Pope accepts big bang theory

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

so the catholic church is official dead now?kayoticdreamz

No. For chrissake the "Big Bang" was formulated by a catholic priest (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre).

Avatar image for With-Hatred
With-Hatred

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 With-Hatred
Member since 2009 • 926 Posts

Silenthps, not trying to be mean, but are u in "special" classes at your school?

Avatar image for soldine
soldine

1980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#153 soldine
Member since 2007 • 1980 Posts

@ Silenthps: Are you Jehovas witness or something (they take the bible word for word)? The Bible is a book for guidance not a book of facts. If God wanted us to be close-minded like you are, he would have never given 99 percent of humankind the power of reason.

As A catholic I do not believe the bible is a literal translation of events of creation, thinking that women were created from the rib of a man and that adam named all of the animals is completely absurd. Perhaps God created scientific parameteres for the universe to follow to impose order on everything and those dictated that it would take a while for humans to appear on the planet. If you believe in God and believe he has limitless power than the billions of years that have gone by from the time of the big bang is just a blink of an eye for him. If God is God than he rules time aswell. It makes more sense that God created the universe by the scientific theories that most humans accept to make it understandable. God wants us to be the caretakers of the earth no? To do that we have to understand the planet aswell.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

Apparently this forum consists of a bunch of uninformed idiots, as does Yahoo news. The Catholic Church accepted evolution and the "big bang" back in the 80's. This is not news. It's common knowledge among Christians.

Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#155 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

It's all part of his plan to ascend to the role of Space Pope. Ace6301

That's the coolest thing I've heard all day.

Avatar image for kayoticdreamz
kayoticdreamz

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 kayoticdreamz
Member since 2010 • 3347 Posts
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"] What? I don't even know how to interpret this statement, or is it a question. I'm pretty sure this post just murdered many of my braincells.

well how can a christian church exist and call the 6 days creation of the world theory false?

Well the Church doesn't close their eyes to scientific discovery. Plus it still believes in Jesus Christ as God and savior so I guess that officially means it's a Christian Church. It's not entirely difficult to figure out. I think the more appropriate question should be, how can someone choose to reject clearly proven scientific theories and still be allowed to pass High School science classes?

sorry big bang theory is still just that a theory. its not 100% and it has holes in it. if there was 100% proof of it every religion would shut up but the fact remains there is not 100% proof of it. as robbo stated big bang violates matter cannot be created nor destroyed a very basic scientific law. also its points of evolution dont 100% makes us relatives to monkeys. but for everyone here how can you be a christian and not believe the bible is factual? doesnt that contradict itsself? it says God created the earth in 6 days....if you believe in God how can you not believe he created the earth in 6 days? so what only believe in the parts that convient for you?
Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#157 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

Lol big bang theory I thought matter couldn't be created or destroyed, so how did it come to be then?RobboElRobbo

Well.. There are some theories.. Which is basically like super mario 64 lol.. Were there is a hub universe and actions that happen in this central hub cause reactions that spark the creations of other universes. All sorts of crazy stuff... It could have been initially created by "god", but not god in the sense that we think as some omnipitent being who watches over our existance.. Maybe just some form of energy or some object that is responsible for the creations of universes and causes big bang reactions.. Because the big bang theory only makes sense seeing as how the universe is expanding at very high speeds. all outward and away from each other.. Which means that everything in the universe had the same place of origin.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

Beingpresbyterian has its perks for me. Like not hanging on the Pope's every word.

Avatar image for Mr_Alexander
Mr_Alexander

1686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#159 Mr_Alexander
Member since 2007 • 1686 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]Admittedly, I know very little about the big ang theory.

But as for needing a time machine to witness evolution, you're just straight up wrong. We've witnessed evolution through the fossil record. And we continue to witness it toda as thing like anti-biotic resistance become more prevalent.

clayron

fossile record =/= observable evidence.

In all my years of living and dealing with people who have been against evolution, I have never heard anyone say this. I am shocked.

..yeah, wow.. just.. wow.. I never could understand religious people's thought of "not ENOUGH evidence = it's not true" (even though there is more than enough evidence), yet they blindly follow a 2,000 year old book with pretty much no actual evidence at all...
Avatar image for DudeNtheRoom
DudeNtheRoom

1276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 DudeNtheRoom
Member since 2010 • 1276 Posts
OutafterReligionisthedevil-nuhhuhargument.
Avatar image for Infinite_Access
Infinite_Access

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#161 Infinite_Access
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
Yay! We win! Converts to Catholicism at once.
Avatar image for rockinplanes
rockinplanes

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 rockinplanes
Member since 2010 • 266 Posts
Typical ignorant atheist.
Avatar image for LaytonsCat
LaytonsCat

3652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#164 LaytonsCat
Member since 2010 • 3652 Posts

I bet he has the hots for Penny too.

Lto_thaG

Don't we all?

Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
Evolution and now this? Glad to see Catholicism making sense.
Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#166 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110106/sc_nm/us_pope_bigbang

The pope accepts the big bang theory! I find it pretty stupid how the church will end up accepting all the advancement made on how we were created...

shadow13702
and so did I accept it...I firmly believe that God can use "tools" to create what he want...so why not a big bang?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

Infinite_Access

Again, the "Big Bang" was developed by a Catholic priest.

Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

pope is a moron

Avatar image for Ingenemployee
Ingenemployee

2307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 Ingenemployee
Member since 2007 • 2307 Posts

pope is a moron

Harisemo

So somebody accepts something that you don't and that automatically makes him a moron?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#170 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

pope is a moron

Harisemo

Why? What exactly does the Big Bang entail that makes him a moron? A person of faith could believe that was the method that god created everything.. Furthermore it doesn't contradict Jesus Christ, the cornerstone of Christianity.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#171 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

Infinite_Access
Since when has science ever been a part of Christian belief? Christians have been open to explore science and history for a very very long time. It's only in recent years that Christians have been criticized for ignoring all schooling, science and common sense and to follow the bible as a scientific text book. No thanks, I'm more confident in recent scientific discoveries than the scientific understanding of nomads that lived 4000 years ago. I'll continue to use the bible as it was meant to be read, a book that provides us with the moral codes, the story of Christ and the truths necessary for salvation.
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

pope is a moron

Ingenemployee

So somebody accepts something that you don't and that automatically makes him a moron?

Big bang contradicts the creation of universe as mentioned in bible. pope should believe what bible says

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="Infinite_Access"]

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

ferrari2001

Since when has science ever been a part of Christian belief? Christians have been open to explore science and history for a very very long time. It's only in recent years that Christians have been criticized for ignoring all schooling, science and common sense and to follow the bible as a scientific text book. No thanks, I'm more confident in recent scientific discoveries than the scientific understanding of nomads that lived 4000 years ago. I'll continue to use the bible as it was meant to be read, a book that provides us with the moral codes, the story of Christ and the truths necessary for salvation.

Tell that to Galileo.

That's not to say that there aren't many Christians who have accepted science throughouot history, but Christianity in general and as an institution has a long history, since its formation really, of ignoring and sometimes even rejecting scientific observations.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#175 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="Ingenemployee"]

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

pope is a moron

Harisemo

So somebody accepts something that you don't and that automatically makes him a moron?

Big bang contradicts the creation of universe as mentioned in bible. pope should believe what bible says

No the bible says that God created the Universe in some amount of time. A day does not have to necessarily mean 24hours, it could mean 5 billion years. The Big Bang theory still holds that true. The bible is a book of theology meant to teach moral and theological teachings that are necessary for our salvation and sanctification. There is no way God expected the writers of the bible to know science and history. He certainly doesn't expect us to read it like we would a science text book. It is what it is, a book of theology. Ignoring science lessens your understanding of God. To understand God we must more fully understand His creation. By ignoring the truths of science he used to create the universe you ignore His power in it. The bible teaching on how God created the universe would be a worthless waste of space. Try reading the meanings of the text and it's overall implications in our quest for salvation instead of closing your mind to God's creation.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#176 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Ingenemployee"]

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

pope is a moron

Harisemo

So somebody accepts something that you don't and that automatically makes him a moron?

Big bang contradicts the creation of universe as mentioned in bible. pope should believe what bible says

No it doesn't.. The Papacy can argue that was a metaphor to what the Big Bang is.. The creation stories in the Bible to many are not taken literally...

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
The pope accepts the big bang theory! I find it pretty stupid how the church will end up accepting all the advancement made on how we were created...shadow13702
Why? Science is merely the means by which we understand the natural world.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#178 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="Infinite_Access"]

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

-Sun_Tzu-

Since when has science ever been a part of Christian belief? Christians have been open to explore science and history for a very very long time. It's only in recent years that Christians have been criticized for ignoring all schooling, science and common sense and to follow the bible as a scientific text book. No thanks, I'm more confident in recent scientific discoveries than the scientific understanding of nomads that lived 4000 years ago. I'll continue to use the bible as it was meant to be read, a book that provides us with the moral codes, the story of Christ and the truths necessary for salvation.

Tell that to Galileo.

That's not to say that there aren't many Christians who have accepted science throughouot history, but Christianity in general and as an institution has a long history, since its formation really, of ignoring and sometimes even rejecting scientific observations.

Galileo wasn't punished not of what he taught but rather because he went against the wishes of Rome. They wished that his theories be taught as Hypothesis for the time being within the scientific Circle until more information could be obtained to safeguard the ordinary catholic. However Galileo ignored this request and thus got him in a bit of trouble. They were more than willing to see it as a hypothesis until it could be definitively proven as fact. We know definitely know this as fact and is taught as such, but in those days we had no such factual evidence.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

Infinite_Access
It doesn't contradict Christian beliefs though.....:|
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#180 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

'Bout tme.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="Infinite_Access"]

Everything that ever contradicts Christian beleifs will eventually become a "coincide" thing.

-Sun_Tzu-

Since when has science ever been a part of Christian belief? Christians have been open to explore science and history for a very very long time. It's only in recent years that Christians have been criticized for ignoring all schooling, science and common sense and to follow the bible as a scientific text book. No thanks, I'm more confident in recent scientific discoveries than the scientific understanding of nomads that lived 4000 years ago. I'll continue to use the bible as it was meant to be read, a book that provides us with the moral codes, the story of Christ and the truths necessary for salvation.

Tell that to Galileo.

That's not to say that there aren't many Christians who have accepted science throughouot history, but Christianity in general and as an institution has a long history, since its formation really, of ignoring and sometimes even rejecting scientific observations.

Galileo's situation was much more complicated than that. He faced the ire of the pope because he made him appear a fool in his book. Nothing that would endear one to oneself.
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="Ingenemployee"]

So somebody accepts something that you don't and that automatically makes him a moron?

sSubZerOo

Big bang contradicts the creation of universe as mentioned in bible. pope should believe what bible says

No it doesn't.. The Papacy can argue that was a metaphor to what the Big Bang is.. The creation stories in the Bible to many are not taken literally...

im sure jesus took em literal

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

Big bang contradicts the creation of universe as mentioned in bible. pope should believe what bible says

Harisemo

No it doesn't.. The Papacy can argue that was a metaphor to what the Big Bang is.. The creation stories in the Bible to many are not taken literally...

im sure jesus took em literal

Jesus never talked about science dude....
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

No it doesn't.. The Papacy can argue that was a metaphor to what the Big Bang is.. The creation stories in the Bible to many are not taken literally...

LJS9502_basic

im sure jesus took em literal

Jesus never talked about science dude....

imtalking aboutthe genesis chapter in old testament. im sure jesus took it literally

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Harisemo"]

im sure jesus took em literal

Harisemo

Jesus never talked about science dude....

imtalking aboutthe genesis chapter in old testament. im sure jesus took it literally

You are sure of this because? I'm sure He didn't....
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

Tell that to Galileo.

That's not to say that there aren't many Christians who have accepted science throughouot history, but Christianity in general and as an institution has a long history, since its formation really, of ignoring and sometimes even rejecting scientific observations.

u_r_a_sausage

Galileo's situation was much more complicated than that. He faced the ire of the pope because he made him appear a fool in his book. Nothing that would endear one to oneself.

:lol: I love the endless certainty with which you assert your uniquely Catholic interpretation of history wherein the Crusades were a secular landgrab, the Pope didn't really care that Galileo was trampling Catholic dogma underfoot and it's purely coincidental that those on one side of the Troubles happen to be Protestant and those on the others Catholic.

Well for one thing it's what I've read in regard to the subject and it was not written from a Catholic perspective or by a Catholic. ;)

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#189 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Harisemo"]

im sure jesus took em literal

Harisemo

Jesus never talked about science dude....

imtalking aboutthe genesis chapter in old testament. im sure jesus took it literally

... How do you know that? Furthermore does that mean Noah's Ark is to be taken literally to? That the entire earth flooded?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Harisemo"]

imtalking aboutthe genesis chapter in old testament. im sure jesus took it literally

u_r_a_sausage

You are sure of this because? I'm sure He didn't....

And why is that?

Because it wasn't something he preached.....nor talked about. It's just an assumption you are making.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="u_r_a_sausage"]:lol: I love the endless certainty with which you assert your uniquely Catholic interpretation of history wherein the Crusades were a secular landgrab, the Pope didn't really care that Galileo was trampling Catholic dogma underfoot and it's purely coincidental that those on one side of the Troubles happen to be Protestant and those on the others Catholic.u_r_a_sausage

Well for one thing it's what I've read in regard to the subject and it was not written from a Catholic perspective or by a Catholic. ;)

No, it's one of the things you've read on the subject, which you chose to accept as fact because you liked it the most.

I've read about the subject a few times. How does something get accepted in the scientific community? Hint...not just because person A says it. At the time of Galileo there wasn't enough study done on the subject for him to print books stating it as a fact. We know it's a fact today because it's been studied and proven to be true. Not so then. Which was the biggest problem with his ideas. They hadn't been accepted yet by the scientific community. He was asked not to publish his ideas until they had more evidence and conversely if he did to give both sides. He then used a character that was a synonym for fool to quote the pope's view. You can read about it if you choose....or just not study it and think what you want. Matters not to me.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="u_r_a_sausage"]And why is that?u_r_a_sausage

Because it wasn't something he preached.....nor talked about. It's just an assumption you are making.

I haven't assumed a damn thing, thanks. You're 'sure' that he didn't take it literally, and I'm asking why.

No proof.;)
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#195 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="u_r_a_sausage"]And why is that?u_r_a_sausage

Because it wasn't something he preached.....nor talked about. It's just an assumption you are making.

I haven't assumed a damn thing, thanks. You're 'sure' that he didn't take it literally, and I'm asking why.

Because there is absolutely no teaching, traditions or biblical evidence to prove otherwise. Christ came to save sinners, not to get caught up in worldly affairs.
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Jesus never talked about science dude....sSubZerOo

imtalking aboutthe genesis chapter in old testament. im sure jesus took it literally

... How do you know that? Furthermore does that mean Noah's Ark is to be taken literally to? That the entire earth flooded?

these stories are meant to be taken literally and thats how people viewed them before. it is only just now that christians find it embarrassing to believe in these stories so they say "oh its not meant to be taken literally". i guarantee in a couple hundred years there will be christians whosay thatGod in bible is not to be taken literally.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Since when has science ever been a part of Christian belief? Christians have been open to explore science and history for a very very long time. It's only in recent years that Christians have been criticized for ignoring all schooling, science and common sense and to follow the bible as a scientific text book. No thanks, I'm more confident in recent scientific discoveries than the scientific understanding of nomads that lived 4000 years ago. I'll continue to use the bible as it was meant to be read, a book that provides us with the moral codes, the story of Christ and the truths necessary for salvation. ferrari2001

Tell that to Galileo.

That's not to say that there aren't many Christians who have accepted science throughouot history, but Christianity in general and as an institution has a long history, since its formation really, of ignoring and sometimes even rejecting scientific observations.

Galileo wasn't punished not of what he taught but rather because he went against the wishes of Rome. They wished that his theories be taught as Hypothesis for the time being within the scientific Circle until more information could be obtained to safeguard the ordinary catholic. However Galileo ignored this request and thus got him in a bit of trouble. They were more than willing to see it as a hypothesis until it could be definitively proven as fact. We know definitely know this as fact and is taught as such, but in those days we had no such factual evidence.

Galileo was punished because what he taught went against the wishes of Rome. During Galileo's time from a scientific perspective, the best model for the solar system was the heliocentric model, and it was rejected by the church not because of scientific skepticism but because it contradicted dogma, and eventually Galileo was put on trial for publically advocating a so-called false and heretical doctrine.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

imtalking aboutthe genesis chapter in old testament. im sure jesus took it literally

Harisemo

... How do you know that? Furthermore does that mean Noah's Ark is to be taken literally to? That the entire earth flooded?

these stories are meant to be taken literally and thats how people viewed them before. it is only just now that christians find it embarrassing to believe in these stories so they say "oh its not meant to be taken literally". i guarantee in a couple hundred years there will be christians whosay thatGod in bible is not to be taken literally.

Who says they are meant to be taken literally? You? I've never been taught to take them literally.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

Tell that to Galileo.

That's not to say that there aren't many Christians who have accepted science throughouot history, but Christianity in general and as an institution has a long history, since its formation really, of ignoring and sometimes even rejecting scientific observations.

-Sun_Tzu-

Galileo wasn't punished not of what he taught but rather because he went against the wishes of Rome. They wished that his theories be taught as Hypothesis for the time being within the scientific Circle until more information could be obtained to safeguard the ordinary catholic. However Galileo ignored this request and thus got him in a bit of trouble. They were more than willing to see it as a hypothesis until it could be definitively proven as fact. We know definitely know this as fact and is taught as such, but in those days we had no such factual evidence.

Galileo was punished because what he taught went against the wishes of Rome. During Galileo's time from a scientific perspective, the best model for the solar system was the heliocentric model, and it was rejected by the church not because of scientific skepticism but because it contradicted dogma, and eventually Galileo was put on trial for publically advocating a so-called false and heretical doctrine.

Yes it is what we know today. But back then it just wasn't scientifically proven or accepted. He was asked not to teach it because they didn't have that proof. And if he wanted to teach it to include BOTH sides. Don't we want more from our scientific advancements than an idea from one individual?