Nvidia GTX 470, 480, SLI review/benchmark round up.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

Ouch..

Having waited over six months for Nvidia to deliver a DirectX 11 graphics card we can't help but feel shocked by the GeForce GTX 480. While offering performance superior to the HD 5870 in some situations, most notably Battlefield: Bad Company 2 and Dirt 2, the GTX 480 is unable to conclusively claim the title as fastest single GPU graphics card, with Crysis a dead heat and the Radeon HD 5870 cards offering much better performance in STALKER.

Even when ahead, at the high resolutions and demanding settings this kind of top-of-the-range card should target, the GTX 480's performance advantage is rarely more than ten percent. Considering the six month wait since the release of the HD 5870 this is deeply disappointing, and we certainly hoped and expected more.

It's hard to back the GTX 480 elsewhere though as it brings with it incredibly high power consumption, high running temperatures and a noisy stock cooling solution which really spoil the party.

The bad news continues. Nvidia has chosen to launch the GTX 480 quoting a price thirty per cent higher than that of its direct competitor. While you can find a HD 5870 1GB for around £310 in stock without too much effort, the GeForce GTX 480 1,536MB will hit e-tailers shelves on April 6th at an MSRP of £420 ($450). Even if you value the Nvidia exclusive features like PhysX, 3D Vision and CUDA support, such a high price will be tough to stomach.

Yes, the GTX 480 offers great performance in our test games, especially in Dirt 2 and Bad Company 2, but compared to the competition, it doesn't make a strong enough case for itself, especially when you consider that there are just so many caveats involved with buying this card. The higher price, the 100W of extra power consumption, scorchingly hot temperatures and a much noisier stock cooler are all extremely detrimental to its desirability. The HD 5870 remains a far better choice if you're a gamer; while we've yet to see how the GTX 480 performs with CUDA apps and Folding, at this stage Fermi looks like a flop.bit-tech

Fermi is slightly better than I expected it would be, but it's still a massive disappointment.

Why would anyone buy this over ATi's offerings..?

Avatar image for redneckdouglas
redneckdouglas

2977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 redneckdouglas
Member since 2005 • 2977 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

lol fail. I'd certianly hope it beats a 5870, but it doesn't come close to the 5970. It runs like an oven too...

nofriekinlemons

why are people comparing a single gpu card to dual card, of course a single gpu wont outperfrom 2 gpu's weres the logic in this

Yet, the power consumption exceeds 2x 5870 and even the older GTX 295. Best measurement for any hardware is by using performance per watt.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#53 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
CellAnimation.... Man you are quoting the sites with nothing but good remarks under the link. Take a look at those reviews people, Fermi does take the crown for the fastest single GPU card, but in many benchmarks it is really not that much faster than the 5K single GPU cards. It sure is not the new "8-series" that everyone was hoping. It is more towards the ATI 2k series, just not quite as bad. Overall Fermi is a flop as most reviewers are saying. Maybe they can work the kinks out with drivers and a refresh later.
Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts
CellAnimation.... Man you are quoting the sites with nothing but good remarks under the link.millerlight89
I don't know what you're reading but I've posted the stuff that sums the reviewers feelings up. Some good, some bad, some indifferent. Maybe you should try reading the quotes again?
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="millerlight89"]CellAnimation.... Man you are quoting the sites with nothing but good remarks under the link.CellAnimation
I don't know what you're reading but I've posted the stuff that sums the reviewers feelings up. Some good, some bad, some indifferent. Maybe you should try reading the quotes again?

MEH, I see one or two. It is not a big deal I was simply pointing it out.
Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts
[QUOTE="CellAnimation"][QUOTE="millerlight89"]CellAnimation.... Man you are quoting the sites with nothing but good remarks under the link.millerlight89
I don't know what you're reading but I've posted the stuff that sums the reviewers feelings up. Some good, some bad, some indifferent. Maybe you should try reading the quotes again?

MEH, I see one or two. It is not a big deal I was simply pointing it out.

Other than the quote from Hexus about SLI support nearly every quote mentions either the price, heat, or both. Hardly "nothing but good remarks". :) In the end it comes down to this, is the extra performance worth the money/heat? At the moment in Australia we have no idea what retail is, so for now I'm holding off on making my mind up. Having said that though 2 480s SLI'd sure is tempting here. Also if you have any reviews/quotes you'd like added to the first post let me know and I'll add them for you. I'm not trying to pick sides in a GPU war, I'm just looking for an upgrade to my 295.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
Having said that though 2 480s SLI'd sure is tempting here.CellAnimation
Yea the SLI reviews I have seen is really the only thing that impresses me. Two of them would be complete awesomeness, but for around $1000 USD and the amount of heat these produce really turns me off. Like I said in another thread, at first I was worried about going ATI this round, and I can fully say I feel I made the right choice. I do miss my EVGA though :(.
Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]It gives you chills? This is not really what Nvidia was hopping.CellAnimation
I was just reading a warning about people getting burnt fingers from the heatsink. Your comment made me laugh out loud. :)

the 5970 and the gtx 295 have similar heat signatures, yet people say the 480 harm you. touching any gpu while under load can injure you what makes the 480 worse than what I've listed?

***

lol i got to edit my post before i actually post it, but thankfully you can understand it:P

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="CellAnimation"][QUOTE="millerlight89"]It gives you chills? This is not really what Nvidia was hopping.nofriekinlemons

I was just reading a warning about people getting burnt fingers from the heatsink. Your comment made me laugh out loud. :)

the 5970 and the gtx 295 have similar heat signatures, yet people say the 480 harm you. touching any gpu while under load can injure you what makes the 480 worse than what ive listed?

I think it is more of a joke people are using to express how hot these cards are. Though I have never burnt my hand on the heatsink though, if it is true idk, but there is no denying that given abit more time, I think Nvidia could had really made these cards really something.
Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="nofriekinlemons"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

lol fail. I'd certianly hope it beats a 5870, but it doesn't come close to the 5970. It runs like an oven too...

redneckdouglas

why are people comparing a single gpu card to dual card, of course a single gpu wont outperfrom 2 gpu's weres the logic in this

Yet, the power consumption exceeds 2x 5870 and even the older GTX 295. Best measurement for any hardware is by using performance per watt.

its not that the power consumption is bad(it is pretty demanding though:( ) but the 5*** had a surpisingly low consumption of energy.

so yes 480 is demanding but the 5870 was just very good, no one expected to be as low as it is,

so don't think that 115 @ idle was to be the norm, it wasn't

Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="nofriekinlemons"]

[QUOTE="CellAnimation"] I was just reading a warning about people getting burnt fingers from the heatsink. Your comment made me laugh out loud. :)millerlight89

the 5970 and the gtx 295 have similar heat signatures, yet people say the 480 harm you. touching any gpu while under load can injure you what makes the 480 worse than what ive listed?

I think it is more of a joke people are using to express how hot these cards are. Though I have never burnt my hand on the heatsink though, if it is true idk, but there is no denying that given abit more time, I think Nvidia could had really made these cards really something.

ya i know, i just want to know what were the difficulties that nvidia faced, cuz im sure it was worse than they expected.

it took so long to make the card. but im fairly sure that the hardware is very powerful all they need is the right drivers to unlock it.

otherwise i don't think there was much for them to do as for the heat issue, im sure they expected this would happen.

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

ya i know, i just want to know what were the difficulties that nvidia faced, cuz im sure it was worse than they expected.

it took so long to make the card. but im fairly sure that the hardware is very powerful all they need is the right drivers to unlock it.

otherwise i don't think there was much for them to do as for the heat issue, im sure they expected this would happen.

nofriekinlemons

Yea I figured you knew what I was saying lol. Yea, maybe drivers can help, as long as Nvidia steps their driver game up. ATI is finally starting to. I love both companies now, use to be an Nvidia fanboy, but no longer. I wish these cards turned out better, the architecture is quite awesome. I think they will get a handle on it by the time they refresh the GPU line.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
lol
Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="nofriekinlemons"]ya i know, i just want to know what were the difficulties that nvidia faced, cuz im sure it was worse than they expected.

it took so long to make the card. but im fairly sure that the hardware is very powerful all they need is the right drivers to unlock it.

otherwise i don't think there was much for them to do as for the heat issue, im sure they expected this would happen.

millerlight89

Yea I figured you knew what I was saying lol. Yea, maybe drivers can help, as long as Nvidia steps their driver game up. ATI is finally starting to. I love both companies now, use to be an Nvidia fanboy, but no longer. I wish these cards turned out better, the architecture is quite awesome. I think they will get a handle on it by the time they refresh the GPU line.

dude thats the exact same as me,i used to be hard core nvidia back with my 8800(god rest it) but now ive chilled into the middle to where i envy the 5870 but alas to broke to get one:P

***

lol well no one said that it was going to be pretty and i doubt my gpu can handle the 480 oh well. but if some one can pull off sli'ed 480s hes set for a good while.

i wonder what 4 sli'ed 480s would look like:shock:

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

dude thats the exact same as me,i used to be hard core nvidia back with my 8800(god rest it) but now ive chilled into the middle to where i envy the 5870 but alas to broke to get one:P

nofriekinlemons

Gawd, when I had my 8800gtx I was like, "Nvidia is god!" I still think they are great, but I also descided to give ATI a go this round and I am very happy thus far. Tough, I really want to see what Nvidia's guys can do once they master this "Fermi" architecture. Great stuff as some reviews have rated the architecture and the cards. The architecture scores higher usually. I think if they were given just a bit more time they would have launced something massive.

Avatar image for akbar13
akbar13

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 akbar13
Member since 2009 • 2186 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]lol

That is sad.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#68 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

i wonder what 4 sli'ed 480s would look like:shock:

nofriekinlemons

IDK, but I imagine that it would make the room feel like a furnace. I wonder if there is even a PSU that could handle that?

Avatar image for akbar13
akbar13

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 akbar13
Member since 2009 • 2186 Posts

[QUOTE="nofriekinlemons"]i wonder what 4 sli'ed 480s would look like:shock:

millerlight89

IDK, but I imagine that it would make the room feel like a furnace. I wonder if there is even a PSU that could handle that?

You also couldn't even pay your electric bill.
Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="nofriekinlemons"]i wonder what 4 sli'ed 480s would look like:shock:

millerlight89

IDK, but I imagine that it would make the room feel like a furnace. I wonder if there is even a PSU that could handle that?


ya im thinking water cooling with 2 loops, 2 cards each with one 360 radiator each.

ya you'll need 2 PSUs just to power the cards alone

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#71 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

[QUOTE="nofriekinlemons"]i wonder what 4 sli'ed 480s would look like:shock:

akbar13

IDK, but I imagine that it would make the room feel like a furnace. I wonder if there is even a PSU that could handle that?

You also couldn't even pay your electric bill.

I bet Nvidia is already working their buts off to improve these things lol. I mean I have never been one to care too much about the wattage a GPU uses, but when a single GPU card is higher than the 5970 it is hard to ignore.
Avatar image for samuraiguns
samuraiguns

11588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 samuraiguns
Member since 2005 • 11588 Posts

[QUOTE="akbar13"][QUOTE="millerlight89"] IDK, but I imagine that it would make the room feel like a furnace. I wonder if there is even a PSU that could handle that?

millerlight89

You also couldn't even pay your electric bill.

I bet Nvidia is already working their buts off to improve these things lol. I mean I have never been one to care too much about the wattage a GPU uses, but when a single GPU card is higher than the 5970 it is hard to ignore.

And look at the SLi wattage consumption, did nVIDIA even try this round? If getting anything nVIDIA this gen it will be after the re-brand cards.

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#73 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

And look at the SLi wattage consumption, did nVIDIA even try this round? If getting anything nVIDIA this gen it will be after the re-brand cards.

samuraiguns

Hmmmmmm, I do not think it is so much they didn't try, but maybe they gave up? What I mean is they had so much trouble in producing these cards they just ended up getting delayed and delayed. I think they were finally tired of losing market share they just said they are "good enough" for now and are going to release them. If they took a few more months they could have come up with s solution and even made these cards really powerful.

Avatar image for lettuceman44
lettuceman44

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#74 lettuceman44
Member since 2005 • 7971 Posts
Sweet! GTX 480>>5870, end of discussion. And if the same thing with 5xxx drivers happened with the GTX 4xx series, then 5xxx is ****. ahh so relieved to see some real benches that will shut ATI fanboys forever. but dam that thing is hot.GazaAli
:lol: Now that is funny. But I'm disappointed. I was expecting more........Nvidia why did you have to blow this? :(
Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"] And look at the SLi wattage consumption, did nVIDIA even try this round? If getting anything nVIDIA this gen it will be after the re-brand cards.

millerlight89

Hmmmmmm, I do not think it is so much they didn't try, but maybe they gave up? What I mean is they had so much trouble in producing these cards they just ended up getting delayed and delayed. I think they were finally tired of losing market share they just said they are "good enough" for now and are going to release them. If they took a few more months they could have come up with s solution and even made these cards really powerful.

GTX 485 anyone?
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#76 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"] And look at the SLi wattage consumption, did nVIDIA even try this round? If getting anything nVIDIA this gen it will be after the re-brand cards.

CellAnimation

Hmmmmmm, I do not think it is so much they didn't try, but maybe they gave up? What I mean is they had so much trouble in producing these cards they just ended up getting delayed and delayed. I think they were finally tired of losing market share they just said they are "good enough" for now and are going to release them. If they took a few more months they could have come up with s solution and even made these cards really powerful.

GTX 485 anyone?

Well they should be able to iron most of these problems out by then. I am really interested to see how they do with their refreshes.
Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

[QUOTE="CellAnimation"][QUOTE="millerlight89"] Hmmmmmm, I do not think it is so much they didn't try, but maybe they gave up? What I mean is they had so much trouble in producing these cards they just ended up getting delayed and delayed. I think they were finally tired of losing market share they just said they are "good enough" for now and are going to release them. If they took a few more months they could have come up with s solution and even made these cards really powerful.

millerlight89

GTX 485 anyone?

Well they should be able to iron most of these problems out by then. I am really interested to see how they do with their refreshes.

LOL funny thought what if they dont fix the problems by 485, i wonder what the 495 would look like(ok that actually might melt your system)

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

LOL funny thought what if they dont fix the problems by 485, i wonder what the 495 would look like(ok that actually might melt your system)

nofriekinlemons

Well if they don't then they are in deep trouble. If they want to even think about a dual GPU they will have to get those wattage numbers down and the heat output under control.

Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts

From my understanding Fermi wasn't a new architecture. It was an old shelved architecture brought back from the dead and made with some improvements.

When the nVidia 8k series was released it was an astounding leap from their previous 7k series and ATi's current offerings. Since ATi didn't really have a breakthrough follow up with their HD3000 series, nVidia basically turned their refresh into the 9k series because they knew they could get away with it and still top the charts. When the GTX2xx series came out it was again basically just a refresh of the 9k series. A refresh of a refresh.

They knew they couldn't continue this path of refreshing old architecture so they pulled their fermi architecture off the shelf and rebranded it for gaming since most of the design work had already been accomplished (they wouldn't have to start from the beginning and waste more time while ATi soaked up the gravy).

Apparently it was orginally designed to be a work-horse platform much like Intel's Larabee is (was?) and, ironically, Larabee started out as an advanced multicore graphics processor that is now desigated towards research, number crunching, etc.

I have no idea where I read this bit about Fermi being a shelved/old/experimental architecture (read it months ago) so it could all be a bunch of smoke up my rear, but I'm sure some of you interweb sleuths can find it. It kinda makes sense though, especially when compairing Larabeee and Fermi.

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts
[QUOTE="akbar13"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]lol

That is sad.

Same power consumption as a HD5970.. I am very dissapointed with the GTX400 series so far. :(
Avatar image for akbar13
akbar13

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 akbar13
Member since 2009 • 2186 Posts
[QUOTE="wklzip"][QUOTE="akbar13"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]lol

That is sad.

Same power consumption as a HD5970.. I am very dissapointed with the GTX400 series so far. :(

Oh... I was looking at SLI and I was about to say that the 480 is 400 more watts. But isn't the 480 1 gpu and the 5970 2 gpus or something? Because that is sad.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#82 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="akbar13"] Oh... I was looking at SLI and I was about to say that the 480 is 400 more watts. But isn't the 480 1 gpu and the 5970 2 gpus or something? Because that is sad.

Yea the 5970 is a dual card.
Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts
[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="akbar13"] Oh... I was looking at SLI and I was about to say that the 480 is 400 more watts. But isn't the 480 1 gpu and the 5970 2 gpus or something? Because that is sad.

Yea the 5970 is a dual card.

... and as the dust settles a very tempting card.
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#84 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
[QUOTE="akbar13"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]lol

That is sad.

HOLY ****! Nvidia expect us to have fusion powered computers?
Avatar image for nofriekinlemons
nofriekinlemons

1392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 nofriekinlemons
Member since 2008 • 1392 Posts

im just trying to sit this one through, waiting for a price drop.

but then again i cam across a 5870 on ebay bidding at $187 it still has 5 days left but ill keep an eye on it(i hope this isnt counted as advertising or something)

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#86 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="akbar13"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]lol  Swiftstrike5
That is sad.

HOLY ****! Nvidia expect us to have fusion powered computers?

NO NO not fusion.. nuclear reactors.. theres a difference.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
so the 5970 beats it in most of the tests and the 5870 isn't far off. nvidia is going to need to get those prices down fast for it to be competitive. 6 months later and only just beats the 5870 that's pretty poor.
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

looks like i might go for the 5970 this time around maybe even the 5990

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
5970 wins this rounds, it looks like the fermi cards just barely ended up in the same boat as the FX series.
Avatar image for Rob_101
Rob_101

3291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Rob_101
Member since 2004 • 3291 Posts

Sweet!

-Great preformance (as drivers mature it will only get better)

-reasonable price (which will eventually go down)

-temps... doesn't bother me (you people act like you have to sit on it or something)

-power... 100 watts more then the 5870 for about 10-15% more performance? I don't see a problem.

If only I could afford a new system... :P I think I'll just wait till the next series of DX11 cards. Although I'll go see how cheap the 5870s are going for on ebay, now that the hardcore are going to want the latest and greatest.

Sooo whats next? Intels Larrabee? :D

Avatar image for Digital_DJ_00
Digital_DJ_00

1460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#91 Digital_DJ_00
Member since 2005 • 1460 Posts

What a let-down... They've pushed back the release of these cards to improve the quality of their products and this is what we get? Now I'm not saying that the test results came out terrible, infact they came out pretty good. But considering the hype from Nvidia and the time they put into these cards, this is a huge dissapointment for me. The test results are great, but no-where near impressive. The GTX 470 would be the more logical choice if you were to buy one of the two, as it's comparable to the 5850 and and the 5870 in a few cases. The release of these cards were gonna play the factor in which company I was going to invest in when I have to choose my new graphics cards. And I have decided to ride with ATi and their 5870.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#92 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

Sweet!

-Great preformance (as drivers mature it will only get better)

-reasonable price (which will eventually go down)

-temps... doesn't bother me (you people act like you have to sit on it or something)

-power... 100 watts more then the 5870 for about 10-15% more performance? I don't see a problem.

If only I could afford a new system... :P I think I'll just wait till the next series of DX11 cards. Although I'll go see how cheap the 5870s are going for on ebay, now that the hardcore are going to want the latest and greatest.

Sooo whats next? Intels Larrabee? :D

Rob_101

its drivers are out already this is what your going to get flat out. they might mature but not in any hardcore way.

prices are actually pretty off there. the ppl up in great britain (who have a vaslty more valued currency than either usa or canada) are paying at least 200 usd more so im standing skeptical at those prices (my proof 428.99 gbp = 639.43 US dollars(and thats not even a good brand!)) .

temps are actually fairly bad case fans/alternative cooling solutions will need to be purchased for many wishing to buy one, and many cases wont fit one (basically it will be sharing cases with an hd 5970).

finally its still worthwhile to note that it require more power than the DUAL gpu solutions in the gtx 295, hd 5970 and hd 4870x2 which are notorious for being power hogs. its not the amount of pwoer that makes the difference is the OTHER cards it hogs pwoer over. this would be like saying your car uses as much gas as 2 hybrid cars to go the same distance as one of them. at the end of the day thats still 2 other friendlier options

Avatar image for Human-after-all
Human-after-all

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Human-after-all
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
Sweet! GTX 480>>5870, end of discussion. And if the same thing with 5xxx drivers happened with the GTX 4xx series, then 5xxx is ****. ahh so relieved to see some real benches that will shut ATI fanboys forever. but dam that thing is hot.GazaAli
Man those Nvidia cards are horrible. Overpriced and underpowered, have fun with that.
Avatar image for bunny569
bunny569

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 bunny569
Member since 2007 • 1181 Posts
[QUOTE="GazaAli"]Sweet! GTX 480>>5870, end of discussion. And if the same thing with 5xxx drivers happened with the GTX 4xx series, then 5xxx is ****. ahh so relieved to see some real benches that will shut ATI fanboys forever. but dam that thing is hot.Human-after-all
Man those Nvidia cards are horrible. Overpriced and underpowered, have fun with that.

lol wow, i was a huge nvidia fan and i was dissapointed and now im going with ATi, dude seriously gaza i dont know why you say its won? it was delayed 6 months and Nvidia had a big ego about it saying "its faster than anything ATi has" and kept us all in suspense... and this is what we got? LOL Fail i still running a 8800GT, i waited to see what Nvidia had to offer, now that i know that im going for a 5970 or 5990 and getting a dedicated physx card maybe a 9600gt
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#95 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
You need to kill Ironman and take his heart if you want to SLi 3-4 GTX480.
Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

not worth the wait or the money. 5870 ftw.

Avatar image for jernas
jernas

1514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#97 jernas
Member since 2005 • 1514 Posts

I think the performance of GTX 480 and 470 is solid but man at that price and with that power consumption and noise levels this is a no go. Sorry nVidia but I'm with ATI now.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#98 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="Human-after-all"][QUOTE="GazaAli"]Sweet! GTX 480>>5870, end of discussion. And if the same thing with 5xxx drivers happened with the GTX 4xx series, then 5xxx is ****. ahh so relieved to see some real benches that will shut ATI fanboys forever. but dam that thing is hot.bunny569
Man those Nvidia cards are horrible. Overpriced and underpowered, have fun with that.

lol wow, i was a huge nvidia fan and i was dissapointed and now im going with ATi, dude seriously gaza i dont know why you say its won? it was delayed 6 months and Nvidia had a big ego about it saying "its faster than anything ATi has" and kept us all in suspense... and this is what we got? LOL Fail i still running a 8800GT, i waited to see what Nvidia had to offer, now that i know that im going for a 5970 or 5990 and getting a dedicated physx card maybe a 9600gt

going to NEED to be a card of the g92 stock architecture (geforce 9 series) as a gts 250, gt200/300 and gtx 200/400 series tend to disagree with ati cards significantly

Avatar image for Ondoval
Ondoval

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 Ondoval
Member since 2005 • 3103 Posts

Sweet!

-Great preformance (as drivers mature it will only get better)

-reasonable price (which will eventually go down)

-temps... doesn't bother me (you people act like you have to sit on it or something)

-power... 100 watts more then the 5870 for about 10-15% more performance? I don't see a problem.

If only I could afford a new system... :P I think I'll just wait till the next series of DX11 cards. Although I'll go see how cheap the 5870s are going for on ebay, now that the hardcore are going to want the latest and greatest.

Sooo whats next? Intels Larrabee? :D

Rob_101

In 1 word: noise.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#100 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

BAHHH!

GTX480 is undeniable the worst card Nvidia has put out under many years, with a compleate system you'll end up at a whooping 400W! the price it skyrocket high when you compare the performance to the HD5870 witch isn't that far off performance wise.

The HD5970 runs over the gtx480 wile actually does that on less wattage and produce less noise, the dual gpu card even does run cooler with is truuly very odd...

The price of a gtx470 even lie about the HD5870 with is better on most things, including power/noise/temps!

I am seriousy vey dissapointed, this is awfull, the Fermi was HALF A YEAR later than the HD5XXX series but are worce in almoust all aspects except for tesselation witch many Nvidia fan already thinks is worthless and probably wont use anyway... :roll:

Man.. This stinks, anyone who cares for PChardware effectiviness will wait for a refresh of the Fermi or the HD6xxx cards, the HD58xx cards are the ones to get still even as the are a half year old rigth now!

Who would thougth that Nvidia was working a half year overdue to put out cards that runs hot as hell, nead to use a 700w PSU, make your ears fall off, not only thoose things... The cards aren't even for sale if you anyway would want such of a card, you'll have to get very lycky to get your hand one witch is already undeniable awfull...