4K Gaming..........Teh Future

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="glez13"]

What is this "30fps=120fps crap" you are talking about and does that make the chart BS?

menes777

Which seems pretty clear about the difference here. http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="glez13"]

Is 2K even popular in PC monitors? Hell actually I don't even think I have seen a 2K monitor only heard about it on the internet here and there.

clyde46

We heard several gens ago how 720p and HD didn't matter from consolites.

 

Then we hard last gen how 1080p didn't matter from consolites..

 

and Now... Yeah the trend will always repeat itself until the always-behind consoles get that specific resolution or fps.

Jankarcop

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="glez13"]

What is this "30fps=120fps crap" you are talking about and does that make the chart BS?

menes777

Which seems pretty clear about the difference here. http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html

Damn :x

I can't see the difference of the 30 and 60 one.

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] I think this has gone far enough off subject, ill probably be moderated for responding to everyones off topic postsm3Boarder32

LOL how is this off subject?  It's about why your magical Plasma is so much better than 4K.

It's ok if you can't really show how it is really is better, just don't make up some BS excuse to do so.

If you want to go by what other people say, then LED is chosen and Plasma is for budget users.  :lol:

"The Verdict
If you can afford them, LED-backlit HDTVs are the way to go. They're thin, energy efficient, and can produce a great picture, but getting all three of those features costs a premium. If you're on a budget, look for a good plasma screen. They're heavy power hogs, but you can get a gorgeous cinematic experience for not nearly as much money. If your budget is limited and you can't find a plasma, CCFL is likely your only other choice, but CCFL-backlit LCDs typically can't match plasmas or LEDs on screen size or features."

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387377,00.asp

Edit:  Sorry forgot my source.

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]Mboarder3 says he can't tell fps differences past 24.

 

glez13

Which seems pretty clear about the difference here. http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html

Damn :x

I can't see the difference of the 30 and 60 one.

There are a couple reasons why that they look the same...

Lol, they can barely settle 1080p 60fps. What makes you think 4k is even possible?

There are a couple reasons why that they look the same...menes777

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="menes777"]

LOL how is this off subject?  It's about why your magical Plasma is so much better than 4K.

It's ok if you can't really show how it is really is better, just don't make up some BS excuse to do so.

menes777

If you want to go by what other people say, then LED is chosen and Plasma is for budget users.  :lol:

"The Verdict
If you can afford them, LED-backlit HDTVs are the way to go. They're thin, energy efficient, and can produce a great picture, but getting all three of those features costs a premium. If you're on a budget, look for a good plasma screen. They're heavy power hogs, but you can get a gorgeous cinematic experience for not nearly as much money. If your budget is limited and you can't find a plasma, CCFL is likely your only other choice, but CCFL-backlit LCDs typically can't match plasmas or LEDs on screen size or features."

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387377,00.asp

Edit:  Sorry forgot my source.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Google it. clyde46

According to wikipedia it's 2048X1080. Basically 1080p + 128 pixels in width. :question:

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] wow a whole 9% more resolution than 1920x1080 So basically just 1080p. glez13

According to wikipedia it's 2048X1080. Basically 1080p + 128 pixels in width. :question:

[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] No, its not 1080p. Its double the width of full HD. m3Boarder32

According to wikipedia it's 2048X1080. Basically 1080p + 128 pixels in width. :question:

haha, alt account thinking he's smart

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="menes777"]

LOL how is this off subject?  It's about why your magical Plasma is so much better than 4K.

It's ok if you can't really show how it is really is better, just don't make up some BS excuse to do so.

menes777

If you want to go by what other people say, then LED is chosen and Plasma is for budget users.  :lol:

"The Verdict
If you can afford them, LED-backlit HDTVs are the way to go. They're thin, energy efficient, and can produce a great picture, but getting all three of those features costs a premium. If you're on a budget, look for a good plasma screen. They're heavy power hogs, but you can get a gorgeous cinematic experience for not nearly as much money. If your budget is limited and you can't find a plasma, CCFL is likely your only other choice, but CCFL-backlit LCDs typically can't match plasmas or LEDs on screen size or features."

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387377,00.asp

Edit:  Sorry forgot my source.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Google it. clyde46

Basically 4k won't be good until consoles do it.

lol Giovela. He does this EVERY gen. He said 720p would be useless. He said 1080p would suck. He said over 24 fps sucks.  As soon as his system of choice reaches those numbers, they stop sucking.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="glez13"]

According to wikipedia it's 2048X1080. Basically 1080p + 128 pixels in width. :question:

Lumpy311

haha, alt account thinking he's smart

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] wow a whole 9% more resolution than 1920x1080 So basically just 1080p. Jankarcop

Basically 4k won't be good until consoles do it.

lol Giovela. He does this EVERY gen. He said 720p would be useless. He said 1080p would suck. He said over 24 fps sucks.  As soon as his system of choice reaches those numbers, they stop sucking.

Exactly, and then tries to use everything he can to prove his purchases were validated.  It must be sad to be so insecure.

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Yah bro, HomeTheater.com just named it the King of 2013 HDTV's for no reason at all.. http://youtu.be/BvJ-VEueE8km3Boarder32

If you want to go by what other people say, then LED is chosen and Plasma is for budget users.  :lol:

"The Verdict
If you can afford them, LED-backlit HDTVs are the way to go. They're thin, energy efficient, and can produce a great picture, but getting all three of those features costs a premium. If you're on a budget, look for a good plasma screen. They're heavy power hogs, but you can get a gorgeous cinematic experience for not nearly as much money. If your budget is limited and you can't find a plasma, CCFL is likely your only other choice, but CCFL-backlit LCDs typically can't match plasmas or LEDs on screen size or features."

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387377,00.asp

Edit:  Sorry forgot my source.

Except you kind of missed the point.  There are websites out there praising Plasma as the best and other websites saying it's budget.  It has it's strengths and it has it's weaknesses like any other piece of tech.  If you want an LED you can find one that matches your plasma.  And 4K is still in it's infancy more of less.

Also different subject but another overall point is that consoles won't be doing 4K games this gen.  Try to downplay it's useful all you want but it won't change the fact that consoles cannot do it.  Just like 1080p was out of the reach of consoles (except in a few rare cases) last gen.

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] No, its not 1080p. Its double the width of full HD. menes777

Basically 4k won't be good until consoles do it.

lol Giovela. He does this EVERY gen. He said 720p would be useless. He said 1080p would suck. He said over 24 fps sucks.  As soon as his system of choice reaches those numbers, they stop sucking.

Exactly, and then tries to use everything he can to prove his purchases were validated.  It must be sad to be so insecure.

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

 

Basically 4k won't be good until consoles do it.

 

lol Giovela. He does this EVERY gen. He said 720p would be useless. He said 1080p would suck. He said over 24 fps sucks.  As soon as his system of choice reaches those numbers, they stop sucking.

m3Boarder32

Exactly, and then tries to use everything he can to prove his purchases were validated.  It must be sad to be so insecure.

LOL jealousy of consoles having the inferior product? 

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Lol that dudes an idiot m3Boarder32

haha, alt account thinking he's smart

We're jelous of dat' "cinematic" 21 fps and low gfx for the "movie-feel.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="menes777"]

If you want to go by what other people say, then LED is chosen and Plasma is for budget users.  :lol:

"The Verdict
If you can afford them, LED-backlit HDTVs are the way to go. They're thin, energy efficient, and can produce a great picture, but getting all three of those features costs a premium. If you're on a budget, look for a good plasma screen. They're heavy power hogs, but you can get a gorgeous cinematic experience for not nearly as much money. If your budget is limited and you can't find a plasma, CCFL is likely your only other choice, but CCFL-backlit LCDs typically can't match plasmas or LEDs on screen size or features."

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387377,00.asp

Edit:  Sorry forgot my source.

menes777

Except you kind of missed the point.  There are websites out there praising Plasma as the best and other websites saying it's budget.  It has it's strengths and it has it's weaknesses like any other piece of tech.  If you want an LED you can find one that matches your plasma.  And 4K is still in it's infancy more of less.

Also different subject but another overall point is that consoles won't be doing 4K games this gen.  Try to downplay it's useful all you want but it won't change the fact that consoles cannot do it.  Just like 1080p was out of the reach of consoles (except in a few rare cases) last gen.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

haha, alt account thinking he's smart

Lumpy311

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Alt account? This account is 11 years old lolm3Boarder32

It does prove you are just GioVela's alt account. Your opinion is 100% worthless.

[QUOTE="menes777"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] That's an article from 2012 comparing 2012 TV's. 2013 Plasmas have better black levels than that 7,000 dollar Sharp Elite in the review. Good effort on your partm3Boarder32

Except you kind of missed the point.  There are websites out there praising Plasma as the best and other websites saying it's budget.  It has it's strengths and it has it's weaknesses like any other piece of tech.  If you want an LED you can find one that matches your plasma.  And 4K is still in it's infancy more of less.

Also different subject but another overall point is that consoles won't be doing 4K games this gen.  Try to downplay it's useful all you want but it won't change the fact that consoles cannot do it.  Just like 1080p was out of the reach of consoles (except in a few rare cases) last gen.

 Every professional ...will tell you the  m3Boarder32

Apparently professionals don't count when they say the eye can easily see over 24 frames per second. :lol:

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="menes777"]

Except you kind of missed the point.  There are websites out there praising Plasma as the best and other websites saying it's budget.  It has it's strengths and it has it's weaknesses like any other piece of tech.  If you want an LED you can find one that matches your plasma.  And 4K is still in it's infancy more of less.

Also different subject but another overall point is that consoles won't be doing 4K games this gen.  Try to downplay it's useful all you want but it won't change the fact that consoles cannot do it.  Just like 1080p was out of the reach of consoles (except in a few rare cases) last gen.

clyde46

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Alt account? This account is 11 years old lolm3Boarder32

Lmao Gio tries to troll but instead gets gangr**ed by all of SW in every thread.

I love it :cool:

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

MonsieurX

Getting that screenshot is probably the biggest accomplishment of mine in SW.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

Lumpy311

It does prove you are just GioVela's alt account. Your opinion is 100% worthless.

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Is that supposed to prove that I'm an alt account?m3Boarder32

It does prove you are just GioVela's alt account. Your opinion is 100% worthless.

Alt account. No matter how old it is. Sorry, you failed.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

It does prove you are just GioVela's alt account. Your opinion is 100% worthless.

Lumpy311

Alt account. No matter how old it is. Sorry, you failed.

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] An 11 year old alt account? Think for a second :lol: m3Boarder32

Alt account. No matter how old it is. Sorry, you failed.

Another example of your stupidity, i never said that, are you really this desperate, giovela?

Consoles are always a generation behind PCs guys...

Next gen: 

PC gaming will be in 4K (8 million pixels)

Console gaming in 1080p (2 million pixels)

Current 7th gen:

PC gaming is largely played in 1440p (3 million pixels)

Console games were 720p (1 million pixels)

Last gen (6th gen):

PC gamers enjoyed resolutions like 1280x1024 (approx 1.5 million pixels)

Console games were 480p ( approx 500K pixels)

5th Generation:

PC games were typically 800x600 (app. 500K pixels)

Console games were 288p (around 250,000 pixels)

Every generation PC gamers have had access to display their games in 2-4 times the resolution of console games.

I bet next gen, the 9th gen when PS5 comes it will be 4K, but by then we'll have PCs with 8K displays.

JVC already made an 8K projector a couple of years back: 

God I can only imagine that PQ.

Consoles are always a generation behind PCs guys...

 

Next gen: 

 

PC gaming will be in 4K (8 million pixels)

Console gaming in 1080p (2 million pixels)

 

Current 7th gen:

 

PC gaming is largely played in 1440p (3 million pixels)

Console games were 720p (1 million pixels)

 

Last gen (6th gen):

PC gamers enjoyed resolutions like 1280x1024 (approx 1.5 million pixels)

Console games were 480p ( approx 500K pixels)

 

5th Generation:

 

PC games were typically 800x600 (app. 500K pixels)

Console games were 288p (around 250,000 pixels)

 

Every generation PC gamers have had access to display their games in 2-4 times the resolution of console games.

 

I bet next gen, the 9th gen when PS5 comes it will be 4K, but by then we'll have PCs with 8K displays.

 

 

JVC already made an 8K projector a couple of years back: 

 

 

God I can only imagine that PQ.

Mozelleple112

STFU I HAVE A SURROUND SOUND AND OPINIONS

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"] Is that supposed to prove that I'm an alt account?m3Boarder32

It does prove you are just GioVela's alt account. Your opinion is 100% worthless.

too bad you need over 2k worth of equipment for 4k gaming stupid ass hermits :lol: http://www.tested.com/tech/pcs/456671-4k-monitor-vs-4-geforce-gtx-titans/

4 titans couldnt even hold 60 FPS at 4k for sleeping Dogs LOL what a fail. only single number amount of people will enjoy 4k gaming on their extremely overpriced expensive pc's. 4k gaming wont be mainstream for a few years

:lol:

butthurt hermits

Consoles are always a generation behind PCs guys...

 

Next gen: 

 

PC gaming will be in 4K (8 million pixels)

Console gaming in 1080p (2 million pixels)

 

Current 7th gen:

 

PC gaming is largely played in 1440p (3 million pixels)

Console games were 720p (1 million pixels)

 

Last gen (6th gen):

PC gamers enjoyed resolutions like 1280x1024 (approx 1.5 million pixels)

Console games were 480p ( approx 500K pixels)

 

5th Generation:

 

PC games were typically 800x600 (app. 500K pixels)

Console games were 288p (around 250,000 pixels)

 

Every generation PC gamers have had access to display their games in 2-4 times the resolution of console games.

 

I bet next gen, the 9th gen when PS5 comes it will be 4K, but by then we'll have PCs with 8K displays.

 

 

JVC already made an 8K projector a couple of years back: 

 

 

God I can only imagine that PQ.

Mozelleple112

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Consoles are always a generation behind PCs guys...

 

Next gen: 

 

PC gaming will be in 4K (8 million pixels)

Console gaming in 1080p (2 million pixels)

 

Current 7th gen:

 

PC gaming is largely played in 1440p (3 million pixels)

Console games were 720p (1 million pixels)

 

Last gen (6th gen):

PC gamers enjoyed resolutions like 1280x1024 (approx 1.5 million pixels)

Console games were 480p ( approx 500K pixels)

 

5th Generation:

 

PC games were typically 800x600 (app. 500K pixels)

Console games were 288p (around 250,000 pixels)

 

Every generation PC gamers have had access to display their games in 2-4 times the resolution of console games.

 

I bet next gen, the 9th gen when PS5 comes it will be 4K, but by then we'll have PCs with 8K displays.

 

 

JVC already made an 8K projector a couple of years back: 

 

 

God I can only imagine that PQ.

m3Boarder32

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Consoles are always a generation behind PCs guys...

 

Next gen: 

 

PC gaming will be in 4K (8 million pixels)

Console gaming in 1080p (2 million pixels)

 

Current 7th gen:

 

PC gaming is largely played in 1440p (3 million pixels)

Console games were 720p (1 million pixels)

 

Last gen (6th gen):

PC gamers enjoyed resolutions like 1280x1024 (approx 1.5 million pixels)

Console games were 480p ( approx 500K pixels)

 

5th Generation:

 

PC games were typically 800x600 (app. 500K pixels)

Console games were 288p (around 250,000 pixels)

 

Every generation PC gamers have had access to display their games in 2-4 times the resolution of console games.

 

I bet next gen, the 9th gen when PS5 comes it will be 4K, but by then we'll have PCs with 8K displays.

 

 

JVC already made an 8K projector a couple of years back: 

 

 

God I can only imagine that PQ.

MonsieurX

I couldn't help but laugh very violently at this.

Consoles are always a generation behind PCs guys...

 

Next gen: 

 

PC gaming will be in 4K (8 million pixels)

Console gaming in 1080p (2 million pixels)

 

Current 7th gen:

 

PC gaming is largely played in 1440p (3 million pixels)

Console games were 720p (1 million pixels)

 

Last gen (6th gen):

PC gamers enjoyed resolutions like 1280x1024 (approx 1.5 million pixels)

Console games were 480p ( approx 500K pixels)

 

5th Generation:

 

PC games were typically 800x600 (app. 500K pixels)

Console games were 288p (around 250,000 pixels)

 

Every generation PC gamers have had access to display their games in 2-4 times the resolution of console games.

 

I bet next gen, the 9th gen when PS5 comes it will be 4K, but by then we'll have PCs with 8K displays.

 

 

JVC already made an 8K projector a couple of years back: 

 

 

God I can only imagine that PQ.

Mozelleple112