XXXXXX

211 results
1
2
3
4
5

This topic is locked from further discussion.

1398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1398 Posts

robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

[QUOTE="Gzus666"] the fastest supercomputer in the world can do 1 petaflops, looks like we lose. give it 5-10 years, and that will be the norm for computers, and we dont get to upgrade. it will happenXanog1

So I can't upgrade my RAM?

Oh man, now I won't be able to run the marathon. :(

cute response, i will take that as a concession to the fact that computers will outdo us

17 years ago

8196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 LiquidMetal14

Member since 2003 • 8196 Posts

I just wrote MIT and they banned me from ever writing letters to them again.....Thank topic creator!!!! :cry:

17 years ago

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 124 Posts

smarter isnt just defined as who has more knowledge...coz its a computer so it has all the knowledge we have ever had as humans....
smarter is who can come on top and live
if it is human vs. ps3
human kicks A$$

17 years ago

1146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1146 Posts

Yes, I'd assume that we are smarter than melted sand and bits of hardened pertroleum.
Well, maybe some of us aren't, but thats besides the point.
Xanog1

what happened to u leaving gs...........

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

tour welcome.

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

[QUOTE="vip3r666"]robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

as i clearly stated above, the fastest supercomputer on the planet can do 1 petaflops. in 5-10 years, a reasonable computer will be able to do this, while supercomputers will be blazing well past that. the human brain just cant keep up with something that is easily upgraded so quickly. once the robots are equipped with this sort of computing ability, combined with future AI, they will have the ability to learn. once they can learn, they can easily pick up more information than we could ever dream of having, and easily use all of it(while we on the other hand, can rarely use everything we have learned effectively because of memory and storage issues, all the calculating in the world wont help if you cant remember it all or comprehend it)then eventually they could use this information to make upgraded forms of themselves, no longer needing our help. this would effectively remove us from the loop, making us obsolete basically.

17 years ago

4061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 4061 Posts

Well I know you arn'tSe7enwolf101

Well, I know you aren't either :\

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

how do you now all that stuff?

17 years ago

3351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 3351 Posts

ACCUALLY we arent smarter than alot of man made tecnology because it took millions of people to make that 1 thing because 1 person alone couldnt :)

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

i wish i knew all that stuff.

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

ACCUALLY we arent smarter than alot of man made tecnology because it took millions of people to make that 1 thing because 1 person alone couldnt :)Roushrsh

another fine point, rarely does 1 person make a new technology or theory, and no 1 person has been able to even begin to contain a large amount of in depth physics knowledge. its just too much for the human brain to handle, have to take it as parts.

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

your smart.

17 years ago

4061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 4061 Posts

[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="vip3r666"]robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

as i clearly stated above, the fastest supercomputer on the planet can do 1 petaflops. in 5-10 years, a reasonable computer will be able to do this, while supercomputers will be blazing well past that. the human brain just cant keep up with something that is easily upgraded so quickly. once the robots are equipped with this sort of computing ability, combined with future AI, they will have the ability to learn. once they can learn, they can easily pick up more information than we could ever dream of having, and easily use all of it(while we on the other hand, can rarely use everything we have learned effectively because of memory and storage issues, all the calculating in the world wont help if you cant remember it all or comprehend it)then eventually they could use this information to make upgraded forms of themselves, no longer needing our help. this would effectively remove us from the loop, making us obsolete basically.

You know deep down that none of that crazy sh!t will actually happen

17 years ago

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 xxalucard66xx

Member since 2006 • 51 Posts

Well, currently, we are smarter then computers. Not because we make them, but because they currently don't have the ability to learn. Sure it's intelligent, but only so far as it's programmed. Besides, not all humans have the same level of intelligence. Look at Eintstein, Tesla, Eddison, are any of us as smart as them? Possibly, the average human uses I believe less then 10% of their brain. The chances of us using more is well....declining. Were relying on computers more and more. Eventually, we will make computers that can learn and judge situations, and at that time, computers may well be more intelligent then us. Either that or we'll end up nuking each other before then, in any case. At this time, yes we are, or atleast, most of us. *coughs*Bush*coughs*

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

tour smart too.

17 years ago

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

If U R Smarter Than A Ps3 Can U Please Make Me Another One!! BecauseThe Last Time I Checked My Body Diidn't Have 3 Cell Processors!

17 years ago

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 xxalucard66xx

Member since 2006 • 51 Posts

I don't have the knowledge to make one, but that's my point, I could LEARN to make one. A machine can make other machines only so long as humans teach them how. They still are limited by the fact that we teach them, when computers can learn on their own, then they will be smarter.

*edit*

Oh, our bodies may not have 3 cell processors, but it has a brain. An organ that has the potential to be infinitely powerful mental wise. But we don't use our brains to their full potential. If we did, hell we'd probably be able to cure cancer by mere will and thought.

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

you have me there.

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

Well, currently, we are smarter then computers. Not because we make them, but because they currently don't have the ability to learn. Sure it's intelligent, but only so far as it's programmed. Besides, not all humans have the same level of intelligence. Look at Eintstein, Tesla, Eddison, are any of us as smart as them? Possibly, the average human uses I believe less then 10% of their brain. The chances of us using more is well....declining. Were relying on computers more and more. Eventually, we will make computers that can learn and judge situations, and at that time, computers may well be more intelligent then us. Either that or we'll end up nuking each other before then, in any case. At this time, yes we are, or atleast, most of us. *coughs*Bush*coughs*xxalucard66xx

the 10% of your brain thing is a myth, you use all your brain, just not at once, cause it wouldnt make sense to do so as each section has its own purpose. why use your emotion portion to make calculations? anyway, your right, right now, they are not more intelligent, but i promise you this, they will be smarter than us as long as we continue making technology updates like we are. its just bound to happen, cause we are merely organic computers. initially they will have to be programmed, but you have to program a child if you want to get technical.

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

your to smart for me.

17 years ago

__King_Laharl__

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 __King_Laharl__

Member since 2007 • 116 Posts

Do you mean : "Are we smarter then the Ps3?"? The way your typing doesn't show that you are! :lol:

17 years ago

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 xxalucard66xx

Member since 2006 • 51 Posts

The 10% thing is not a myth. Why is it that I'm more intelligent then some of my friends, and can learn faster then them? Why is it that previous geniuses were geniuses and we aren't? Every person uses different amounts of their brain's power, but the average is below 10%. Back on topic though. Give it a couple years and computers will be smarter then us, because in truth, we don't WANT to be smart, we want a robot to do everything for us.

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

The 10% thing is not a myth. Why is it that I'm more intelligent then some of my friends, and can learn faster then them? Why is it that previous geniuses were geniuses and we aren't? Every person uses different amounts of their brain's power, but the average is below 10%. Back on topic though. Give it a couple years and computers will be smarter then us, because in truth, we don't WANT to be smart, we want a robot to do everything for us.
xxalucard66xx

all of your brain gets used, want proof? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_brain "Although folklore would have it that about 90% of the human brain is dormant, this has proven scientifically unfounded. The fact that ~10% of neurons in the brain fire at any one time is a possible source of this misconception. (If a large percentage of the neurons were to fire at the same time, the result would be a grand mal seizure.)" you cant use all of your brain at the same time, especially for thought. part of your brain is dedicated to involuntary movements (heart, breathing, etc) obviously you couldnt use those for thought. you have a portion of your brain that decodes senses and pain, obviously not used for thought.

17 years ago

1552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1552 Posts

[QUOTE="MrFizzle"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="vip3r666"]robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

as i clearly stated above, the fastest supercomputer on the planet can do 1 petaflops. in 5-10 years, a reasonable computer will be able to do this, while supercomputers will be blazing well past that. the human brain just cant keep up with something that is easily upgraded so quickly. once the robots are equipped with this sort of computing ability, combined with future AI, they will have the ability to learn. once they can learn, they can easily pick up more information than we could ever dream of having, and easily use all of it(while we on the other hand, can rarely use everything we have learned effectively because of memory and storage issues, all the calculating in the world wont help if you cant remember it all or comprehend it)then eventually they could use this information to make upgraded forms of themselves, no longer needing our help. this would effectively remove us from the loop, making us obsolete basically.

You know deep down that none of that crazy sh!t will actually happen

Roflcopter and no, the PS3 isnt smarter than me, I canhear music, play games and fart at the same time, something the PS3 cant

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

[QUOTE="Tlahui"][QUOTE="MrFizzle"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="vip3r666"]robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

as i clearly stated above, the fastest supercomputer on the planet can do 1 petaflops. in 5-10 years, a reasonable computer will be able to do this, while supercomputers will be blazing well past that. the human brain just cant keep up with something that is easily upgraded so quickly. once the robots are equipped with this sort of computing ability, combined with future AI, they will have the ability to learn. once they can learn, they can easily pick up more information than we could ever dream of having, and easily use all of it(while we on the other hand, can rarely use everything we have learned effectively because of memory and storage issues, all the calculating in the world wont help if you cant remember it all or comprehend it)then eventually they could use this information to make upgraded forms of themselves, no longer needing our help. this would effectively remove us from the loop, making us obsolete basically.

You know deep down that none of that crazy sh!t will actually happen

Roflcopter and no, the PS3 isnt smarter than me, I canhear music, play games and fart at the same time, something the PS3 cant

something only the smartest of creatures do

17 years ago

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 xxalucard66xx

Member since 2006 • 51 Posts

I guess I wasn't clear in my example. Some people can handle more neurons being fired off then others. Can you make cold fusion? I highly doubt it. Some people are smarter then others, their brains are more developed. Besides, I don't believe wikipedia, a 10 year old can edit the friggin' articles how the hell am I supposed to find it to be reliant??

17 years ago

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 xxalucard66xx

Member since 2006 • 51 Posts

[QUOTE="Tlahui"][QUOTE="MrFizzle"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="vip3r666"]robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

as i clearly stated above, the fastest supercomputer on the planet can do 1 petaflops. in 5-10 years, a reasonable computer will be able to do this, while supercomputers will be blazing well past that. the human brain just cant keep up with something that is easily upgraded so quickly. once the robots are equipped with this sort of computing ability, combined with future AI, they will have the ability to learn. once they can learn, they can easily pick up more information than we could ever dream of having, and easily use all of it(while we on the other hand, can rarely use everything we have learned effectively because of memory and storage issues, all the calculating in the world wont help if you cant remember it all or comprehend it)then eventually they could use this information to make upgraded forms of themselves, no longer needing our help. this would effectively remove us from the loop, making us obsolete basically.

You know deep down that none of that crazy sh!t will actually happen

Roflcopter and no, the PS3 isnt smarter than me, I canhear music, play games and fart at the same time, something the PS3 cant

The PS3 can control god knows how many AI enemy units all at the same time, how many people can you control at once in a game?

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

I guess I wasn't clear in my example. Some people can handle more neurons being fired off then others. Can you make cold fusion? I highly doubt it. Some people are smarter then others, their brains are more developed. Besides, I don't believe wikipedia, a 10 year old can edit the friggin' articles how the hell am I supposed to find it to be reliant??
xxalucard66xx

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm theres another source for you spanky. you ever notice how really intelligent people are usually only good at one thing? and i dont mean kind of intelligent, i mean the extremely intelligent, like einstein, he was considered retarded by his peers and teachers, but was amazing with math. stop making such simple conclusions on something which is more complicated than anyone knows at this point. they are still decoding the brain, and figuring these things out, but it is a cold hard fact that we use all our brains

17 years ago

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 xxalucard66xx

Member since 2006 • 51 Posts

[QUOTE="xxalucard66xx"]
I guess I wasn't clear in my example. Some people can handle more neurons being fired off then others. Can you make cold fusion? I highly doubt it. Some people are smarter then others, their brains are more developed. Besides, I don't believe wikipedia, a 10 year old can edit the friggin' articles how the hell am I supposed to find it to be reliant??
Gzus666

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm theres another source for you spanky. you ever notice how really intelligent people are usually only good at one thing? and i dont mean kind of intelligent, i mean the extremely intelligent, like einstein, he was considered retarded by his peers and teachers, but was amazing with math. stop making such simple conclusions on something which is more complicated than anyone knows at this point. they are still decoding the brain, and figuring these things out, but it is a cold hard fact that we use all our brains

You said it yourself, we're still decoding the brain and understanding it. It's more complicated then anything we can understand, so how is it cold hard fact? Sure, I said I believe we use less then 10% of our brains. Maybe I'm wrong, sure, but how do you know you're right? Are you god? If you are then I'll be damned I need to kick your ass for alot of things then.

Whatever let's just all shut up and agree, were smarter then the PS3, and until we make machines that can learn on their own, we will be smarter.

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

http://tafkac.org/science/10_percent_of_brain.html here is another source denouncing your 10% BS theory. seems the scientific community thinks your wrong

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="xxalucard66xx"]
I guess I wasn't clear in my example. Some people can handle more neurons being fired off then others. Can you make cold fusion? I highly doubt it. Some people are smarter then others, their brains are more developed. Besides, I don't believe wikipedia, a 10 year old can edit the friggin' articles how the hell am I supposed to find it to be reliant??
xxalucard66xx

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm theres another source for you spanky. you ever notice how really intelligent people are usually only good at one thing? and i dont mean kind of intelligent, i mean the extremely intelligent, like einstein, he was considered retarded by his peers and teachers, but was amazing with math. stop making such simple conclusions on something which is more complicated than anyone knows at this point. they are still decoding the brain, and figuring these things out, but it is a cold hard fact that we use all our brains

You said it yourself, we're still decoding the brain and understanding it. It's more complicated then anything we can understand, so how is it cold hard fact? Sure, I said I believe we use less then 10% of our brains. Maybe I'm wrong, sure, but how do you know you're right? Are you god? If you are then I'll be damned I need to kick your ass for alot of things then.

Whatever let's just all shut up and agree, were smarter then the PS3, and until we make machines that can learn on their own, we will be smarter.

here is a simple example used in the article you obviously didnt read. if you get brain damage, and you only use 10% of your brain, logically unless you damaged that 10%, it would go unnoticed right? next they have scans that can show neuron impulses, clearly showing that all your brain is used. nice job on not reading it though. cute god reference, im sure the complacency that comes from thinking a higher power has all the answers for you is a nice way to take yourself off the hook of using any logic or reasoning on anything, go team

17 years ago

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Acidrain1988

Member since 2006 • 603 Posts

[QUOTE="xxalucard66xx"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="xxalucard66xx"]
I guess I wasn't clear in my example. Some people can handle more neurons being fired off then others. Can you make cold fusion? I highly doubt it. Some people are smarter then others, their brains are more developed. Besides, I don't believe wikipedia, a 10 year old can edit the friggin' articles how the hell am I supposed to find it to be reliant??
Gzus666

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm theres another source for you spanky. you ever notice how really intelligent people are usually only good at one thing? and i dont mean kind of intelligent, i mean the extremely intelligent, like einstein, he was considered retarded by his peers and teachers, but was amazing with math. stop making such simple conclusions on something which is more complicated than anyone knows at this point. they are still decoding the brain, and figuring these things out, but it is a cold hard fact that we use all our brains

You said it yourself, we're still decoding the brain and understanding it. It's more complicated then anything we can understand, so how is it cold hard fact? Sure, I said I believe we use less then 10% of our brains. Maybe I'm wrong, sure, but how do you know you're right? Are you god? If you are then I'll be damned I need to kick your ass for alot of things then.

Whatever let's just all shut up and agree, were smarter then the PS3, and until we make machines that can learn on their own, we will be smarter.

here is a simple example used in the article you obviously didnt read. if you get brain damage, and you only use 10% of your brain, logically unless you damaged that 10%, it would go unnoticed right? next they have scans that can show neuron impulses, clearly showing that all your brain is used. nice job on not reading it though. cute god reference, im sure the complacency that comes from thinking a higher power has all the answers for you is a nice way to take yourself off the hook of using any logic or reasoning on anything, go team

sorry im not taking sides here but its not like a chunck of the brain in the corner is the 10% we use, the 10% could be used throughout, and maybe he didnt mean mass, what if we only use 10% of what the brain is capable? (not saying either is right or wrong, just saying we are leap and bounds and light years smarter then a ps3)

17 years ago

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts

you couldnt use all your brain, cause you would have a seizure, i linked that too. the portions of your brain needed for a particular task are used, it would be silly for your brain not to. we may have more knowledge than the PS3, but only because of a lack of self contained AI. given time, computers will have self contained AI and learning(they already can make decisions with AI, even in non logical situations, its called fuzzy logic, its been around for a while now)and they will surpass us. its just how it will happen, its impossible to deny if you have any thought behind your answer. and for the cute flops comparison of the brain, lets remember that at least half of the brain is not used for calculations of thought at all, most of it being used for involuntary actions, artistic thoughts, sensory reception, etc. its rather pitiful how much you people try to act like your smarter than it just cause of what its made of. how many of you can cleanly run a game at 1080P 60fps? none? thought so, not so fun when someone uses those same BS examples the other way huh. it will be some time before robots can out think us, but it will come.

17 years ago

__King_Laharl__

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 __King_Laharl__

Member since 2007 • 116 Posts

Wow, these posts links are very nice. I've learned a thing or two!

17 years ago

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Acidrain1988

Member since 2006 • 603 Posts

you couldnt use all your brain, cause you would have a seizure, i linked that too. the portions of your brain needed for a particular task are used, it would be silly for your brain not to. we may have more knowledge than the PS3, but only because of a lack of self contained AI. given time, computers will have self contained AI and learning(they already can make decisions with AI, even in non logical situations, its called fuzzy logic, its been around for a while now)and they will surpass us. its just how it will happen, its impossible to deny if you have any thought behind your answer. and for the cute flops comparison of the brain, lets remember that at least half of the brain is not used for calculations of thought at all, most of it being used for involuntary actions, artistic thoughts, sensory reception, etc. its rather pitiful how much you people try to act like your smarter than it just cause of what its made of. how many of you can cleanly run a game at 1080P 60fps? none? thought so, not so fun when someone uses those same BS examples the other way huh. it will be some time before robots can out think us, but it will come.Gzus666

i agree, first you need to define by what you mean by smarter. i do think computers will get smarter and smarter and even tho AI could get very smart, i dont think anything will ever equal a human brain unless it is made from biological compnents. like no matter how smart a computer is it will never be aware of its on mortality because it dosnt have one, so there we cant be equal, that also cant be measured in illteligence

17 years ago

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 8430 Posts

lol i gotta admit this is the best thread i've had in months here in the ps3 forum.. lol all i've been hearing is talk about trolls and gs and ratings and more trolls lol i like this thread and i do think the ps3 has a secret AI slumbering between it's chips! just wait for an update SONY will launch operation: PAIN SYSTEM 3 RAWR!

17 years ago

292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 292 Posts

[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Tlahui"][QUOTE="MrFizzle"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="vip3r666"]robots are very simplistic machines.

and the human processing power isnt based only on speculation.

"A human brain's probable processing power is around 100 teraflops, roughly 100 trillion calculations per second, according to Hans Morvec, principal research scientist at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. This is based on factoring the capability of the brain's 100 billion neurons, each with over 1,000 connections to other neurons, with each connection capable of performing about 200 calculations per second."

as i clearly stated above, the fastest supercomputer on the planet can do 1 petaflops. in 5-10 years, a reasonable computer will be able to do this, while supercomputers will be blazing well past that. the human brain just cant keep up with something that is easily upgraded so quickly. once the robots are equipped with this sort of computing ability, combined with future AI, they will have the ability to learn. once they can learn, they can easily pick up more information than we could ever dream of having, and easily use all of it(while we on the other hand, can rarely use everything we have learned effectively because of memory and storage issues, all the calculating in the world wont help if you cant remember it all or comprehend it)then eventually they could use this information to make upgraded forms of themselves, no longer needing our help. this would effectively remove us from the loop, making us obsolete basically.

You know deep down that none of that crazy sh!t will actually happen

Roflcopter and no, the PS3 isnt smarter than me, I canhear music, play games and fart at the same time, something the PS3 cant

something only the smartest of creatures do

LMAO

17 years ago

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 ssvegeta555

Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts

This is a very thought provoking thread and a great read.

Though I remember reading that the brain can, for the lack of better words, output at around 10 petaflops. But, don't take my word on it, I'm not so sure myself. :P

17 years ago

AllSystemsRocks

1079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 AllSystemsRocks

Member since 2005 • 1079 Posts

I can turn on and off my PS3 ...ok yeah it can also do that with me I'm confused %"$/$?%&

17 years ago

1103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1103 Posts

Well I know you arn'tSe7enwolf101

Great call.

17 years ago

1739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1739 Posts

We are smarter because we think, imagine, and try to create. Computers just follow programs that we set out for them.

17 years ago

1886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 zero_cool098

Member since 2006 • 1886 Posts

the ps3 can just process information faster than us thats alll.....but we humans have the ideas and manipulating abilities, which makes us smarter (by a large margin compared to ps3, which makes this post sound so stupid)

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

wow r u guys genuses?

17 years ago

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Member since 2005 • 1864 Posts

the matrix??? lol, jk

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

ha what?

17 years ago

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 248 Posts

[QUOTE="shuriken_ninja"]how mamy of us think were as smart or smater than the ps3?comissario

everyone is smarter than the ps3 ok. if humans invent something it means they're smarter than the thing they invented ok. i guess ur the only human dummer than the ps3 excluding the mentally ill (no offense to them)

yeah but not evryone in the world invented the ps3, if sumone stuk u down with a hole heap of stuff i doubt you could invnt one, although saying that i still think his is a stupid pointles question, damn teenagers and there drugs

17 years ago

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Member since 2005 • 1864 Posts

in the matrix machines are smarter than humans. it was a joke.

17 years ago

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 shuriken_ninja

Member since 2006 • 1161 Posts

oh ha!and oh_its_on is right not every one invented the ps3.

17 years ago

211 results
1
2
3
4
5

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment