Official Crysis 2 Thread! Please keep it here and share some benchmarks and pics

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#1 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Crysis 2 demo is out now. The board has started to get flooded with threads so I figured I would make one big one. Please keeep it all here.

Here's the link. It will be out on Steam on March 1st.

http://static.cdn.ea.com/crytek/u/f/crysis2/Crysis_2_Multiplayer_Demo.exe

Anyways post your benchmarks, screenshots, cheers, and jeers here please.

Avatar image for MGS-GrayFox
MGS-GrayFox

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 MGS-GrayFox
Member since 2008 • 319 Posts
I'm getting about 50 or so frames on Hardcore at 1920 x 1200 in the demo with my GTX 570. Buying another GTX 570 next week, can't wait!
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

Just did a test and I get better performance with 1 gtx570 than I do with 2. Pretty sad right there. I get about 70 average with 1 and around 50-60 with 2.

Avatar image for brandojones
brandojones

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 brandojones
Member since 2005 • 3103 Posts

Run really smooth on my GTX 260 on hardcore settings. The graphics are amazing :o. I didn't think this would run good at all but it does. I think this demo changed my mind and I might get it now.And for some reason I got a feeling of the older Unreal Tournament games :?.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
30-40fps Hardcore 1080p, GTX 280 Athlon 640@3.4ghz, 4gb DDR2-800. Not too impressed honestly.
Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts
Getting 50+fps. Screenshots: [spoiler]

[/spoiler]
Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#7 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

I'm getting about 35fps on advanced settings at 1920x1200 (rig below). Crossfire seems to be working for me, both my gpus are being utilized. Overall the gameplay was fun and will take some getting used to. I buying mostly for the single player and mods from community, MP is justa bonus for me.

Avatar image for ShimmerMan
ShimmerMan

4634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#8 ShimmerMan
Member since 2008 • 4634 Posts

COuld of at least given credit to the guy who posted the link in the first place. Instead just lock his thread, create your own, and take the link he found. Nice modding -_-.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
So far I'm not impressed. The textures are really low res and there's a lot of jaggies. It looks more on par with Singularity and definitely nothing like Crysis 1. If this is indicative of the final product I will not be buying Crysis 2. The multiplayer is definitely forgettable too. I've seen COD-clones before, but this game has taken the phrase "COD clone" to a whole new level. It's almost as if Crysis 2 is nothing more than a mod for MW2. Demos are supposed to impress and show you the best a game has to offer. If this is the best Crysis 2 has to offer, I feel confident in saying this game is going to be a massive flop.
Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#10 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11620 Posts

Its pretty fun, but honestly it looks like ass. Blurry and fuzzy. Couldn't even tell how good the textures were because of how damn blurry everything is. I tried on all 3 different graphics modes and couldn't tell a difference, performance was exactly the same as well (which was honestly pretty good).

I felt like I was playing the gamea at 1024x768 even though I set it to 1600x900 (my moniters native res).

But other than that it was great, suit powers were loads of fun and the gunplay was super tight/hit detection right on.

Avatar image for Upparoom
Upparoom

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Upparoom
Member since 2010 • 2111 Posts

My GTS 450 ran it pretty decently(24fps-30 on 1650x1050 and 1920x1080 on hardcore though :cry: )

I didn't find the gameplay particularly that fun or engaging, and it felt like COD with gimmicky suit powers and acrobatics. I've already uninstalled it :|.

Avatar image for MGS-GrayFox
MGS-GrayFox

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 MGS-GrayFox
Member since 2008 • 319 Posts

I think it's alot of fun, it just needs to be 8 v 8. I noticed in the other thread ppl were complaining about only being able to use preset classes. You know you have to unlock the ability to make cutom classes right? Also you can see stealthed opponents using a visor (forgot what it's called)

Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts

Its pretty fun, but honestly it looks like ass. Blurry and fuzzy. Couldn't even tell how good the textures were because of how damn blurry everything is. I tried on all 3 different graphics modes and couldn't tell a difference, performance was exactly the same as well (which was honestly pretty good).

I felt like I was playing the gamea at 1024x768 even though I set it to 1600x900 (my moniters native res).

But other than that it was great, suit powers were loads of fun and the gunplay was super tight/hit detection right on.

with_teeth26
Really? Playing on hardcore at 1920x1080 felt quite beautiful. Looked a little better than Crysis, in my opinion. Vanilla, of course.
Avatar image for KillerJuan77
KillerJuan77

3823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 KillerJuan77
Member since 2007 • 3823 Posts

I liked it, great graphics and performance, pretty fun to play too.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#15 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

It's at 45-70FPS(mostly 50-60) on hardcore settings with a Athlon II X4 645, 1GB GTX 460 and DDR2 RAM. Pretty good for someone who has a decent PC.:P

Also, I got most valuable player in my 1st match.

Avatar image for Upparoom
Upparoom

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Upparoom
Member since 2010 • 2111 Posts

[QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

Its pretty fun, but honestly it looks like ass. Blurry and fuzzy. Couldn't even tell how good the textures were because of how damn blurry everything is. I tried on all 3 different graphics modes and couldn't tell a difference, performance was exactly the same as well (which was honestly pretty good).

I felt like I was playing the gamea at 1024x768 even though I set it to 1600x900 (my moniters native res).

But other than that it was great, suit powers were loads of fun and the gunplay was super tight/hit detection right on.

SoraX64

Really? Playing on hardcore at 1920x1080 felt quite beautiful. Looked a little better than Crysis, in my opinion. Vanilla, of course.

I still looked a little blurry to me on 1080, but that's probably because I was getting like 22fps :P.

The post processing motion blur is tad overbearing, so I can see why it'd look a bit blurry. If only we could, you know, tweak the settings(hint hint Crytek)or something.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

It's at 45-70FPS(mostly 50-60) on hardcore settings with a Athlon II X4 645, 1GB GTX 460 and DDR2 RAM. Pretty good for someone who has a decent PC.:P

Also, I got most valuable player in my 1st match.

mitu123

Same with MVP on 1st match, i had a K/D of 10 to one and captured two of the drop things

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="Upparoom"]

[QUOTE="SoraX64"][QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

Its pretty fun, but honestly it looks like ass. Blurry and fuzzy. Couldn't even tell how good the textures were because of how damn blurry everything is. I tried on all 3 different graphics modes and couldn't tell a difference, performance was exactly the same as well (which was honestly pretty good).

I felt like I was playing the gamea at 1024x768 even though I set it to 1600x900 (my moniters native res).

But other than that it was great, suit powers were loads of fun and the gunplay was super tight/hit detection right on.

Really? Playing on hardcore at 1920x1080 felt quite beautiful. Looked a little better than Crysis, in my opinion. Vanilla, of course.

I still looked a little blurry to me on 1080, but that's probably because I was getting like 22fps :P.

The post processing motion blur is tad overbearing, so I can see why it'd look a bit blurry. If only we could, you know, tweak the settings(hint hint Crytek)or something.

Naw, the game is blurry.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Nothing impressed me about the game.

Avatar image for ATLReppa770
ATLReppa770

4208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ATLReppa770
Member since 2005 • 4208 Posts

COuld of at least given credit to the guy who posted the link in the first place. Instead just lock his thread, create your own, and take the link he found. Nice modding -_-.

ShimmerMan
I was thinkin' the same thing.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#21 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

It's at 45-70FPS(mostly 50-60) on hardcore settings with a Athlon II X4 645, 1GB GTX 460 and DDR2 RAM. Pretty good for someone who has a decent PC.:P

Also, I got most valuable player in my 1st match.

ferret-gamer

Same with MVP on 1st match, i had a K/D of 10 to one and captured two of the drop things

You are awesome.:o There was one guy that try to give me trouble though, but my team won regardless.:P

Avatar image for HeavenIceDay
HeavenIceDay

798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 HeavenIceDay
Member since 2004 • 798 Posts

Playing on hardcore at 1920x1080 no vsync i'm getting 50-80 fps. It looks so smooth and beautiful :D Can't wait to see what the game will be like in dx11.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
My original thoughts were right, consolized garbage. MATCH MAKING P2P garbage, and all that crap. I'd rather play MW2 again.
Avatar image for Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Ikuto_Tsukiyomi

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Member since 2010 • 822 Posts

Playing this at 800x600 will be a pain :P, Had to redownload file corrupted on me.

Avatar image for HeavenIceDay
HeavenIceDay

798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 HeavenIceDay
Member since 2004 • 798 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

It's at 45-70FPS(mostly 50-60) on hardcore settings with a Athlon II X4 645, 1GB GTX 460 and DDR2 RAM. Pretty good for someone who has a decent PC.:P

Also, I got most valuable player in my 1st match.

mitu123

Same with MVP on 1st match, i had a K/D of 10 to one and captured two of the drop things

You are awesome.:o There was one guy that try to give me trouble though, but my team won regardless.:P

I got MVP on my 2nd match :D 9 kills, 3 deaths. The game runs amazing and i noticed little to no lag.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#26 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
My original thoughts were right, consolized garbage. MATCH MAKING P2P garbage, and all that crap. I'd rather play MW2 again.JigglyWiggly_
Uh I thought there were dedicated servers?
Avatar image for KillerJuan77
KillerJuan77

3823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 KillerJuan77
Member since 2007 • 3823 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]My original thoughts were right, consolized garbage. MATCH MAKING P2P garbage, and all that crap. I'd rather play MW2 again.nutcrackr
Uh I thought there were dedicated servers?

They are dedicated servers. People in the PC forums like to whine about EVERYTHING.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

My original thoughts were right, consolized garbage. MATCH MAKING P2P garbage, and all that crap. I'd rather play MW2 again.JigglyWiggly_

What ever gave you the impression that this is P2P:?

Avatar image for Upparoom
Upparoom

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Upparoom
Member since 2010 • 2111 Posts

[QUOTE="nutcrackr"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]My original thoughts were right, consolized garbage. MATCH MAKING P2P garbage, and all that crap. I'd rather play MW2 again.KillerJuan77

Uh I thought there were dedicated servers?

They are dedicated servers. People in the PC forums like to whine about EVERYTHING.

Call me crazy, but I think I'd rather have matchmaking. 12 player limit and short matches aren't exactly fun with a server browser.

Avatar image for sinpkr
sinpkr

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 sinpkr
Member since 2010 • 1255 Posts

i dont know it dosent look that amazing. 40s and up with my 6870 only dipping when recording in fraps. game dosent look as good as i thought it would , but i have to say the guns look much nicer in this one

12 player limit is a downer. hope it isnt like that in the full game

Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts
It runs well on my 9800gtx on hardcore. Not sure of the fps. As for the actual game, the jumping up ledges and falling stomp are really the only especially interesting things to me. Otherwise, not a fan.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#33 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Just did a test and I get better performance with 1 gtx570 than I do with 2. Pretty sad right there. I get about 70 average with 1 and around 50-60 with 2.

millerlight89

Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#34 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

Just did a test and I get better performance with 1 gtx570 than I do with 2. Pretty sad right there. I get about 70 average with 1 and around 50-60 with 2.

Elann2008

Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

Just did a test and I get better performance with 1 gtx570 than I do with 2. Pretty sad right there. I get about 70 average with 1 and around 50-60 with 2.

mitu123

Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

Its just lazyness, sli is becoming more and more popuar. Yet why doesn't every game ship with it. But what do you expect from a demo that only dx9.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#36 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

James161324

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

Its just lazyness, sli is becoming more and more popuar. Yet why doesn't every game ship with it. But what do you expect from a demo that only dx9.

Exactly.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#37 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

I guess there is one simple thing in the demo which perfectly sums up the PC-Version of the Game:

"Press Start to Begin"

Good night.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#38 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

Just did a test and I get better performance with 1 gtx570 than I do with 2. Pretty sad right there. I get about 70 average with 1 and around 50-60 with 2.

mitu123

Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

I hope so. If the full game doesn't support sli then I'll end up buying a GTX 580. Based on Crysis 2 and games that have been released already, i don't see the point of sli any more. I thought I was making an "upgrade" when I went dual gpu. Not so much as I thought. Maybe one day when it's implemented in 90% of games, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
Avatar image for Ownsin
Ownsin

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Ownsin
Member since 2007 • 1331 Posts
[QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

COuld of at least given credit to the guy who posted the link in the first place. Instead just lock his thread, create your own, and take the link he found. Nice modding -_-.

ATLReppa770
I was thinkin' the same thing.

Agreed! wrong move Mod!
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

James161324

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

Its just lazyness, sli is becoming more and more popuar. Yet why doesn't every game ship with it. But what do you expect from a demo that only dx9.

The hilarious thing is that SLI has been around since the 90s and multi-GPU cards actually used to be the NORM, and yet here we are in 2011 where gaming has become so consolized that PC game developers can't even take advantage of hardware features over a decade old.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

Elann2008

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

I hope so. If the full game doesn't support sli then I'll end up buying a GTX 580. Based on Crysis 2 and games that have been released already, i don't see the point of sli any more. I thought I was making an "upgrade" when I went dual gpu. Not so much as I thought. Maybe one day when it's implemented in 90% of games, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

This is the only game that doesn't scale well with SLI. Other than old games like Silent Hill and such.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

I guess there is one simple thing in the demo which perfectly sums up the PC-Version of the Game:

"Press Start to Begin"

Good night.

millerlight89

Yea, I hate to say it but this is right. I'm already starting to feel buyer's remorse on my preorder. I want my money back. :( Apparently there are rumors of some people getting their hands on a very recent build of the game and there still isn't any DX10/DX11 implementation. Scary.

And what's with the stuttering mouse controls? Apparently some people have it and some people don't. Anybody know of a fix?

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

gameguy6700

Its just lazyness, sli is becoming more and more popuar. Yet why doesn't every game ship with it. But what do you expect from a demo that only dx9.

The hilarious thing is that SLI has been around since the 90s and multi-GPU cards actually used to be the NORM, and yet here we are in 2011 where gaming has become so consolized that PC game developers can't even take advantage of hardware features over a decade old.

Really i didn't know that. That makes it sader. It seemed that more games were going to use it, battlefield 3 has already been confirmed by the developers and so has homefront. But Crytek a dev that was pc and crysis 1 scaled decently on sli. Just being lazy with this demo is showing the sad state of the gaming industry. Its not really the framerate that bothers me, 40+ fps is more than fine, its the lazyness of the develpers.

But most games scale on sli, not 100 percent as it should be, but a majority usually has around 50 percent scalling.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

I guess there is one simple thing in the demo which perfectly sums up the PC-Version of the Game:

"Press Start to Begin"

Good night.

millerlight89

I don't see your point at all. Especially considering that the menus and gameplay feel just fine.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

I guess there is one simple thing in the demo which perfectly sums up the PC-Version of the Game:

"Press Start to Begin"

Good night.

JangoWuzHere

I don't see your point at all. Especially considering that the menus and gameplay feel just fine.

Its refering to how half assed the demo is. That they pretty much just took the 360 verision and threw it on the pc.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#46 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

Elann2008

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

I hope so. If the full game doesn't support sli then I'll end up buying a GTX 580. Based on Crysis 2 and games that have been released already, i don't see the point of sli any more. I thought I was making an "upgrade" when I went dual gpu. Not so much as I thought. Maybe one day when it's implemented in 90% of games, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

Which doesn't make sense seeing how many games in the past supported it well, BC2 being a great example as some guy got up to 150FPS with 2 460s. What other games don't scale well with SLI?

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#47 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

millerlight89

I hope so. If the full game doesn't support sli then I'll end up buying a GTX 580. Based on Crysis 2 and games that have been released already, i don't see the point of sli any more. I thought I was making an "upgrade" when I went dual gpu. Not so much as I thought. Maybe one day when it's implemented in 90% of games, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

This is the only game that doesn't scale well with SLI. Other than old games like Silent Hill and such.

Yup.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#48 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mkay. I think I'm going to sell my other GTX 460 now. Or perhaps both and buy a GTX 570 or 580. I'm really disappointed with the lack of sli support/scaling in games. In new games, it should be implemented.

James161324

I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

Its just lazyness, sli is becoming more and more popuar. Yet why doesn't every game ship with it. But what do you expect from a demo that only dx9.

I'm just hoping that's only for demo purposes, would be odd if the full game doesn't support it. I was thinking about getting another GTX 460 for this game, but after hearing how it doesn't take advantage of it, I might as well improve my cpu and get new ram, mine is FAR from the best anyways.:P

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I honestly don't understand why games like that don't support SLI, it's just getting out of hands IMO. I'm hoping the full game does, hell, even the original does.

mitu123

I hope so. If the full game doesn't support sli then I'll end up buying a GTX 580. Based on Crysis 2 and games that have been released already, i don't see the point of sli any more. I thought I was making an "upgrade" when I went dual gpu. Not so much as I thought. Maybe one day when it's implemented in 90% of games, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

Which doesn't make sense seeing how many games in the past supported it well, BC2 being a great example as some guy got up to 150FPS with 2 460s. What other games don't scale well with SLI?

And bc2 is a crap console port, which is the funny part of it. BC2 is around a 50 percent improvement with sli.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

I guess there is one simple thing in the demo which perfectly sums up the PC-Version of the Game:

"Press Start to Begin"

Good night.

James161324

I don't see your point at all. Especially considering that the menus and gameplay feel just fine.

Its refering to how half assed the demo is. That they pretty much just took the 360 verision and threw it on the pc.

So when Dragon Age 2 says "press any key" that means its a 360 port I'm guessing?