This topic is locked from further discussion.
I have to very selectively choose what to watch when at home because of terribad internet. I think Cowboy Bebop is what I am leaning towards.
Watch? That would be your folly.I have to very selectively choose what to watch when at home because of terribad internet. I think Cowboy Bebop is what I am leaning towards.
coolbeans90
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]Watch? That would be your folly.I have to very selectively choose what to watch when at home because of terribad internet. I think Cowboy Bebop is what I am leaning towards.
EagleEyedOne
if you are talking about manga, bebop has no manga adaptation.
I have to very selectively choose what to watch when at home because of terribad internet. I think Cowboy Bebop is what I am leaning towards.
coolbeans90
good choice.
the ending will make you feel feelings you didn't know you had for days.
Watch? That would be your folly.[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
I have to very selectively choose what to watch when at home because of terribad internet. I think Cowboy Bebop is what I am leaning towards.
frannkzappa
if you are talking about manga, bebop has no manga adaptation.
No. I am talking about watching.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] Watch? That would be your folly.EagleEyedOne
if you are talking about manga, bebop has no manga adaptation.
No. I am talking about watching.what does that even mean?
My political philosophy? I hate politicians. Right wing, left wing, liberal or conservative, independant or libertarian, they're all scum. All they do is spend their lives figuring out what the largest part of the population wants to hear, then figure out how to get to say it to as many of those people as they can. And then it turns out that when they get power, all their words become lies and compromises. See the youtube video "candidate Obama vs President Obama" for more info.El_Zo1212o
cough" technocracy "cough
[QUOTE="El_Zo1212o"]My political philosophy? I hate politicians. Right wing, left wing, liberal or conservative, independant or libertarian, they're all scum. All they do is spend their lives figuring out what the largest part of the population wants to hear, then figure out how to get to say it to as many of those people as they can. And then it turns out that when they get power, all their words become lies and compromises. See the youtube video "candidate Obama vs President Obama" for more info.frannkzappa
cough" technocracy "cough
Explain.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="El_Zo1212o"]My political philosophy? I hate politicians. Right wing, left wing, liberal or conservative, independant or libertarian, they're all scum. All they do is spend their lives figuring out what the largest part of the population wants to hear, then figure out how to get to say it to as many of those people as they can. And then it turns out that when they get power, all their words become lies and compromises. See the youtube video "candidate Obama vs President Obama" for more info.El_Zo1212o
cough" technocracy "cough
Explain.90% percent of this thread is me explaining.
Explain.[QUOTE="El_Zo1212o"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
cough" technocracy "cough
frannkzappa
90% percent of this thread is me explaining.
Then I would suggest you dial back your cool factor by not trying to prove how smart you are by throwing vague one word replies around.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="El_Zo1212o"] Explain.El_Zo1212o
90% percent of this thread is me explaining.
Then I would suggest you dial back your cool factor by not trying to prove how smart you are by throwing vague one word replies around.i assumed you had read the thread....
no need to get confrontational.
Then I would suggest you dial back your cool factor by not trying to prove how smart you are by throwing vague one word replies around.[QUOTE="El_Zo1212o"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
90% percent of this thread is me explaining.
frannkzappa
i assumed you had read the thread....
no need to get confrontational.
Sorry, confrontational is my default setting, especially when my opinion is likely to have people gathering their torches and pitchforks(which seems to be the case for most of my opinions lately). As far as actually reading... 36 pages on a topic I hate? My blood pressure would skyrocket and I'd very likely pass out from a rage-induced migraine. So that's a no.No. I am talking about watching.[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
if you are talking about manga, bebop has no manga adaptation.
frannkzappa
what does that even mean?
[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] No. I am talking about watching.EagleEyedOne
what does that even mean?
that's quite a black and white view.
are you saying that any form of electronic visual media is bad?
[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
what does that even mean?
frannkzappa
that's quite a black and white view.
are you saying that any form of electronic visual media is bad?
Any form of electronic visual media is not as good as reading works of literature that have survived hundreds, thousands of years such as The Iliad, The Republic, The Elements, The Prince, Divine Comedy, or Critique of Pure Reason etc... the list goes on.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"]
Kind of like that.EagleEyedOne
that's quite a black and white view.
are you saying that any form of electronic visual media is bad?
Any form of electronic visual media is not as good as reading works of literature that have survived hundreds, thousands of years such as The Iliad, The Republic, The Elements, The Prince, Divine Comedy, or Critique of Pure Reason etc... the list goes on.you do realize that people said the same things about books 1 thousand or so years ago. Plato for instance didn't consider writing a proper form of information conveyance.
also you can read and do other things by the way.
ps ("The republic" is a book to live by)
Any form of electronic visual media is not as good as reading works of literature that have survived hundreds, thousands of years such as The Iliad, The Republic, The Elements, The Prince, Divine Comedy, or Critique of Pure Reason etc... the list goes on.[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
that's quite a black and white view.
are you saying that any form of electronic visual media is bad?
frannkzappa
you do realize that people said the same things about books 1 thousand or so years ago. Plato for instance didn't consider writing a proper form of information conveyance.
also you can read and do other things by the way.
ps ("The republic" is a book to live by)
The question then is, what do you choose to watch, which channels?[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] Any form of electronic visual media is not as good as reading works of literature that have survived hundreds, thousands of years such as The Iliad, The Republic, The Elements, The Prince, Divine Comedy, or Critique of Pure Reason etc... the list goes on.EagleEyedOne
you do realize that people said the same things about books 1 thousand or so years ago. Plato for instance didn't consider writing a proper form of information conveyance.
also you can read and do other things by the way.
ps ("The republic" is a book to live by)
The question then is, what do you choose to watch, which channels?i don't watch tv that much, but i love sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format.
i read subjects to numerus to count.
The question then is, what do you choose to watch, which channels?[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
you do realize that people said the same things about books 1 thousand or so years ago. Plato for instance didn't consider writing a proper form of information conveyance.
also you can read and do other things by the way.
ps ("The republic" is a book to live by)
frannkzappa
i don't watch tv that much, but i love sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format.
i read subjects to numerus to count.
If you watch sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format then you are wasting your time.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] The question then is, what do you choose to watch, which channels?EagleEyedOne
i don't watch tv that much, but i love sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format.
i read subjects to numerus to count.
If you watch sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format then you are wasting your time.you'll excuse me if i don't take that to heart.
If you watch sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format then you are wasting your time.[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
i don't watch tv that much, but i love sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format.
i read subjects to numerus to count.
frannkzappa
you'll excuse me if i don't take that to heart.
Of course. Especially if you include Zelda and Okami.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] If you watch sci fi, fantasy, manga and anime in any format then you are wasting your time.EagleEyedOne
you'll excuse me if i don't take that to heart.
Of course. Especially if you include Zelda and Okami.those are video games...
Of course. Especially if you include Zelda and Okami.[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
you'll excuse me if i don't take that to heart.
frannkzappa
those are video games...
They are manga and anime.[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] Of course. Especially if you include Zelda and Okami.EagleEyedOne
those are video games...
They are manga and anime.mhm....:?
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]
realism pretty much
frannkzappa
how do you determine what is real?
do you know what the definition of realism is in a political context?[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]
realism pretty much
Darkman2007
how do you determine what is real?
do you know what the definition of realism is in a political context?vaguely, enlighten me.
do you know what the definition of realism is in a political context?[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
how do you determine what is real?
frannkzappa
vaguely, enlighten me.
its more of an international policy idea than internal politics, realism means a belief the world is chaotic, or in anarchy, and that states, not any sort of international body, or any treaties signed there (represented most prominently by the UN for instance) are most important. what this leads to is a situation where states really only sign treaties, or alliances with each other for the sake of survival or to balance off more powerful states. the opposing theory is liberalism , which does place a greater emphasis on international law, democracy (such as the idea that more democracy = less war) , etc. each of these has variations (such as neoliberalism)[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] do you know what the definition of realism is in a political context?Darkman2007
vaguely, enlighten me.
its more of an international policy idea than internal politics, realism means a belief the world is chaotic, or in anarchy, and that states, not any sort of international body, or any treaties signed there (represented most prominently by the UN for instance) are most important. what this leads to is a situation where states really only sign treaties, or alliances with each other for the sake of survival or to balance off more powerful states. the opposing theory is liberalism , which does place a greater emphasis on international law, democracy (such as the idea that more democracy = less war) , etc. each of these has variations (such as neoliberalism)this isn't too far out of line with technocratic foreign policy.
its more of an international policy idea than internal politics, realism means a belief the world is chaotic, or in anarchy, and that states, not any sort of international body, or any treaties signed there (represented most prominently by the UN for instance) are most important. what this leads to is a situation where states really only sign treaties, or alliances with each other for the sake of survival or to balance off more powerful states. the opposing theory is liberalism , which does place a greater emphasis on international law, democracy (such as the idea that more democracy = less war) , etc. each of these has variations (such as neoliberalism)[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
vaguely, enlighten me.
frannkzappa
this isn't too far out of line with technocratic foreign policy.
its not really foreign policy, just a way of seeing the world, it lacks the perception that people are at heart, good. the only non state actors I deem important, are ones who have weapons and use them to enforce their bargaining power vis-a-vis states[QUOTE="frannkzappa"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"] its more of an international policy idea than internal politics, realism means a belief the world is chaotic, or in anarchy, and that states, not any sort of international body, or any treaties signed there (represented most prominently by the UN for instance) are most important. what this leads to is a situation where states really only sign treaties, or alliances with each other for the sake of survival or to balance off more powerful states. the opposing theory is liberalism , which does place a greater emphasis on international law, democracy (such as the idea that more democracy = less war) , etc. each of these has variations (such as neoliberalism)Darkman2007
this isn't too far out of line with technocratic foreign policy.
its not really foreign policy, just a way of seeing the world, it lacks the perception that people are at heart, good. the only non state actors I deem important, are ones who have weapons and use them to enforce their bargaining power vis-a-vis statesi didn't say IT was a foreign policy, just that it relates to technocratic foreign policy.
its not really foreign policy, just a way of seeing the world, it lacks the perception that people are at heart, good. the only non state actors I deem important, are ones who have weapons and use them to enforce their bargaining power vis-a-vis states[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]
this isn't too far out of line with technocratic foreign policy.
frannkzappa
i didn't say IT was a foreign policy, just that it relates to technocratic foreign policy.
ah , I see, ok.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment