[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="comissario"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="comissario"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="comissario"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="vip3r666"]the processing power of the ps3 is 1% that of the human brain. of course, in some cases (george dubya bush) the brain's processing power is .1% that of the ps3's :Dcomissariowhere did you get this stat? computers can out process us by miles, and have a larger capacity for information please go to school. computers can never out process us. if we could put our processing power in a computer, the computer would be almost flawless just like how we are almost flawless? oh wait, we arent. not sure what this has to do with processing, we cant come close. tell me when you can crunch trillions of mathematical equations at a time, and we will talk. supercomputers have been out processing us for years.
show me video evidence of a supercomputer controlling all of our bodily functions then i'll believe that supercomputers out process humans
how is that complicated? there would be no reason for it, and since they use simple machines to control hearts (pace makers) lungs(breathing machines) its a simple electronic impulse to make the muscle contract. you seem to overrate the human body. they have made an artificial stomach that can digest. all these things will easily be reproduced. but why would a computer need to do this? there is no reason, it could be done with the correct programming, as computers can do more than us on a computational level. how many humans can run modern jets by themselves? most of the functions are computer controlled, with the basic things a human input, but can be easily controlled by computers. you make a simple argument, and a silly comparison. when it comes down to it, we are talking about intelligence, and computers will beat us. ok smarty (or maybe not) pants i wanna see you substitute your brain for a super computer and let's see if you're gonna be very smart. why are some scientists considering uusing dna to power super computers (atlhough not possible yet), because there isn't anything better than a human. i guess you are one of those ignorant people, maybe a brit? well americans can be ignorant too. not sure where you get the DNA powered super computers, would love to see that in writing. at this point, you couldnt directly throw in a computer, cause like i said, they are still working on proper AI. AI will eventually get to the point where it can make logical decisions for every situation on the fly. they already have a primitive version called fuzzy logic. it has been used for years for computers to make decisions. computers can run any organ in the body, and you know that for a fact, cause they do it all the time to keep people alive. running the body doesnt mean we are intelligent, just means designed for life, rather than pure thought. computers on the other hand wont suffer from emotion, and body functions to really worry about, so it can be all dedicated to thought. you keep telling me to do things that are currently not really possible, i never stated it is going to happen tomorrow, but it will eventually. everyone seems to say since computers were designed by us, we have to be smarter, but you were designed by nature and evolution, and im pretty sure we are smarther than the general idea of nature as we know it. you have to teach children, otherwise they will just be a simple creature, children have to be taught the combined knowledge of an entire civilization, which would have to be done with the computer also. but clearly they can do this better, because computers have long since surpassed our storage capacities, and computational is debatable to a point, but they will eventually pass us for sure. remember just 20 years ago, computers were almost retarded by comparison, thats quite a quick progression, much faster than our evolutionary process will ever begin to be. ok suit yourself. i think we humans are smarter and you've got a different opinion, we shouldn't kill each other over that. but there is one thing i've to say, and that is that if all our brain functions were made into memory the computer would be nothing our braindoes calculations much faster than a computer, i bet if we put a computer to replace a brain the computer wouldn't stand a chance of controlling everything. and boy we had to teach computers how to work too or else it would be retarted as you said it was 20 years ago. i need to say that computers make smarter decisions but they aren't smarter than us. no chess player stands a chance of beating a computer because we humans programed it to do smart moves, while a human cannot be programmed. i want you to teach a computer how to talk. this is the link where i got the dna powered computer thing http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/dec99/945138490.Ns.r.html . and i didn't want to tell you things that aren't currently possible but i told you to prove how smart a computer actually is. i ask you a final question. imagine if we humans had no brains how would computers exist? if computers we're smart they would be able to create themselves, a computer is just taught to make things easier and better deccison for humans. the link i gave will show you some valuable information. i bet you couldn't put a robot as a soldier wthout it having help. let's put this to rest. i liked the points you brought up and i hope you liked my points too. very long debate ey, let's quit this.
Aren't computers just 1's and 0's which are just yeses and nos. How complicated is the structure of computers. yes, no, while, if then statements ect this is the core of computers right? Doesn't sound complicated to me...Ask a computer a question like what should i do about girlfriend problems. How could a computer help? If we humans dont put the ability in the computer to answer the question then the computer cant. Simple as that.
Log in to comment