I was playing a bit yeaterday. I did play extensively Crysis Wars in the past (over 320 hours), and more than 130 hours betwee Crysis & Warhead campaigns. My impressions:
Playing at hardcore settings, at 2560 x 1440, with a i720, 6 GB of RAM and with a 5870 under W7 Ultimate 64:
The good: excellent performance, around 35 fps average despite the huge resolution; the framerrate was always solid and smooth.
The bad: eveything else. The menu is horrible, worst one for a PC port since UT III; the lack of options is abysmal, doesn't support console commands; the temporal antialiasing filter is beyond awful and combined with the over the top HDR and the motion blur makes the game the fps with the worst image quality I saw in my life. As long as yo ustat to move everything turns blurry; cloack mode is unnecesary, due the high contrast between areas, the TAA and HDR makes you constantly unaware about what the hell is happening around you.
Gameplay wise, the need to hold the right mouse bottun in orderto keep the zoom entirely destroys the gunplay to me. You can kill fast, but your movements are slow and the "nanosuit supersoldier" moves like a fat turtle. The game lacks deep in the teamwork department; as COD, is a run 'n gun. To nail the coffin, uses Gamespy as network (not as bad as GFWL, but not much better, to be honest).
Big dissapoint. Feels and looks as a console game, with console graphics, controls and options. I was waiting the demo to chose between the nano edition of the game and the regular one and today I'm chgoosing between buying the game at the release or waiting for a sale a few months after...
Log in to comment