Trump tells congresswomen of color born in America to "go back to their crime infested country"

My graphs literally answered this question. It's a yes.

I'm glad you concede on jobs too.

lmfao, they took trumps bait

lol such a cool Presidant, dividing both sides even further via racism! Much fun!

Awesome 4d chess luls. Awesum Trolling!111

again, theres nothing racist about telling someone to leave the US if they hate it so much.. people like you water down the term until it is meaningless by applying it to anything and everything.. to the point of calling it racist simply for not liking someone who just happens to have a different skin color.. you probably think the only people who didnt like obama were racists too.. you do not understand the meaning of the word and it does a great disservice to anyone who may actually be a victim of racism

as for dividing the DNC? who the **** cares, if theyre stupid enough to take the bait, that's their problem, and AOC, omar, and tlaib are trash, whether they were black, white, pink, rainbow colored, or zebra striped doesnt matter and i dont care

if youre not going to put THIS country and its CITIZENS first then you have no business being in public office

And the liberal tears are once again delicious.

CNN has special guest and well known white nationalist, Richard Spencer on to talk about Trump's tweets.

Much journalisming.

you mean this richard spencer?

https://powderedwigsociety.com/socialist-richard-spencer/

Trump's tweet was racist. This debate was already settled. I would appreciate if you stop lying.

Federal Law Says ‘Go Back To Where You Came From’ Counts As Discrimination

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/federal-law-go-back-came-from-discrimination_n_5d2e815de4b085eda5a390cc

White Supremacists, Extremists Celebrate President Trump’s Latest Racist Tweets

https://www.adl.org/blog/white-supremacists-extremists-celebrate-president-trumps-latest-racist-tweets

Republicans give Trump a rare rebuke over racist comments

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/15/politics/gop-rebuke-trump-tweet/index.html

British Prime Minister Theresa May Condemns President Trump's Racist Tweets About Congresswomen

https://time.com/5627053/british-prime-minister-candidates-condemn-trump-tweets/

Then Trump should not be in public office. There are several policies the GOP supports that most American CITIZEN's do not. And are harmful to them.

• FOX regularly has on white nationalists.
• Trump says white nationalist talking points.
• White nationalists are a right wing group.

BUT CNN HAD ONE ON ONE TIME GUYS!

Luls.

And racism is still for low IQ inbreeds.

you guys seem to take this richard spencer as if he was actually somebody on the right... this clown is in favor of socialism, nationalized healthcare, is close allies jason kessler who was behind the occupy wallstreet protest and the two together planned the charlottesville protests.. lmfao, richard spencer is on your side, he's a leftwing plant used to make the more gullible and uneducated people on the left thing neo nazis actually exist in order to justify your own acts of hate and violence towards any americans you disagree with

And racism is still for low IQ inbreeds.

Agreed, and that is why you should apologize for your racist comments on page two, rather than ignore requests to do so further highlighting your own inability to face your own racism

I honestly can't tell if the Trump supporters in this thread are just being disingenuous, or if they're actually retarded. Like, I can't wrap my mind around how fvcking stupid you have to be to honestly not understand how Trump's statement was racist.

Like, what if someone shouted out "George Soros/Bernie Sanders/Whatever and his entire family should be rounded up in a concentration camp and burned in an oven!" and then people tried defending it like "well, he didn't specifically say BECAUSE HE'S JEWISH so, IMO, it shouldn't count as an antisemitic statement".

like, what the ****?

Which is not what Trump said.

@zaryia: why are you spamming the same links over and over?

I don't really know this dude, but nothing about his wikipedia page suggests that he's either exclusively a republican or democrat, but the movements he's involved in are the one's listed below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_B._Spencer#Donald_Trump

• Alt-right
• Identitarian movement
• Neo-Nazism
• White nationalism
• White supremacy

You're going to have to PM a moderator instead of crying to me.

I'm going to link them any time anyone says something astonishingly stupid like Trump's tweets were not racist. Even racists disagree with him. Even Federal Guidelines disagree with him. Worldwide condemnation.

He lost that one. And badly.

heres richard spencer speaking in favor of bernie sanders, and what a great president bernie would be.. lmfao, right wing my ass

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmQvoHC6tqs

Fact. Richard Spencer is a member of far right groups.

Fact. Neo Nazis literally exist, and are a far right group.

@burntbyhellfire said: in order to justify your own acts of hate and violence towards any americans you disagree with

The far right has a significant higher number of terrorist acts and murders over the last 10 years, and last few years Vs. the far left.

The groups he is part of are right wing (as most hate groups are). But whether or not he is left or right, doesn't concern me or this topic.

I'm not sure why we are even talking about him alone. Multiple racist groups praised Trump's tweets. Because they were.....wait for it.....racist.

he's an outted and admitted lefting socialist who supports bernie sanders and put together a protest once upon a time while saying stupid shit in front of a camera so gullible people who watch CNN all day and cant think for themselves will tie his BS in with their opponents by association and use it as an excuse to hate people on the right.. you fell for that BS, and youre going to continue to fall for that BS because you watch CNN all day and refuse to think for yourself

You are aware what you listed deals with employees, job applicants and employers, no?

You are aware WHY that phrase (or those like it) can't be said to those people, right?

"Harassment Based on National Origin"

The law classifies that statement as such. We're not saying what Trump did was illegal, which is clear as he isn't their Employer. We're stating the fact that it was racist. As the EEOC does. As everyone with half a brain already knew.

P.S. Telling a minority to go back to their country, especially American born, is a commonly used racist phrase. This wasn't debated before Sunday. It's barely being debated now outside of far right nuts. What he said was objectively racist.

What the hell are you talking about? I don't watch CNN all day.

Richard Spencer is not the reason people are calling this tweet racist, and he's not the citation I was using. People are calling his tweet racist because his tweet had racist statements in it. LOGIC AM HARD.

Several far right hate groups love Trump's racist tweet.

i explained it to him before, he knows, but far be it for reality to stand in the way of a libs endless bleats

lol now the fvcking cuntservatives are trying to argue that a literal neonazi doesn’t count as “right wing”.

These people are hopeless.

You two are either stupid or trolling,

Harassment Based on National Origin

Ethnic slurs and other verbal or physical conduct because of nationality are illegal if they are severe or pervasive and create an intimidating, hostile or offensive workinge nvironment, interfere with work performance, or negatively affect job opportunities,” the commission said on its website to describe harassment based on national origin.

“Examples of potentially unlawful conduct include insults, taunting, or ethnic epithets, such as making fun of a person’s foreign accent or comments like, ‘Go back to where you came from,’ whether made by supervisors or co-workers,” it continued.

We're using Federal law to show that this statement is objectively described as discriminatory. Something which wasn't even up for debate before Sunday. You TRUMP cultists love to turn commonly accepted fact into something up for debate (like climate change). We weren't saying what Trump did was illegal.

How are you two missing the point completely?

Jesus you keep losing debates in this one thread.

Jesus Christ? Read the god damned EEOC website rather than finding some b.s. the clown from VA claims to be true. What you posted (w/o actually reading into BTW) does not apply to Trump.

Do you actually read or just find things online and post them?

zaryia, nobody fucking cares, you didnt argue discriminatory, or xenophobic, or nationalist, you argued RACIST, which it is most definitely not, and on the discriminatory front, i discriminate against anti-american socialists as well.. trump is entitled to his opinion, you can disagree with it all you want, but pissing and moaning for 7 pages two days straight trying to convince everyone to give a damn is just sad.. dont like it, vote against him (not that that's going to work) or move elsewhere because nothings changing and you're not changing anyones mind

Holy shit, I knew you were dumb. But not this dumb.

Do you know WHY are you aren't supposed to say those things to your employees (or anyone else)? Because they are objectively seen as:

Harassment Based on National Origin

We aren't applying the EEOC guidelines to say his statements as illegal. We applying the EEOC guidelines to state Trump's sentence was racist. The EEOC classification helps our case. A case that wasn't even debate before you cultists showed up on Sunday.

Telling an American born minority to go back to their country is dead to rights racist.

Is this why Red States have such poor education standards and Trump won the largest uneducated vote in 40 years?

Do you discriminate against people due to their country of origin or race?

Why are white supremacist groups in love with his tweet and agree it is racist?

I'm not trying to convince you. You're the only one trying to debate against facts, and possibly convince yourself with contrarian opinions:

Poll: Most Americans call Trump's tweets targeting 4 congresswomen 'un-American'

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/17/trump-tweets-poll-unamerican-offensive-partisan-divide/1748737001/

Two-thirds of those surveyed, 65%, say that telling minority Americans to "go back where they came from" is a racist statement.

Facts don't care about your feelings.

What you linked and what Kaine has said does not apply to Trump and his comments so why even link something that is not germane? Trump is not their employer nor do the three anti americans work for him. Quit posting things having nothing to do with what he said. Your link is attempting to argue the illegality of what Trump said so for not arguing the legal aspect you linked an article making that it's focal point.

In lamens terms, if you aren't arguing that it is illegal, why even link an article saying it is illegal?

I'm sorry if you mis-understood my use of the EEOC.

I'm literally only using it to show you an official body objectively considering the term as a form of discrimination. For those who have been living in a cave and never heard the term before, or for some wild reason didn't think it was seen as racist.

As do most Americans,

"Two-thirds of those surveyed, 65%, say that telling minority Americans to "go back where they came from" is a racist statement."

It's a good thing that's not all he said....

@zaryia: I don't concede on anything. Did Trump inherit a strong economy? Yes.

Is all the success were having now only because of Obama? Absolutely not. Sorry your statement is wrong.

I've noticed the people constantly calling others racist act more like racist than the accused. These PC people need some Xanax or a good lay... Maybe both. What Trump said was stupid, but that's Trump. He was elected for saying stupid things. I get his point for saying it, although it really only applied to one of the four. But his message was clear as day. It wasn't a racist message. But he should know that's how a lot of people will take it. Maybe that was his plan. Who knows. Better to just ignore him than to spread this everywhere... You're doing exactly what he wants(which I don't agree with but it's apparently effective). Curious if these four congresswomen were white, if it'd still be considered racist to those claiming it is. Or does racist comments only count if they are toward a minority?

I never said they were only due to Obama. The lowest unemployment rate, however, was mostly due to him.

heres a good read by a couple harvard and princeton economists, one who worked for the obama administration talking about that job growth under obammy.. spoiler alert, they were part time jobs

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-23/top-white-house-economist-admits-94-all-new-jobs-under-obama-were-part-time

https://www.cebglobal.com/talentdaily/part-time-temporary-employment-new-normal/

He doesn't have to pm a mod. He was considerate in his request. Spamming links over and over is against the CoC.

I understand you are passionate about the subject but in spamming you are doing a disservice to your argument and stance. Please refrain from continued spamming of the links.

@RicanV: It seems like zaryia is continuously citing his sources, not "spamming links". It directly contributes to the discussion and lends him credibility when he does so.

@Serraph105: There is no point in continuously repeating a message if the ones it is for turns a deaf ear to it. Where we draw the line for that can be discussed.

Imo this thread is mind boggling yet not surprising at all. Does that make sense???

Okay, I'll just link my post number instead of spamming multiple links to fact check them. If they want to finally refute it they will be free to do so.

Which as we both know, they won't be able to :-)

I'm not going to play the "seems like" game. If Zaryia was citing different sources as a means of reinforcing his argument then that would be acceptable.

The initial links did contribute to the discussion and lended Zaryia credibility as to where he derived his opinion. The second, third and fourth post of the very same links did not.

I am actually a fan of citing sources and I don't think people do it enough.

That's better. Appreciate you willing to work with us. Thank you.

And full time jobs. It seems cool and "omg I owned Obama!" if you leave those out tho. There was a spike in Part-Time for 2013 and 2016, which is what some people made a big deal about. But full-time still rose dramatically. Obama beat Trump in jobs, and the current lowest unemployment rate is due to him.

What Kind Of 'Jobs President' Has Obama Been — In 8 Charts

https://www.npr.org/2017/01/07/508600239/what-kind-of-jobs-president-has-obama-been-in-8-charts

Improvement for part-time workers

Full-time job growth over the course of the Obama presidency has far outstripped part-time job growth, as FiveThirtyEight's Ben Casselman has pointed out.

Here's What Obama's 'Part-Time America' Really Looks Like

The president's critics love this talking point. But since 2010, full-time jobs are up 7.6 million, and part-time jobs have declined by more than 900,000.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/07/heres-what-obamas-part-time-america-really-looks-like/374356/

@zaryia stop derailing the thread. Obama’s economy have nothing to do with the topic.

Feel free to go back and read who started it.

It was Blackhairedhero's alt, who almost always de-rails threads. Then this new guy fireinhell whatever picked it back up.

But I agree we should go back to talking about Trump's very racist tweets and how most Americans and EEOC agree with me.

Trump knows he can't win on policy, so he makes it racial, like the total fucking buffoon he is. He says that there governments are broken disasters, gee I wonder why trump? Could it be because you are continuing the failed US foreign policy that has been in place for decades that over throws those governments, and replaces there former leaders with fascist puppets of america? You clown.

Meh, nobody’s perfect. While inappropriate, I don’t see how his tweets were racist. The Left don’t even know the meaning of the word.

I still support Trump 100% though.

68% of The country and federal guidelines disagree with you. It's a commonly used racist phrase.

Even racist groups celebrated it's use when Trump tweeted it.

@zaryia: I don’t need you numbers to influence or change my views. I know the tweets aren’t racist. Or at least come from that sentiment.

Of course you do, you have trump blinders on. Even when Bernie does, or says something I disagree with, I call him out, you moronic trump supporters would still suck his dick if he was yelling that hitler was right.