[QUOTE="ariz3260"]
Maybe I'm just old fashion, I have trouble calling a man heterosexual when he has sexual relations with another man.
And I think the definition of who qualifies as a homosexual (not base on act, but base purely on one's self report attraction to whichever gender) is too narrow of a qualifier to determine one's sexuality. Furthermore, I would contend that self report is another concept that is not 100% guarantee accurate.
GabuEx
I'm not talking about self-reporting, I'm talking about actuality. Whether or not a person admits sexual attraction towards someone has nothing to do with whether or not that attraction actually exists. (1)
A man is homosexual if he feels sexual attraction towards other men and does not feel sexual attraction towards women. (2)What's too narrow about that?
Somehow I think we are just missing each other... let me try again
1. A person can say he/she feels no sexual attraction towards the same sex, yet he/she keeps on having sex with person of same sex. That person can deny he/she has homosexual tendency, yet his/her action speaks otherwise. Some people can make belief that despite having sex with people of same sex, he/she is still straight
2. Nothing wrong with that statement. I am referring to the fact that qualifying a person base solely on one admitted to having sexual attraction toward another person of same sex imo, is inadequate. Reason being, a person can deny having sexual attraction for people of same sex, yet his/her act of having sex with another person of same sex is a strong indication that one has homosexual tendency, despite ones claim that he/she is not. That is what I meant by a narrow definition.
Log in to comment