Why do people believe you need evidence to disprove a god?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. You're the one making the claim that he doesn't exist. themajormayor

I knew I'd get a post like this, I was just waiting for it really.....

We are all born without the belief in god, we lack the belief because as newborns we don't hold many opinions on ideas that we have no knowledge about, and god is simply that, an idea. It seems you lack understanding on what Atheism is, so I'll sum it up for you "atheism is merely the absence of belief in a god"

I hope you can understand now why your post sounds ridiculous :)

That's not really Atheism though IMO. Sounds more like Agnosticism to me. Of course it depends on what defintion you use. It's all very fluid.

It is Atheism, I don't know what definition you use.


Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="l4dak47"] No, the burden of proof is on the one that claims god is real. l4dak47
No one made that claim. TC seemed to have claimed that God isn't real without anyone having claimed that he is. So burden of proof is on him

First off, he never claimed that. Also, this sentence was has got to be of the most pathetic attempts I've seen.

Well your sentence is not much to hang in the christmas tree either.

Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

If one thing turns into something else, it is impossible to say those both were not designed. Evolution is simply a bridge that explains a change, it does not contradict design. You can see evolution among things created by humans. You say its debated by scientists arguing it is random? How do you know it is random? It is random from an observable viewpoint. This is a theory remember.

RationalAtheist

Do you have any evidence to support your view, or is repetition your preferred tactic? Perhaps you should investigate evolutionary biology some more, before making your claims.Random mutation has been clearly evidenced in meiosis and DNA division. Are you saying randomly mutated off-spring have been designed that way?

I think you confuse what a scientific theory is. Theories are different from hypotheses, since they have corroborating evidence to support them. Do you accept the theory of gravity, or do you float about? Being a self-proclaimed "engineer", you'll be needing scientific theories to establish your engineering principles.

You can attempt to be as condescending as you like, it does little to favour your argument for which I have already adressed. The fact that you pride yourself on being a "rational atheist" leads me to ask the question, do you believe the two to be mutually exclusive or not? I'm just curious.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"] I knew I'd get a post like this, I was just waiting for it really.....

We are all born without the belief in god, we lack the belief because as newborns we don't hold many opinions on ideas that we have no knowledge about, and god is simply that, an idea. It seems you lack understanding on what Atheism is, so I'll sum it up for you "atheism is merely the absence of belief in a god"

I hope you can understand now why your post sounds ridiculous :)

SuperKaio-ken

That's not really Atheism though IMO. Sounds more like Agnosticism to me. Of course it depends on what defintion you use. It's all very fluid.

It is Atheism, I don't know what definition you use.


"As commonly understood, atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. So an atheist is someone who disbelieves in God, whereas a theist is someone who believes in God. Another meaning of "atheism" is simply nonbelief in the existence of God"

So as you see there is no clear definition

Avatar image for l4dak47
l4dak47

6838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 l4dak47
Member since 2009 • 6838 Posts

[QUOTE="l4dak47"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] No one made that claim. TC seemed to have claimed that God isn't real without anyone having claimed that he is. So burden of proof is on himthemajormayor

First off, he never claimed that. Also, this sentence was has got to be of the most pathetic attempts I've seen.

Well your sentence is not much to hang in the christmas tree either.

Standard was set low by you.
Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

You can attempt to be as condescending as you like, it does little to favour your argument for which I have already adressed. The fact that you pride yourself on being a "rational atheist" leads me to ask the question, do you believe the two to be mutually exclusive or not? I'm just curious.

Asim90

I don't think you've addressed any of my comments. I believe you explicity ignored them: for example, after I explained to you the qualities of a scientific theory, you threw the "it's only a theory" out again as part of your continued assertion.

How would you know what I pride myself on? Are you asking if rationality and atheism are mutually exclusive? If so, then I think not. I find religion to be irrational. To deny clear evidence (for example about evolution) seems far less rational than to accept it.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#57 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Why do people that disbelieve in God talk about religion so much?
Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

"As commonly understood, atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. So an atheist is someone who disbelieves in God, whereas a theist is someone who believes in God. Another meaning of "atheism" is simply nonbelief in the existence of God"

So as you see there is no clear definition

themajormayor

There are some very clear definitions, but also some confusion over their interpretation.

Avatar image for maheo30
maheo30

5102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 maheo30
Member since 2006 • 5102 Posts

You want something that deals with the material universe to prove something that is spirit and therefore suprnatural? Typical.:roll:

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Can you even present evidence for or against the existence of something that is undefined?
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="l4dak47"] First off, he never claimed that. Also, this sentence was has got to be of the most pathetic attempts I've seen. l4dak47

Well your sentence is not much to hang in the christmas tree either.

Standard was set low by you.

Not as low as your face

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

Why do people that disbelieve in God talk about religion so much?SolidSnake35

Why do religious people talk so much about atheists?

Avatar image for maheo30
maheo30

5102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 maheo30
Member since 2006 • 5102 Posts
By the way, I'm not opposed to providing evidence, but from a reformed perspective there are certain presuppositions we have to get to. When an atheist immediately brings up the evidence card I usually walk away because it tells me the person I am dealing with is utterly oblivious to the Christian faith. I just don't have the patience to deal with it. It also tells me the person is not interested in having a genuine discussion.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#64 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Why do people that disbelieve in God talk about religion so much?RationalAtheist

Why do religious people talk so much about atheists?

Because they exist.
Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

The senseless one has said in his heart:
There is no Jehovah.
They have acted ruinously, they have acted detestably in [their] dealing.
There is no one doing good.

2As for Jehovah, he has looked down from heaven itself upon the sons of men,

To see whether there exists anyone having insight, anyone seeking Jehovah.

3They have all turned aside, they are [all] alike corrupt;

There is no one doing good,
Not even one.

4Have none of the practicers of what is hurtful got knowledge,

Eating up my people as they have eaten bread?
They have not called even upon Jehovah.

5There they were filled with a great dread,

For Jehovah is among the generation of the righteous one.

6The counsel of the afflicted oneYOUpeople would put to shame,

Because Jehovah is his refuge.

7O that out of Zion there were the salvation of Israel!

When Jehovah gathers back the captive ones of his people,
Let Jacob be joyful, let Israel rejoice.

Psalms 14

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

[QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Why do people that disbelieve in God talk about religion so much?SolidSnake35

Why do religious people talk so much about atheists?

Because they exist.

So does religion....

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
I figure because it is like 2nd grade. Whomever has more on their side the teacher believes and the other side gets the crap. Whomever looks more prepared, legit, and backed by evidence pulls in more people who just wanna be on the bashing side.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#68 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

Why do religious people talk so much about atheists?

RationalAtheist

Because they exist.

So does religion....

Not God though, apparently.
Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

Not God though, apparently.SolidSnake35

You too?

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#70 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Not God though, apparently.RationalAtheist

You too?

I don't believe or disbelieve.
Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts

[Quote="Psalms 14"]

The senseless one has said in his heart:
There is no Jehovah.
They have acted ruinously, they have acted detestably in [their] dealing.
There is no one doing good.

2As for Jehovah, he has looked down from heaven itself upon the sons of men,

To see whether there exists anyone having insight, anyone seeking Jehovah.

3They have all turned aside, they are [all] alike corrupt;

There is no one doing good,
Not even one.

4Have none of the practicers of what is hurtful got knowledge,

Eating up my people as they have eaten bread?
They have not called even upon Jehovah.

5There they were filled with a great dread,

For Jehovah is among the generation of the righteous one.

6The counsel of the afflicted oneYOUpeople would put to shame,

Because Jehovah is his refuge.

7O that out of Zion there were the salvation of Israel!

When Jehovah gathers back the captive ones of his people,
Let Jacob be joyful, let Israel rejoice.

BluRayHiDef

So the bible talks about non believers in a negative way and predicts that there will be those who do not believe? This is amazing how exactly? What religion doesn't do this?

Man you might as well convert to Islam or any other religion if you think what you just posted means something

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

[Quote="Psalms 14"]

The senseless one has said in his heart:
There is no Jehovah.
They have acted ruinously, they have acted detestably in [their] dealing.
There is no one doing good.

2As for Jehovah, he has looked down from heaven itself upon the sons of men,

To see whether there exists anyone having insight, anyone seeking Jehovah.

3They have all turned aside, they are [all] alike corrupt;

There is no one doing good,
Not even one.

4Have none of the practicers of what is hurtful got knowledge,

Eating up my people as they have eaten bread?
They have not called even upon Jehovah.

5There they were filled with a great dread,

For Jehovah is among the generation of the righteous one.

6The counsel of the afflicted oneYOUpeople would put to shame,

Because Jehovah is his refuge.

7O that out of Zion there were the salvation of Israel!

When Jehovah gathers back the captive ones of his people,
Let Jacob be joyful, let Israel rejoice.

SuperKaio-ken

So the bible talks about non believers in a negative way and predicts that there will be those who do not believe? This is amazing how exactly? What religion doesn't do this?

Man you might as well convert to Islam or any other religion if you think what you just posted means something

I used to be like you, constantly trying to disprove God's existence and never understanding that belief in God is not a matter of science but is a matter of faith. Either you believe or you don't. It's up to you to believe. I've decided to believe. For me, Yahweh/ Jehovah is real.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

I figure because it is like 2nd grade. Whomever has more on their side the teacher believes and the other side gets the crap. Whomever looks more prepared, legit, and backed by evidence pulls in more people who just wanna be on the bashing side. CreasianDevaili
Well that's deplorable, isnt it...

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
[...] why do I see so many religious people asking for Atheists to disprove their beliefs?SuperKaio-ken
Because usually, that is what they were taught to regurgitate.
Avatar image for Necrifer
Necrifer

10629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Necrifer
Member since 2010 • 10629 Posts

Because God means a lot to them one way or another, and it isnt easy for them to admit the possibility he is just like flying unicorns, giant teapots etc, the only difference being his/her/it's greater plausibility, which is only true based on standards of human psychology, not science.

That's my take.

Teenaged

You sayin' giant teapots don't exist?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#76 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I dont think people approach god/religion in a scientific matter. It's not something like physics or electomagnetism that can be directly studied and observed. Religion is more a cultural and spritual phenomena.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Because God means a lot to them one way or another, and it isnt easy for them to admit the possibility he is just like flying unicorns, giant teapots etc, the only difference being his/her/it's greater plausibility, which is only true based on standards of human psychology, not science.

That's my take.

Necrifer

You sayin' giant teapots don't exist?

They have them at that Mad Hatter ride at Disney world. lol
Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

[Quote="Psalms 14"]

The senseless one has said in his heart:
There is no Jehovah.
They have acted ruinously, they have acted detestably in [their] dealing.
There is no one doing good.

2As for Jehovah, he has looked down from heaven itself upon the sons of men,

To see whether there exists anyone having insight, anyone seeking Jehovah.

3They have all turned aside, they are [all] alike corrupt;

There is no one doing good,
Not even one.

4Have none of the practicers of what is hurtful got knowledge,

Eating up my people as they have eaten bread?
They have not called even upon Jehovah.

5There they were filled with a great dread,

For Jehovah is among the generation of the righteous one.

6The counsel of the afflicted oneYOUpeople would put to shame,

Because Jehovah is his refuge.

7O that out of Zion there were the salvation of Israel!

When Jehovah gathers back the captive ones of his people,
Let Jacob be joyful, let Israel rejoice.

BluRayHiDef

So the bible talks about non believers in a negative way and predicts that there will be those who do not believe? This is amazing how exactly? What religion doesn't do this?

Man you might as well convert to Islam or any other religion if you think what you just posted means something

I used to be like you, constantly trying to disprove God's existence and never understanding that belief in God is not a matter of science but is a matter of faith. Either you believe or you don't. It's up to you to believe. I've decided to believe. For me, Yahweh/ Jehovah is real.

Firstly, I'm not trying to "Disprove gods" existence, I just see no compelling reason to believe in one when there is absolutely not one spec of evidence to support the claim of one. I tend to hold the belief that believing in something based off of nothing isn't the smartest thing to do. Now of course you'll have the opposing argument, such as"God is not a matter of science it is a matter of faith" but do you even understand what faith is? It is believing in something without proof, without evidence, and without good reason.

Now you might be willing to do that, but I am not nor will I ever be, because not only do I think it is irrational to do so, I hold that belief it is absolutely absurd to do so. Just because you WISH and WANT something to be true, doesn't mean it is true, nor does it give you a good reason to believe in it. Because you have no reason to believe in something, there is no reason why you should believe, it really is that simple. The point of this topic wasn't to DISPROVE god, the point was that because of there being no reason to believe in god (because it is a claim that is not supported with any sort of evidence) it can be dismissed equally without it.

This is why it is not up to science or anybody to disprove god in the first place, it is up to the person making the claim to prove god exists. If they cannot do so, their claim is uterrly worthless. Now trying to seperate god from the basis on which we judge something as true or false (because you hold the belief it is special) isn't an arguement either.

Avatar image for Zonno
Zonno

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Zonno
Member since 2012 • 69 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. You're the one making the claim that he doesn't exist. SuperKaio-ken

I knew I'd get a post like this, I was just waiting for it really.....

We are all born without the belief in god, we lack the belief because as newborns we don't hold many opinions on ideas that we have no knowledge about, and god is simply that, an idea. It seems you lack understanding on what Atheism is, so I'll sum it up for you "atheism is merely the absence of belief in a god"

I hope you can understand now why your post sounds ridiculous :)




I find calling another's post ridiculous unjustified, even if you don't agree. It's very reasonable what he's saying actually. Not nescessarily as in the manner of the subject, but as in a general principle. As for the ideas; I don't know where the rejection of 'ideas' on the basis that we have no knowledge about them comes from. You can easily question the truthfulness of one's knowledge on an idea, but then you can question knowledge as a whole as easily. Most ideas originate from experiences. I can give you an example on that: The idea of the rejection of hitting one another (violence) originates from one being hit once and having found that a negative experience. Hence, this person will not hit another in the future. This makes a good person for saving others from the same sorrow. Usually the same counts for the origin of the idea of 'God'. What you're saying is that people who believe God exists have no knowledge of what they are believing in. Before you attack someone on believing in God, you must consider what God means to him and more importantly, what God's existance means to him. If you replace 'God' with a tangible presence, such as a table you can still argue infinitely about it's existence. Because what is a table? You tell me, defining things is harder than it seems. And if you keep denying things are what others call them, then they aren't those. For you that is. Luckily we have a dictionary which rounds up pretty much everything mankind has agreed upon for now. You have no definition for 'God' apparently, thus you don't believe in God. Or you have a definition which you find so unlikely that you reject it completely. I don't have a definition for 'God' for myself either, but I understand the definitions of others. Nobody has the right to force you to believe in 'God'. Maybe you will one day. TL;DR, God is a subjective thing, so is atheism. The evidence for the subjective is as subjective as the subjective. You can't force people to think differently.
Avatar image for Nude_Dude
Nude_Dude

5530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Nude_Dude
Member since 2007 • 5530 Posts
The logic SuperKaio-ken
learn the difference between this and belief. k bye
Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"] So the bible talks about non believers in a negative way and predicts that there will be those who do not believe? This is amazing how exactly? What religion doesn't do this?

Man you might as well convert to Islam or any other religion if you think what you just posted means something

SuperKaio-ken

I used to be like you, constantly trying to disprove God's existence and never understanding that belief in God is not a matter of science but is a matter of faith. Either you believe or you don't. It's up to you to believe. I've decided to believe. For me, Yahweh/ Jehovah is real.

Firstly, I'm not trying to "Disprove gods" existence, I just see no compelling reason to believe in one when there is absolutely not one spec of evidence to support the claim of one. I tend to hold the belief that believing in something based off of nothing isn't the smartest thing to do. Now of course you'll have the opposing argument, such as"God is not a matter of science it is a matter of faith" but do you even understand what faith is? It is believing in something without proof, without evidence, and without good reason.

Now you might be willing to do that, but I am not nor will I ever be, because not only do I think it is irrational to do so, I hold that belief it is absolutely absurd to do so. Just because you WISH and WANT something to be true, doesn't mean it is true, nor does it give you a good reason to believe in it. Because you have no reason to believe in something, there is no reason why you should believe, it really is that simple. The point of this topic wasn't to DISPROVE god, the point was that because of there being no reason to believe in god (because it is a claim that is not supported with any sort of revidence) it can be dismissed equally without it.

This is why it is not up to science or anybody to disprove god in the first place, it is up to the person making the claim.

If you're not trying to disprove God's existence, then why did you make this thread? If you think belief in God is so stupid, then why are you concerned with it? Why not just let us foolish people of faith be? As for evidence, the evidence for God is not empirical but spiritual; it's something that people of faith feel in their being. It's not something that can be proven or disproven by physical observations. As I said, it's a matter of faith.

26 ForYOUbehold his calling ofYOU, brothers, that not many wise in a fleshly way were called, not many powerful, not many of noble birth;

27but God chose the foolish things of the world, that he might put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world, that he might put the strong things to shame;

28 and God chose the ignoble things of the world and the things looked down upon, the things that are not, that he might bring to nothing the things that are,

29in order that no flesh might boast in the sight of God.

30But it is due to him thatYOUare in union with Christ Jesus, who has become to us wisdom from God, also righteousness and sanctification and release by ransom;

31that it may be just as it is written: He that boasts, let him boast in Jehovah.1 Corinthians 1

Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]The logic Nude_Dude
learn the difference between this and belief. k bye

....cant tell if serious?

Avatar image for Necrifer
Necrifer

10629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Necrifer
Member since 2010 • 10629 Posts

BluRayHiDef

Having fun?

Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts
[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]The logic Nude_Dude
learn the difference between this and belief. k bye

This made me laugh for some reason =P
Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

I used to be like you, constantly trying to disprove God's existence and never understanding that belief in God is not a matter of science but is a matter of faith. Either you believe or you don't. It's up to you to believe. I've decided to believe. For me, Yahweh/ Jehovah is real.

BluRayHiDef

Firstly, I'm not trying to "Disprove gods" existence, I just see no compelling reason to believe in one when there is absolutely not one spec of evidence to support the claim of one. I tend to hold the belief that believing in something based off of nothing isn't the smartest thing to do. Now of course you'll have the opposing argument, such as"God is not a matter of science it is a matter of faith" but do you even understand what faith is? It is believing in something without proof, without evidence, and without good reason.

Now you might be willing to do that, but I am not nor will I ever be, because not only do I think it is irrational to do so, I hold that belief it is absolutely absurd to do so. Just because you WISH and WANT something to be true, doesn't mean it is true, nor does it give you a good reason to believe in it. Because you have no reason to believe in something, there is no reason why you should believe, it really is that simple. The point of this topic wasn't to DISPROVE god, the point was that because of there being no reason to believe in god (because it is a claim that is not supported with any sort of revidence) it can be dismissed equally without it.

This is why it is not up to science or anybody to disprove god in the first place, it is up to the person making the claim.

If you're not trying to disprove God's existence, then why did you make this thread? If you think belief in God is so stupid, then why are you concerned with it? Why not just let us foolish people of faith be? As for evidence, the evidence for God is not empirical but spiritual; it's something that people of faith feel in their being. It's not something that can be proven or disproven by physical observations. As I said, it's a matter of faith.

26 ForYOUbehold his calling ofYOU, brothers, that not many wise in a fleshly way were called, not many powerful, not many of noble birth;

27but God chose the foolish things of the world, that he might put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world, that he might put the strong things to shame;

28 and God chose the ignoble things of the world and the things looked down upon, the things that are not, that he might bring to nothing the things that are,

29in order that no flesh might boast in the sight of God.

30But it is due to him thatYOUare in union with Christ Jesus, who has become to us wisdom from God, also righteousness and sanctification and release by ransom;

31that it may be just as it is written: He that boasts, let him boast in Jehovah.1 Corinthians 1

Well if you read the topic title......

Edit: Trying to seperate god from the basis on which we judge something as true or false (because you hold the belief it is special) isn't an arguement.

Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#86 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts
BRHD is just trolling. The guy makes anti-religion threads every other day.
Avatar image for LiftedHeadshot
LiftedHeadshot

2460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 LiftedHeadshot
Member since 2009 • 2460 Posts
i believe there is a pink unicorn and purple dragon doing battle in front me. you can't disprove me cus i have teh faithz tr0l0l0l
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

BRHD is just trolling. The guy makes anti-religion threads every other day. th3warr1or
No no... he just genuinely thinks he's smart.

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"] Firstly, I'm not trying to "Disprove gods" existence, I just see no compelling reason to believe in one when there is absolutely not one spec of evidence to support the claim of one. I tend to hold the belief that believing in something based off of nothing isn't the smartest thing to do. Now of course you'll have the opposing argument, such as"God is not a matter of science it is a matter of faith" but do you even understand what faith is? It is believing in something without proof, without evidence, and without good reason.

Now you might be willing to do that, but I am not nor will I ever be, because not only do I think it is irrational to do so, I hold that belief it is absolutely absurd to do so. Just because you WISH and WANT something to be true, doesn't mean it is true, nor does it give you a good reason to believe in it. Because you have no reason to believe in something, there is no reason why you should believe, it really is that simple. The point of this topic wasn't to DISPROVE god, the point was that because of there being no reason to believe in god (because it is a claim that is not supported with any sort of revidence) it can be dismissed equally without it.

This is why it is not up to science or anybody to disprove god in the first place, it is up to the person making the claim.

SuperKaio-ken

If you're not trying to disprove God's existence, then why did you make this thread? If you think belief in God is so stupid, then why are you concerned with it? Why not just let us foolish people of faith be? As for evidence, the evidence for God is not empirical but spiritual; it's something that people of faith feel in their being. It's not something that can be proven or disproven by physical observations. As I said, it's a matter of faith.

26 ForYOUbehold his calling ofYOU, brothers, that not many wise in a fleshly way were called, not many powerful, not many of noble birth;

27but God chose the foolish things of the world, that he might put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world, that he might put the strong things to shame;

28 and God chose the ignoble things of the world and the things looked down upon, the things that are not, that he might bring to nothing the things that are,

29in order that no flesh might boast in the sight of God.

30But it is due to him thatYOUare in union with Christ Jesus, who has become to us wisdom from God, also righteousness and sanctification and release by ransom;

31that it may be just as it is written: He that boasts, let him boast in Jehovah.1 Corinthians 1

Well if you read the topic title......

Edit: Trying to seperate god from the basis on which we judge something as true or false (because you hold the belief it is special) isn't an arguement.

You don't understand. God's existence isn't something to be argued, especially in a religious context. You have to take a leap of faith. Either you do or you don't. One cannot prove or disprove the existence of a being that is invisible, intangible, and beyond the scope of Human comprehension. You, me, and everyone else are infinitely less to God than what a microorganism is to us. He is way above our level.

Avatar image for Necrifer
Necrifer

10629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Necrifer
Member since 2010 • 10629 Posts

i believe there is a pink unicorn and purple dragon doing battle in front me. you can't disprove me cus i have teh faithz tr0l0l0lLiftedHeadshot

Logically, you can assume there is not much space in front of you, as you are probably on a desktop against the wall. If a fight were in front of you, your computer would be heavily damaged and you wouldn't have been able to make that post.

Faith is not enough here.

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

BRHD is just trolling. The guy makes anti-religion threads every other day. th3warr1or
I'm not trolling. I've taken a leap of faith. Seriously.

Avatar image for FMAB_GTO
FMAB_GTO

14385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 FMAB_GTO
Member since 2010 • 14385 Posts

[QUOTE="th3warr1or"]BRHD is just trolling. The guy makes anti-religion threads every other day. BluRayHiDef

I'm not trolling. I've taken a leap of faith. Seriously.

That's a start ;o
Avatar image for SuperKaio-ken
SuperKaio-ken

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 SuperKaio-ken
Member since 2012 • 322 Posts

[QUOTE="SuperKaio-ken"]

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

If you're not trying to disprove God's existence, then why did you make this thread? If you think belief in God is so stupid, then why are you concerned with it? Why not just let us foolish people of faith be? As for evidence, the evidence for God is not empirical but spiritual; it's something that people of faith feel in their being. It's not something that can be proven or disproven by physical observations. As I said, it's a matter of faith.

[quote="1 Corinthians 1"]

26 ForYOUbehold his calling ofYOU, brothers, that not many wise in a fleshly way were called, not many powerful, not many of noble birth;

27but God chose the foolish things of the world, that he might put the wise men to shame; and God chose the weak things of the world, that he might put the strong things to shame;

28 and God chose the ignoble things of the world and the things looked down upon, the things that are not, that he might bring to nothing the things that are,

29in order that no flesh might boast in the sight of God.

30But it is due to him thatYOUare in union with Christ Jesus, who has become to us wisdom from God, also righteousness and sanctification and release by ransom;

31that it may be just as it is written: He that boasts, let him boast in Jehovah.BluRayHiDef

Well if you read the topic title......

Edit: Trying to seperate god from the basis on which we judge something as true or false (because you hold the belief it is special) isn't an arguement.

You don't understand. God's existence isn't something to be argued, especially in a religious context. You have to take a leap of faith. Either you do or you don't. One cannot prove or disprove the existence of a being that is invisible, intangible, and beyond the scope of Human comprehension. You, me, and everyone else are infinitely less to God than what a microorganism is to us. He is way above our level.

Well I'm done replying for awhile. need to catch some sleep but I'll make one last reply towards you.

God's existence is something to be argued, regardless of the religious context of it or not. It is not "Special" It is still subject to the same basis on which we judge something as true or false, and hyping the belief up as "something special, you just need faith to see the light, it cant be disproved because it is beyond human comprehension" is not only ridiculous, but it is really quite laughable.

If you truly believe the claim of god should not be subject to the same scrutiny as other claims you are kidding yourself or simply just delusional. I agree, god is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, just like little billy's imaginary best friend and unicorns. We cannot disprove these things. but because they are asserted without evidence they can be dismissed without evidence, which is the point I was trying to make through-out this thread.

"He is way above our level, you me and everybody are microorganisms compared to god" This makes me wonder if you truly even believe what you are saying. I really hope you are trolling bro.


Avatar image for LiftedHeadshot
LiftedHeadshot

2460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 LiftedHeadshot
Member since 2009 • 2460 Posts

[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]i believe there is a pink unicorn and purple dragon doing battle in front me. you can't disprove me cus i have teh faithz tr0l0l0lNecrifer

Logically, you can assume there is not much space in front of you, as you are probably on a desktop against the wall. If a fight were in front of you, your computer would be heavily damaged and you wouldn't have been able to make that post.

Faith is not enough here.

faith is enough for any sort of ignorant nonsense. i win muahaha
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]I figure because it is like 2nd grade. Whomever has more on their side the teacher believes and the other side gets the crap. Whomever looks more prepared, legit, and backed by evidence pulls in more people who just wanna be on the bashing side. Teenaged

Well that's deplorable, isnt it...

I said looks, not is, you unstable teenager.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#96 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

You do need an argument/evidence to disprove the notion of God. You do not need an argument/evidence to dismiss it.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#97 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]I figure because it is like 2nd grade. Whomever has more on their side the teacher believes and the other side gets the crap. Whomever looks more prepared, legit, and backed by evidence pulls in more people who just wanna be on the bashing side. CreasianDevaili

Well that's deplorable, isnt it...

I said looked, not is, you unstable teenager.

Either you are more backed by evidence or you arent.

If someone tries to "deceive" the other side of being credible, there are ways to sort things out.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Well that's deplorable, isnt it...

I said looked, not is, you unstable teenager.

Either you are more backed by evidence or you arent.

If someone tries to "deceive" the other side of being credible, there are ways to sort things out.

Evidence is not fact but an attempted assertion to prelude to such by means of linking aspects to convince another of such. Being more backed by evidence is worthless until you can show that absolution. So I have no idea why you replied aside from that you are insane.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#99 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I said looked, not is, you unstable teenager.CreasianDevaili

Either you are more backed by evidence or you arent.

If someone tries to "deceive" the other side of being credible, there are ways to sort things out.

Evidence is not fact but an attempted assertion to prelude to such by means of linking aspects to convince another of such. Being more backed by evidence is worthless until you can show that absolution. So I have no idea why you replied aside from that you are insane.

So to you evidence is worth nothing?

Good to know. Keep calling meinsane if that makes you feel better though.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#100 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Not being able to disprove something, does not mean that its existnece is proven.