I don't think sending addicts to prison will help them either.
Imagine if obesity was illegal, do you think prison would help them?
Obesity is a disease
Drug abuse is a disease
:3
Gaming-Planet
they would probably lose weight
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]People obviously. Hard drugs are just a subjective thing and democracy exists for making such choices. foxhound_foxPoliticians already decided. We should be using science to differentiate the objectively good from the objectively bad. Positive benefits should be weighed against the negative and the consumer be informed of both before they purchase and use. Agreed. But where do you draw the line in the sand? Because whatever you keep in the state of illegality, there will always be extreme criminal behaviour tied to it because it's profit margins soar.
People who want all drugs to be legal clearly haven't been looking at the country they live in seriously
Look at your country right now, you're not even ready for Marijuana to be fully legalized..
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"]It's definitely not realistic for heroin or meth to ever be legal. However, that's not to say I think people who use it should be put in prison.lostrib
Well they already have oxycodone for heroin, and they use meth for ADHD
And morphine is given to people too. I'm talking about the ability to buy it without the expressed consent of a medical doctor.That's why you have the use of the drug to be legal as default, regardless of what it is. Have people decide on what should be illegal to manufacture and what shouldn't, at whatever level you want. The important thing is to have the use and possession of the drug legal which prevents massive prison overcrowding and jailing of people for stupid things like having a small amount of dope on them as well as preventing treating people who need help like criminals. [QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] Politicians already decided. We should be using science to differentiate the objectively good from the objectively bad. Positive benefits should be weighed against the negative and the consumer be informed of both before they purchase and use. If you start giving certain scientists huge sway on things like this then their personal views are going to start leaking into legislation just like politicians do now. It's better to have them give information to the public and let them come to their decision that way the science remains either unbiased or if it is bias it can be seen as such easily. Also I said people, not politicians. Scientists are people and politicians are people (most of them at least) so they're included and get their say as well.but that's how we end up with issues like marijuana where a state legalizes it but the federal government does not
lostrib
[QUOTE="lostrib"][QUOTE="chrisrooR"]It's definitely not realistic for heroin or meth to ever be legal. However, that's not to say I think people who use it should be put in prison.chrisrooR
Well they already have oxycodone for heroin, and they use meth for ADHD
And morphine is given to people too. I'm talking about the ability to buy it without the expressed consent of a medical doctor.well they already do that. Â And from my understanding, the prescribed drugs are not that difficult to get
People who want all drugs to be legal clearly haven't been looking at the country they live in seriously
Look at your country right now, you're not even ready for Marijuana to be fully legalized..
ThisIsTwoFace
what does that even mean?
Multiple states have alread legalized it in some form
Never really thought about it like that before. True it is a disease. Makes me think I shouldnt despise drug abusers so much.I don't think sending addicts to prison will help them either.
Imagine if obesity was illegal, do you think prison would help them?
Obesity is a disease
Drug abuse is a disease
:3
Gaming-Planet
[QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"]Never really thought about it like that before. True it is a disease. Makes me think I shouldnt despise drug abusers so much.I don't think sending addicts to prison will help them either.
Imagine if obesity was illegal, do you think prison would help them?
Obesity is a disease
Drug abuse is a disease
:3
Capitan_Kid
Why not? they did it to themselves
I can see why, from a certain point of view, how that would be a good thing but dear god the negatives outway the pros. Sure, that would cripple the power the drug lords have over the US and hey, a super responsible well built person could enjoy some heroin every now and then and walk away problem free but for every responsible joe schmoe, you have many irresponsible sallys. People are weak, people cave in, people do things they normally wouldnt during dark times. These people, who there are many of, would be given an opportunity to simply walk to a pharmacy and pick up some meth and then ruin their lives. They would get addicted and become a wreck. Families, would break, stores would get robbed, and many would simply OD. Too many innocent lives would get lost and ruined over something like this. Do you agree? Do you disagree?
Capitan_Kid
I don't know any people that will do heroin if it were legal.
Legalize all drugs and regulate and tax them and instead of imprisoning people with addiction, treat them.
Â
Portugal already proved that legalizing makes usage go down, not up.
Never really thought about it like that before. True it is a disease. Makes me think I shouldnt despise drug abusers so much.[QUOTE="Capitan_Kid"][QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"]
I don't think sending addicts to prison will help them either.
Imagine if obesity was illegal, do you think prison would help them?
Obesity is a disease
Drug abuse is a disease
:3
lostrib
Why not? they did it to themselves
Because humans make mistakes, it's like what we do, and drugs that are extremely addictive are hard mistakes to correct without help.Agreed. But where do you draw the line in the sand? Because whatever you keep in the state of illegality, there will always be extreme criminal behaviour tied to it because it's profit margins soar. chrisrooRMake them all legal. Really, it's the simplest way of fixing the problem. So long as there is an illicit market, there will be organized crime tied to it. [QUOTE="Ace6301"]If you start giving certain scientists huge sway on things like this then their personal views are going to start leaking into legislation just like politicians do now. It's better to have them give information to the public and let them come to their decision that way the science remains either unbiased or if it is bias it can be seen as such easily. Also I said people, not politicians. Scientists are people and politicians are people (most of them at least) so they're included and get their say as well. If complete legalization is out of the question, then it is better to let an educated few use science to determine the truth than to let the mouth-breathing masses decide. If American's got "true democracy" to make big decisions like this, we'd be seeing a rampant increase in Creationism in science classes. And scientists wouldn't be deciding for political reasons, they'd want to give the public all the information about each individual product, and let them decide what they should and shouldn't put in their body (at least I'd hope any self-respecting scientist would).
And morphine is given to people too. I'm talking about the ability to buy it without the expressed consent of a medical doctor.[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="lostrib"]
Well they already have oxycodone for heroin, and they use meth for ADHD
lostrib
well they already do that. Â And from my understanding, the prescribed drugs are not that difficult to get
Which is why doctors put their medical license on the LINE every time they prescribe something. They are significantly harder to get than illegal drugs because no drug dealer is ever regulated. "well they already do that" - exactly, but there is some process of screening the people who are on a given drug.I don't know any people that will do heroin if it were legal.GummiRaccoonIf I were to try any opiate recreationally, it would likely be morphine. I hear it's wonderful.
They are significantly harder to get than illegal drugs because no drug dealer is ever regulated.chrisrooRIllegally obtained prescription drugs are a dime-a-dozen these days. People steal them from their parents, relatives, friends and sell them on the street. People steal from pharmacies/dispensaries. Shipments are hijacked and distributed illegally. The average price of an prescription opiate on the street these days is $1.00-1.50 a pill. And when crushed and insufflated, will give a high lasting hours. People *want* to get high. Humans have been doing it for, well, since we found out that one plant made us feel goofy. It helps them cope with reality (or in the case of psychedelics, help better understand reality). Better to give them access to safe products and lots of information than try and force them not to do it.
People get it anyway and then go to jail for it, so we have to ask ourselves, why are we sending people to jail for using certain chemicals on themselves? If legal there'd have to be restrictions (like an age 21 requirement or something) but the war on drugs is a waste of time and money. Cube_of_MooNYou know, there is a halfway point between current drug policy and full legalization. I think the ideal thing is decriminalization for users. Have distribution and sale remain a crime, but decriminalize the use and possession of small amounts. That'd still solve the problem of addicts getting sent to prison for being addicts. Yet we could still treat drug addiction as a public health issue rather than a criminal issue. Anyway, as a public health issue, there are some drugs that simply shouldn't be allowed to be sold. Think of it like the regulations we have regarding the food industry. Your dumb ass won't be arrested for buying raw seafood out of the back of a van, but that guy sure as $hit shouldn't be allowed to sell it.
[QUOTE="eggdog1234"]All drugs should be legal. Government should never dictate what you can and can't do with/to your body. MrGeezerHowever, government SHOULD be able to dictate what you can and cannot sell to another person. The only potential issue I have with that is wouldn't it, at least in theory, leave those banned substances to be marketed by gangs/violent criminals as they are now?
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="eggdog1234"]All drugs should be legal. Government should never dictate what you can and can't do with/to your body. mattbbplHowever, government SHOULD be able to dictate what you can and cannot sell to another person. The only potential issue I have with that is wouldn't it, at least in theory, leave those banned substances to be marketed by gangs/violent criminals as they are now? Wouldn't really change anything if it was made completely legal either. The gangs would still be the primary pushers and would put competition out of business just like they do now. Gangs are pretty great at capitalism, not so great at morality. At least if it's illegal you can try to prevent it and have there be stigma against it. The actual illegality of it may not do a whole lot but the cultural stigma sure as hell does.
People get it anyway and then go to jail for it, so we have to ask ourselves, why are we sending people to jail for using certain chemicals on themselves? If legal there'd have to be restrictions (like an age 21 requirement or something) but the war on drugs is a waste of time and money. Cube_of_MooNNo, certain drugs are so damaging to the body and socioty that there is no reason for them to be legal.
[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Marijuana should be legalThe_LipscombI would be comfortable with Weed, Shrooms, Methylone, Clean MDMA, Clean LSD, 2c-b, GHB and Mescaline, being legal first. Everything else needs a harder look and discussion.MDMA Ruins your dopamine system.
You literally can't fell as happy as you used to after using it.
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Wouldn't really change anything if it was made completely legal either. The gangs would still be the primary pushers and would put competition out of business just like they do now. Gangs are pretty great at capitalism, not so great at morality. At least if it's illegal you can try to prevent it and have there be stigma against it. The actual illegality of it may not do a whole lot but the cultural stigma sure as hell does.Ace6301Why do you think gangs would be the primary pushers of it? Because they are at the moment and they're willing to use violence and other illegal methods to remove competition. When you've already got the facilities and trained staff on a market you do have an advantage over the new guy. This is especially true when you're also willing to send some dumb kid into the new guys office to shoot him in the head. Not to mention hard drugs do have a fairly substantial level of "brand loyalty".
Do you know what happened when the United States made alcohol illegal? And do you know what happened when the United States subsequently made alcohol legal again?
[QUOTE="Master_Live"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] You do know if you legalize it the exact same people running the operations at this moment will be doing it when it's legal right? Ace6301You don't what the heck you are talking. Have you seen how the Marihuana's laws currently regulate their sale in Washington and Colorado? The pre-requisite for applying for a license are overly stringent (like having no previous convictions) precisely to try to build trust for the producers and sellers. So get informed before spewing nonsense all around. So the operations that are illegal remain illegal. In which case the people who are breaking the law now won't give a shit about breaking the law if it's slightly more relaxed. In other words the same people running the operations at the moment will be doing so when it's legal.
Â
Dude, I don't think people would risk buying something illegally when they could do it legally. Plus anyone still selling drugs illegally after legalization should be shutdown just like law enforcement try to do now.
So the operations that are illegal remain illegal. In which case the people who are breaking the law now won't give a shit about breaking the law if it's slightly more relaxed. In other words the same people running the operations at the moment will be doing so when it's legal.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="Master_Live"] You don't what the heck you are talking. Have you seen how the Marihuana's laws currently regulate their sale in Washington and Colorado? The pre-requisite for applying for a license are overly stringent (like having no previous convictions) precisely to try to build trust for the producers and sellers. So get informed before spewing nonsense all around. Master_Live
Â
Dude, I don't think people would risk buying something illegally when they could do it legally. Plus anyone still selling drugs illegally after legalization should be shutdown just like law enforcement try to do now.
Cigarettes are a prime example*. Certainly there's a black market for cigarettes, but it's almost insignificant compared to the legal market because most people aren't going to go through the hassle and risk of biging off some sleazy guy that may not be trust worthy in a back alley when they can simply go down to the store and get their cigarettes trouble-free.
(*Or DVD players or just about any other high demand product you can think of.)
Alcohol is quite different than something like meth or bath salts. Booze is such an established part of humanity that quite a few formally reputable people ended up breaking the law to circumvent it. The user base is also very different. Alcohol has always been the main drug of humanity, every class and creed pretty much have a drink associated with them. Meth? Yeah meth addicts don't tend to be the sort of people who really give two f*cks if their meth is from a reliable source or if they're breaking the law. Most end up breaking far worse laws just to feed their addiction which should tell you how horrific it is. Cigarettes may be bad but they don't turn you into something that people on the internet mistake for zombies. On top of all that alcohol takes quite a long time and a large amount to become addicted. Cigarettes are far more comparable in speed of addiction but still don't have anything when it comes to the strength of the addiction when compared to certain other drugs.Do you know what happened when the United States made alcohol illegal? And do you know what happened when the United States subsequently made alcohol legal again?
worlock77
Guess you'd think wrong then. 100% of the market for the drugs I'm talking about is illegal. You really think meth heads give a f*ck if the person they're buying from is sketchy or not? If the market increases that just means people who wouldn't buy illegally now are. That's a really bad thing. So they'd get shutdown just like now? In other words it wouldn't affect them in any way and they'd remain as successful as they are now.Dude, I don't think people would risk buying something illegally when they could do it legally. Plus anyone still selling drugs illegally after legalization should be shutdown just like law enforcement try to do now.
Master_Live
Alcohol use went down during prohibition. Alcohol use then increased after alcohol was legalized again. Now, banning alcohol most certainly did open the door for organized crime. But the use did go down during prohibition. I'm not saying that legalization of other drugs would lead to an increase in their use. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't, and that probably depends on other factors than solely whether or not they are legal. But if something like heroin were to ever be legalized for recreational use, I think it's fair to say that it should probably only be done with some strict conditions. Such as no advertising of the product, and maybe even going so far as requiring background checks before selling it to a dude. Nothing like what we have going on with alcohol and tobacco, where you can smoke tobacco in designated public areas and get $hitfaced at the bar. If we're talking about actual legalization of hard drugs (rather than mere criminalization), then I think it's fair to regulate the living $hit out of it (way more than with alcohol and tobacco) in order to avoid making it convenient and socially acceptable.Do you know what happened when the United States made alcohol illegal? And do you know what happened when the United States subsequently made alcohol legal again?
worlock77
Q: But what about hard drugs?
A: Hard drugs should be regulated heavily in order to ensure product quality and safety. Treatment should be provided for those heavily addicted who wish to overcome their addiction without the force of law.
Q: The country isn't ready! How can it be ready for legalization?
A: Prohibition doesn't work and the question being asked is stupid. The country is ready for legalization and no, not everyone in this country is going to go smoke pot, just like how most refuse or show no interest in smoking cigarettes or consuming alcohol. However people will try new things and that's what humanity does: We like to try it out.
Q: But what about society!? Society will break down and crumble!
A: Right and they said the same thing about alcohol back in the 20s and guess what? Nothing happened. These are nothing but irrational exaggerations used to frighten people such as yourself. Society will not crumble, nor will America collapse and succumb to China or whatever idiotic fantasy you think will happen. The one thing that will mostly likely happen is this: Two guys are going to get stoned, eating some Twinkies laughing at Dane Cook.
Q: But Opium nearly destroyed China! Explain that!
A: This is a legit question. However while addiction rates were high in China, the rest of the world was consuming opium at the time, and today the world's largest consumer of opium is the USA and so far, no breakdown in society. There were far more problems in China other than Opium use such as the fact that China went from a great nation to a laughing stock due to their loss in the Opium wars, trade disputes, and etc.
Q: But people are stupid! How can you control them?
A: You can't. People will always make stupid or irrational decisions whether they're high, drunk, or even sober. Instead of outright banning certain drugs, there needs to be regulation of the product to ensure it's safe when moderately used and to ensure quality, but the most important thing is education: Just like how we educate ourselves and others to limit our consumption of alcohol, we can educate those to limit their consumption of drugs. We can always try to help but sometimes it doesn't work but its better than destroying a person's life for trying some drug.
Q: Drugs can ruin a person's potential right?
A: Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Steve Jobs, Bill Clinton, Richard Branson, the list goes on. What's disturbing is that many of those who fight against its legalization are the ones who joke about their use in which I think they're hypocritical scumbags. There is something called personal responsibility and perhaps drugs can ruin a person's life but so can a million other things such as death in the family, tradegy, etc. It's how we handle it that counts.
Â
And now I have a question for all of you: What has the War on Drugs accomplished?
Â
[QUOTE="leviathan91"]It's thrown a truly astounding number of drug users in jail and wasted an equally impressive amount of money doing so. Its not a waste of money to put criminals in prisonAnd now I have a question for all of you: What has the War on Drugs accomplished?
Ace6301
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="leviathan91"]It's thrown a truly astounding number of drug users in jail and wasted an equally impressive amount of money doing so. Its not a waste of money to put criminals in prison If tomorrow it became illegal to have an account on gamespot and we were all arrested is that a valid use of money? Does something being illegal justify the ends to enforce that code, regardless of the law in question? When you throw someone in jail simply for the purchase or use of currently illegal drugs all you're doing is either putting someone who has made a choice to damage themself seeking pleasure or, in a more fargone case, a victim. It brings no benefit to society to arrest someone like that and as such is a waste. Not only is a waste of government funds but also a waste of someone who can potentially do some good.And now I have a question for all of you: What has the War on Drugs accomplished?
Capitan_Kid
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"]They are significantly harder to get than illegal drugs because no drug dealer is ever regulated.foxhound_foxIllegally obtained prescription drugs are a dime-a-dozen these days. People steal them from their parents, relatives, friends and sell them on the street. People steal from pharmacies/dispensaries. Shipments are hijacked and distributed illegally. The average price of an prescription opiate on the street these days is $1.00-1.50 a pill. And when crushed and insufflated, will give a high lasting hours. People *want* to get high. Humans have been doing it for, well, since we found out that one plant made us feel goofy. It helps them cope with reality (or in the case of psychedelics, help better understand reality). Better to give them access to safe products and lots of information than try and force them not to do it. I stand corrected. The prescription drug market is huge, but there is still some form of attempt at formal regulation and taxation of the market. I'm going to assume the illicit trade attracts more criminal behaviour, as there is no screening process. People do drugs. People also are driven by profits. If there's an incentive for an illicit business that has profit margins higher than any other business people are going to gravitate toward it. If the drugs are taxed, at least some financial benefit can be put back into society.
the drug war must stay, we must send people to prison for using drugs or else we might possibly maybe one day need to send them to prison for some other reason. we must ruin lives because the alternative is that their lives might be ruined at some point in the future by their own hands, i want to be apart of that ruining, and it must be as expansive as possible.
Unless you can provide numbers that prove rehabilitating drug addicts is more expensive than putting them in prison in the United States then your claim remains within the ideological void.the drug war must stay, we must send people to prison for using drugs or else we might possibly maybe one day need to send them to prison for some other reason. we must ruin lives because the alternative is that their lives might be ruined at some point in the future by their own hands, i want to be apart of that ruining, and it must be as expansive as possible.
surrealnumber5
Unless you can provide numbers that prove rehabilitating drug addicts is more expensive than putting them in prison in the United States then your claim remains within the ideological void. lol[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]
the drug war must stay, we must send people to prison for using drugs or else we might possibly maybe one day need to send them to prison for some other reason. we must ruin lives because the alternative is that their lives might be ruined at some point in the future by their own hands, i want to be apart of that ruining, and it must be as expansive as possible.
EagleEyedOne
Â
Q: do you have title to every human under your drug policy? if not, then what gives you the right to force them into prison or prison light(treatment) for being peaceful people?Â
Unless you can provide numbers that prove rehabilitating drug addicts is more expensive than putting them in prison in the United States then your claim remains within the ideological void. lol[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"]
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]
the drug war must stay, we must send people to prison for using drugs or else we might possibly maybe one day need to send them to prison for some other reason. we must ruin lives because the alternative is that their lives might be ruined at some point in the future by their own hands, i want to be apart of that ruining, and it must be as expansive as possible.
surrealnumber5
Â
Q: do you have title to every human under your drug policy? if not, then what gives you the right to force them into prison or prison light(treatment) for being peaceful people?Â
Comparing professional sports players to illegal drug users is illegitimate as one pays taxes and generates millions of dollars legally while the other does not. An illegal drug user does not generate wealth as there are no investors backing him while a professional sports player has investors backing him and the sports player pays taxes and generates wealth.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]lol[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"] Unless you can provide numbers that prove rehabilitating drug addicts is more expensive than putting them in prison in the United States then your claim remains within the ideological void.
EagleEyedOne
Â
Q: do you have title to every human under your drug policy? if not, then what gives you the right to force them into prison or prison light(treatment) for being peaceful people?Â
Comparing professional sports players to illegal drug users is illegitimate as one pays taxes and generates millions of dollars legally while the other does not. An illegal drug user does not generate wealth as there are no investors backing him while a professional sports player has investors backing him and the sports player pays taxes and generates wealth. you cant be this obviously dumb, are you still butt hurt over the health of the central banking system?[QUOTE="EagleEyedOne"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] lolComparing professional sports players to illegal drug users is illegitimate as one pays taxes and generates millions of dollars legally while the other does not. An illegal drug user does not generate wealth as there are no investors backing him while a professional sports player has investors backing him and the sports player pays taxes and generates wealth. you cant be this obviously dumb, are you still butt hurt over the health of the central banking system? I am dumb over the fact that you think am dumb over the central banking system based on my previous statement, can you clarify?Â
Â
Q: do you have title to every human under your drug policy? if not, then what gives you the right to force them into prison or prison light(treatment) for being peaceful people?Â
surrealnumber5
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment