Lol, Wow. You guys must be lurking these threads just waiting to catch a mistake :lol:Snipes_2
No, I just came back from being away. :P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Ehh, it's a bit premature to already be placing him in a list of best presidents. He's been in office for barely 2 years forcrying out loud.
THGarrett
I don't think its premature, seeing as this list is not set in stone and it will change. with those two years for better or worse.
Before highways were common, the car industry was just a fraction of what it is today. Of course people lived closer to things. That's just logical. To me this sounds like one of those "In the good ol' days" arguments.jalexbrownNot only in the "good ol' days", but in other countries as well. Living so far from work is almost uniquely North American. When more transit modes are incorporated into the infrastructure, people use them. Why are neighborhoods still being built without sidewalks? Many places in this country were built for cars, not for people. And, fortunately, planners are realizing the mistakes that have been made in the past 50 years, and are starting to reverse the trend.
I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:
Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.
Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.
"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.
He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"
LINK to video.
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Before highways were common, the car industry was just a fraction of what it is today. Of course people lived closer to things. That's just logical. To me this sounds like one of those "In the good ol' days" arguments.Engrish_MajorNot only in the "good ol' days", but in other countries as well. Living so far from work is almost uniquely North American. When more transit modes are incorporated into the infrastructure, people use them. Why are neighborhoods still being built without sidewalks? Many places in this country were built for cars, not for people. And, fortunately, planners are realizing the mistakes that have been made in the past 50 years, and are starting to reverse the trend. If you look at a lot of urban cities, you'll find that public transportation is a money pit. For example I live near Cincinnati, and public transportation is practically non-existent unless you go into the heart of downtown - which has next to nothing and no real reason to use public transportation anyways. The suburban areas of Cincinnati had public transportation for a while in the 90s, but most of them are now gone because nobody used them. Even when gas was over $4 a gallon, the public transportation system only saw a very marginal hike - and it still never picked up in suburban areas. During the gas peak, very few gas stations were reporting any major change in gas sales. Maybe people use public transportation in your city, but you're very blatantly assuming it would be the same in every other city.
I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:
Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.
Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.
"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.
He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"
LINK to video.
Ninja-Hippo
Of all the things people could legitimately criticize Obama on, I will never understand why "he can't speak without a teleprompter" and "he hasn't done anything" have always been the old standbys. I have to react like, that's the best argument against him one can make?
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Before highways were common, the car industry was just a fraction of what it is today. Of course people lived closer to things. That's just logical. To me this sounds like one of those "In the good ol' days" arguments.jalexbrownNot only in the "good ol' days", but in other countries as well. Living so far from work is almost uniquely North American. When more transit modes are incorporated into the infrastructure, people use them. Why are neighborhoods still being built without sidewalks? Many places in this country were built for cars, not for people. And, fortunately, planners are realizing the mistakes that have been made in the past 50 years, and are starting to reverse the trend. If you look at a lot of urban cities, you'll find that public transportation is a money pit. For example I live near Cincinnati, and public transportation is practically non-existent unless you go into the heart of downtown - which has next to nothing and no real reason to use public transportation anyways. The suburban areas of Cincinnati had public transportation for a while in the 90s, but most of them are now gone because nobody used them. Even when gas was over $4 a gallon, the public transportation system only saw a very marginal hike - and it still never picked up in suburban areas. During the gas peak, very few gas stations were reporting any major change in gas sales. Maybe people use public transportation in your city, but you're very blatantly assuming it would be the same in every other city.
Public transportaiton in most areas like street cars system were bought out and dismantled by the car companies, to force people to buy cars.. Thats why public transportation is a joke in the US compared to places in Europe.
If you look at a lot of urban cities, you'll find that public transportation is a money pit. For example I live near Cincinnati, and public transportation is practically non-existent unless you go into the heart of downtown - which has next to nothing and no real reason to use public transportation anyways. The suburban areas of Cincinnati had public transportation for a while in the 90s, but most of them are now gone because nobody used them. Even when gas was over $4 a gallon, the public transportation system only saw a very marginal hike - and it still never picked up in suburban areas. During the gas peak, very few gas stations were reporting any major change in gas sales. Maybe people use public transportation in your city, but you're very blatantly assuming it would be the same in every other city.jalexbrown
Yes, they are money pits. No form of transit is inherently profitable for the users or builders, including driving. Roads are quiteheavily subsidized.
Here are some articles profiling the rise in transit use among various US cities that correlate to the rise in gas prices, I'll find more if you'd like:
Travelers Turn to Public Transit
Gas Prices Send Surge of Riders to Mass Transit
Drivers Switch to Public Transit
They are both so easily refuted, as well, making them all the more hollow as criticisms. And this comes from someone who has been quite critical of Obama over the last couple of months. I just don't understand either the teleprompter jibes or the 'he hasn't done anything' accusations which i just find baffling.Of all the things people could legitimately criticize Obama on, I will never understand why "he can't speak without a teleprompter" and "he hasn't done anything" have always been the old standbys. I have to react like, that's the best argument against him one can make?
GabuEx
Obama did thank himself, Fox didn't skew that (It's on multiple news sites). Why are we now using Youtube links to prove points? I thought one obscure link on Youtube wasn't good enough to prove his inadequacy. Can you post the link for that article please?I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:
Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.
Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.
"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.
He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"
LINK to video.
Ninja-Hippo
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]
I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:
Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.
Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.
"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.
He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"
LINK to video.
GabuEx
Of all the things people could legitimately criticize Obama on, I will never understand why "he can't speak without a teleprompter" and "he hasn't done anything" have always been the old standbys. I have to react like, that's the best argument against him one can make?
There's more than just his inability to speak without a prompter, that just pertains to the argument.Public transportaiton in most areas like street cars system were bought out and dismantled by the car companies, to force people to buy cars.. Thats why public transportation is a joke in the US compared to places in Europe.
GM was also instrumental in shaping our transit infrastructure policy beginning after WW2, which was more destructive to our cities than the war could have dreamt of being. They thought the ideal lifestyle was separating work from living areas. You should see their Futurama video (yes, that's the origin of the term) from the 1939 World's Fair. Any sane planner today would laugh at the absurd ideas they presented as being the "ideal future".
Obama did thank himself, Fox didn't skew that (It's on multiple news sites). Why are we now using Youtube links to prove points? I thought one obscure link on Youtube wasn't good enough to prove his inadequacy. Can you post the link for that article please?Snipes_2
The article is from a newspaper report which you need to subscribe to to view, but an excert from it including most of what i quoted can be read here (it also includes both videos featured):
Link to the Telegraph article.
Choice quote for you, however:
'That was pretty clear: there was a teleprompter mix up and the fall guy was Cowen. Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense.
Ironically, therefore, Obama was ad-libbing rather than mindlessly reading the wrong speech from a teleprompter.
I've exchanged emails with Englund and he confirmed this was the caseand kindly supplied me with an audio file of the event that removes all doubt.'
Public transportaiton in most areas like street cars system were bought out and dismantled by the car companies, to force people to buy cars.. Thats why public transportation is a joke in the US compared to places in Europe.
GM was also instrumental in shaping our transit infrastructure policy beginning after WW2, which was more destructive to our cities than the war could have dreamt of being. They thought the ideal lifestyle was separating work from living areas. You should see their Futurama video (yes, that's the origin of the term) from the 1939 World's Fair. Any sane planner today would laugh at the absurd ideas they presented as being the "ideal future". A quick question: do you support the government forcing people into policies that they don't want?As a joke.
GabuEx
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]
Obama did thank himself, Fox didn't skew that (It's on multiple news sites). Why are we now using Youtube links to prove points? I thought one obscure link on Youtube wasn't good enough to prove his inadequacy. Can you post the link for that article please?Ninja-Hippo
The article is from a newspaper report which you need to subscribe to to view, but an excert from it including most of what i quoted can be read here (it also includes both videos featured):
Link to the Telegraph article.
Choice quote for you, however:
'That was pretty clear: there was a teleprompter mix up and the fall guy was Cowen. Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense.
Ironically, therefore, Obama was ad-libbing rather than mindlessly reading the wrong speech from a teleprompter.
I've exchanged emails with Englund and he confirmed this was the caseand kindly supplied me with an audio file of the event that removes all doubt.'
Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.I said it was a joke, Gabu said it was a joke. Where's the conflict?Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.
jalexbrown
A quick question: do you support the government forcing people into policies that they don't want?jalexbrownThat's very vague (and can be a slippery slope). People don't want to pay taxes, but the government forces them to, for instance. If you're talking about transit, then the government (along with mega corporations) shapes our habits already. Like I said earlier, roads and highways are heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Whether people know it or not, they are already socially engineered by where roads/rail/transit is built, how zoning laws are enacted, and by subsidies on things such as oil and forms of infrastructure. The specific mode of transit is irrelevant. It just so happens that cars are the most expensive to society, so if the government takes action to lessen that, then I'm all for it.
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]A quick question: do you support the government forcing people into policies that they don't want?Engrish_MajorThat's very vague (and can be a slippery slope). People don't want to pay taxes, but the government forces them to, for instance. If you're talking about transit, then the government (along with mega corporations) shapes our habits already. Like I said earlier, roads and highways are heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Whether people know it or not, they are already socially engineered by where roads/rail/transit is built, how zoning laws are enacted, and by subsidies on things such as oil and forms of infrastructure. The specific mode of transit is irrelevant. It just so happens that cars are the most expensive to society, so if the government takes action to lessen that, then I'm all for it. Do you think that most people wanting the President trying to get gas prices up to seven bucks?
Obama....15th......wow *facepalm* he hasnt really did anything -_-'.Foxi911:roll:
Have u ben living under a rock?
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]I said it was a joke, Gabu said it was a joke. Where's the conflict? I thought you said he didn't thank himself. Oh well, I don't really care about this argument. Carry on. :PNow I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.
Ninja-Hippo
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"]I said it was a joke, Gabu said it was a joke. Where's the conflict? I thought you said he didn't thank himself. Oh well, I don't really care about this argument. Carry on. :P He didn't thank himself literally, he did so as a joke.Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.
jalexbrown
Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.
jalexbrown
It pretty much goes like this:
1. Cowen accidentally began to read from Obama's speech. He recognized his mistake and stopped.
2. Obama came on and jokingly said, "Thank you, President Obama" as though he were reading from Cowen's speech. Everyone has a good laugh, except apparently certain people in the media.
3. Those certain people decide to ignore the background and just report that Obama thanked himself as though he were so stupid that he couldn't figure out that "Thank you, President Obama" was not part of his speech.
Do you think that most people wanting the President trying to get gas prices up to seven bucks?jalexbrownI don't support any round-about way of doing it. Just like the proposed soda tax in many areas (where we subsizide high-fructose corn syrup, yet add a tax to the end product :?), there are too many artificial mechanisms that affect the price. Letting gas go to its natural cost (which is above the cost consumers pay at the pump) would be sufficient. Why do you think that gas is more expensive in most every other Western nation than ours? Just ending the subsidies to oil companies would be great.
the teleprompter attacks come because some might think he relies to much on it. xbox360isgr8tAnd former presidents that used note cards or pieces of paper instead of Obama's ubiquitous teleprompters? Should they be criticized?
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Do you think that most people wanting the President trying to get gas prices up to seven bucks?Engrish_MajorI don't support any round-about way of doing it. Just like the proposed soda tax in many areas (where we subsizide high-fructose corn syrup, yet add a tax to the end product :?), there are too many artificial mechanisms that affect the price. Letting gas go to its natural cost (which is above the cost consumers pay at the pump) would be sufficient. Why do you think that gas is more expensive in most every other Western nation than ours? Just ending the subsidies to oil companies would be great. Do you have a source with gas prices for other countries? That would be an interesting read.
Do you have a source with gas prices for other countries? That would be an interesting read.jalexbrownSo far, just Wikipedia.
(Note where it states "In the absence of subsidies in the United States, per gallon prices are expected to reach or exceeded European levels.")
Actually, one of the sourced links here seems to be good (though it doesn't work so well on my work PC)
I wonder what the republicans will be busier doing: bashing Obama or defending Bush.jalexbrown
I think is a trap for them to defend Bush, I say Obama bashing like always.
So far, just Wikipedia.[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Do you have a source with gas prices for other countries? That would be an interesting read.Engrish_Major
(Note where it states "In the absence of subsidies in the United States, per gallon prices are expected to reach or exceeded European levels.")
Actually, one of the sourced links here seems to be good (though it doesn't work so well on my work PC)
That's interesting. I never would have imagined that gas was so cheap in the US compared to other countries - especially countries like Turkey that are close to the oil industry.Wow.... I am losing more and more respect for people.... Obama has done nothing but make situations worse. Bush was horrible but Obama is just as bad if not worse.
Each one of those scholars should be ashamed
Whether you are liberal or not you have to admit this is absurd...
I don't think it is fair to rank Obama among the other Presidents until many years after he has left office, that way we can really see the full impact of his actions.
I agree to be honest they should not even rank bush yetI don't think it is fair to rank Obama among the other Presidents until many years after he has left office, that way we can really see the full impact of his actions.
DarkGamer007
I personally believe they should be ranked 10 years after their presidency ends. that way it filters out possible political bias
Several scholars consider FDR to be one of top 3 Presidents of all-time. So I don't get this comment?Uh...FDR at number one? :lol:
Yeah, I'm totally going to trust what they say from now on.Saturos3091
I just think it's funny that people on here are claiming to have a better views of who's a good president than "238 presidential scholars" you know the guys with degrees and whose jobs are to study presidents.
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]I wonder what the republicans will be busier doing: bashing Obama or defending Bush.Bikouchu35
I think is a trap for them to defend Bush, I say Obama bashing like always.
Will that be Bush's fault as well?Obama....15th......wow *facepalm* he hasnt really did anything -_-'.Foxi911
Besides going back on what he got elected to do (end the war).
1. Making Obamacare (great there goes the economy/my great grandchildren's social security I'm 20 btw so yeah...)
2. Tried to get a Israel spy that helped save many lives deported
3. Made his aunt a citizen. (unconstitutional)
4. Oil "thing" going on right now...
5. Blame it on the previous president...
He is done nothing...good that is. These "scholars" need to stop watching mtv and actually watch the news or something.
[QUOTE="Bikouchu35"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"]I wonder what the republicans will be busier doing: bashing Obama or defending Bush.Unassigned
I think is a trap for them to defend Bush, I say Obama bashing like always.
Will that be Bush's fault as well? http://townhall.com/blog/g/2e863e96-533c-4a46-9b03-b858273122f7?comments=true&commentsSortDirection=Descending Srsly. http://townhall.com/blog/g/2e863e96-533c-4a46-9b03-b858273122f7?comments=true&commentsSortDirection=Descending Obama is the worst president we've ever had. I actually miss Bush and I am beginning to suspect the media influenced my teenage peers...Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment