Occupy Wall Street being ousted RIGHT NOW

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for microsoft4life
microsoft4life

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 microsoft4life
Member since 2005 • 946 Posts

I support this movement. It's a shame for this to be happening. Police are destorying the tents and other various things. Apparently theirs also some police brutality going on. Whats your take on this?

http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution

EDIT: Having trouble linking.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
I'll wait for a bit more context on what's happening before passing any kind of judgment on this...
Avatar image for hadoken
hadoken

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 hadoken
Member since 2003 • 2730 Posts

.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Sounds good.

Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

What a wonderful police state we live in.

Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
Its a damn shame. But don't worry the occupiers will come back. There is no stopping them.
Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

Sounds good.

airshocker

Yes, delicious fascism. MMMM It's exactly what we need.

Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

What are these people protesting anyway? Making money? "Wealth and corporate greed", so to say?

I find it ironic how these Occupy Wall Street protestors have made their slogan "we are the 99%", when if you compare them to the entire world they probably rank within the top 1% as far as wealth goes.

Avatar image for Mafiree
Mafiree

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mafiree
Member since 2008 • 3704 Posts
Private property....... If the owners of said property want them to get out, they need to be removed. They have the final say on access and use of their property.
Avatar image for limpbizkit818
limpbizkit818

15044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 limpbizkit818
Member since 2004 • 15044 Posts
From BBC: "The New York Times said as the police operation in Zuccotti Park began at about 01:00 (06:00), a police officer gave an announcement, saying: "The city has determined that the continued occupation of Zuccotti Park poses an increasing health and fire safety hazard". Occupants were told to "immediately remove all private property" and that they would be arrested if they interfered with the operation, the report said. Leaflets were also handed out saying protesters would be allowed to return once the clearance had taken place, but not to bring camping equipment."
Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#11 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

Its a damn shame. But don't worry the occupiers will come back. There is no stopping them.MgamerBD
And in greater numbers.

Seriously though, I support OWS.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

From BBC: "The New York Times said as the police operation in Zuccotti Park began at about 01:00 (06:00), a police officer gave an announcement, saying: "The city has determined that the continued occupation of Zuccotti Park poses an increasing health and fire safety hazard". Occupants were told to "immediately remove all private property" and that they would be arrested if they interfered with the operation, the report said. Leaflets were also handed out saying protesters would be allowed to return once the clearance had taken place, but not to bring camping equipment."limpbizkit818
That doesn't so bad..I can't blame them either, apparently there was a shooting last week alone with some other violence. You never know though, the cops could of set both of the examples up.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

Gas the bastards and move in with the rubber bullets. Their silly little movement should have come to an end weeks ago.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

Gas the bastards and move in with the rubber bullets. Their silly little movement should have come to an end weeks ago.

QuistisTrepe_
Look, I'm no fan of OWS, but you serious?
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gas the bastards and move in with the rubber bullets. Their silly little movement should have come to an end weeks ago.

chessmaster1989

Look, I'm no fan of OWS, but you serious?

These whiny little ******* are a pestilence. I have to put up with these punks here in Oakland. And what I get are disease-ridden, smelly hippies infesting my neighborhood, committing vandalism of small businesses (I guess they're the evil 1% too), theft, and violent crime (despite what you've been hearing about their allegedly peaceful demonstrations). They're not achieving anything, they're costing us millions for law enforcement sweeping the city, dispersing their encampments and bringing small businesses to a standstill with all the ruckus, interfering with mass transit, while drawing lawless lunatics from all corners of the Bay Area.

I want these people gone by any means necessary. They've had their say, the party is over. This isn't about ideology, it's about returning to civilized society.

Avatar image for quadraleap
quadraleap

36581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 quadraleap
Member since 2004 • 36581 Posts
I sorta like the cause but I think it has made its point and time to move on to other avenues.
Avatar image for jonathant5
jonathant5

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jonathant5
Member since 2010 • 873 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gas the bastards and move in with the rubber bullets. Their silly little movement should have come to an end weeks ago.

QuistisTrepe_

Look, I'm no fan of OWS, but you serious?

These whiny little ******* are a pestilence. I have to put up with these punks here in Oakland. And what I get are disease-ridden, smelly hippies infesting my neighborhood, committing vandalism of small businesses (I guess they're the evil 1% too), theft, and violent crime (despite what you've been hearing about their allegedly peaceful demonstrations). They're not achieving anything, they're costing us millions for law enforcement sweeping the city, dispersing their encampments and bringing small businesses to a standstill with all the ruckus, interfering with mass transit, while drawing lawless lunatics from all corners of the Bay Area.

I want these people gone by any means necessary. They've had their say, the party is over. This isn't about ideology, it's about returning to civilized society.

I agree with you, these people are doing no good (many have never done anything productive for society) and are now whining about not having a decent income or even a job, and blaming that its the fault of Wall Street and big businesses that they dont have a job, rather than looking inside of them and realizing that it is in fact their own fault, because they never put in the effort in school and never bothered to get a decent education or even bothered to work hard. There are individuals in 3rd world countries who cant get an education even if they want to, because the system is not there or they need to help their parents so that the family does not starve to death, yet in the US the infrastructure is there, getting a Uni/college education is not expensive and can be done through student loans if need be, yet these people never bothered...
Avatar image for Cerage
Cerage

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Cerage
Member since 2010 • 45 Posts

They're wasting their time. No peaceful protest has changed anything.

Avatar image for microsoft4life
microsoft4life

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 microsoft4life
Member since 2005 • 946 Posts

They're wasting their time. No peaceful protest has changed anything.

Cerage

We're talking about it. Are we not? Occupy Wall Street is putting pressure on a lot of people.

Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts
still a lot of people with a taste for boot.
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
They've had their say, the party is over. This isn't about ideology, it's about returning to civilized society.QuistisTrepe_
I don't think our society was civilized before OWS started. I enjoy watching the movement from the sidelines because I feel that if it gets bigger we could see some actual positive government reformation (idk what thought). If I was a protester, I would be protesting all the BS in government and politics and getting that message across. I hope this movement is the catalyst to our "enlightenment" because we desperately need some.
Avatar image for anthonycg
anthonycg

2017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 anthonycg
Member since 2009 • 2017 Posts

[QUOTE="Cerage"]

They're wasting their time. No peaceful protest has changed anything.

microsoft4life

We're talking about it. Are we not? Occupy Wall Street is putting pressure on a lot of people.

The only pressure is whether or not the cops need to move in with gas and rubber bullets. These people can't even protest right. Remember the MLK protests? You didn't have people running around and vandalizing crap but that's happening at almost every location here. You have a bunch of immature people with self-richous attitudes running around, telling people what to do when most of the time they are the ones that are breaking the law. Of course there's corruption in America but you need to be smart about how you go about this. It only takes one idiot to break the law for them to have the green light and force people to disperse. And then they whine about a police state? How about obeying the law first - then complain.

Stop building stupid tents you lazy @#$ Americans and stand on your feet. This country wasn't built by lazy bums and it won't be saved by them either. Most of the places that these tents are being put up are illegal anyway! One woman in OccupyOakland got all angry because the cops took her's down. I mean she may as well have done it on I95. At least she'd get more press!

All they have to do is pick a PUBLIC AREA and peacefully protest. Don't waltz up to someone's property and think you won't get your cherry popped. These people think they can muscle their way into what they want but that is not gonna happen. If you push they push back harder. They need to use words if they're going to get anything done. But if they can't stand there for an hour without doing something stupid then this is a waste of time. All they need is for you to mess up one time. That's all they need.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

This has been said before but these people should be occupying Washington DC, not wall street. It's the governement that's the problem. They're the ones allowing the corporate greed to go unchecked.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] Look, I'm no fan of OWS, but you serious?jonathant5

These whiny little ******* are a pestilence. I have to put up with these punks here in Oakland. And what I get are disease-ridden, smelly hippies infesting my neighborhood, committing vandalism of small businesses (I guess they're the evil 1% too), theft, and violent crime (despite what you've been hearing about their allegedly peaceful demonstrations). They're not achieving anything, they're costing us millions for law enforcement sweeping the city, dispersing their encampments and bringing small businesses to a standstill with all the ruckus, interfering with mass transit, while drawing lawless lunatics from all corners of the Bay Area.

I want these people gone by any means necessary. They've had their say, the party is over. This isn't about ideology, it's about returning to civilized society.

I agree with you, these people are doing no good (many have never done anything productive for society) and are now whining about not having a decent income or even a job, and blaming that its the fault of Wall Street and big businesses that they dont have a job, rather than looking inside of them and realizing that it is in fact their own fault, because they never put in the effort in school and never bothered to get a decent education or even bothered to work hard. There are individuals in 3rd world countries who cant get an education even if they want to, because the system is not there or they need to help their parents so that the family does not starve to death, yet in the US the infrastructure is there, getting a Uni/college education is not expensive and can be done through student loans if need be, yet these people never bothered...

whatever you think about them they have managed to get conversations going between the media and politicians about income inequality.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

I agree with you, these people are doing no good (many have never done anything productive for society) and are now whining about not having a decent income or even a job, and blaming that its the fault of Wall Street and big businesses that they dont have a job, rather than looking inside of them and realizing that it is in fact their own fault, because they never put in the effort in school and never bothered to get a decent education or even bothered to work hard. There are individuals in 3rd world countries who cant get an education even if they want to, because the system is not there or they need to help their parents so that the family does not starve to death, yet in the US the infrastructure is there, getting a Uni/college education is not expensive and can be done through student loans if need be, yet these people never bothered...jonathant5

A lot of them did go to college, but took the wrong courses and got the wrong degree and now, can't get a job. They are wanting their student loans forgiven instead of paying for them. Go figure.

Avatar image for PunkAntiHero
PunkAntiHero

628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 PunkAntiHero
Member since 2011 • 628 Posts
It should be interesting to see how this will all play out.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

From what I heard on the radio on my way in this morning, they will be allowed back in after the place is cleaned. Personally, I would have let them stay in their own filth, but doesn't really bother me too much. In a way, the city is doing them a favor.

Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts
Its a damn shame. But don't worry the occupiers will come back. There is no stopping them.MgamerBD
Actually they can be stopped with ease. *Sets up a snack bar in a remote section of town
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

i in no way support what i have seen come from OWS, but i do luz at what minor property damage (uncharacteristically petty i know) will occur to the protesters vie the government that not only screwed their pooch, but by whom they stretched out their hands and pleaded to for salvation. i just get some small level of sick joy from seeing people who demand the work of others getting their own destroyed in return.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

This has been said before but these people should be occupying Washington DC, not wall street. It's the governement that's the problem. They're the ones allowing the corporate greed to go unchecked.

junglist101

they wrote the check.... what do you mean unchecked? in the profit loss system greed is fine, but once people turn their back to you or you make bad investments you need too fail, the government wrote the checks to bail the bad businesses out, that is not the fault of the businesses, it is the fault of the thing giving the business public monies. if the government came to me with a check for 100 billion, i would take it without a second thought, and i am ideologically oppose to such acts and am a highly principled person... i am just not naive enough to decline a hundred billion dollars. frankly it would be stupid not to take the monies.

Avatar image for Just-Breathe
Just-Breathe

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Just-Breathe
Member since 2011 • 3130 Posts
I don't think the Occupy movement is going to change anything but why do the police even think this is a good idea? Don't they and their commanders know that people will just get angrier and their numbers increase?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105]whatever you think about them they have managed to get conversations going between the media and politicians about income inequality.

what creates income inequality? what moves the market away from equilibrium as apposed to towards equilibrium?

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105]whatever you think about them they have managed to get conversations going between the media and politicians about income inequality. surrealnumber5

what creates income inequality? what moves the market away from equilibrium as apposed to towards equilibrium?

Conversations about income desparity were not going on prior to two months ago? Were the countless articles I've read and news commentaries I've seen all in my mind?

EDIT: Holy Glitchspot, Batman! For clarity I have bolded my text.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

This has been said before but these people should be occupying Washington DC, not wall street. It's the governement that's the problem. They're the ones allowing the corporate greed to go unchecked.

surrealnumber5

they wrote the check.... what do you mean unchecked? in the profit loss system greed is fine, but once people turn their back to you or you make bad investments you need too fail, the government wrote the checks to bail the bad businesses out, that is not the fault of the businesses, it is the fault of the thing giving the business public monies. if the government came to me with a check for 100 billion, i would take it without a second thought, and i am ideologically oppose to such acts and am a highly principled person... i am just not naive enough to decline a hundred billion dollars. frankly it would be stupid not to take the monies.

Uncontrolled may have been a better word.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

This has been said before but these people should be occupying Washington DC, not wall street. It's the governement that's the problem. They're the ones allowing the corporate greed to go unchecked.

junglist101

they wrote the check.... what do you mean unchecked? in the profit loss system greed is fine, but once people turn their back to you or you make bad investments you need too fail, the government wrote the checks to bail the bad businesses out, that is not the fault of the businesses, it is the fault of the thing giving the business public monies. if the government came to me with a check for 100 billion, i would take it without a second thought, and i am ideologically oppose to such acts and am a highly principled person... i am just not naive enough to decline a hundred billion dollars. frankly it would be stupid not to take the monies.

Uncontrolled may have been a better word.

controls are what prevents competition, regulations and compliance costs keep new entries out, small firms small, and big firms big. the bigger the firm the more easily they can absorb these costs, if you seek to control the actions of these big businesses all you will do is better prop them up, give them larger shares of the market and create even more "wage inequality" as another person called it. people are calling to kill or harm all good actors that play within the profit/loss system just because they wish to control the large actors and dont understand the implications of the actions they are calling for.

big businesses are not even that important to employment in this nation, and would be far less important if we would just let people enter the industries they know as competitors, instead of trapping them within one of the huge firms.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105]whatever you think about them they have managed to get conversations going between the media and politicians about income inequality. Planet_Pluto

what creates income inequality? what moves the market away from equilibrium as apposed to towards equilibrium?

Conversations about income desparity were not going on prior to two months ago? Were the countless articles I've read and news commentaries I've seen all in my mind?

EDIT: Holy Glitchspot, Batman! For clarity I have bolded my text.

yea, more taxes on those with more than me has been going on for far longer than i have been alive.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] they wrote the check.... what do you mean unchecked? in the profit loss system greed is fine, but once people turn their back to you or you make bad investments you need too fail, the government wrote the checks to bail the bad businesses out, that is not the fault of the businesses, it is the fault of the thing giving the business public monies. if the government came to me with a check for 100 billion, i would take it without a second thought, and i am ideologically oppose to such acts and am a highly principled person... i am just not naive enough to decline a hundred billion dollars. frankly it would be stupid not to take the monies.

surrealnumber5

Uncontrolled may have been a better word.

controls are what prevents competition, regulations and compliance costs keep new entries out, small firms small, and big firms big. the bigger the firm the more easily they can absorb these costs, if you seek to control the actions of these big businesses all you will do is better prop them up, give them larger shares of the market and create even more "wage inequality" as another person called it. people are calling to kill or harm all good actors that play within the profit/loss system just because they wish to control the large actors and dont understand the implications of the actions they are calling for.

big businesses are not even that important to employment in this nation, and would be far less important if we would just let people enter the industries they know as competitors, instead of trapping them within one of the huge firms.

Companies all have to have some level of greed because they have the desire for money. It's just when it gets to the point where it is at the detrement to society. A great example of this is the predatory lending by banks and lenders that went on during the housing boom. That should have been controlled.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="junglist101"]Uncontrolled may have been a better word.

junglist101

controls are what prevents competition, regulations and compliance costs keep new entries out, small firms small, and big firms big. the bigger the firm the more easily they can absorb these costs, if you seek to control the actions of these big businesses all you will do is better prop them up, give them larger shares of the market and create even more "wage inequality" as another person called it. people are calling to kill or harm all good actors that play within the profit/loss system just because they wish to control the large actors and dont understand the implications of the actions they are calling for.

big businesses are not even that important to employment in this nation, and would be far less important if we would just let people enter the industries they know as competitors, instead of trapping them within one of the huge firms.

Companies all have to have some level of greed because they have the desire for money. It's just when it gets to the point where it is at the detrement to society. A great example of this is the predatory lending by banks and lenders that went on during the housing boom. That should have been controlled.

everyone has want, you want, i want, others want. there is no amount of voluntary want that can ever be detrimental to society. the banking industry is controlled, more so now than EVER before in US history, that is why those loans were made. if banks were not insured by the FDIC and banks were not told to give out risky loans vie acts like the affordable housing act, no sane business would make those loans, but once a business is immune to failure why not act stupid? youre only ever going to win.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] controls are what prevents competition, regulations and compliance costs keep new entries out, small firms small, and big firms big. the bigger the firm the more easily they can absorb these costs, if you seek to control the actions of these big businesses all you will do is better prop them up, give them larger shares of the market and create even more "wage inequality" as another person called it. people are calling to kill or harm all good actors that play within the profit/loss system just because they wish to control the large actors and dont understand the implications of the actions they are calling for.

big businesses are not even that important to employment in this nation, and would be far less important if we would just let people enter the industries they know as competitors, instead of trapping them within one of the huge firms.

surrealnumber5

Companies all have to have some level of greed because they have the desire for money. It's just when it gets to the point where it is at the detrement to society. A great example of this is the predatory lending by banks and lenders that went on during the housing boom. That should have been controlled.

everyone has want, you want, i want, others want. there is no amount of voluntary want that can ever be detrimental to society. the banking industry is controlled, more so now than EVER before in US history, that is why those loans were made. if banks were not insured by the FDIC and banks were not told to give out risky loans vie acts like the affordable housing act, no sane business would make those loans, but once a business is immune to failure why not act stupid? youre only ever going to win.

We've certainly allowed them to gamble with our money. Your huge corporation makes poor decisions and bad investments? Don't worry about it, the taxpayers got you covered lol.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="junglist101"]Companies all have to have some level of greed because they have the desire for money. It's just when it gets to the point where it is at the detrement to society. A great example of this is the predatory lending by banks and lenders that went on during the housing boom. That should have been controlled.

junglist101

everyone has want, you want, i want, others want. there is no amount of voluntary want that can ever be detrimental to society. the banking industry is controlled, more so now than EVER before in US history, that is why those loans were made. if banks were not insured by the FDIC and banks were not told to give out risky loans vie acts like the affordable housing act, no sane business would make those loans, but once a business is immune to failure why not act stupid? youre only ever going to win.

We've certainly allowed them to gamble with our money. Your huge corporation makes poor decisions and bad investments? Don't worry about it, the taxpayers got you covered lol.

Is that why OWS types protest Michelle Bachman, who opposed all bailouts and corporate welfare?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="junglist101"]Companies all have to have some level of greed because they have the desire for money. It's just when it gets to the point where it is at the detrement to society. A great example of this is the predatory lending by banks and lenders that went on during the housing boom. That should have been controlled.

junglist101

everyone has want, you want, i want, others want. there is no amount of voluntary want that can ever be detrimental to society. the banking industry is controlled, more so now than EVER before in US history, that is why those loans were made. if banks were not insured by the FDIC and banks were not told to give out risky loans vie acts like the affordable housing act, no sane business would make those loans, but once a business is immune to failure why not act stupid? youre only ever going to win.

We've certainly allowed them to gamble with our money. Your huge corporation makes poor decisions and bad investments? Don't worry about it, the taxpayers got you covered lol.

mine? i am all for business, but in no way have i ever advocated a protectionist state. the system is how it is set up and killing the small guys to further back the big guys does not seem like a fix to me, the only way to fix the current system as i see it is to reverse what we have been doing. we need less political power in the economy, that will diminish the power of lobbies, we need ZERO market intervention, no more bailouts loans or any other government gifts to business people, and we need competition, this last one can only happen if the government allows people to compete against these huge firms and this last one is also the only way i see the pay disparity ever working towards equilibrium again.

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

Sounds good.

Guybrush_3

Yes, delicious fascism. MMMM It's exactly what we need.

I agree. (funny it's usually the self proclaimed conservatives who want it the most when it involves opposing ideologies.)

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] Is that why OWS types protest Michelle Bachman, who opposed all bailouts and corporate welfare?

No, it's more likely that it's because she's an idiot and a bigot.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] everyone has want, you want, i want, others want. there is no amount of voluntary want that can ever be detrimental to society. the banking industry is controlled, more so now than EVER before in US history, that is why those loans were made. if banks were not insured by the FDIC and banks were not told to give out risky loans vie acts like the affordable housing act, no sane business would make those loans, but once a business is immune to failure why not act stupid? youre only ever going to win.

DevilMightCry

We've certainly allowed them to gamble with our money. Your huge corporation makes poor decisions and bad investments? Don't worry about it, the taxpayers got you covered lol.

Is that why OWS types protest Michelle Bachman, who opposed all bailouts and corporate welfare?

i protest her because she is a nut... but in this case "even a broken clock is right twice a day"

Avatar image for supa_badman
supa_badman

16714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#46 supa_badman
Member since 2008 • 16714 Posts

smh.

Woulda figured there would be more of a response from the protesters. Guess they just don't want this thing badly enough. =\

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I think you have the right to peaceful assembly. However, if you engage in the destruction of private property or other such illegal actions, the police may remove you. I dont know enough of what's going on to really comment on this current OWS crisis.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] Is that why OWS types protest Michelle Bachman, who opposed all bailouts and corporate welfare?

No, it's more likely that it's because she's an idiot and a bigot.

What do OWS have to do with religion, and social matters? Nothing. It's just a nutty part of liberal Democrat movement, that scream and yell at anyone that they disagree with.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] Is that why OWS types protest Michelle Bachman, who opposed all bailouts and corporate welfare?

No, it's more likely that it's because she's an idiot and a bigot.

What do OWS have to do with religion, and social matters? Nothing. It's just a nutty part of liberal Democrat movement, that scream and yell at anyone that they disagree with.

Michelle Bachmann has much to do with religion and social matters (like many conservatives). Separate the fiscal conservatism from the social conservatism, and I'm sure that the type of people that attend events such as OWS would support them a bit more. Do you really expect someone who states that gay marriage is probably the biggest issue" to garner support from the type of crowd that is in OWS?
Avatar image for Kcube
Kcube

25398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Kcube
Member since 2003 • 25398 Posts
[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] Is that why OWS types protest Michelle Bachman, who opposed all bailouts and corporate welfare?

No, it's more likely that it's because she's an idiot and a bigot.

What do OWS have to do with religion, and social matters? Nothing. It's just a nutty part of liberal Democrat movement, that scream and yell at anyone that they disagree with.

Kinda like the Tea party isn't it.