible specifically condemns adultery, a practice which is typical in our society. Polygamy is not officially condemned in the Bible, and no longer has legal status. Not every moral argument arises from the Bible. And not every moral argument from the Bible is still followed today.

[QUOTE="SkullCrusher04"]

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

kingkong0124

Traditions change and people and society evolve. In Roman culture, it was acceptable and common practice for men to take younger male lovers as a sign of their power and virility.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Yes. Clearly I'm saying that I want to give people the liberty to engage in cannibalism. F*ckwit.

worlock77

Christ, you can't even keep up with a coherant argument.

Good, there's been enough beating around the bush. It's time we got over this already, if you don't want to support gay marriage then fine, but stop imposing your religious beliefs on others.

[QUOTE="SkullCrusher04"]

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

Amazon-Blight

Please cite the case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Ten Commandments are to be posted on government buildings.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="SkullCrusher04"]

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

jimkabrhel

Traditions change and people and society evolve. In Roman culture, it was acceptable and common practice for men to take younger male lovers as a sign of their power and virility.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] I thought you wanted separation of religion and state? This topic has nothing to do with Christianity. Marriages between men and women only are a universal theme, regardless of religion or geographic region. kingkong0124

Christ, you can't even keep up with a coherant argument.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Okay, SkullCrusher (pleasant name by the way), marriage has always been defined with man and woman in civilized societies. I agree, this has nothing to do with Christianity. This has to do with universal tradition. All successful civilizations defined marriage between a man and a woman. kingkong0124

Traditions change and people and society evolve. In Roman culture, it was acceptable and common practice for men to take younger male lovers as a sign of their power and virility.

The Roman Empire? Geographic isolation? Are you kidding?

[QUOTE="Amazon-Blight"][QUOTE="SkullCrusher04"]

@Everyone Funny how this kingkong loser is so adamant about banning something that has absolutely no effect on him whatsoever. And to try and even remotely support his claims, he resorts to using the bible. All credibility is lost there. XD

@KingKong0124 And you do realize that marriage was conceived way before christianity was ever conceived right? Christianity is only 2,ooo years old so don't make it sound like christianity created marriage. Leave the bible out of this, man up, and try debating without using your fake stories. Oh wait... you probably cant.

worlock77

Please cite the case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Ten Commandments are to be posted on government buildings.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

Christ, you can't even keep up with a coherant argument.

Ace6301

lol people still argue with kingkong? i thought it was pretty obvious dude is an elaborate troll character

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] I thought you wanted separation of religion and state? This topic has nothing to do with Christianity. Marriages between men and women only are a universal theme, regardless of religion or geographic region. kingkong0124

Christ, you can't even keep up with a coherant argument.

Actually the native americans had no qualms with people taking spouses of the same sex. Try making an argument that doesn't rely on just pulling things out of your ass.

lol people still argue with kingkong? i thought it was pretty obvious dude is an elaborate troll character

Aljosa23

I can't help it. I'm bored.

lol people still argue with kingkong? i thought it was pretty obvious dude is an elaborate troll character

Aljosa23