So now its more acceptable to be g@y than it is to be a christian?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#151 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

it's unacceptable to use your religion to keep others from obtaining equality in society.

ferrari2001

Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives.

Can you give a valid argument against it or are you just going to hide behind completely unrelated issues?

But anyway yes those people should be allowed to marry as well.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#152 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

it's unacceptable to use your religion to keep others from obtaining equality in society.

ferrari2001

Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives.

Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#153 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="Serraph105"]

it's unacceptable to use your religion to keep others from obtaining equality in society.

DroidPhysX
Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives.

Slippery slope! First they say we can't have guns, next thing you know I'm having a dinner party with the U.S. military in my home under martial law.

Christians say gays can't get married. Next thing you know they're saying non-Christians can't get married! Then they're saying divorces are illegal! Oh sh*t wait both of those follow the same logic that use for opposing gay marriage.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#154 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="Serraph105"]

it's unacceptable to use your religion to keep others from obtaining equality in society.

Aljosa23

Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives.

Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#155 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives. ferrari2001

Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?

Whats that got to do with gays?

Avatar image for deactivated-5c8ff6a32bb23
deactivated-5c8ff6a32bb23

3185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#156 deactivated-5c8ff6a32bb23
Member since 2012 • 3185 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives.

Slippery slope! First they say we can't have guns, next thing you know I'm having a dinner party with the U.S. military in my home under martial law.

Christians say gays can't get married. Next thing you know they're saying non-Christians can't get married! Then they're saying divorces are illegal! Oh sh*t wait both of those follow the same logic that use for opposing gay marriage.

Do you even know what you're talking about?
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#157 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

it's unacceptable to use your religion to keep others from obtaining equality in society.

ferrari2001

Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives.

First off, they are NOT just fighting for the right to file jointly, it's about receiving death benefits and a whole host of other legal rights that homosexuals are being denied the right to. Simply letting them file jointly would not make homosexuals happy, and it isn't the government's job to make Christians happy. What isn't getting through to your fundie brain is that there is Supreme Court precedent that says there has to be a legitimate SECULAR reason for the government to establish any religious practice, and there is no legitimate secular reason for the government to define marriage according to Christian values.

Polygamy and incest have victims, unlike homosexuality. It is not some slippery slope where if you allow homosexuals to marry you have to allow everyone to be able to marry as homosexuality ios completely different from incestual and polygamou relationships. Marriage to first cousins is also allowed in states where homosexual marriage is banned.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#158 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives. ferrari2001

Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?

I never said they shouldn't be allowed to marry, I just said that comparison is ridiculous. Being gay is perfectly normal but being attracted sexually to a sibling isn't.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#159 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

toast_burner

So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?

Whats that got to do with gays?

I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#160 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?ferrari2001

Whats that got to do with gays?

I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is.

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#161 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="PonchoTaco"][QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Slippery slope! First they say we can't have guns, next thing you know I'm having a dinner party with the U.S. military in my home under martial law.

Christians say gays can't get married. Next thing you know they're saying non-Christians can't get married! Then they're saying divorces are illegal! Oh sh*t wait both of those follow the same logic that use for opposing gay marriage.

Do you even know what you're talking about?

Yes.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#162 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?ferrari2001

Whats that got to do with gays?

I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is.

Appeal to tradition, fallacy.

It's not a double-standard, homosexuality is a natural urge whereas incest is not. Someone who is attracted to a relative is still able to be attracted to other females, the attraction arose because of environment.

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives. ferrari2001

Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?

Genetically similar mates that have a dangerously high chance of creating some sort of monter is not the same as two adults marrying.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

No. Ideally people would shut the f*ck up about both. Instead the situation at the moment is religious types don't want gays to have equal rights because their book says gays are bad. People get outspoken about the religious types being dicks and then themselves become dicks. If Christians didn't shove their book down peoples throats and try to use it to justify laws then sensible people wouldn't have a problem with them and Christians could legit complain when people are dicks to them.Ace6301

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcAaertdaQk

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

No. Ideally people would shut the f*ck up about both. Instead the situation at the moment is religious types don't want gays to have equal rights because their book says gays are bad. People get outspoken about the religious types being dicks and then themselves become dicks. If Christians didn't shove their book down peoples throats and try to use it to justify laws then sensible people wouldn't have a problem with them and Christians could legit complain when people are dicks to them.Ace6301
It's also noteworthy that Christians pretty much ignore all of leviticus but one certain passage on gays, and even then take it out of context.

I've called quite a few people on that and have never gotten a real response. Ferrari inculuded.

Religion of hipocrisy ftl

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] Do you also believe that polygamy, marriage to one's mother/father sister/brother, should be legal as well? There have always throughout the history of man kind been restrictions on those who could get married. The case with gay marriage is no different. If gays can get married then so also should relatives and polygamists be allowed to get married. All gay rights people are fighting for is the ability to file jointly on their taxes, that's all that government marriage is. Shouldn't we take this to the IRS instead? If gay's can file jointly on their taxes then they have equality in society. Seems to be a much easier fight to me. Christians are happy and gays are happy and we can all go on living our lives. ferrari2001

Are you really comparing gay marriage to polygamy and incest? Wtf is wrong with you?

So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?

You have problems with blacks getting married?

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#167 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]Whats that got to do with gays?

toast_burner

I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is.

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c8ff6a32bb23
deactivated-5c8ff6a32bb23

3185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#168 deactivated-5c8ff6a32bb23
Member since 2012 • 3185 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="PonchoTaco"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Christians say gays can't get married. Next thing you know they're saying non-Christians can't get married! Then they're saying divorces are illegal! Oh sh*t wait both of those follow the same logic that use for opposing gay marriage.

Do you even know what you're talking about?

Yes.

It's quite obvious that you don't, if you say Christians will be against all those one day.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#169 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is. ferrari2001

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.

Why do you care then what government marriage does. It's already changed the definition of marriage in your opinion so why do you care if this thing that you believe isn't marriage suddenly includes more people. Are you actually going to argue in favor of denying people equality because of a sequence of letters?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#170 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is. ferrari2001

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.

So what about Churches that support same sex marriage, or other religions?

And marriage does exist as a legal document, you may not like it but it does. As long as it exists don't you think they should let gays marry as well?

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#171 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is. ferrari2001

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.

You may not agree with government marriage, but it definitely exists.

If you take government out of marriage, it pretty much creates a situation in which churchs can marry gays if they want to. And there's no doubt that some church's will do so.

Which would be fine with me, but I'm realistic enough to know that government marriage is not going away.

Also, I'm not sure why you think that appeal to tradition is a legitimate argument gay marriage.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#172 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="PonchoTaco"]Do you even know what you're talking about?PonchoTaco
Yes.

It's quite obvious that you don't, if you say Christians will be against all those one day.

Do you even know what you're talking about? It was a joke about slippery slope fallacies. Touchy.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#173 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.harashawn
They can have an open opinion like that. They just shouldn't be surprised when people tell them to shove it.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#175 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
[QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.Ace6301
They can have an open opinion like that. They just shouldn't be surprised when people tell them to shove it.

They can, but it would not be in their best interest to do so. Professionalism means sometimes keeping your mouth shut.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#176 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.harashawn
They can have an open opinion like that. They just shouldn't be surprised when people tell them to shove it.

They can, but it would not be in their best interest to do so. Professionalism means sometimes keeping your mouth shut.

Indeed.
Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#177 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] So if a brother and sister love each other they shouldn't be allowed to marry? Double standard much?ferrari2001

Whats that got to do with gays?

I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is.

I too married after bringing the father of my wife two thousand foreskins of philistines.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

in OTJigglyWiggly_

Word.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.harashawn

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#180 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

GreySeal9

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.

You may not agree with government marriage, but it definitely exists.

If you take government out of marriage, it pretty much creates a situation in which churchs can marry gays if they want to. And there's no doubt that some church's will do so.

Which would be fine with me, but I'm realistic enough to know that government marriage is not going away.

Also, I'm not sure why you think that appeal to tradition is a legitimate argument gay marriage.

Government marriage also ensures non-discrimination in issues that affect marriage, such as being able to share benefits. If individual churches were the only institutions that could marry (aside from the issues that could create with atheist marriages) then it could stand to reason that an employer has no obligation to honor that specific marriage when it comes to paying out benefits to the spouse. Companies could even try to get out of paying benefits at all because marriages are simply a religious contract and not any officially recognized contract as they are now.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.N30F3N1X

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

Wanting a group to have equal rights is now morally comparable to actively opposing the rights of a group now?
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#182 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="ferrari2001"] I'm pointing out that most people who support gay marriage would oppose marriage if it was a brother and sister trying to get married. It seems to be a double standard. Also pointing out a fact that there have always been restrictions on what marriage is. It has always been the union of a man and a woman. This doesn't of course mean gays can't be equal in society. The fight they should be fighting is with the IRS instead of trying to change the long standing definition of what marriage is. ferrari2001

You still haven't given a reason as to why gay marriage shouldn't be allowed.

Well if need need my opinion I don't accept any forms of government marriage. Government marriage simply doesn't exist. The long standing definition of marriage has been a lifelong union of a man and a woman. It's primary focus is for the rearing of children. And it has almost always been taken as some form of religious practice. Even the roman pagans dedicated marriages to the gods. Government "marriage" is simply a document that gives tax benefits as well as end of life care. If the government were to allow these same rights to individuals without calling it marriage I would have no problem with it. However this gay marriage fight is not contained only within the government but it effects church marriages and how it is viewed as well.

It's not government's place to establish a religious definition of marriage. If gay marriage were legal it wouldn't affect you in the slightest, you could sit in your little church and pout and pine about what marriage is "supposed" to be and meanwhile the rest of the world could do with their private lives what every straight couple is already allowed to do.

Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#183 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts

[QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.N30F3N1X

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

To say anything negative about a group of people is unprofessional. I don't see the double standard here.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#184 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.N30F3N1X

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#185 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

[QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.Aljosa23

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

Not in the Christian world, apparently.
Avatar image for lo_Pine
lo_Pine

4978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#186 lo_Pine
Member since 2012 • 4978 Posts

Only more acceptable when the Christian takes himself and the Bible too seriously.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#187 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

l4dak47

Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

Not in the Christian world, apparently.

Seems to depend largely on whether you listen to that Jesus guy or the other guys. The other guys aren't as chill.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#188 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="harashawn"]It was unprofessional on Chick-Fil-A's part to make such comments regarding something as personal as sexuality. Whether anyone agrees with them or not, a company can't have an open opinion like that.N30F3N1X

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

Preachin' hate isn't okay.
Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#189 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]

It was unprofessional for them to make such comments but gay rights campaigns from companies are fine?

Double standard much?

l4dak47

Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

Not in the Christian world, apparently.

It should be frowned upon even moreso by Christians, since Jesus was sort of against hate.
Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#190 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.harashawn
Not in the Christian world, apparently.

It should be frowned upon even moreso by Christians, since Jesus was sort of against hate.

I know. You'd think the Christians would follow the SON OF GOD, but they refuse to do so.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Wanting a group to have equal rights is now morally comparable to actively opposing the rights of a group now?Ace6301

Your point? It's still a blatant double standard.

Avatar image for harashawn
harashawn

27620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#192 harashawn
Member since 2008 • 27620 Posts
[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="harashawn"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] Not in the Christian world, apparently.

It should be frowned upon even moreso by Christians, since Jesus was sort of against hate.

I know. You'd think the Christians would follow the SON OF GOD, but they refuse to do so.

One can call himself a bird, but unless he grows wings, feathers, and a beak he will never be a bird.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

To say anything negative about a group of people is unprofessional. I don't see the double standard here.harashawn

To say *anything* about someone else is unprofessional. You want to take a stance on something, that's fine, don't pull your company along with you tho.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

Aljosa23

And here I thought I could swear from looking around forums and blogs that we're in the middle of a witchhunt towards bible followers :roll:

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23354 Posts
If Christians actually followed the teachings of Jesus and worried about how they lived their own lives rather than how others live their's, maybe fewer people would find the group repugnant.
Just because someone is a christian and beleives in what the bible says about marriage, that doesn't mean they are a hateful person. I mean we are still in America right? We aren't allowed to have freedom of religion anymore??djshowstopper87
And I love the irony here.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#196 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

N30F3N1X

And here I thought I could swear from looking around forums and blogs that we're in the middle of a witchhunt towards bible followers :roll:

Might as well fight fire with fire.

Also, my original statement was in reference to corporations taking stances on issues. Not sure why you had to mention OT.

Avatar image for msfan1289
msfan1289

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 msfan1289
Member since 2011 • 1044 Posts

Once again... Chick-Fil-A doesnt just believe in whatever they believe in.

They also fund anti-gay organisations. And its their right, but it is also our right to dislike them for it.

Teenaged

but yet gays are becoming more mainstream, and not being limited to much by anything anymore...

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#199 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

in OTJigglyWiggly_
Most definitely.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#200 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Spreading hate is generally frowned upon.

N30F3N1X

And here I thought I could swear from looking around forums and blogs that we're in the middle of a witchhunt towards bible followers :roll:

I think you're being a little dramatic.