[QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="beenieman40k"][QUOTE="xscrapzx"] I don't know how you call that fair considering every other media outlet in this nation was pro liberal the entire time.
xscrapzx
As opposed to fox news with their hateful BS and propogation of the Ashley Todd rubbish (which was clearly a hoax)
it's all moot anyway. Obama got elected. As hard as it is you're going to have to stomach the change from Bush
It isnt hard for me to stomach anything, I mean because clearly no matter who got elected president. I still have to wake up in the morning goto work and goto school to earn the degree to make something of myself. So no trust me I'm not losing sleep over it. But since Obama is now in office I could probably take the route of not having to do any of that and just mooch off people, because thats who is for anyways. Mine as well take the easy road and get everything handed to me.
Yup, live off wellfare and food stamps, that's fine.
But when you live in either a trailer park, or a ghetto, just barely scraping by off food stamps with little to nothing in your name while your friends who actually applied themselves go to work, buy large houses and nice cars, you can shove your foot down your throat. This is America, those that apply themselves will always reap the benefits.
America isn't, and will never be, a wellfare state no matter how hard you whine about it. This isn't Sweden or Norway and it never will be. Obama won't make it one no matter how much O'Reilly says he will. I promise.
No I don't remember O'Reilly mentioning that, but thats ok. The bottom line is liberals like to help out a lot of people, put a lot of government programs in place and the money to do all that comes out of my check. Thats what Obama is for and thats what liberals have been for and if you don't see that then well I don't have much more to say to you, other than that you have definately missed the past 4 years where the dems have had controll of the senate and it was dems who felt it was a great idea that everyone should be able to have house and get a loan. Look how that worked out for you.
Wow, ignorance is bliss I guess.
Well for one, you are completely wrong about democratse believing everyone should have a house. This is actually a republican ideal. It's called reagonomics, and it's policies that were eneacted under Reagan, and continued to be untill today, have been to increase home ownership. The belief is that if you own a house, you will contribute more to the economy and to the community than if you didn't. So you are completely wrong on that.
Furthermore, if you feel Obama's main goal is to "put a lot of government programs in place and the money to do all that comes out of my check" you are crazy. Especially consider under BUSH, a republican, the deficit it as the highest it has ever been in the history of the U.S. But I digress, Obama isn't some crazy liberal. He is a moderate democrat. in fact, the reason he one is becuase he appeals so well to moderates, and McCain really only appeals to the far right. Obama won't be enacting any crazy wellfare policies. If you truley believe that, give me some examples of him saying so.
You also are completely wrong about how long the democrats have been in control of the senate. They have controlled it for the past 2 years, not 4. And we began our path to this economic decline LONG before they controlled it.
First off you hear of Barney Frank or is that someone you just think is myth? Thats all I have to say about the crisis we are in.
Yup, this entire financial crisis lands on Barney Franks shoulders :lol: This crisis is the fault of democrats and republicans ALIKE. To blame one or the other is completely ridiculous
Secondly you want to talk about some far left ideals from Obama,spread the wealth
This was a poor choice of words. All he was trying to say was he wished to increse the middle **** Something every president has tried to do since FDR.
, tax the wealthy because you know its not fair that they make the money they do and some who can't be a CEO doesn't
He's increasing taxes on the extremely wealthy, the top 5% of the nation. He is only increasing these taxes because they were lowered under Bush, and this "trickle down effect" failed. Again, you lack of knowledge on the issue of taxes and the economy is showing.
. Give tax breaks to 95% of Americans, which 40% of that 95% don't even contribute.
They contributed, but not sizably. They can't because they are in the lower quintile and NEED that money for Little Susie's braces, or to send Greg to college. Again, a policy to increase the middle ****which has decreased significantly under Bush.
Talks of a national healthcare system is all that has to be said about his healthcare deal.
This is a COMPLETE miss characterization of his healthcare proposal. All he wants is to have affordable healthcare rates, not a socialized healthcare system. Again you are ethier misscharacterizing his stance, or you don't completely understand the issue.
I really don't want to go anymore into this because I really don't have the time, but I'll be sure to get back on later.
You should look into taking an econ ****in before you come back)
Log in to comment