http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdVODFombco
Do you think most Americans agree or disagree with plans supporting raising taxes on wealthy Americans?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdVODFombco
Do you think most Americans agree or disagree with plans supporting raising taxes on wealthy Americans?
I would imagine a large percentage of the population, who are the not part of the 1%, would support a raise.
I'd consider supporting this if the 51% who currently pay no income taxes paid SOMETHING. 1% would even be a good starting point.
Vice President Biden put it best when he said, "Everyone needs to have some skin in the game."
I'm not sure how you'ld tax them as they can easily move themselves or their assets to another nation.
EDIT: I rmemeber something Warren Buffet said in an interview: if i wanted to i could have not taken a pay check or dividends for most of my life, i could have taken out a loan against my portfolio and live off that. Technically if he had done that Warren wouldn't have been earning anything.
i dont know what the other 300+ million people in this country think, but i find special treatment by government deplorable, it does not matter if that treatment is favorable or not.
I've got a brilliant idea: How bout' they stop wasting all the money we already give them and then maybe nobody would have to pay more taxes then they're already paying.
It takes money to buy votes.I've got a brilliant idea: How bout' they stop wasting all the money we already give them and then maybe nobody would have to pay more taxes then they're already paying.
junglist101
*waits for poster to reply with "tax dollars are streched too thin as is" also grabs popcorn*I've got a brilliant idea: How bout' they stop wasting all the money we already give them and then maybe nobody would have to pay more taxes then they're already paying.
junglist101
No. What right does the government have to tax higher those that make more money. They didn't necessarily do anything bad to get it. The fed is just punishing success, which is something that Americans should strive for if they see fit. And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.
it is easy, IF your moral fiber is not comprised of feculent materialsHow could you not be for raising taxes on somebody else?
sonicare
And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.
BATTOSAI76
Not necessarily true. Call me crazy but If I were to find myself in that situation I personally wouldn't mind paying a little extra.
[QUOTE="BATTOSAI76"]
And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.
CycleOfViolence
Not necessarily true. Call me crazy but If I were to find myself in that situation I personally wouldn't mind paying a little extra.
and no one would stop you, the government does take donations.The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people think taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or cause them to lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else over that line. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.
As it stands there are too many ways to get out of paying taxes, and that should be addressed first.
The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people act like taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else at that point. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.UniverseIXthey pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay.....
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people act like taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else at that point. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.surrealnumber5they pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay..... It's too low as is. :|
it is easy, IF your moral fiber is not comprised of feculent materials agreed thats why i wanna raise taxes on the guy working at taco bell...hes had it too easy at a minimum wage job for too long. There are hard working americans out there lending money to poor people, and only getting a few percent interest on the dollar.[QUOTE="sonicare"]
How could you not be for raising taxes on somebody else?
surrealnumber5
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"]The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people act like taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else at that point. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.UniverseIXthey pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay..... It's too low as is. :| i LOL'd
Does it really matter much?
Taxing the rich more merely shifts the $$$ from private spending to public spending.
Considering how politicians use the tax dollar,I don't think giving them more would be a smart idea.
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] they pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay..... surrealnumber5It's too low as is. :| i LOL'd good. IT's all really funny business.
Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
it doesnt matter because trickle down worked, and at the end of the bush era.. we have the lowest unemployment and strongest economy in history.Does it really matter much?
nitekids2004
Taxing the rich more merely shifts the $$$ from private spending to public spending.
Considering how politicians use the tax dollar,I don't think giving them more would be a smart idea.
the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
sonicare
the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
sonicare
but none of it would go to paying off debt, if the government can balance its budget, then we can talk about tax hikes. anything before that time will only go into lessening the deficit, and that means our wise masters are still as foolish as ever.Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
sonicare
Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system. Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so.[QUOTE="sonicare"]
Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
but none of it would go to paying off debt, if the government can balance its budget, then we can talk about tax hikes. anything before that time will only go into lessening the deficit, and that means our wise masters are still as foolish as ever.What I worry about, is that if the government gets increased revenue it will only see fit to increase spending rather than pay its current bills.I support raising everyone's taxes. -Sun_Tzu-That's why I dont mind seeing the Bush tax cuts expire.
[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]it doesnt matter because trickle down worked, and at the end of the bush era.. we have the lowest unemployment and strongest economy in history.Does it really matter much?
Taxing the rich more merely shifts the $$$ from private spending to public spending.
Considering how politicians use the tax dollar,I don't think giving them more would be a smart idea.Baconnaise
The unemployment numbers at the end of both Bush's terms (H.W. and W.) were 7.4%, far from lowest in history.
[QUOTE="sonicare"]the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system. the formation of democracies was to fight the merchant class and not the ruling class.... i dont recall reading that in any history class. also the united states is a republic.Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
Baconnaise
Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system. Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so. well its come full circle. But all the peasant rebellions of the past were to close the wealth gap.[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="Baconnaise"] the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.BaconnaiseHuh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so. well its come full circle. But all the peasant rebellions of the past were to close the wealth gap. I thought it was more about self government and opposing the tyranny of despots.
On the topic of taking money from the rich that they have earned, I'll quote myself from a thread some time ago..........
From Previous Thread/Post:
Example:
- Person A takes out a business loan to open a small pizza joint
- After a few years, the loan is finally paid off
- A few years later, the reward for the risk is paying off, and Person A is taking home, say, $100k per year
- Person A takes out a second loan to open another joint in the next town
- After a few years, the second loan is finally paid off
- A few years later, the second risk is paying off and Person A is taking home another $100K per year (now a total of $200K)
- A few years later and a few more investments later, Person A is taking home a cool $1million per year.....
What exactly did Person A do wrong? Should Person A get NO CREDIT for forming who-knows-how-many jobs? Considering he'd need help managing the individual locations, will likely need to hire accountants, lawyers, insurance agents, advertising consultants, construction companies and make purchases from food vendors as well as kitchen equipment vendors...... how is this person NOT giving back to society as a whole? Keep in mind, he already IS in a considerably high tax bracket. How exactly is Person A the villian in all of this? Considering the work (and risk) that Person A took upon himself, how do we justify telling him, "Ok there, buddy. We've decided that you've earned more than you need......so we're going to go ahead and take a big chunk of it."
I support raising everyone's taxes. -Sun_Tzu-If that includes people that pay zero percent currently, I think I'd probably agree with you (so long as we put meaninful checks in place to stop at least SOME of the waste/fraud that goes on currently).
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]I support raising everyone's taxes. sonicareThat's why I dont mind seeing the Bush tax cuts expire. but how can poor people like bill gates, steve jobs and mark zuckerberg... get by without those tax cuts they didnt qualify for when starting their business?
[QUOTE="sonicare"]
Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.
but none of it would go to paying off debt, if the government can balance its budget, then we can talk about tax hikes. anything before that time will only go into lessening the deficit, and that means our wise masters are still as foolish as ever.What I worry about, is that if the government gets increased revenue it will only see fit to increase spending rather than pay its current bills. Actually, it seems to be the other way around. Decreases in revenue makes it easier for the government to increase spending (and conversely, it makes it harder for them to cut it) because it hides the real cost of the spending. It gives the public the perception that you can have your cake and eat it too. Not so when people are paying more in taxes.TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Hekynnim fairly certain they all do, which is why they all invest in china. Tough love.
TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! HekynnYeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........
[QUOTE="Baconnaise"][QUOTE="sonicare"] Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so.sonicarewell its come full circle. But all the peasant rebellions of the past were to close the wealth gap. I thought it was more about self government and opposing the tyranny of despots. in the past, closing the wealth gap meant opposing tyranny. In modern society, it means not giving tax breaks for yachts and private planes.
Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........ the last election was one of the most decisive in history. and after the incumbents got kicked out, we got no jobs... despite them all promising jobs. Makes you wonder if the tea party are just quacks.[QUOTE="Hekynn"]TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Planet_Pluto
Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........ Were these the same Republicans that enacted Bush Tax Cuts?[QUOTE="Hekynn"]TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Planet_Pluto
Gaining money is not the creation of wealth but redistribution of wealth. In the ideal world any given person has max. wealth. In a less than ideal world, the real world, in which the amount of wealth is limited, someone who deserves wealth gains money. However the gap between 1% rich people and the rest is so big in terms of wealth, that it is impossible to be in sync with what they deserve, or their success. They are not successful as much as they are bandits.No. What right does the government have to tax higher those that make more money. They didn't necessarily do anything bad to get it. The fed is just punishing success, which is something that Americans should strive for if they see fit. And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.
BATTOSAI76
[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........ Were these the same Republicans that enacted Bush Tax Cuts? those republicans are considered legislative gods, as the trickle down lead to untold economic prosperity, which we all currently enjoy.[QUOTE="Hekynn"]TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! DroidPhysX
[QUOTE="BATTOSAI76"]Gaining money is not the creation of wealth but redistribution of wealth. In the ideal world any given person has max. wealth. In a less than ideal world, the real world, in which the amount of wealth is limited, someone who deserves wealth gains money. However the gap between 1% rich people and the rest is so big in terms of wealth, that it is impossible to be in sync with what they deserve, or their success. They are not successful as much as they are bandits. in the real world with the free actions of men wealth is indeed created (mutually beneficial trade), and it is also often destroyed by the actions of government (involuntary collections).No. What right does the government have to tax higher those that make more money. They didn't necessarily do anything bad to get it. The fed is just punishing success, which is something that Americans should strive for if they see fit. And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.
KungfuKitten
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........Were these the same Republicans that enacted Bush Tax Cuts? those republicans are considered legislative gods, as the trickle down lead to untold economic prosperity, which we all currently enjoy. how does the over spending of government equate to a market theory?Baconnaise
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment