Obama named 15th best president by 238 Presidential Scholars

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#251 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Lol, Wow. You guys must be lurking these threads just waiting to catch a mistake :lol:Snipes_2

No, I just came back from being away. :P

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#252 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Ehh, it's a bit premature to already be placing him in a list of best presidents. He's been in office for barely 2 years forcrying out loud.

THGarrett

I don't think its premature, seeing as this list is not set in stone and it will change. with those two years for better or worse.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#253 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]Lol, Wow. You guys must be lurking these threads just waiting to catch a mistake :lol:GabuEx

No, I just came back from being away. :P

Fair enough. You got me.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Before highways were common, the car industry was just a fraction of what it is today. Of course people lived closer to things. That's just logical. To me this sounds like one of those "In the good ol' days" arguments.jalexbrown
Not only in the "good ol' days", but in other countries as well. Living so far from work is almost uniquely North American. When more transit modes are incorporated into the infrastructure, people use them. Why are neighborhoods still being built without sidewalks? Many places in this country were built for cars, not for people. And, fortunately, planners are realizing the mistakes that have been made in the past 50 years, and are starting to reverse the trend.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#255 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:

Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.

"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.

He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"

LINK to video.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#256 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Before highways were common, the car industry was just a fraction of what it is today. Of course people lived closer to things. That's just logical. To me this sounds like one of those "In the good ol' days" arguments.Engrish_Major
Not only in the "good ol' days", but in other countries as well. Living so far from work is almost uniquely North American. When more transit modes are incorporated into the infrastructure, people use them. Why are neighborhoods still being built without sidewalks? Many places in this country were built for cars, not for people. And, fortunately, planners are realizing the mistakes that have been made in the past 50 years, and are starting to reverse the trend.

If you look at a lot of urban cities, you'll find that public transportation is a money pit. For example I live near Cincinnati, and public transportation is practically non-existent unless you go into the heart of downtown - which has next to nothing and no real reason to use public transportation anyways. The suburban areas of Cincinnati had public transportation for a while in the 90s, but most of them are now gone because nobody used them. Even when gas was over $4 a gallon, the public transportation system only saw a very marginal hike - and it still never picked up in suburban areas. During the gas peak, very few gas stations were reporting any major change in gas sales. Maybe people use public transportation in your city, but you're very blatantly assuming it would be the same in every other city.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#257 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:

Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.

"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.

He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"

LINK to video.

Ninja-Hippo

Of all the things people could legitimately criticize Obama on, I will never understand why "he can't speak without a teleprompter" and "he hasn't done anything" have always been the old standbys. I have to react like, that's the best argument against him one can make?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#258 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Before highways were common, the car industry was just a fraction of what it is today. Of course people lived closer to things. That's just logical. To me this sounds like one of those "In the good ol' days" arguments.jalexbrown
Not only in the "good ol' days", but in other countries as well. Living so far from work is almost uniquely North American. When more transit modes are incorporated into the infrastructure, people use them. Why are neighborhoods still being built without sidewalks? Many places in this country were built for cars, not for people. And, fortunately, planners are realizing the mistakes that have been made in the past 50 years, and are starting to reverse the trend.

If you look at a lot of urban cities, you'll find that public transportation is a money pit. For example I live near Cincinnati, and public transportation is practically non-existent unless you go into the heart of downtown - which has next to nothing and no real reason to use public transportation anyways. The suburban areas of Cincinnati had public transportation for a while in the 90s, but most of them are now gone because nobody used them. Even when gas was over $4 a gallon, the public transportation system only saw a very marginal hike - and it still never picked up in suburban areas. During the gas peak, very few gas stations were reporting any major change in gas sales. Maybe people use public transportation in your city, but you're very blatantly assuming it would be the same in every other city.

Public transportaiton in most areas like street cars system were bought out and dismantled by the car companies, to force people to buy cars.. Thats why public transportation is a joke in the US compared to places in Europe.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#259 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Watch this and then tell me with a straight fact that Obama is a bad orator.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

If you look at a lot of urban cities, you'll find that public transportation is a money pit. For example I live near Cincinnati, and public transportation is practically non-existent unless you go into the heart of downtown - which has next to nothing and no real reason to use public transportation anyways. The suburban areas of Cincinnati had public transportation for a while in the 90s, but most of them are now gone because nobody used them. Even when gas was over $4 a gallon, the public transportation system only saw a very marginal hike - and it still never picked up in suburban areas. During the gas peak, very few gas stations were reporting any major change in gas sales. Maybe people use public transportation in your city, but you're very blatantly assuming it would be the same in every other city.jalexbrown

Yes, they are money pits. No form of transit is inherently profitable for the users or builders, including driving. Roads are quiteheavily subsidized.

Here are some articles profiling the rise in transit use among various US cities that correlate to the rise in gas prices, I'll find more if you'd like:

Travelers Turn to Public Transit

Gas Prices Send Surge of Riders to Mass Transit

Drivers Switch to Public Transit

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#261 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Of all the things people could legitimately criticize Obama on, I will never understand why "he can't speak without a teleprompter" and "he hasn't done anything" have always been the old standbys. I have to react like, that's the best argument against him one can make?

GabuEx

They are both so easily refuted, as well, making them all the more hollow as criticisms. And this comes from someone who has been quite critical of Obama over the last couple of months. I just don't understand either the teleprompter jibes or the 'he hasn't done anything' accusations which i just find baffling.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#262 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:

Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.

"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.

He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"

LINK to video.

Ninja-Hippo
Obama did thank himself, Fox didn't skew that (It's on multiple news sites). Why are we now using Youtube links to prove points? I thought one obscure link on Youtube wasn't good enough to prove his inadequacy. Can you post the link for that article please?
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#263 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

I think you may find this interesting/enlightening, Snipes. A journalist for the British media did an article on mistakes Obama and Biden have made (so no accusations of bias, please), and then later did a follow up when many American readers commented why he did not include anything about Obama's recent supposed teleprompter gaffe. He had this to say:

Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense. Cowen, having read Obama's speech from the teleprompter realized his mistake 12 words-in, after which Obama returned to the podium to make an off-cuff and light-hearted joke, saying 'thank you to President Obama' to uproarious laughter, before wishing everyone a happy St. Patrick's day.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News misreporting fed into theprevailing anti-Obama theme that he cannot speak without a teleprompter, and mistakenly thanked himself. The video here features Limbaugh ranting about his idiocy for over six minutes, based on one completely misreported story.

"It's rubbish, of course, to argue that Obama cannot speak without a teleprompter. On the campaign trail, Obama often spoke off the cuff and did so remarkably well. Anyone denying that is not living in the real world and his political opponents are deluding themselves if they think he is not a good – at times,superb – speaker.

He had off days on the campaign trail but on top form he was a campaigner without rival. I remember him at the height of his campaigning powers at an event in Alexandria, Virginia last February. Here's a sample of what I saw (note he is not using a teleprompter):"

LINK to video.

GabuEx

Of all the things people could legitimately criticize Obama on, I will never understand why "he can't speak without a teleprompter" and "he hasn't done anything" have always been the old standbys. I have to react like, that's the best argument against him one can make?

There's more than just his inability to speak without a prompter, that just pertains to the argument.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Public transportaiton in most areas like street cars system were bought out and dismantled by the car companies, to force people to buy cars.. Thats why public transportation is a joke in the US compared to places in Europe.

GM was also instrumental in shaping our transit infrastructure policy beginning after WW2, which was more destructive to our cities than the war could have dreamt of being. They thought the ideal lifestyle was separating work from living areas. You should see their Futurama video (yes, that's the origin of the term) from the 1939 World's Fair. Any sane planner today would laugh at the absurd ideas they presented as being the "ideal future".
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#265 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Obama did thank himselfSnipes_2

As a joke.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#266 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts


Obama did thank himself, Fox didn't skew that (It's on multiple news sites). Why are we now using Youtube links to prove points? I thought one obscure link on Youtube wasn't good enough to prove his inadequacy. Can you post the link for that article please?Snipes_2


He did not thank himself. :| Don't believe everything you read, man. The fact that you indeed do that he thanked himself further emphasizes the point that the journalist is making; that certain media moguls want to ingrain things in the public consciousness which simply aren't true, but which cannot be removed once they're there.

The article is from a newspaper report which you need to subscribe to to view, but an excert from it including most of what i quoted can be read here (it also includes both videos featured):

Link to the Telegraph article.

Choice quote for you, however:

'That was pretty clear: there was a teleprompter mix up and the fall guy was Cowen. Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense.

Ironically, therefore, Obama was ad-libbing rather than mindlessly reading the wrong speech from a teleprompter.

I've exchanged emails with Englund and he confirmed this was the caseand kindly supplied me with an audio file of the event that removes all doubt.'

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#267 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Public transportaiton in most areas like street cars system were bought out and dismantled by the car companies, to force people to buy cars.. Thats why public transportation is a joke in the US compared to places in Europe.

GM was also instrumental in shaping our transit infrastructure policy beginning after WW2, which was more destructive to our cities than the war could have dreamt of being. They thought the ideal lifestyle was separating work from living areas. You should see their Futurama video (yes, that's the origin of the term) from the 1939 World's Fair. Any sane planner today would laugh at the absurd ideas they presented as being the "ideal future".

A quick question: do you support the government forcing people into policies that they don't want?
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#268 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

As a joke.

GabuEx

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]
Obama did thank himself, Fox didn't skew that (It's on multiple news sites). Why are we now using Youtube links to prove points? I thought one obscure link on Youtube wasn't good enough to prove his inadequacy. Can you post the link for that article please?Ninja-Hippo



He did not thank himself. :| Don't believe everything you read, man. The fact that you indeed do that he thanked himself further emphasizes the point that the journalist is making; that certain media moguls want to ingrain things in the public consciousness which simply aren't true, but which cannot be removed once they're there.

The article is from a newspaper report which you need to subscribe to to view, but an excert from it including most of what i quoted can be read here (it also includes both videos featured):

Link to the Telegraph article.

Choice quote for you, however:

'That was pretty clear: there was a teleprompter mix up and the fall guy was Cowen. Obama stepped in after Cowen's five-minute speech to make a good-natured and well-received joke at the Irish premier's expense.

Ironically, therefore, Obama was ad-libbing rather than mindlessly reading the wrong speech from a teleprompter.

I've exchanged emails with Englund and he confirmed this was the caseand kindly supplied me with an audio file of the event that removes all doubt.'

Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#269 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.

jalexbrown
I said it was a joke, Gabu said it was a joke. Where's the conflict?
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
A quick question: do you support the government forcing people into policies that they don't want?jalexbrown
That's very vague (and can be a slippery slope). People don't want to pay taxes, but the government forces them to, for instance. If you're talking about transit, then the government (along with mega corporations) shapes our habits already. Like I said earlier, roads and highways are heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Whether people know it or not, they are already socially engineered by where roads/rail/transit is built, how zoning laws are enacted, and by subsidies on things such as oil and forms of infrastructure. The specific mode of transit is irrelevant. It just so happens that cars are the most expensive to society, so if the government takes action to lessen that, then I'm all for it.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#271 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]A quick question: do you support the government forcing people into policies that they don't want?Engrish_Major
That's very vague (and can be a slippery slope). People don't want to pay taxes, but the government forces them to, for instance. If you're talking about transit, then the government (along with mega corporations) shapes our habits already. Like I said earlier, roads and highways are heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Whether people know it or not, they are already socially engineered by where roads/rail/transit is built, how zoning laws are enacted, and by subsidies on things such as oil and forms of infrastructure. The specific mode of transit is irrelevant. It just so happens that cars are the most expensive to society, so if the government takes action to lessen that, then I'm all for it.

Do you think that most people wanting the President trying to get gas prices up to seven bucks?
Avatar image for batman_is_aweso
batman_is_aweso

2762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#272 batman_is_aweso
Member since 2009 • 2762 Posts

Obama....15th......wow *facepalm* he hasnt really did anything -_-'.Foxi911
:roll:

Have u ben living under a rock?

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#273 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]

Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.

Ninja-Hippo
I said it was a joke, Gabu said it was a joke. Where's the conflict?

I thought you said he didn't thank himself. Oh well, I don't really care about this argument. Carry on. :P
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#274 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="jalexbrown"]

Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.

jalexbrown
I said it was a joke, Gabu said it was a joke. Where's the conflict?

I thought you said he didn't thank himself. Oh well, I don't really care about this argument. Carry on. :P

He didn't thank himself literally, he did so as a joke.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#275 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Now I'm a bit confused on the matter, because we have two people that disagree with Snipes offering conflicting views of what happened.

jalexbrown

It pretty much goes like this:

1. Cowen accidentally began to read from Obama's speech. He recognized his mistake and stopped.

2. Obama came on and jokingly said, "Thank you, President Obama" as though he were reading from Cowen's speech. Everyone has a good laugh, except apparently certain people in the media.

3. Those certain people decide to ignore the background and just report that Obama thanked himself as though he were so stupid that he couldn't figure out that "Thank you, President Obama" was not part of his speech.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#276 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Do you think that most people wanting the President trying to get gas prices up to seven bucks?jalexbrown
I don't support any round-about way of doing it. Just like the proposed soda tax in many areas (where we subsizide high-fructose corn syrup, yet add a tax to the end product :?), there are too many artificial mechanisms that affect the price. Letting gas go to its natural cost (which is above the cost consumers pay at the pump) would be sufficient. Why do you think that gas is more expensive in most every other Western nation than ours? Just ending the subsidies to oil companies would be great.
Avatar image for xbox360isgr8t
xbox360isgr8t

6600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#277 xbox360isgr8t
Member since 2006 • 6600 Posts
the teleprompter attacks come because some might think he relies to much on it. the what has he done comes from those that are critical of him and think the things he has done are not great. well thats how i feel about those more commonly used criticisms.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
the teleprompter attacks come because some might think he relies to much on it. xbox360isgr8t
And former presidents that used note cards or pieces of paper instead of Obama's ubiquitous teleprompters? Should they be criticized?
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#279 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Do you think that most people wanting the President trying to get gas prices up to seven bucks?Engrish_Major
I don't support any round-about way of doing it. Just like the proposed soda tax in many areas (where we subsizide high-fructose corn syrup, yet add a tax to the end product :?), there are too many artificial mechanisms that affect the price. Letting gas go to its natural cost (which is above the cost consumers pay at the pump) would be sufficient. Why do you think that gas is more expensive in most every other Western nation than ours? Just ending the subsidies to oil companies would be great.

Do you have a source with gas prices for other countries? That would be an interesting read.
Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts

What the hell is Nixon doing above Bush?

MasterBolt360
And why is Obama even in the top 40?
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#281 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

Do you have a source with gas prices for other countries? That would be an interesting read.jalexbrown
So far, just Wikipedia.

(Note where it states "In the absence of subsidies in the United States, per gallon prices are expected to reach or exceeded European levels.")

Actually, one of the sourced links here seems to be good (though it doesn't work so well on my work PC)

Avatar image for Bikouchu35
Bikouchu35

8344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#282 Bikouchu35
Member since 2009 • 8344 Posts

I wonder what the republicans will be busier doing: bashing Obama or defending Bush.jalexbrown

I think is a trap for them to defend Bush, I say Obama bashing like always.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#283 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]Do you have a source with gas prices for other countries? That would be an interesting read.Engrish_Major

So far, just Wikipedia.

(Note where it states "In the absence of subsidies in the United States, per gallon prices are expected to reach or exceeded European levels.")

Actually, one of the sourced links here seems to be good (though it doesn't work so well on my work PC)

That's interesting. I never would have imagined that gas was so cheap in the US compared to other countries - especially countries like Turkey that are close to the oil industry.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#284 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

Uh...FDR at number one? :lol:

Yeah, I'm totally going to trust what they say from now on.

Avatar image for Ingenemployee
Ingenemployee

2307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#285 Ingenemployee
Member since 2007 • 2307 Posts

Yay the president I am related to is not at the bottom.

Avatar image for LORD_BLACKGULT
LORD_BLACKGULT

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#286 LORD_BLACKGULT
Member since 2006 • 947 Posts

Obama the 15th best president? Subjectivity at its finest.

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#287 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Wow.... I am losing more and more respect for people.... Obama has done nothing but make situations worse. Bush was horrible but Obama is just as bad if not worse.

Each one of those scholars should be ashamed

Whether you are liberal or not you have to admit this is absurd...

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23350 Posts
Seems a little early, but no one will remember this in a month much less after his term(s).
Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#289 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

I don't think it is fair to rank Obama among the other Presidents until many years after he has left office, that way we can really see the full impact of his actions.

Avatar image for NightStalkerBX
NightStalkerBX

2032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 NightStalkerBX
Member since 2006 • 2032 Posts

My favorite president is 2nd on the list. :D

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

I don't think it is fair to rank Obama among the other Presidents until many years after he has left office, that way we can really see the full impact of his actions.

DarkGamer007

I agree to be honest they should not even rank bush yet

I personally believe they should be ranked 10 years after their presidency ends. that way it filters out possible political bias

Avatar image for sboyer2
sboyer2

941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#292 sboyer2
Member since 2010 • 941 Posts
I love how the media rides Obamas **** so hard
Avatar image for Perd1t1on
Perd1t1on

1031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 Perd1t1on
Member since 2009 • 1031 Posts
He should of been numba 1
Avatar image for Ace_WondersX
Ace_WondersX

4455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#294 Ace_WondersX
Member since 2003 • 4455 Posts

Uh...FDR at number one? :lol:

Yeah, I'm totally going to trust what they say from now on.

Saturos3091

Several scholars consider FDR to be one of top 3 Presidents of all-time. So I don't get this comment?

I just think it's funny that people on here are claiming to have a better views of who's a good president than "238 presidential scholars" you know the guys with degrees and whose jobs are to study presidents.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#295 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

I voted for Obama and I still support Obama, but it's a tad premature to rank his presidancy just yet. Let's wait until it's over and get a bit of perspective.

Avatar image for Unassigned
Unassigned

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#296 Unassigned
Member since 2004 • 1970 Posts

[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]I wonder what the republicans will be busier doing: bashing Obama or defending Bush.Bikouchu35

I think is a trap for them to defend Bush, I say Obama bashing like always.

Will that be Bush's fault as well?
Avatar image for IWKYB
IWKYB

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 IWKYB
Member since 2010 • 1545 Posts

Obama....15th......wow *facepalm* he hasnt really did anything -_-'.Foxi911

Besides going back on what he got elected to do (end the war).

1. Making Obamacare (great there goes the economy/my great grandchildren's social security I'm 20 btw so yeah...)

2. Tried to get a Israel spy that helped save many lives deported

3. Made his aunt a citizen. (unconstitutional)

4. Oil "thing" going on right now...

5. Blame it on the previous president...


He is done nothing...good that is. These "scholars" need to stop watching mtv and actually watch the news or something.

Avatar image for IWKYB
IWKYB

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#298 IWKYB
Member since 2010 • 1545 Posts
[QUOTE="Bikouchu35"]

[QUOTE="jalexbrown"]I wonder what the republicans will be busier doing: bashing Obama or defending Bush.Unassigned

I think is a trap for them to defend Bush, I say Obama bashing like always.

Will that be Bush's fault as well?

http://townhall.com/blog/g/2e863e96-533c-4a46-9b03-b858273122f7?comments=true&commentsSortDirection=Descending Srsly. http://townhall.com/blog/g/2e863e96-533c-4a46-9b03-b858273122f7?comments=true&commentsSortDirection=Descending Obama is the worst president we've ever had. I actually miss Bush and I am beginning to suspect the media influenced my teenage peers...
Avatar image for IWKYB
IWKYB

1545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#300 IWKYB
Member since 2010 • 1545 Posts
I love how the media rides Obamas **** so hardsboyer2
Obama is just hype. A guy with no American values and no experience.