Why can't I make neologisms? I mean, creationists exist, why not evolutionists...? What, does it make them sound like bad people...? Lol.Anyway, we all know that evolution is a theory. I, for one, will not stick to a theory like that. I hate how you say it like it exists for a fact, it doesn't. Oh sure, give me the, "Bu-bu-bu... there's evidence...!". Is there enough to prove it 100% correct. And just as you stick to your theory of evolution I will stick to the "theory" of a creator. You can explain how we changed over the years, I will explain how we came to exist. Are we good?
brightshadow525
Because there is no such thing as a "evolutionist." You make it sound as if it is based solely off of a belief purported by an individual and not a fact supported by observable and demonstrable empirical evidence that is accepted by the general scientific community.
Nothing can be proven 100% correct, except math... and math isn't an empirical entity. Evolution is the greatest and most supported explanation we currently have and if new evidence comes along that refutes it, it will be adapted to the new evidence... unlike any other "guess" that just keeps denying any evidence that comes along to refute it.
There is no such thing as a "theory" of a creator. It is a guess based on no empirical evidence. It is not a science and never will be a science unless evidence comes along to support an empirical understanding of it. You cannot explain how we came to exist because you have no observable or demonstrable evidence to support your guess. I can make the best guess I can based on the evidence I have.
Log in to comment