So now its more acceptable to be g@y than it is to be a christian?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#251 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]

....Is this like, three dudes f*cking instead of two?

Philokalia

Activists.

How does being an activist make one radical exactly?

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#252 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Uh, no, there have been anti-sodomy laws, some of which are still on the books albeit not enforced, and beatings and arrests of homosexuals by police officers in America's history.

FYI, you are a brain dead fundamentalist.

Philokalia

You seem confused by what you originally said, THat is you implied that simply being gay to some Christians is a sin in of itself. This is not the majority viewpoint on the matter. And thus you changed the attack to saying Christians have attacked the actions of homosexuals, that is the sexual actions which yes Christians condemn. But by the standard defintion of fundamentalist I am not. I do not accept those ideologies of those baptists in the 1900s that said we must believe in a literal creation account of genesis, I do not believe in sola scriptura, I do not believe in Sola Fide I do not believe in those doctrines.

Im not a fundamentalist.

Glad to know you that you support archaic laws that punish individuals for victimless acts performed within the privacy of their own homes. It's people like you that make me thankful our founding fathers had the foresight to keep religion out of government.

Avatar image for Philokalia
Philokalia

2910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 Philokalia
Member since 2012 • 2910 Posts

sooooo everyone who advocates the rights of homosexuals is a radical homosexual?

You're silly.

THE_DRUGGIE

No, but everyone who utterly jumps to that conclusion from a few vague words and thinks thats the others position. Now he is silly.

Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#254 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

I don't agree with the homosexual lifestyle.

djshowstopper87

What does this even mean?

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#255 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

sooooo everyone who advocates the rights of homosexuals is a radical homosexual?

You're silly.

Philokalia

No, but everyone who utterly jumps to that conclusion from a few vague words and thinks thats the others position. Now he is silly.

Well maybe people should stop being vague so the silliness can be minimized.

Avatar image for Philokalia
Philokalia

2910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#256 Philokalia
Member since 2012 • 2910 Posts

Glad to know you that you support archaic laws that punish individuals for victimless acts performed within the privacy of their own homes. It's people like you that make me thankful our founding fathers had the foresight to keep religion out of government.

theone86

I do? Again your jumping to these conclusions from things I never say. But I dont expect you to do any different mind you.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#257 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="Philokalia"]

Only the brain dead Fundamentalists. Please distinguish.

CycleOfViolence

Uh, no, there have been anti-sodomy laws, some of which are still on the books albeit not enforced, and beatings and arrests of homosexuals by police officers in America's history.

FYI, you are a brain dead fundamentalist.

Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma still have their laws codified.

I could swear there was a local area that still haed a sodomy law on the books, Cincy I want to say. At any rate, there's very little enforcement of it as, even if someone blew the whislte on an act of sodomy, most police departments have the good sense to not arrest people for consensual acts of sex.

Avatar image for CycleOfViolence
CycleOfViolence

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 CycleOfViolence
Member since 2011 • 2813 Posts

[QUOTE="djshowstopper87"]I don't agree with the homosexual lifestyle.

Pffrbt

What does this even mean?

He doesn't like rainbows.

Avatar image for Jazz_Fan
Jazz_Fan

29516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 Jazz_Fan
Member since 2008 • 29516 Posts

[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]

....Is this like, three dudes f*cking instead of two?

Philokalia

Activists.

Oh, a snarl word. Well, I was thinking this would be something humorous. I'm disappointed.

Carry on.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#260 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Philokalia"]

No its more acceptable to be a radical homosexual to the left than to be a devout Christian. Most people I imagine, that is most people not being on gamespot would prefer devout Christians to radical gay activists.

Philokalia

Depends if being a devout Christian involves forcing your religious beliefs onto others. In which case "radical" homosexualism is indeed preferable. Especially when this group of "radicals" just wants to be treated as equal members of society.

Radical in that they want to force this issue on everyone regaurdless of the society that rejects it. Like suggesting Homosexuals ought boycott and force Chick Fil to shut down and not give money to whom it freely chooses instead of just not going there and supporting their brand if they are that against it. And by devout I seperate them from rabid fundamentalists.

I imagine you would be displeased with if a corporation started lobbying saying Christianity should be made illegal. Even then I don't actually see any support on this forum for banning Chik-Fil-A. I see many saying it's deplorable to fund hate and I see many who refuse to give them their business. I don't see really anyone saying they should be shut down. Your response to what you think a devout Christian is doesn't really answer my question, only makes me wonder what you would consider rabid fundamentalism.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="CycleOfViolence"]

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Uh, no, there have been anti-sodomy laws, some of which are still on the books albeit not enforced, and beatings and arrests of homosexuals by police officers in America's history.

FYI, you are a brain dead fundamentalist.

theone86

Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma still have their laws codified.

I could swear there was a local area that still haed a sodomy law on the books, Cincy I want to say. At any rate, there's very little enforcement of it as, even if someone blew the whislte on an act of sodomy, most police departments have the good sense to not arrest people for consensual acts of sex.

The laws themselves are unconstitutional and can't be enforced even if law enforcement wanted to, but they are still on the books just in case Lawrence v. Texas ever gets overturned (similar to state laws that prohibit abortion that are still on the books)
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#262 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Philokalia"]

No its more acceptable to be a radical homosexual to the left than to be a devout Christian. Most people I imagine, that is most people not being on gamespot would prefer devout Christians to radical gay activists.

Philokalia

Depends if being a devout Christian involves forcing your religious beliefs onto others. In which case "radical" homosexualism is indeed preferable. Especially when this group of "radicals" just wants to be treated as equal members of society.

Radical in that they want to force this issue on everyone regaurdless of the society that rejects it. Like suggesting Homosexuals ought boycott and force Chick Fil to shut down and not give money to whom it freely chooses instead of just not going there and supporting their brand if they are that against it. And by devout I seperate them from rabid fundamentalists.

Wanting to be treated equally is not forcing your beliefs on the rest of society, thinking that the rest of society should adhere to your religious beliefs is forcing your beliefs on the rest of society. If gay marriage was legal those who oppose it could pontificate on the matter to their hearts' content and practice their religion however they please, there is absolutely no coercion going on whatsoever.

Avatar image for Philokalia
Philokalia

2910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 Philokalia
Member since 2012 • 2910 Posts

Well maybe people should stop being vague so the silliness can be minimized.

THE_DRUGGIE

Maybe silly people shouldnt jump to unwarrented conclusions/

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#264 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="Pffrbt"]

[QUOTE="djshowstopper87"]I don't agree with the homosexual lifestyle.

CycleOfViolence

What does this even mean?

He doesn't like rainbows.

Dude, rainbows are awesome and have gold at the end of them with little Irish people who would probably kill you if you weren't Jennifer Aniston wait I think I know why some people hate rainbows.

Avatar image for Philokalia
Philokalia

2910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#265 Philokalia
Member since 2012 • 2910 Posts

Wanting to be treated equally is not forcing your beliefs on the rest of society, thinking that the rest of society should adhere to your religious beliefs is forcing your beliefs on the rest of society. If gay marriage was legal those who oppose it could pontificate on the matter to their hearts' content and practice their religion however they please, there is absolutely no coercion going on whatsoever.

theone86

Agian you have to misrepresent who Im talking about. Im not talking abou those who are civil and act in a orderly fashion when trying to get an idea they want to be legal from illegal. Thats not what IM saying. So instead of jumping the gun, enquire first. Do as God says and not open your mouth so that you might be condemned. But again I don't blame you.

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#266 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

Well maybe people should stop being vague so the silliness can be minimized.

Philokalia

Maybe silly people shouldnt jump to unwarrented conclusions/

It would only be possible if silly people didn't counter silliness with more silliness because they want to be silly and in a trunk or something.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#267 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="CycleOfViolence"]

Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma still have their laws codified.

-Sun_Tzu-

I could swear there was a local area that still haed a sodomy law on the books, Cincy I want to say. At any rate, there's very little enforcement of it as, even if someone blew the whislte on an act of sodomy, most police departments have the good sense to not arrest people for consensual acts of sex.

The laws themselves are unconstitutional and can't be enforced even if law enforcement wanted to, but they are still on the books just in case Lawrence v. Texas ever gets overturned (similar to state laws that prohibit abortion that are still on the books)

Droppin' precedent like it's going out of style.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="theone86"]

I could swear there was a local area that still haed a sodomy law on the books, Cincy I want to say. At any rate, there's very little enforcement of it as, even if someone blew the whislte on an act of sodomy, most police departments have the good sense to not arrest people for consensual acts of sex.

theone86

The laws themselves are unconstitutional and can't be enforced even if law enforcement wanted to, but they are still on the books just in case Lawrence v. Texas ever gets overturned (similar to state laws that prohibit abortion that are still on the books)

Droppin' precedent like it's going out of style.

Avatar image for Jazz_Fan
Jazz_Fan

29516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 Jazz_Fan
Member since 2008 • 29516 Posts
I'm going to ask xaos what he considers to be radical homosexual acts.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
I'm going to ask xaos what he considers to be radical homosexual acts.Jazz_Fan
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#271 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Wanting to be treated equally is not forcing your beliefs on the rest of society, thinking that the rest of society should adhere to your religious beliefs is forcing your beliefs on the rest of society. If gay marriage was legal those who oppose it could pontificate on the matter to their hearts' content and practice their religion however they please, there is absolutely no coercion going on whatsoever.

Philokalia

Agian you have to misrepresent who Im talking about. Im not talking abou those who are civil and act in a orderly fashion when trying to get an idea they want to be legal from illegal. Thats not what IM saying. So instead of jumping the gun, enquire first. Do as God says and not open your mouth so that you might be condemned. But again I don't blame you.

I never do as god says.

If a restaurant were donating money to a group tha wanted to shut down all religious institutions in America I wouldn't blame Christians for boycotting it. Calling homosexuals radicals for boycotting Chick-fil-A is, simply, bullsh*t. They disagree with their practices and they have every right to take action against them.

People who advocate for having their beliefs forced on the rest of the population do not deserve civility. They didn't deserve it when they were telling women they couldn't vote, they didn't deserve it when they were segregating the country, and they do't deserve it now. They deserve to shut up and deal with the fact that we aren't living in a theocracy.

Avatar image for CycleOfViolence
CycleOfViolence

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#272 CycleOfViolence
Member since 2011 • 2813 Posts

[QUOTE="Jazz_Fan"]

....Is this like, three dudes f*cking instead of two?

Philokalia

Activists.

So anyone who actively or vigorously advocates for a cause, political or other, is a radical?

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is. ferrari2001

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.

For somebody claiming to be studying for the preisthood, you have a very poor understanding of the biblical history of marriage

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#274 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

This is just one of many signs of the end times. Soon, the Son of Man shall return.

msfan1289

They've been saying the son of man "soon" shall return for thousands of years now

Why people waste time on this fairytale religious BS is beyond me. Religion really is humanity's greatest weakness in my opinion.


hateful words from someone who hates, hate. :roll:

i think the greatest human weakness is, money and power.

Then the vatican is the weakest of all groups of humans

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#275 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Maybe it's just where you live. Most people I know couldn't care less if you're religious or not. kingkong0124
I live in Ct and that was crazy. I don't even want to begin to imagine what living in the Bible belt would be like.

o wow, when I went there everybody was pretty tolerant.

On that note: I do have to hide the fact I'm an atheist or else some people get really aggressive with me for no real reason.

Seriously, they should chill out.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#276 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] I live in Ct and that was crazy. I don't even want to begin to imagine what living in the Bible belt would be like. THE_DRUGGIE

o wow, when I went there everybody was pretty tolerant.

On that note: I do have to hide the fact I'm an atheist or else some people get really aggressive with me for no real reason.

Seriously, they should chill out.

mhm

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#277 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] o wow, when I went there everybody was pretty tolerant. wis3boi

On that note: I do have to hide the fact I'm an atheist or else some people get really aggressive with me for no real reason.

Seriously, they should chill out.

mhm

I remember there was this one time where I was in a group project for college a couple years ago and we went around talking about ourselves, which included saying what religious beliefs we had for some reason. The guy to my left said he was Christian, then I said I was atheist and he kept glaring at me the rest of the time.

Creeped me out.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#278 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

On that note: I do have to hide the fact I'm an atheist or else some people get really aggressive with me for no real reason.

Seriously, they should chill out.

THE_DRUGGIE

mhm

I remember there was this one time where I was in a group project for college a couple years ago and we went around talking about ourselves, which included saying what religious beliefs we had for some reason. The guy to my left said he was Christian, then I said I was atheist and he kept glaring at me the rest of the time.

Creeped me out.

:lol:

I had to do the same in a philosophy course, no one cared what each other believed, but I find more adults that get upset at the non-religious than the younger generations. I'm 21, and just about everyone I know my age is non-religious or atheist and everyone is very tolerant.

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#279 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

mhm

wis3boi

I remember there was this one time where I was in a group project for college a couple years ago and we went around talking about ourselves, which included saying what religious beliefs we had for some reason. The guy to my left said he was Christian, then I said I was atheist and he kept glaring at me the rest of the time.

Creeped me out.

:lol:

I had to do the same in a philosophy course, no one cared what each other believed, but I find more adults that get upset at the non-religious than the younger generations. I'm 21, and just about everyone I know my age is non-religious or atheist and everyone is very tolerant.

I'm 22 and 75% of religious people my age really need a chill pill when they enounter someone they find out is non-religious.

BUT, I do like bumming around the ecumenical center (religious building on campus) because it's empty a lot and is really quiet/nicely designed.

Avatar image for layton2012
layton2012

3489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 layton2012
Member since 2011 • 3489 Posts
It is their right to believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, my problem is that they are using the money to fund anti-gay associations. Which I do not support so I will not spend my money there.
Avatar image for layton2012
layton2012

3489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#281 layton2012
Member since 2011 • 3489 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="theone86"]

I could swear there was a local area that still haed a sodomy law on the books, Cincy I want to say. At any rate, there's very little enforcement of it as, even if someone blew the whislte on an act of sodomy, most police departments have the good sense to not arrest people for consensual acts of sex.

theone86

The laws themselves are unconstitutional and can't be enforced even if law enforcement wanted to, but they are still on the books just in case Lawrence v. Texas ever gets overturned (similar to state laws that prohibit abortion that are still on the books)

Droppin' precedent like it's going out of style.

This, I got a huge smile on my face when you referenced Lawrence v. Texas.
Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#282 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

No, but it's more acceptable to be gay than to be a douchebag. Thankfully...kuraimen

Love this. I just can't find any reason to sympathize with the "Christian" arguement here... Your beliefs are limiting others, ours are encouraging.... How are you in the right and proper? Im sorry. Take your bible back home to the belt. No sympathy from me, get out.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#283 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

Gay people don't necessarily believe in rediculous fairy tales.

Avatar image for MistressMinako
MistressMinako

45964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#284 MistressMinako
Member since 2008 • 45964 Posts
Not offline. But seriously... if you don't want to get any backlash for your opinions keep them to yourself. Free speech does not mean say whatever you want without consequences.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#285 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

I remember there was this one time where I was in a group project for college a couple years ago and we went around talking about ourselves, which included saying what religious beliefs we had for some reason. The guy to my left said he was Christian, then I said I was atheist and he kept glaring at me the rest of the time.

Creeped me out.

THE_DRUGGIE

:lol:

I had to do the same in a philosophy course, no one cared what each other believed, but I find more adults that get upset at the non-religious than the younger generations. I'm 21, and just about everyone I know my age is non-religious or atheist and everyone is very tolerant.

I'm 22 and 75% of religious people my age really need a chill pill when they enounter someone they find out is non-religious.

BUT, I do like bumming around the ecumenical center (religious building on campus) because it's empty a lot and is really quiet/nicely designed.

Growing up here (BC, Canada for those not keeping score) I didn't even know people were dicks about religion until I got on the internet. Like I have some people I've known for nearly a decade who I have no idea what their religious beliefs are. I think in my 23 years of existence here I've talked to one guy who was openly (excluding the mormon door knockers who are super chill) talking about religious beliefs and I think he got kind of offended when I told him I had my own ideas on the subject but he didn't really pursue. Then I started going down to the states. Very different attitude there than Canada and Europe.
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#286 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
I'll still go to Chick-Fil-A regardless of what the CEO said if I want to go. I do support gays and I'm sure my opinion conflicts with him but its not like he's killing them off. I don't think what he said is appropriate but there is only so much you can do in a country where 75% of the people believe in angels in the sky. I can live with it though and I talk to christians all the time, they're cool. It used to be where Christians used to give death threats to people who oppose their religion but I think thats turned around with the internet and all. Especially when people are still angry about those threats. But the reason why I'll still go is they'll lose money if they support anti-gay organizations. Hollywood will criminalize Chick-Fil-A because... Well hollywood is really into supporting gay people.
Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#287 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

I do support gaysshadowchronicle

Not if you give Chick-Fil-A money.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

Some things in th bible are mean't to be taken literally but the bible is the word of God and if you consider yourself a christian then you shold be familar with it. But one thing that bible states clear as day man should not lay with man. God loves everyone (even non christians and people who mock him) but he does not condone sin and homosexuality is considered a sin. But calling the bible out of date, not be a long shot, most the the thing the bible talks about still happens today just in different forms.

djshowstopper87

yes the bible is out of date.

that said it made much more sense in a small village setting were marriage and the children it brings meant the difference between life or death for the village . in that kind situation it makes allot more sense to make homosexuality an extreme taboo as it put the whole community at a disadvantage i.e two males who would never have children which to a small tribal community means a decimating blow to the work force.

on a whole, the bible makes a whole lot of sense when applied to small and primitive agrarian tribal communities, modern life not so much.

Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#289 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

Only more acceptable when the Christian doesn't understand the importance of this life and to prepare for the next life in this life is illogical because no one knows if there is even an after life.

Unless you are a fairy tale kind of guy. Believe your fairy tales and be happy. But don't tell us how much better your fairy tale is than the rest of our menial lives. Stop trying to make everything more significant than it really is.

Your God has no grand plan, but an equilibrium which is unpredictable in what will happen, but predictable in that it will always return to "normal". No matter what.

Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#290 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts

[QUOTE="shadowchronicle"]I do support gaysPffrbt

Not if you give Chick-Fil-A money.

And you don't think other companies do the same thing? Quiet frankly kfc is the unfortunate victim of the media, if you do your research you'll probably find things similar to this with other places you go to to buy your good or general needs. I'm sure kfc has been doing what they're doing for a long time and so have other places. And even then do you really think these anti-gay societies will hurt gay people? The media is just manipulating the people and thats pretty much why this whole Chick-Fil-A news is so popular. Also it isn't that hard to support gays, it really isn't. It generally means accepting them into society like any other group of people and thats all gays should want and need. Gay people don't need special treatment they just need to be accepted.
Avatar image for Pffrbt
Pffrbt

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#291 Pffrbt
Member since 2010 • 6612 Posts

[QUOTE="Pffrbt"]

[QUOTE="shadowchronicle"]I do support gaysshadowchronicle

Not if you give Chick-Fil-A money.

And you don't think other companies do the same thing?
Yes, which is why I avoid them too.
And even then do you really think these anti-gay societies will hurt gay people?
Yes.
Also it isn't that hard to support gays, it really isn't.
Yeah, all you have to do is stop giving money to anti-gay organizations.
It generally means accepting them into society like any other group of people and thats all gays should want and need. Gay people don't need special treatment they just need to be accepted.

Equal rights would be nice too.

Avatar image for svenus97
svenus97

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#292 svenus97
Member since 2009 • 2318 Posts

Oh yeah, poor Christians... when you are Christian you can't get a job, you can't get married, you can't go to your church. When you are walking down the street people stare and point and whisper, "Look! That guy's a Christian!" Poor Christians.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#293 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="shadowchronicle"][QUOTE="Pffrbt"]

Not if you give Chick-Fil-A money.

Pffrbt

And you don't think other companies do the same thing?
Yes, which is why I avoid them too.
And even then do you really think these anti-gay societies will hurt gay people?
Yes.
Also it isn't that hard to support gays, it really isn't.
Yeah, all you have to do is stop giving money to anti-gay organizations.
It generally means accepting them into society like any other group of people and thats all gays should want and need. Gay people don't need special treatment they just need to be accepted.

Equal rights would be nice too.

Agreed. The only thing preventing homosexuals getting equal rights is these anti-gay oraganisations. So getting rid of them or weakening them is the only way to get equal rights.

Fortunatly the pro-equality side is getting more support and the anti-gays are getting less and less.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#294 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
More acceptable to be g@y than christian? How fvcking high are you people? This ridiculous persecution complex has got to go away. You're the fvcking majority for crying out loud!
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#295 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

Mr. Cathy has the right to say whatever he wants, but in the era of Youtube and cell-phones, he should understand the consequences of spouting beliefs that people may take exception to. No doubt there are thousands, if not millions of gay people who eat at Chik-Fil-A, and the news will get around to them.

A person would run the same risk of alienating consumers by putting a simple political sign on the window of the store. I do think this is being made into a much larger issue that it needs to be, because everyone wants a bit of attention. People who are upset should simply stop going to the restaurant. There are a lot of other stores where you can get over-priced mediocre food.

Avatar image for noscope-ak47
noscope-ak47

1318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#296 noscope-ak47
Member since 2012 • 1318 Posts

[QUOTE="noscope-ak47"]

Case in point trolls pop up:lol:

l4dak47

I have some bad news, dude. When several longtime members are calling you an idiot, it's because you are one. Not because they're trolling.

I get the long time members have created planet GS here but your opinions do not reflect normal people of the planet earth. So I get that the members here would gang up to preserve what they have created here. Your opinion does not equal fact. So calling me names because I don't agree with you is the mature thing to do on planet GS :lol:

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#297 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="noscope-ak47"]

Case in point trolls pop up:lol:

noscope-ak47

I have some bad news, dude. When several longtime members are calling you an idiot, it's because you are one. Not because they're trolling.

I get the long time members have created planet GS here but your opinions do not reflect normal people of the planet earth. So I get that the members here would gang up to preserve what they have created here. Your opinion does not equal fact. So calling me names because I don't agree with you is the mature thing to do on planet GS :lol:

No he is right you are considered an idiot. Posting fake pics of your 'Gun Room' lol was just the icing on the cake.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#298 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="noscope-ak47"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] I have some bad news, dude. When several longtime members are calling you an idiot, it's because you are one. Not because they're trolling. tenaka2

I get the long time members have created planet GS here but your opinions do not reflect normal people of the planet earth. So I get that the members here would gang up to preserve what they have created here. Your opinion does not equal fact. So calling me names because I don't agree with you is the mature thing to do on planet GS :lol:

No he is right you are considered an idiot. Posting fake pics of your 'Gun Room' lol was just the icing on the cake.

Stop responding to him, man.

How many times does he have to say that he hates drama? :P

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#299 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="noscope-ak47"]

Case in point trolls pop up:lol:

noscope-ak47

I have some bad news, dude. When several longtime members are calling you an idiot, it's because you are one. Not because they're trolling.

I get the long time members have created planet GS here but your opinions do not reflect normal people of the planet earth. So I get that the members here would gang up to preserve what they have created here. Your opinion does not equal fact. So calling me names because I don't agree with you is the mature thing to do on planet GS :lol:

Because you never insult either.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#300 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
I am all for gay rights but this blowing up on Chic-fil-a boycott is pretty hypocritical.. If people actually looked into many of the businesses they use or their products, they would be boycotting them too..