Should rich people give their money to poor people ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bastards12345
bastards12345

7194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 bastards12345
Member since 2005 • 7194 Posts
if they want to, but no they shouldnt have to. Bleive it or not, alotta rich people worked for their money.Shalashaska77
Indeed.
Avatar image for Fkid
Fkid

1028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 Fkid
Member since 2003 • 1028 Posts
Tycoonmike does not know what he is talking about. From what I have seen in this thread, only im_very_kind and smasbroslegend knows what they are talking about. Fact is, especially in America, everybody can get to college. Hell, many people in gr12 or senior year can get to a regular community college and be successful in life. But when I remember my last year in high school, they were this bunch of ppl who DID NOT GIVE A CRAP, and just wanted to have fun and work STRAIGHT after high school. Obviously they are not going to end in a really nice paying job. From what I have experienced is that if you really want to have a good job, YOU WILL WORK YOUR ASS FOR IT. My parents were dirt ass poor living in the provinces (this is in ASIA, where ppl ARE BROKEASS poor COMPARED TO THE POOR PPL IN THE U.S) and all they did was studied. YEs they studied, yes they made sacrifices. But guess where they are now. Both have successfull jobs living in North America. MEanwhile, their siblings who did not try as hard, are still living with my grandparents, asking money from my parents! I think majority of ppl just dont try at all. Which is why they end up where they are. I think many rich people got where they are form hard work. Not all, but many of them really put the effort. To say that all rich people got lucky IS STUPID AND IGNORANT. Yup there goes my rant.
Avatar image for Cornerstore
Cornerstore

2137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 Cornerstore
Member since 2006 • 2137 Posts
No effence but most of you will agreee with me why dosnt bill gates give most of his money to the poor? He makes around 12 thousand dollars a minute you know?
Avatar image for Blu_Falcon37
Blu_Falcon37

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#204 Blu_Falcon37
Member since 2006 • 4041 Posts
If they were forced to then thats communism, but they can give it to poor people if they want.
Avatar image for DJ-PRIME90
DJ-PRIME90

11292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#205 DJ-PRIME90
Member since 2004 • 11292 Posts
I think not.
Avatar image for NrGcHaRgE021
NrGcHaRgE021

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 NrGcHaRgE021
Member since 2003 • 3930 Posts
No effence but most of you will agreee with me why dosnt bill gates give most of his money to the poor? He makes around 12 thousand dollars a minute you know?Cornerstore
Obviously you know nothing.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gates_foundation The foundation was initially funded by Bill Gates with US$106 million in 2000 Not to mention Buffett gave 30.7 Billion..... Know what you're talking about before you criticize...
Avatar image for Aztlan_920228
Aztlan_920228

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 Aztlan_920228
Member since 2005 • 345 Posts
They should but only to the really REALLY poor people that isnt poor because of drugs
Avatar image for scorpi13
scorpi13

288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#208 scorpi13
Member since 2004 • 288 Posts
They don't have to. They can give some once in a while but I know I wouldn't give my money away. I worked too hard for it.
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
if they want to, but no they shouldnt have to.  Bleive it or not, alotta rich people worked for their money.Shalashaska77
most are simply born into it without a lick of work.....is that really fair in socioty?
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
I believe that the rich should be expected to pay a larger portion of the taxes destributed among people in socioty.
Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#211 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="Shalashaska77"]if they want to, but no they shouldnt have to. Bleive it or not, alotta rich people worked for their money.yoshi-lnex
most are simply born into it without a lick of work.....is that really fair in socioty?

You got any facts to back that up?
Avatar image for xxQuadropwnedxx
xxQuadropwnedxx

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 xxQuadropwnedxx
Member since 2007 • 2201 Posts
Deuteronomy 16: 17: "All must give as they are able, according to the blessings given to them by the lord."
Avatar image for bigglesbear
bigglesbear

3187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#213 bigglesbear
Member since 2004 • 3187 Posts
[QUOTE="Cornerstore"]No effence but most of you will agreee with me why dosnt bill gates give most of his money to the poor? He makes around 12 thousand dollars a minute you know?NrGcHaRgE021
Obviously you know nothing.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gates_foundation The foundation was initially funded by Bill Gates with US$106 million in 2000 Not to mention Buffett gave 30.7 Billion..... Know what you're talking about before you criticize...

yup and when he dies most of his money goes to charity
Avatar image for gman56
gman56

6542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#214 gman56
Member since 2004 • 6542 Posts
The poor people shouldn't have to rely on rich people, they need to work harder.
Avatar image for NrGcHaRgE021
NrGcHaRgE021

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 NrGcHaRgE021
Member since 2003 • 3930 Posts
[QUOTE="Shalashaska77"]if they want to, but no they shouldnt have to. Bleive it or not, alotta rich people worked for their money.yoshi-lnex
most are simply born into it without a lick of work.....is that really fair in socioty?

hahahahahh born into it? No. Fair? Not everything is fair, as I said.
Avatar image for The_Vampress
The_Vampress

6472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#216 The_Vampress
Member since 2006 • 6472 Posts
Rich people should give money and time to save the natural world, IE, the Amazon Rainforest, and animals on the endangered species list before humans. 
Avatar image for Mumbles527
Mumbles527

7706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 Mumbles527
Member since 2004 • 7706 Posts
Its their money, let them do what they want with it. If they choose to give it to charities, good for them. If they choose to live the most extravagant life possible, or just let their children inherit it all, thats their right.
Avatar image for formula1racer
formula1racer

6075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#218 formula1racer
Member since 2007 • 6075 Posts
no,they should not have to,but they should be taxed accordingly and not get to slip through "loopholes"
Avatar image for Satanshelper
Satanshelper

2812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 Satanshelper
Member since 2006 • 2812 Posts
I think they should at a certain point, when people start earning more money than they know what to do with, thats when they should give it away, also the votes are 54-54, its pretty even!
Avatar image for LiquidZ08
LiquidZ08

8820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#220 LiquidZ08
Member since 2004 • 8820 Posts
what do you think ?konichiwa21
Is the space pope reptilian?  Sure why not.
Avatar image for Darkside5675
Darkside5675

1041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#221 Darkside5675
Member since 2007 • 1041 Posts
NOOO! If I was rich I WOULD give some money away to the poor, but only because i'm nice, not because some lazy high school dropout is telling me to.
Avatar image for LB80
LB80

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#222 LB80
Member since 2005 • 618 Posts

If they worked hard for it, they shouldn't have to.

If they inherited the money, then yes.

Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
Yes, they should.  And they do, through taxation.  The real problems are abuse of loopholes and rates of taxation.   It's the proportions that strike me as wrong right now - too few people control too much of the wealth, and it's rather sickening that certain individuals own several multi-million dollar homes while many more are starving on the street.  You can blather on all you want about laziness and so forth, but it still doesn't make it right.  You don't need to be dining off of diamond encrusted plates when others can't afford basic necessities.  Humility and compassion are virtues that seem to be totally lost on too many of the wealthy, and they pass on their vices to their gloating, spoiled children who brag about attending expensive private schools or post-secondary institutions, and complain about receiving expensive sports cars as gifts because they aren't the right colour.

I'm also irritated by the fact that certain major contributors to society (such as fire fighters, medical personnel, educators, and gifted artists and craftsmen) are not as well-compensated for their efforts as they should be by comparison to the majority of the truly wealthy, who often build their fortunes by selling products which are of much less value, or even harmful, to society.  Examples would be tobacco giants; the oil industry; personal injury lawyers; professional athletes; horrible entertainers such as 50 Cent, who inexplicably attract a large following and leave them stupider for having experienced their 'art;' or profiteering businessmen who leech off of other peoples' innovations and ingenuity (don't get me started on publishers, for instance).
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#224 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
^^^ The Rolling stones pay 1.5% taxes in the Netherlands. Besides tax differences are way too small, some people still earn millions and others still earn next to nothing. Money is a recipe for disaster anyway.
Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"]^^^ The Rolling stones pay 1.5% taxes in the Netherlands. Besides tax differences are way too small, some people still earn millions and others still earn next to nothing. Money is a recipe for disaster anyway.



Yes, and it's through taxation that the proper distribution of wealth must be achieved.  A person who makes millions of dollars off of society should be paying a much greater percentage of his or her earnings than someone who makes much less off of society.  But you can't kill the profit motive either... otherwise most people will simply stop working, or at the very least, will put less effort into what they do.  The few who feel compelled to work for the benefit of humanity are not enough to compensate for the vast majority, who are compelled to work only for themselves.
Avatar image for groovdafied
groovdafied

5012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 groovdafied
Member since 2005 • 5012 Posts
There's a lot of poor people out there who choose to be poor and homeless. My friend and I had left overs from this resturaunt, these 20 year old couple walked by and were like "Can we have that food, because we have no money and we're homeless" litterally said that to us. My friend kept walking. I asked.. " Why didn't you give the food?" Because they choose to be homeless, they're young and can get jobs if they wanted. True point.
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#227 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
[QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"]^^^ The Rolling stones pay 1.5% taxes in the Netherlands. Besides tax differences are way too small, some people still earn millions and others still earn next to nothing. Money is a recipe for disaster anyway.



Yes, and it's through taxation that the proper distribution of wealth must be achieved. A person who makes millions of dollars off of society should be paying a much greater percentage of his or her earnings than someone who makes much less off of society. But you can't kill the profit motive either... otherwise most people will simply stop working, or at the very least, will put less effort into what they do. The few who feel compelled to work for the benefit of humanity are not enough to compensate for the vast majority, who are compelled to work only for themselves.

That doesn't meant that singers may earn millions and base doctors may hardly earn any money at all. :| All jobs should have the same base pay.
Avatar image for LB80
LB80

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#228 LB80
Member since 2005 • 618 Posts

There's a lot of poor people out there who choose to be poor and homeless. My friend and I had left overs from this resturaunt, these 20 year old couple walked by and were like "Can we have that food, because we have no money and we're homeless" litterally said that to us. My friend kept walking. I asked.. " Why didn't you give the food?" Because they choose to be homeless, they're young and can get jobs if they wanted. True point.groovdafied

Yeah I pretty much feel the same way.

Avatar image for jm4847
jm4847

3535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#229 jm4847
Member since 2006 • 3535 Posts
Rich people worked for their money. If poor people want money, they should earn it. If you're talking about poor children, well it's their parents' fault for having kids while being poor. That's where the state comes in.
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
There's a lot of poor people out there who choose to be poor and homeless. My friend and I had left overs from this resturaunt, these 20 year old couple walked by and were like "Can we have that food, because we have no money and we're homeless" litterally said that to us. My friend kept walking. I asked.. " Why didn't you give the food?" Because they choose to be homeless, they're young and can get jobs if they wanted. True point.groovdafied
Very very few, half of the people who are homeless have a mental illness, and half are children.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#231 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
Taxes? 
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#232 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38929 Posts
it doesn't hurt. they are people too are they not?
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#233 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
Last time I checked I paid taxes into Medicaid, Social Security, Welfare, among other things. That's plenty.
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
Its their money, let them do what they want with it. If they choose to give it to charities, good for them. If they choose to live the most extravagant life possible, or just let their children inherit it all, thats their right. Mumbles527
How is that in any sence fair or right? While many people may struggle with multiple jobs to scrape by with the bare minimum, some do nothing to earn their way and simply profit off of socioty while giving little back, how can that be justified? If you make more off of socioty, you should be expected to give more, for the general benifit of socioty.
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#235 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
[QUOTE="Mumbles527"]Its their money, let them do what they want with it. If they choose to give it to charities, good for them. If they choose to live the most extravagant life possible, or just let their children inherit it all, thats their right. yoshi-lnex
How is that in any sence fair or right? While many people may struggle with multiple jobs to scrape by with the bare minimum, some do nothing to earn their way and simply profit off of socioty while giving little back, how can that be justified? If you make more off of socioty, you should be expected to give more, for the general benifit of socioty.

The more you make, the higher tax bracket you get dumped into. I earn WAY more then my brother, and I pay WAY more in income tax. Sure, that can't be said about the Uber-Rich, but they are an extremely small percent of the population.
Avatar image for NrGcHaRgE021
NrGcHaRgE021

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 NrGcHaRgE021
Member since 2003 • 3930 Posts
[QUOTE="Mumbles527"]Its their money, let them do what they want with it. If they choose to give it to charities, good for them. If they choose to live the most extravagant life possible, or just let their children inherit it all, thats their right. yoshi-lnex
How is that in any sence fair or right? While many people may struggle with multiple jobs to scrape by with the bare minimum, some do nothing to earn their way and simply profit off of socioty while giving little back, how can that be justified? If you make more off of socioty, you should be expected to give more, for the general benifit of socioty.

As i've said and will continue to say, capitalism isnt necessarily fair. Life isnt fair. It's a shame that people are poor and the like, but that isnt everyone else's problem.
Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#238 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts
[QUOTE="im_very_kind"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="sutherland19"][QUOTE="im_very_kind"][QUOTE="teh_forbidden"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]No. Rich people have the right to do what they please with their money. Poor people are poor because of their own choices in life. It's their own fault they didn't go to college and get a decent job. No one should be give anything. Everyone should have to earn their place in the world.greenprince
It's either you've never gone out of your own house,you haven't experienced much of life yet, or you're just good old fashioned ignorant. I figure those are the only reasons for an answer like that.

actually smash is right, you arent at all.

Nope Smash is quite far off. No one CHOOSES to be poor, sure there are some people who do slack off in highschool and are now paying for it for the rest of their lives...which isn't really fair. But there are also people that no matter how hard they try they can't get ahead, meanwhile the rich live in luxury buying millions of dollars worth of things that they don't need at all...now I know that is definitely not fair...but unfortunately that's Capitialism!

If you work hard enough in high school, you can get a scholarship. High school is not hard, and if you do not finish it is no one's fault but your own. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions instead of blaming society. Society will never change.

i totally agree with you. even if you mess up in highschool theres so many ways to get ahead in our very forgiving society! 1. goto a community college with financial aid 2. do good there, then goto a real college or you can try this: move in with a few people, and youll get by. duh nobody should be poor. if you are, its totally your own fault and yes i am saying some people choose to be poor because they lack common sense or they are trying to ride the system

Dude, my brother and I are going to community college...are you saying its not ''real'' ? I mean, I'm transfering to university like you mention but still I find it offensive....

Avatar image for Candy-Star
Candy-Star

4378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 Candy-Star
Member since 2004 • 4378 Posts
no,its not the rich person's fault that the poor man is poor.teh_destroyer
You never know.. a lot things you can't see relate.. and they shouldn't have to if they don't want to.. and like someone said, its good to share =].
Avatar image for NrGcHaRgE021
NrGcHaRgE021

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 NrGcHaRgE021
Member since 2003 • 3930 Posts
[QUOTE="im_very_kind"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="sutherland19"][QUOTE="im_very_kind"][QUOTE="teh_forbidden"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]No. Rich people have the right to do what they please with their money. Poor people are poor because of their own choices in life. It's their own fault they didn't go to college and get a decent job. No one should be give anything. Everyone should have to earn their place in the world.greenprince
It's either you've never gone out of your own house,you haven't experienced much of life yet, or you're just good old fashioned ignorant. I figure those are the only reasons for an answer like that.

actually smash is right, you arent at all.

Nope Smash is quite far off. No one CHOOSES to be poor, sure there are some people who do slack off in highschool and are now paying for it for the rest of their lives...which isn't really fair. But there are also people that no matter how hard they try they can't get ahead, meanwhile the rich live in luxury buying millions of dollars worth of things that they don't need at all...now I know that is definitely not fair...but unfortunately that's Capitialism!

If you work hard enough in high school, you can get a scholarship. High school is not hard, and if you do not finish it is no one's fault but your own. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions instead of blaming society. Society will never change.

i totally agree with you. even if you mess up in highschool theres so many ways to get ahead in our very forgiving society! 1. goto a community college with financial aid 2. do good there, then goto a real college or you can try this: move in with a few people, and youll get by. duh nobody should be poor. if you are, its totally your own fault and yes i am saying some people choose to be poor because they lack common sense or they are trying to ride the system

Dude, my brother and I are going to community college...are you saying its not ''real'' ? I mean, I'm transfering to university like you menton but still its offensive....

A community college isnt a 'real' collegiate institution in the sense of a university. It's pretty much a prep school.
Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#241 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts
[QUOTE="greenprince"][QUOTE="im_very_kind"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="sutherland19"][QUOTE="im_very_kind"][QUOTE="teh_forbidden"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]No. Rich people have the right to do what they please with their money. Poor people are poor because of their own choices in life. It's their own fault they didn't go to college and get a decent job. No one should be give anything. Everyone should have to earn their place in the world.NrGcHaRgE021
It's either you've never gone out of your own house,you haven't experienced much of life yet, or you're just good old fashioned ignorant. I figure those are the only reasons for an answer like that.

actually smash is right, you arent at all.

Nope Smash is quite far off. No one CHOOSES to be poor, sure there are some people who do slack off in highschool and are now paying for it for the rest of their lives...which isn't really fair. But there are also people that no matter how hard they try they can't get ahead, meanwhile the rich live in luxury buying millions of dollars worth of things that they don't need at all...now I know that is definitely not fair...but unfortunately that's Capitialism!

If you work hard enough in high school, you can get a scholarship. High school is not hard, and if you do not finish it is no one's fault but your own. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions instead of blaming society. Society will never change.

i totally agree with you. even if you mess up in highschool theres so many ways to get ahead in our very forgiving society! 1. goto a community college with financial aid 2. do good there, then goto a real college or you can try this: move in with a few people, and youll get by. duh nobody should be poor. if you are, its totally your own fault and yes i am saying some people choose to be poor because they lack common sense or they are trying to ride the system

Dude, my brother and I are going to community college...are you saying its not ''real'' ? I mean, I'm transfering to university like you menton but still its offensive....

A community college isnt a 'real' collegiate institution in the sense of a university. It's pretty much a prep school.

Prep school? I dont think so. My brother has no intentions of going to university, but does that mean he did not recieve higher education??? College and universities are all stated ''higher education'' but I find weird that students in Universities feel superior to college students....
Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#242 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts
Yes, they should.  And they do, through taxation.  The real problems are abuse of loopholes and rates of taxation.   It's the proportions that strike me as wrong right now - too few people control too much of the wealth, and it's rather sickening that certain individuals own several multi-million dollar homes while many more are starving on the street.  You can blather on all you want about laziness and so forth, but it still doesn't make it right.  You don't need to be dining off of diamond encrusted plates when others can't afford basic necessities.  Humility and compassion are virtues that seem to be totally lost on too many of the wealthy, and they pass on their vices to their gloating, spoiled children who brag about attending expensive private schools or post-secondary institutions, and complain about receiving expensive sports cars as gifts because they aren't the right colour.

I'm also irritated by the fact that certain major contributors to society (such as fire fighters, medical personnel, educators, and gifted artists and craftsmen) are not as well-compensated for their efforts as they should be by comparison to the majority of the truly wealthy, who often build their fortunes by selling products which are of much less value, or even harmful, to society.  Examples would be tobacco giants; the oil industry; personal injury lawyers; professional athletes; horrible entertainers such as 50 Cent, who inexplicably attract a large following and leave them stupider for having experienced their 'art;' or profiteering businessmen who leech off of other peoples' innovations and ingenuity (don't get me started on publishers, for instance).
pianist
Great post
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#243 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38929 Posts
Prep school? I dont think so. My brother has no intentions of going to university, but does that mean he did not recieve higher education??? College and universities are all stated ''higher education'' but I find weird that students in Universities feel superior to college students....greenprince
i think its more from a degree standpoint.. associates degree vs. bachelors.. many employers will look for a bachelors as a min. education req.
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#244 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
[QUOTE="greenprince"] Prep school? I dont think so. My brother has no intentions of going to university, but does that mean he did not recieve higher education??? College and universities are all stated ''higher education'' but I find weird that students in Universities feel superior to college students....comp_atkins
i think its more from a degree standpoint.. associates degree vs. bachelors.. many employers will look for a bachelors as a min. education req.

Not to mention the fact that in order to teach at most community colleges, you are only required to have a BA.
Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"]^^^ The Rolling stones pay 1.5% taxes in the Netherlands. Besides tax differences are way too small, some people still earn millions and others still earn next to nothing. Money is a recipe for disaster anyway.



Yes, and it's through taxation that the proper distribution of wealth must be achieved. A person who makes millions of dollars off of society should be paying a much greater percentage of his or her earnings than someone who makes much less off of society. But you can't kill the profit motive either... otherwise most people will simply stop working, or at the very least, will put less effort into what they do. The few who feel compelled to work for the benefit of humanity are not enough to compensate for the vast majority, who are compelled to work only for themselves.

That doesn't meant that singers may earn millions and base doctors may hardly earn any money at all. :| All jobs should have the same base pay.



You can argue till your face is blue that all jobs should receive the same base pay... and I would agree with you that it's unfortunate that it can't be this way. But it just wouldn't work. Again, the vast majority of people will put forward effort into their jobs only to help themselves. If you can make as much money by not attending 10-12 years of post-secondary instruction as you can by attending (and in so doing, putting yourself 10-12 years behind the game when it comes to earnings), most people simply wouldn't attend.

I'm sorry, but unless human nature and societal values are radically altered for some reason, a system of financial equality simply won't work out. It's unfortunate, but it's true.  Entertainers make money because that's what people want to pay for.  I detest most wealthy entertainers, but it's a problem with the population's value judgements of art as much as it is a problem with the system.
Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
[QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="-Karayan-"]^^^ The Rolling stones pay 1.5% taxes in the Netherlands. Besides tax differences are way too small, some people still earn millions and others still earn next to nothing. Money is a recipe for disaster anyway.



Yes, and it's through taxation that the proper distribution of wealth must be achieved. A person who makes millions of dollars off of society should be paying a much greater percentage of his or her earnings than someone who makes much less off of society. But you can't kill the profit motive either... otherwise most people will simply stop working, or at the very least, will put less effort into what they do. The few who feel compelled to work for the benefit of humanity are not enough to compensate for the vast majority, who are compelled to work only for themselves.

That doesn't meant that singers may earn millions and base doctors may hardly earn any money at all. :| All jobs should have the same base pay.



You can argue till your face is blue that all jobs should receive the same base pay... and I would agree with you that it's unfortunate that it can't be this way. But it just wouldn't work. Again, the vast majority of people will put forward effort into their jobs only to help themselves. If you can make as much money by not attending 10-12 years of post-secondary instruction as you can by attending (and in so doing, putting yourself 10-12 years behind the game when it comes to earnings), most people simply wouldn't attend.

I'm sorry, but unless human nature and societal values are radically altered for some reason, a system of financial equality simply won't work out. It's unfortunate, but it's true.

There are other rewards than money. And frankly I'd much rather study till I'm 60 than work as a cleaner, and I should say most people would. If it would mean getting money from the government for it at least.
Avatar image for BlackVII
BlackVII

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247 BlackVII
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts
If rich people don't want to share they're money than they dont have to. But personally think they should since most of the time they don't know what to do with all of it.
Avatar image for coldkill19
coldkill19

1658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#248 coldkill19
Member since 2007 • 1658 Posts
Think about it this way...If you were rich, would you give your money to poor people?
Avatar image for greenprince
greenprince

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#249 greenprince
Member since 2006 • 3332 Posts

[QUOTE="greenprince"] Prep school? I don't think so. My brother has no intentions of going to university, but does that mean he did not receive higher education??? College and universities are all stated '' higher education '' but I find weird that students in Universities feel superior to college students....comp_atkins
i think its more from a degree standpoint.. associates degree vs. bachelors.. many employers will look for a bachelors as a min. education req.

I understand but if you live in  Canada ( I live in Canada) I went to visit Sheridan college ( community college ) the same college my brother is attended. The first comment I heard was this guy from Brock university saying : Sheridan college sucks! go to a real school!''( apparently this quote is said often among university students) Now after he said that he got his ass kicked but still it affected me because people passed judgment on other people(who they don't know) because of their education their taking.

I mean, my family is lower class and my only alternative was to go to college then transfer to university. The benefits were that the classes were smaller, it was cheaper,  I don't have to share a room with anyone and of course students who begin their higher education career at a community college are more likely to transfer to a higher quality four-year institution than if they had started at a four-year college. Of course, I will always consider my self a person who went to Sheridan college than a guy who went to community then transfer to ( insert university here)

Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts
[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"][QUOTE="Mumbles527"]Its their money, let them do what they want with it. If they choose to give it to charities, good for them. If they choose to live the most extravagant life possible, or just let their children inherit it all, thats their right. LukeAF24
How is that in any sence fair or right? While many people may struggle with multiple jobs to scrape by with the bare minimum, some do nothing to earn their way and simply profit off of socioty while giving little back, how can that be justified? If you make more off of socioty, you should be expected to give more, for the general benifit of socioty.

The more you make, the higher tax bracket you get dumped into. I earn WAY more then my brother, and I pay WAY more in income tax. Sure, that can't be said about the Uber-Rich, but they are an extremely small percent of the population.

That's how it should be, and the uber rich should be taxed even more considering that 6% of the population holds half the money in the country.