[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"]
I'm aware that ending the war on drugs =/= legalizing pot. What exactly are you trying to say with this post?
HoolaHoopMan
I assumed this was part of your argument for legalising weed: the notion that criminalising drug use doesn't curb drug abuse, and that you were equating the war on drugs with the benchmark case to prove your point.I am against the war on drugs, mostly because of how ineffective it is.
I'm not stating that every drug should be legal and sold with out regulation. I think each drug should be approached with a different mindset. Tobacco isn't regulated the same as alcohol, nor should it. I also wouldn't advocate for legalizing meth and distributing it the same way as say pot could.
As for criminalizing drug use, I do think it's a problem. At the very least I would like to see decriminalization, putting users in jail is just a waste of time and money.
I guess my main point I'm making is that the war on drugs is just plain ineffective, and at it's core it's no different from prohibition during the 20's. We don't seem to be learning from our mistakes.
Sure, As you say, it's a waste of resources to repeatedly punish people who, for one reason or another, choose to smoke. That's why the current punitive system we have in place here in Britain is sufficient. It basically costs nothing to confiscate a bit of pot and issue a warning, or even to turn a blind eye, as police usually choose to. Imprisonment for personal use of weed alone is basically unheard of in Britain.However, profit from sale and distribution of any drug which can have powerful and lasting psychiatric impact on a substantial percentage of the population is ethically dodgy in my book. AFAIC, from a statistical standpoint regarding mental health, the fewer people try weed the better. Whatever people say to the contrary, I reckon a lot of them know deep down that its illegality does act as a deterrant for weed, especially for those most at risk of psychiatric problems. I wouldn't like to see weed available in every off licence to every antisocial schizoid and in every parent's booze cabinet.
Having said that, psychoactive cannabis is basically just a weed, and it would have remained an innocuous and relatively obsucre one if it wasn't for the constant incentive of profit through regulating, controlling and expanding the market. Decriminalisation of personal cultivation, possession of small quantities and private use is a nice idea, especially as it theoretically eliminates all the evils of criminal industry whilst simultaneously sidestepping the danger of development of protective lobbies which would inevitably result from commercialisation, but it's one that's frequently ignored in these debates. No idea why.
Log in to comment