This topic is locked from further discussion.
All drugs should be legal because why should you care what someone else does? We already have laws to take care of anything someone might do like rob or kill, why should drugs even be a factor? It seems like anyone who says otherwise just wants an authoritative father figure to step in and tell everyone else not to do something that they don't like.FuggaJHow do you feel about food safety laws? Should businesses be allowed to sell tainted food (provided that they don't deceive the customer)? Why would you care what someone else does? If I want to save some money by eating shrimp that's probably spoiled, why should the government be able to prevent you from selling it to me?
[QUOTE="FuggaJ"]All drugs should be legal because why should you care what someone else does? We already have laws to take care of anything someone might do like rob or kill, why should drugs even be a factor? It seems like anyone who says otherwise just wants an authoritative father figure to step in and tell everyone else not to do something that they don't like.MrGeezerHow do you feel about food safety laws? Should businesses be allowed to sell tainted food (provided that they don't deceive the customer)? Why would you care what someone else does? If I want to save some money by eating shrimp that's probably spoiled, why should the government be able to prevent you from selling it to me?
yeah, but possessing spoiled food isn't a crime, while possessing drugs is.
And I agree that possessing drugs (at least small amounts) shouldn't be a crime. But it's a lot different to argue that the SALE of such drugs should be fully legalized. Yes, it's not a crime for me to own spoiled shrimp, and I won't get arrested for consuming spoiled shrimp. However, if I open up a roadside stand and start selling spoiled shrimp out of the back of a pickup truck, then I'm probably gonna get arrested. And I should get arrested, because I'm selling something for human consumption that is not safe for human consumption. Similarly, I think it's safe to say that at least some drugs are generally not safe for human consumption. And...it probably SHOULD be illegal to sell them. But yes, I agree entirely that possession of small amounts should not be a crime. But it's another matter if you get caught selling it, or if you own such a huge amount of the stuff that it's obvious that you're selling it. Also, keep in mind that I'm not saying that this should apply to all drugs which are currently illegal. Some drugs are probably safe enough that it's worth legalizing their sale.yeah, but possessing spoiled food isn't a crime, while possessing drugs is.
lostrib
[QUOTE="worlock77"]Alcohol is quite different than something like meth or bath salts. Booze is such an established part of humanity that quite a few formally reputable people ended up breaking the law to circumvent it. The user base is also very different. Alcohol has always been the main drug of humanity, every class and creed pretty much have a drink associated with them. Meth? Yeah meth addicts don't tend to be the sort of people who really give two f*cks if their meth is from a reliable source or if they're breaking the law. Most end up breaking far worse laws just to feed their addiction which should tell you how horrific it is. Cigarettes may be bad but they don't turn you into something that people on the internet mistake for zombies. On top of all that alcohol takes quite a long time and a large amount to become addicted. Cigarettes are far more comparable in speed of addiction but still don't have anything when it comes to the strength of the addiction when compared to certain other drugs.Do you know what happened when the United States made alcohol illegal? And do you know what happened when the United States subsequently made alcohol legal again?
Ace6301
Congrats on avoiding the question entirely.
[QUOTE="lostrib"]And I agree that possessing drugs (at least small amounts) shouldn't be a crime. But it's a lot different to argue that the SALE of such drugs should be fully legalized. Yes, it's not a crime for me to own spoiled shrimp, and I won't get arrested for consuming spoiled shrimp. However, if I open up a roadside stand and start selling spoiled shrimp out of the back of a pickup truck, then I'm probably gonna get arrested. And I should get arrested, because I'm selling something for human consumption that is not safe for human consumption. Similarly, I think it's safe to say that at least some drugs are generally not safe for human consumption. And...it probably SHOULD be illegal to sell them. But yes, I agree entirely that possession of small amounts should not be a crime. But it's another matter if you get caught selling it, or if you own such a huge amount of the stuff that it's obvious that you're selling it. Also, keep in mind that I'm not saying that this should apply to all drugs which are currently illegal. Some drugs are probably safe enough that it's worth legalizing their sale.Â
yeah, but possessing spoiled food isn't a crime, while possessing drugs is.
MrGeezer
Â
So I shouldn't be able to own "huge amounts of the stuff" for personal consumption?
merck and pfizer don't like competition. comp_atkins
They would probably jump at the chance to market recreational drugs if they were allowed to. These companies market what are basically variations of those drugs anyway. Pinning the war on drugs on "big pharma" is terribly short-sighted.
At least potentially, no. At the very least, even if that's not outright illegal then it's still enough to make it certain that you are in fact involved in the illegal sale of the product. But seriously...if you ever get caught with something like 10 pounds of cocaine then it'll be pretty stupid to try to pretend like it's for personal consumption.Â
So I shouldn't be able to own "huge amounts of the stuff" for personal consumption?
Master_Live
[QUOTE="Master_Live"]At least potentially, no. At the very least, even if that's not outright illegal then it's still enough to make it certain that you are in fact involved in the illegal sale of the product. But seriously...if you ever get caught with something like 10 pounds of cocaine then it'll be pretty stupid to try to pretend like it's for personal consumption.Â
So I shouldn't be able to own "huge amounts of the stuff" for personal consumption?
MrGeezer
Unless you're Charlie Sheen.
All drugs should be legal because why should you care what someone else does? We already have laws to take care of anything someone might do like rob or kill, why should drugs even be a factor? It seems like anyone who says otherwise just wants an authoritative father figure to step in and tell everyone else not to do something that they don't like.FuggaJ
And this is why America cannot advance.
[QUOTE="FuggaJ"]All drugs should be legal because why should you care what someone else does? We already have laws to take care of anything someone might do like rob or kill, why should drugs even be a factor? It seems like anyone who says otherwise just wants an authoritative father figure to step in and tell everyone else not to do something that they don't like.MrGeezerHow do you feel about food safety laws? Should businesses be allowed to sell tainted food (provided that they don't deceive the customer)? Why would you care what someone else does? If I want to save some money by eating shrimp that's probably spoiled, why should the government be able to prevent you from selling it to me? People NEED to eat food. People most certainly can live without drugs. It's a different product. Think of drugs like tobacco and alcohol. A food equivalent of a cigarette is like a donut packed with cocaine, and the immediate health consequences are overwhelmingly negative. But it's a choice. People need food to survive, so clearly there should be enforced regulation on the quality of it. Why shouldn't the same apply to drugs that are taxed?
[QUOTE="Master_Live"]At least potentially, no. At the very least, even if that's not outright illegal then it's still enough to make it certain that you are in fact involved in the illegal sale of the product. But seriously...if you ever get caught with something like 10 pounds of cocaine then it'll be pretty stupid to try to pretend like it's for personal consumption. The only reason having that much has an inflated value is because of the illicit nature of the drug. If it was regulated and produced legally, at least the tax revenue could be put back into improving roads, schools...etc. The current system of prohibition forces a trillion dollar industry underground, where the uneducated, criminal elements become involved. If there was taxation on it all, at least some social benefit would come out of it.Â
So I shouldn't be able to own "huge amounts of the stuff" for personal consumption?
MrGeezer
[QUOTE="lostrib"]And I agree that possessing drugs (at least small amounts) shouldn't be a crime. But it's a lot different to argue that the SALE of such drugs should be fully legalized. Yes, it's not a crime for me to own spoiled shrimp, and I won't get arrested for consuming spoiled shrimp. However, if I open up a roadside stand and start selling spoiled shrimp out of the back of a pickup truck, then I'm probably gonna get arrested. And I should get arrested, because I'm selling something for human consumption that is not safe for human consumption. Similarly, I think it's safe to say that at least some drugs are generally not safe for human consumption. And...it probably SHOULD be illegal to sell them. But yes, I agree entirely that possession of small amounts should not be a crime. But it's another matter if you get caught selling it, or if you own such a huge amount of the stuff that it's obvious that you're selling it. Also, keep in mind that I'm not saying that this should apply to all drugs which are currently illegal. Some drugs are probably safe enough that it's worth legalizing their sale.Â
yeah, but possessing spoiled food isn't a crime, while possessing drugs is.
MrGeezer
then i guess we better ban alcohol.
Firstly, I think one could make a reasonable argument that alcohol is relatively safe in normal doses. Sure, excessive use undeniably leads to all kinds of problems, but normal use doesn't tend to turn most people into alcoholics or cause their livers to fail. If you could establish that normal use of heroin was similarly harmless, then I think that would be a fair case for legalizing heroin. Unfortunately (and maybe this is just me buying into anti-drug propaganda), there seem to be at least some drugs that are significantly more dangerous even with normal use.then i guess we better ban alcohol.
lostrib
[QUOTE="lostrib"]Firstly, I think one could make a reasonable argument that alcohol is relatively safe in normal doses. Sure, excessive use undeniably leads to all kinds of problems, but normal use doesn't tend to turn most people into alcoholics or cause their livers to fail. If you could establish that normal use of heroin was similarly harmless, then I think that would be a fair case for legalizing heroin. Unfortunately (and maybe this is just me buying into anti-drug propaganda), there seem to be at least some drugs that are significantly more dangerous even with normal use.then i guess we better ban alcohol.
MrGeezer
"Â And I should get arrested, because I'm selling something for human consumption that is not safe for human consumption."
As you said, alcohol is not safe for human consumption. so it should be banned
[QUOTE="FuggaJ"]All drugs should be legal because why should you care what someone else does? We already have laws to take care of anything someone might do like rob or kill, why should drugs even be a factor? It seems like anyone who says otherwise just wants an authoritative father figure to step in and tell everyone else not to do something that they don't like.MrGeezerHow do you feel about food safety laws? Should businesses be allowed to sell tainted food (provided that they don't deceive the customer)? Why would you care what someone else does? If I want to save some money by eating shrimp that's probably spoiled, why should the government be able to prevent you from selling it to me? I don't know what you thought I would say in reply to that but I don't think it's what you had in mind. Of course. If you are idiotic enough to want, buy, and eat spoiled food that is advertised as such you should be able too. Why should the government have a say in that at all?
Alcohol often IS safe for human consumption. Normal use, using the product as intended is safe. Sometimes even BENEFICIAL. If one can establish that the same is true of crack or heroin, then I guess one would have a good case for why its sale should be legalized."Â And I should get arrested, because I'm selling something for human consumption that is not safe for human consumption."
As you said, alcohol is not safe for human consumption. so it should be banned
lostrib
[QUOTE="lostrib"]Alcohol often IS safe for human consumption. Normal use, using the product as intended is safe. Sometimes even BENEFICIAL. If one can establish that the same is true of crack or heroin, then I guess one would have a good case for why its sale should be legalized."Â And I should get arrested, because I'm selling something for human consumption that is not safe for human consumption."
As you said, alcohol is not safe for human consumption. so it should be banned
MrGeezer
Heroin is sold to help people alleviate pain. Â cocaine and meth is given to kids to help with ADD/ADHD
How do you feel about food safety laws? Should businesses be allowed to sell tainted food (provided that they don't deceive the customer)? Why would you care what someone else does? If I want to save some money by eating shrimp that's probably spoiled, why should the government be able to prevent you from selling it to me? I don't know what you thought I would say in reply to that but I don't think it's what you had in mind. Of course. If you are idiotic enough to want, buy, and eat spoiled food that is advertised as such you should be able too. Why should the government have a say in that at all? Well then, you clearly don't see the value in public safety, in which I feel comforatble dismissing your entire viewpoint as ridiculous. If you think there should be no standards or regulations with regards to quality, then that's just silly.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="FuggaJ"]All drugs should be legal because why should you care what someone else does? We already have laws to take care of anything someone might do like rob or kill, why should drugs even be a factor? It seems like anyone who says otherwise just wants an authoritative father figure to step in and tell everyone else not to do something that they don't like.FuggaJ
I am definitely in favor of legalizing every substance, obviously only among citizens that are educated about the possible dangers. My main issue with banning addictive substances is the negative effect that it has on addicts.Â
For example, a illegal environment aggravates and lengthens a addictions. In the current situation, it's quite difficult for a severe addict to get access to a clean environment that prevents confrontation with the substance he is addicted to. A second problem that lengthens the addictions is the limited access ability that support groups, family or medical care have in these illegal environments. Obviously violence en debts are also problems that further aggravate addiction.
Another issue with a ban on additive substances is the increase in cost of the product and the decrease in purity. Many street level drugs are cut with a wide variety of unhealthy products, increasing the damage that these drugs do. There is no doubt that health problems are a big issue with addicts attempting a return to normal life. The mentioned increase in cost makes it harder for addicts to actually make a attempt at recovering as there is simply no time between being high and getting money.
I've read about experiments in which addicts were set up in a register, provided with clean free heroin, needle and 'usage stall', giving addicts far more time and money to make a attempt at recovery, in addition this place made it easy for support groups to get in touch with addicts. The addicts were improving in their social life and had significantly less encounters with the law by the time the experiment ended.
So for me, there is little doubt that a legalizing increases an addicts recovery chances. This makes the ban only reasonable when one assumes that legalizing increases the amount of addicts to such a extent, that the addiction length caused by the ban becomes negligible. I sincerely doubt that, but there is no conclusive proof until we try.
[QUOTE="FuggaJ"]I don't know what you thought I would say in reply to that but I don't think it's what you had in mind. Of course. If you are idiotic enough to want, buy, and eat spoiled food that is advertised as such you should be able too. Why should the government have a say in that at all? Well then, you clearly don't see the value in public safety, in which I feel comforatble dismissing your entire viewpoint as ridiculous. If you think there should be no standards or regulations with regards to quality, then that's just silly. The same rules and regulations that apply to tobacco and alcohol should apply to these other drugs. Now, I'm not suggesting that there should be bars where you can legally buy cocaine, as the two mixing together can be lethal. But I think that someone who's already willing to do cocaine will still obtain it. As long as there remains a high demand for these products, and an insane profit margin to boot, drug dealers will continue the cyclical violence that characterizes the illicit drug trade. It makes no sense whatsoever to continue to ignore the enormous financial potential in the trade, especially considering the level of debt the United States is in. If there was the ability to regulate these products by the government, while strongly enforcing age restrictions and persuasive ads against use, I see a huge base for a taxable industry immediately cutting out the cartels and many other criminal organizations. Prohibition is a beautiful example of what happens when you flip-flop the legal status of a drug. And for the people who say "but it would lead to increased use!" - Maybe. But I know that many people who don't use heroin or meth aren't avoiding it because of its legal status. They avoid it because of the widespread knowledge of how badly it f*cks your life.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"] How do you feel about food safety laws? Should businesses be allowed to sell tainted food (provided that they don't deceive the customer)? Why would you care what someone else does? If I want to save some money by eating shrimp that's probably spoiled, why should the government be able to prevent you from selling it to me?MrGeezer
[QUOTE="lostrib"]Firstly, I think one could make a reasonable argument that alcohol is relatively safe in normal doses. Sure, excessive use undeniably leads to all kinds of problems, but normal use doesn't tend to turn most people into alcoholics or cause their livers to fail. If you could establish that normal use of heroin was similarly harmless, then I think that would be a fair case for legalizing heroin. Unfortunately (and maybe this is just me buying into anti-drug propaganda), there seem to be at least some drugs that are significantly more dangerous even with normal use.then i guess we better ban alcohol.
MrGeezer
To even answer this we'd need to first establish what "normal use" is.
Firstly, I think one could make a reasonable argument that alcohol is relatively safe in normal doses. Sure, excessive use undeniably leads to all kinds of problems, but normal use doesn't tend to turn most people into alcoholics or cause their livers to fail. If you could establish that normal use of heroin was similarly harmless, then I think that would be a fair case for legalizing heroin. Unfortunately (and maybe this is just me buying into anti-drug propaganda), there seem to be at least some drugs that are significantly more dangerous even with normal use.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="lostrib"]
then i guess we better ban alcohol.
worlock77
To even answer this we'd need to first establish what "normal use" is.
i think moderate alcohol use is considered 2 beers a day. Â However if you drink 14 beers one day a week, that's not the same thing
In other words, "not for recreational purposes." If you're gonna get it legally, then you need to have some kind of actual physical or mental problem and you need a doctor putting his ass on the line when he says that you should have it. If you want to apply that standard for every single drug out there, then I'll agree with legalization. But that's clearly not what this discussion is about, it's about going down to the 7-11 and buying some crack over the counter because it's Friday and you want to party.Heroin is sold to help people alleviate pain. Â cocaine and meth is given to kids to help with ADD/ADHD
lostrib
[QUOTE="worlock77"]
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"] Firstly, I think one could make a reasonable argument that alcohol is relatively safe in normal doses. Sure, excessive use undeniably leads to all kinds of problems, but normal use doesn't tend to turn most people into alcoholics or cause their livers to fail. If you could establish that normal use of heroin was similarly harmless, then I think that would be a fair case for legalizing heroin. Unfortunately (and maybe this is just me buying into anti-drug propaganda), there seem to be at least some drugs that are significantly more dangerous even with normal use.lostrib
To even answer this we'd need to first establish what "normal use" is.
i think moderate alcohol use is considered 2 beers a day. Â However if you drink 14 beers one day a week, that's not the same thing
So what's "normal use" for heroin, cocaine, etc?
[QUOTE="lostrib"]In other words, "not for recreational purposes." If you're gonna get it legally, then you need to have some kind of actual physical or mental problem and you need a doctor putting his ass on the line when he says that you should have it. If you want to apply that standard for every single drug out there, then I'll agree with legalization. But that's clearly not what this discussion is about, it's about going down to the 7-11 and buying some crack over the counter because it's Friday and you want to party.Heroin is sold to help people alleviate pain. Â cocaine and meth is given to kids to help with ADD/ADHD
MrGeezer
so buying crack because you want to party is bad? but buying 151 rum and everclear because you want to party is okay?
[QUOTE="lostrib"]
[QUOTE="worlock77"]
To even answer this we'd need to first establish what "normal use" is.
worlock77
i think moderate alcohol use is considered 2 beers a day. Â However if you drink 14 beers one day a week, that's not the same thing
So what's "normal use" for heroin, cocaine, etc?
idk, what's the recommended dose for oxy and ritalin?
I think it's entirely possible that one is substantially more harmful than the others. As far as normal recreational use is concerned, is crack generally considered to be as safe as alcohol?so buying crack because you want to party is bad? but buying 151 rum and everclear because you want to party is okay?
lostrib
[QUOTE="lostrib"]I think it's entirely possible that one is substantially more harmful than the others. As far as normal recreational use is concerned, is crack generally considered to be as safe as alcohol?so buying crack because you want to party is bad? but buying 151 rum and everclear because you want to party is okay?
MrGeezer
they're both dangerous substances, that can easily kill you or lead to addiction
I didn't want to read all seven pages but here's my piece.
All drugs should be legal. Period.
We already have laws to protect people, if someone gets high and hurts someone its assault either way. Drugs can only be destructive to the users. So why try and regulate it? We already have alcohol legalized, which few people understand how dangerous it is.
Why is someone trying to control my freedom and what I want to do with my mind. If i want to much shrooms and lay in a field for 5 hours why is that illegal? who is being affected besides me? If im not allowed to explore my own mind i am truly imprisoned.
Why put a drug user in jail hm? For what reason? That doesn't help them it hurts them, they should be given real help and support.
Making drugs illegal is basically like saying assault, theft and rape are just as bad as consuming a substance that only affects you.
And strawberries have been known to kill people, but I'm not going to pretend that they're as dangerous as alcohol. When misused, alcohol is extremely dangerous. However, for most people it is fairly harmless when not used excessively. Can one say the same thing about recreational crack use? Once we've established what "normal" recreational crack use is, once we've established how the product is intended to be used, can we still claim that it's as safe as alcohol? I'd just like to throw this out there...if alcohol had a high enough rate of addiction and death, then it probably WOULD still be illegal to sell. If even "normal" use had a tendency to turn most people into pathetic alcoholics who die from liver failure, then it would still be illegal to sell because the social costs of doing so would be too high. Where does crack fall in all of this? How about heroin or meth? I don't know. But stop using semantics to draw false equivalences. Not all drugs are the same, and some drugs absolutely are more dangerous than others.they're both dangerous substances, that can easily kill you or lead to addiction
lostrib
[QUOTE="worlock77"]
[QUOTE="lostrib"]
i think moderate alcohol use is considered 2 beers a day. Â However if you drink 14 beers one day a week, that's not the same thing
lostrib
So what's "normal use" for heroin, cocaine, etc?
idk, what's the recommended dose for oxy and ritalin?
Is there a point you're trying to make here?
[QUOTE="lostrib"]I think it's entirely possible that one is substantially more harmful than the others. As far as normal recreational use is concerned, is crack generally considered to be as safe as alcohol?so buying crack because you want to party is bad? but buying 151 rum and everclear because you want to party is okay?
MrGeezer
Again, to answer this we'd have to establish what's considered "normal" use.
Well yeah, that's what I was asking him. What is "normal" use and how dangerous is it when used "normally"? I don't know the answer to that, but I think that's the standard for whether or not it should be legal. Not some general idealistic concept of "it's my body I can do what I want."Again, to answer this we'd have to establish what's considered "normal" use.
worlock77
[QUOTE="lostrib"]
[QUOTE="worlock77"]
So what's "normal use" for heroin, cocaine, etc?
worlock77
idk, what's the recommended dose for oxy and ritalin?
Is there a point you're trying to make here?
i don't know what "normal use" is for heroin or cocaine, but perhaps you could draw info from their pharmacological equivalents
[QUOTE="lostrib"]And strawberries have been known to kill people, but I'm not going to pretend that they're as dangerous as alcohol. When misused, alcohol is extremely dangerous. However, for most people it is fairly harmless when not used excessively. Can one say the same thing about recreational crack use? Once we've established what "normal" recreational crack use is, once we've established how the product is intended to be used, can we still claim that it's as safe as alcohol? I'd just like to throw this out there...if alcohol had a high enough rate of addiction and death, then it probably WOULD still be illegal to sell. If even "normal" use had a tendency to turn most people into pathetic alcoholics who die from liver failure, then it would still be illegal to sell because the social costs of doing so would be too high. Where does crack fall in all of this? How about heroin or meth? I don't know. But stop using semantics to draw false equivalences. Not all drugs are the same, and some drugs absolutely are more dangerous than others.Â
they're both dangerous substances, that can easily kill you or lead to addiction
MrGeezer
the point was that you have a problem with people wanting to buy crack in order to party, but no problem with selling alcohol for people to "party" (aka binge drink, get drunk, "shitfaced") which is dangerous. Â
[QUOTE="worlock77"]Well yeah, that's what I was asking him. What is "normal" use and how dangerous is it when used "normally"? I don't know the answer to that, but I think that's the standard for whether or not it should be legal. Not some general idealistic concept of "it's my body I can do what I want."Again, to answer this we'd have to establish what's considered "normal" use.
MrGeezer
Well certainly a line or two of cocaine a day isn't going to harm you anymore than a beer or two a day will.
I was just using that as an example, and I already admitted that my impressions of most hard drugs was largely informed by anti-drug propaganda. I'm not an expert and I've never thoroughly studied crack, I'm just operating off of what "society" has told me about it. If crack is no more dangerous than alcohol, then crack is no more dangerous than alcohol. Once someone demonstrates that to me then I'll happily admit that I was wrong about crack. Having said that, crack was just a single example in a discussion about legalizing ALL drugs. Crack might not be "too dangerous" to legalize its sale, but not all drugs are equally dangerous. As long as there exists ANY drug which is "too dangerous" to allow people to sell it, then I'd still be against legalizing the sale of ALL drugs for recreational purposes. Which drugs would be allowed and which drugs wouldn't? I don't know, but that ought to be decided on a case-by-case basis.the point was that you have a problem with people wanting to buy crack in order to party, but no problem with selling alcohol for people to "party" (aka binge drink, get drunk, "shitfaced") which is dangerous. Â
lostrib
Alcohol is quite different than something like meth or bath salts. Booze is such an established part of humanity that quite a few formally reputable people ended up breaking the law to circumvent it. The user base is also very different. Alcohol has always been the main drug of humanity, every class and creed pretty much have a drink associated with them. Meth? Yeah meth addicts don't tend to be the sort of people who really give two f*cks if their meth is from a reliable source or if they're breaking the law. Most end up breaking far worse laws just to feed their addiction which should tell you how horrific it is. Cigarettes may be bad but they don't turn you into something that people on the internet mistake for zombies. On top of all that alcohol takes quite a long time and a large amount to become addicted. Cigarettes are far more comparable in speed of addiction but still don't have anything when it comes to the strength of the addiction when compared to certain other drugs.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Do you know what happened when the United States made alcohol illegal? And do you know what happened when the United States subsequently made alcohol legal again?
worlock77
Congrats on avoiding the question entirely.
Sorry for responding to your dumb question with an actual argument instead of "yes" twice. Here I thought maybe people wanted to discuss things and perhaps actually talk about solutions and issues rather than reaffirming things even high schoolers know.[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Alcohol is quite different than something like meth or bath salts. Booze is such an established part of humanity that quite a few formally reputable people ended up breaking the law to circumvent it. The user base is also very different. Alcohol has always been the main drug of humanity, every class and creed pretty much have a drink associated with them. Meth? Yeah meth addicts don't tend to be the sort of people who really give two f*cks if their meth is from a reliable source or if they're breaking the law. Most end up breaking far worse laws just to feed their addiction which should tell you how horrific it is. Cigarettes may be bad but they don't turn you into something that people on the internet mistake for zombies. On top of all that alcohol takes quite a long time and a large amount to become addicted. Cigarettes are far more comparable in speed of addiction but still don't have anything when it comes to the strength of the addiction when compared to certain other drugs. Ace6301
Congrats on avoiding the question entirely.
Sorry for responding to your dumb question with an actual argument instead of "yes" twice. Here I thought maybe people wanted to discuss things and perhaps actually talk about solutions and issues rather than reaffirming things even high schoolers know.Except your "actual argument" didn't have a thing to do with what I asked.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment