The Top 1% Super Rich Americans

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdVODFombco

Do you think most Americans agree or disagree with plans supporting raising taxes on wealthy Americans?

Avatar image for Elraptor
Elraptor

30966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Elraptor
Member since 2004 • 30966 Posts
Well, the rest of us make up 99% of Americans, yes? And a large majority of those are not rich at all. Tax away!
Avatar image for CycleOfViolence
CycleOfViolence

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 CycleOfViolence
Member since 2011 • 2813 Posts

I would imagine a large percentage of the population, who are the not part of the 1%, would support a raise.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

I'd consider supporting this if the 51% who currently pay no income taxes paid SOMETHING. 1% would even be a good starting point.

Vice President Biden put it best when he said, "Everyone needs to have some skin in the game."

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

I'm not sure how you'ld tax them as they can easily move themselves or their assets to another nation.

EDIT: I rmemeber something Warren Buffet said in an interview: if i wanted to i could have not taken a pay check or dividends for most of my life, i could have taken out a loan against my portfolio and live off that. Technically if he had done that Warren wouldn't have been earning anything.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

i dont know what the other 300+ million people in this country think, but i find special treatment by government deplorable, it does not matter if that treatment is favorable or not.

Avatar image for junglist101
junglist101

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 junglist101
Member since 2007 • 5517 Posts

I've got a brilliant idea: How bout' they stop wasting all the money we already give them and then maybe nobody would have to pay more taxes then they're already paying.

Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

I've got a brilliant idea: How bout' they stop wasting all the money we already give them and then maybe nobody would have to pay more taxes then they're already paying.

junglist101

It takes money to buy votes.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

I've got a brilliant idea: How bout' they stop wasting all the money we already give them and then maybe nobody would have to pay more taxes then they're already paying.

junglist101

*waits for poster to reply with "tax dollars are streched too thin as is" also grabs popcorn*

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

How could you not be for raising taxes on somebody else?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d1cb98d088e5
deactivated-5d1cb98d088e5

4084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5d1cb98d088e5
Member since 2009 • 4084 Posts

No. What right does the government have to tax higher those that make more money. They didn't necessarily do anything bad to get it. The fed is just punishing success, which is something that Americans should strive for if they see fit. And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

How could you not be for raising taxes on somebody else?

sonicare

it is easy, IF your moral fiber is not comprised of feculent materials

Avatar image for CycleOfViolence
CycleOfViolence

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 CycleOfViolence
Member since 2011 • 2813 Posts

And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.

BATTOSAI76

Not necessarily true. Call me crazy but If I were to find myself in that situation I personally wouldn't mind paying a little extra.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="BATTOSAI76"]

And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.

CycleOfViolence

Not necessarily true. Call me crazy but If I were to find myself in that situation I personally wouldn't mind paying a little extra.

and no one would stop you, the government does take donations.

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts

The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people think taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or cause them to lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else over that line. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.

As it stands there are too many ways to get out of paying taxes, and that should be addressed first.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people act like taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else at that point. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.UniverseIX
they pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay.....
Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people act like taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else at that point. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.surrealnumber5
they pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay.....

It's too low as is. :|
Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

How could you not be for raising taxes on somebody else?

surrealnumber5

it is easy, IF your moral fiber is not comprised of feculent materials

agreed thats why i wanna raise taxes on the guy working at taco bell...hes had it too easy at a minimum wage job for too long. There are hard working americans out there lending money to poor people, and only getting a few percent interest on the dollar.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"]The wealthy are not in the same situation as those who are not wealthy. They should be paying taxes in scale with their wealth. As should everybody else. Same goes for criminal offenses and fines. It's not about envy, or about wanting to stick it to the successful. It's about facing reality. Some people act like taxing the wealthy is going to make them be poor, or lead miserable lives. There is evidence that shows past a certain point of wealth you don't become any more happy than anyone else at that point. The fact is the wealthy could pay more, and should be. A person with less resources that is paying taxes is more burdened by those taxes than a person that is wealthy. Taxes must be proportionate to ones income if you're going to have an integrable tax system.UniverseIX
they pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay.....

It's too low as is. :|

i LOL'd
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts

Does it really matter much?

Taxing the rich more merely shifts the $$$ from private spending to public spending.

Considering how politicians use the tax dollar,I don't think giving them more would be a smart idea.

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] they pay more than scale as we have a bracket system and the more you make the higher % you pay..... surrealnumber5
It's too low as is. :|

i LOL'd

good. IT's all really funny business.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts

Does it really matter much?

Taxing the rich more merely shifts the $$$ from private spending to public spending.

Considering how politicians use the tax dollar,I don't think giving them more would be a smart idea.

nitekids2004
it doesnt matter because trickle down worked, and at the end of the bush era.. we have the lowest unemployment and strongest economy in history.
Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

sonicare
the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.
Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

sonicare
the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

sonicare

but none of it would go to paying off debt, if the government can balance its budget, then we can talk about tax hikes. anything before that time will only go into lessening the deficit, and that means our wise masters are still as foolish as ever.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="Baconnaise"][QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.

Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

but none of it would go to paying off debt, if the government can balance its budget, then we can talk about tax hikes. anything before that time will only go into lessening the deficit, and that means our wise masters are still as foolish as ever.

What I worry about, is that if the government gets increased revenue it will only see fit to increase spending rather than pay its current bills.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
I support raising everyone's taxes.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
I support raising everyone's taxes. -Sun_Tzu-
That's why I dont mind seeing the Bush tax cuts expire.
Avatar image for CycleOfViolence
CycleOfViolence

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 CycleOfViolence
Member since 2011 • 2813 Posts

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

Does it really matter much?

Taxing the rich more merely shifts the $$$ from private spending to public spending.

Considering how politicians use the tax dollar,I don't think giving them more would be a smart idea.

Baconnaise

it doesnt matter because trickle down worked, and at the end of the bush era.. we have the lowest unemployment and strongest economy in history.

The unemployment numbers at the end of both Bush's terms (H.W. and W.) were 7.4%, far from lowest in history.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

Baconnaise

the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.

the formation of democracies was to fight the merchant class and not the ruling class.... i dont recall reading that in any history class. also the united states is a republic.

Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="Baconnaise"][QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.

Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so.

well its come full circle. But all the peasant rebellions of the past were to close the wealth gap.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="Baconnaise"] the reason people rebelled and formed democracies, is because we dont like rich people controlling us because they can easily game the system.Baconnaise
Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so.

well its come full circle. But all the peasant rebellions of the past were to close the wealth gap.

I thought it was more about self government and opposing the tyranny of despots.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

On the topic of taking money from the rich that they have earned, I'll quote myself from a thread some time ago..........

From Previous Thread/Post:

Example:
- Person A takes out a business loan to open a small pizza joint
- After a few years, the loan is finally paid off
- A few years later, the reward for the risk is paying off, and Person A is taking home, say, $100k per year
- Person A takes out a second loan to open another joint in the next town
- After a few years, the second loan is finally paid off
- A few years later, the second risk is paying off and Person A is taking home another $100K per year (now a total of $200K)
- A few years later and a few more investments later, Person A is taking home a cool $1million per year.....

What exactly did Person A do wrong? Should Person A get NO CREDIT for forming who-knows-how-many jobs? Considering he'd need help managing the individual locations, will likely need to hire accountants, lawyers, insurance agents, advertising consultants, construction companies and make purchases from food vendors as well as kitchen equipment vendors...... how is this person NOT giving back to society as a whole? Keep in mind, he already IS in a considerably high tax bracket. How exactly is Person A the villian in all of this? Considering the work (and risk) that Person A took upon himself, how do we justify telling him, "Ok there, buddy. We've decided that you've earned more than you need......so we're going to go ahead and take a big chunk of it."

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
at the very least there tax cuts need to be ended
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

I support raising everyone's taxes. -Sun_Tzu-
If that includes people that pay zero percent currently, I think I'd probably agree with you (so long as we put meaninful checks in place to stop at least SOME of the waste/fraud that goes on currently).

Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]I support raising everyone's taxes. sonicare
That's why I dont mind seeing the Bush tax cuts expire.

but how can poor people like bill gates, steve jobs and mark zuckerberg... get by without those tax cuts they didnt qualify for when starting their business?
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

Honestly, I have no problem with higher taxes if that increase is used to exclusively pay off the debt. Once that's done, then we can have a discussion as to whether or not we need other expenditures.

but none of it would go to paying off debt, if the government can balance its budget, then we can talk about tax hikes. anything before that time will only go into lessening the deficit, and that means our wise masters are still as foolish as ever.

What I worry about, is that if the government gets increased revenue it will only see fit to increase spending rather than pay its current bills.

Actually, it seems to be the other way around. Decreases in revenue makes it easier for the government to increase spending (and conversely, it makes it harder for them to cut it) because it hides the real cost of the spending. It gives the public the perception that you can have your cake and eat it too. Not so when people are paying more in taxes.
Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell!
Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts
TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Hekynn
im fairly certain they all do, which is why they all invest in china. Tough love.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Hekynn
Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........

Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts
[QUOTE="Baconnaise"][QUOTE="sonicare"] Huh? Rich people still control a lot of the system under a democracy. Maybe more so.sonicare
well its come full circle. But all the peasant rebellions of the past were to close the wealth gap.

I thought it was more about self government and opposing the tyranny of despots.

in the past, closing the wealth gap meant opposing tyranny. In modern society, it means not giving tax breaks for yachts and private planes.
Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts

[QUOTE="Hekynn"]TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Planet_Pluto

Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........

the last election was one of the most decisive in history. and after the incumbents got kicked out, we got no jobs... despite them all promising jobs. Makes you wonder if the tea party are just quacks.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="Hekynn"]TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! Planet_Pluto

Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........

Were these the same Republicans that enacted Bush Tax Cuts?
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#46 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

No. What right does the government have to tax higher those that make more money. They didn't necessarily do anything bad to get it. The fed is just punishing success, which is something that Americans should strive for if they see fit. And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.

BATTOSAI76
Gaining money is not the creation of wealth but redistribution of wealth. In the ideal world any given person has max. wealth. In a less than ideal world, the real world, in which the amount of wealth is limited, someone who deserves wealth gains money. However the gap between 1% rich people and the rest is so big in terms of wealth, that it is impossible to be in sync with what they deserve, or their success. They are not successful as much as they are bandits.
Avatar image for Baconnaise
Baconnaise

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Baconnaise
Member since 2011 • 27 Posts
[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

[QUOTE="Hekynn"]TAX THE HELL OUT OF THEM!! Since they don't give a damn about the country or its people. That includes the Republicans in Congress they too needs to be taxed like hell! DroidPhysX

Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........

Were these the same Republicans that enacted Bush Tax Cuts?

those republicans are considered legislative gods, as the trickle down lead to untold economic prosperity, which we all currently enjoy.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="BATTOSAI76"]

No. What right does the government have to tax higher those that make more money. They didn't necessarily do anything bad to get it. The fed is just punishing success, which is something that Americans should strive for if they see fit. And the people who think the rich should be taxed more are just being b*****, If they made that kind of money they sure as hell wouldn't want it heavily taxed.

KungfuKitten

Gaining money is not the creation of wealth but redistribution of wealth. In the ideal world any given person has max. wealth. In a less than ideal world, the real world, in which the amount of wealth is limited, someone who deserves wealth gains money. However the gap between 1% rich people and the rest is so big in terms of wealth, that it is impossible to be in sync with what they deserve, or their success. They are not successful as much as they are bandits.

in the real world with the free actions of men wealth is indeed created (mutually beneficial trade), and it is also often destroyed by the actions of government (involuntary collections).

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Yeah. Darn republicans! I mean, GE paid NO taxes last year, and then the republicans go and appoint the head of GE to the position of Jobs Czar! Oh, wait........

Baconnaise

Were these the same Republicans that enacted Bush Tax Cuts?

those republicans are considered legislative gods, as the trickle down lead to untold economic prosperity, which we all currently enjoy.

how does the over spending of government equate to a market theory?

Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
deactivated-598fc45371265

13247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-598fc45371265
Member since 2008 • 13247 Posts

In America, the top 1% already pay more than the bottom 90% do they not? How much is fair? Should they pay more than the bottom 91%? 95%?