It was also a really really bad game, compared to previous Splinter Cell games.. IMHO it wasnt even a stealth game anymore.Solid_Tango
Yeah. As a game I enjoyed it. As a Splinter Cell game, I raged inside :x
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="yourafool"]
Well....ifyou had a racing game that claimed to be the god of racing games,6 years in the making and then flops...Then brags about the move controller and how hard core it is and going to sell better than kinnect........and flops.......And then...killzone 3. The so called hallo reach killer, thinking because they see the pretty graphics it's going to be much better. It flops. Hey if i was a cow, i would be going crazy too.
lundy86_4
Who called KZ3 a Halo Reach killer?
mad cows. as soon as pictures of killzone 3 started coming out and gameplay videos was posted up thinking because the graphics look so great that the game would be better....the insanity began.[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
[QUOTE="yourafool"]
Well....ifyou had a racing game that claimed to be the god of racing games,6 years in the making and then flops...Then brags about the move controller and how hard core it is and going to sell better than kinnect........and flops.......And then...killzone 3. The so called hallo reach killer, thinking because they see the pretty graphics it's going to be much better. It flops. Hey if i was a cow, i would be going crazy too.
yourafool
Who called KZ3 a Halo Reach killer?
mad cows. as soon as pictures of killzone 3 started coming out and gameplay videos was posted up thinking because the graphics look so great that the game would be better....the insanity began.I remember no such thing, and i've been around SW for quite a while. The last time I remember KZ being called a Halo killer was when the first was being hyped, and that was instigated by the media.
It's a well-scoring game that is held in high regard by many 360 owners. Oh, what a horrid, horrid fate... :|I remember that back in the day, Xbots wouldn't shut up about Alan Wake, and I could never figure out why they were so hyped for it. Yeah, it wasn't as bad as Too Human, but now look at it...
Timstuff
Didnt you just do what you accused the OP of doing?gaming25Damage control from what? Alan Wake flopping? This thread? What I "accused" him of doing, as opposed to what he actually did? I wouldn't call what I did very much DC considering I think Alan Wake was a pretty "good" game with some great highlights.
[QUOTE="rolo107"]Interesting approach to damage control... Too bad Alan Wake is a better game than KillZone 3 could ever be, so the point's moot about which flopped harder. KillZone 3 is a nice thrill ride though. lbjkurono23How exactly is AW better?... oh yeah thats you're opinion. Anyhow the biggest flop this gen has to be Lair or Too human. Yeah... It was my opinion. What else would it be? My fact? ;P
mad cows. as soon as pictures of killzone 3 started coming out and gameplay videos was posted up thinking because the graphics look so great that the game would be better....the insanity began.[QUOTE="yourafool"]
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
Who called KZ3 a Halo Reach killer?
lundy86_4
I remember no such thing, and i've been around SW for quite a while. The last time I remember KZ being called a Halo killer was when the first was being hyped, and that was instigated by the media.
i been around sw too and i seen it. heck, some of them was saying it look even better than crysis. as soon as pictures and video play of the game came out, they hyped it up.really? so when playing through KZ2 and 3 the only thing that sticks in your mind is how the first one wasn't all that it was cracked up to be? surreal.Yet Killzone will always be remembered for being hyped the "halo-killer" before it scored a sub 7 score here on GS.
Basinboy
[QUOTE="yourafool"]
i been around sw too and i seen it. heck, some of them was saying it look even better than crysis. as soon as pictures and video play of the game came out, they hyped it up.
lundy86_4
Some proof might be nice. I haven't seen this at all.
if you go back in the threads im sure you'll see it.[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
[QUOTE="yourafool"]
i been around sw too and i seen it. heck, some of them was saying it look even better than crysis. as soon as pictures and video play of the game came out, they hyped it up.
yourafool
Some proof might be nice. I haven't seen this at all.
if you go back in the threads im sure you'll see it.Tried. Didn't see it. Again, some proof might be nice.
It kept it's AAA hype.[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
lol, damage control. You mad Killzone 3 flopped? Alan Wake had diminishing hype over time. I'm not even sure it was hyped AAA.
You know what else flppped harder than anything else this generation? Gran Turismo 5. Yet another high-level PS3 game.Chutebox
8.5 is not AAA last I checked :|
they both flopped, end of, there is no 'harder'delta3074
That's what she said.
Sorry... couldn't resist :oops:
It kept it's AAA hype.[QUOTE="Chutebox"]
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
lol, damage control. You mad Killzone 3 flopped? Alan Wake had diminishing hype over time. I'm not even sure it was hyped AAA.
You know what else flppped harder than anything else this generation? Gran Turismo 5. Yet another high-level PS3 game.AdobeArtist
8.5 is not AAA last I checked :|
That's not what he meant :|[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]
[QUOTE="Chutebox"] It kept it's AAA hype.
Giancar
8.5 is not AAA last I checked :|
That's not what he meant :|Maybe he was being sarcastic.:P
When are people gonna learn ? lol a flop doesn't mean it's a bad game, both scored 8.5 which is a great score :).johny300
You DID notice how the TC never came back to defend his point right?:P I love how this thread is still going.:P
[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]
[QUOTE="Chutebox"] It kept it's AAA hype.
Giancar
8.5 is not AAA last I checked :|
That's not what he meant :|Ohhhh, I did miunderstand that. He was saying AW's hype diminished over time, whereas KZ3's kept at a steady AAA. Got it now.
[QUOTE="sanim02"]
[QUOTE="Giancar"] That's not what he meant :|
tonitorsi
Maybe he was being sarcastic.:P
B-bu-bu-but, worst case scenario...what if he wasn't? :P
It was a misunderstanding so it's all good.:) Sometimes people try it spin it to make themselves look good, but when they don't I give 'em no flak.:P
[QUOTE="yourafool"]
i been around sw too and i seen it. heck, some of them was saying it look even better than crysis. as soon as pictures and video play of the game came out, they hyped it up.
lundy86_4
Some proof might be nice. I haven't seen this at all.
There is no proof because it didn't happen.It kept it's AAA hype.[QUOTE="Chutebox"]
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
lol, damage control. You mad Killzone 3 flopped? Alan Wake had diminishing hype over time. I'm not even sure it was hyped AAA.
You know what else flppped harder than anything else this generation? Gran Turismo 5. Yet another high-level PS3 game.AdobeArtist
8.5 is not AAA last I checked :|
Not what I meant. I meant it was still hyped AAA when the score came out.[QUOTE="lundy86_4"][QUOTE="yourafool"]
i been around sw too and i seen it. heck, some of them was saying it look even better than crysis. as soon as pictures and video play of the game came out, they hyped it up.
Chutebox
Some proof might be nice. I haven't seen this at all.
There is no proof because it didn't happen.Exactly my point. I never saw this, and even if it were one or two, that's hardly anything to write home about.
Alan Wake had five years of waiting and then flopped... nothing at all like GT5 then.Xbol-LoxSo did GT5 lol.
TC creator Wins and EPIC Fails at the same time.
Wins for accurately discribing that Alan Wake flopped.
EPIC FAILS for hyping KZ3 as some sort of King?
i played the demo friday, the Wait for it to download on PSN was far more compelling than playing the actual demo.
TYPICAL KZ3 gameplay....Sev, lets shoot these guys with this gatling gun in the snow WHILE FLAGS WAVE, oh and theres the new blood animation only More Red, Gee, we've NEVER seen that before? now have we?
I'm going to go all-in on the fact that you don't have a 360 and you've never actually played Alan Wake, amirite?All the hype for alan wake, a 5 year wait, and it turned out to completely suck
right4dead
[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
[QUOTE="scar-hawk"]Killzone 3 flopped by half a point. Big deal seriously. I guess you guys will be missing out while I'm loving the MP on Feb 22 :DFIipMode
I actually believe that cows expected it to score at least 9.5, surpassing KZ2 in quality and being a huge improvement.
And it could possibly surpass Killzone 2 in quality, I can't wait to find out in 3 days. :)Then it would have scored higher than 8.5, wouldn't it? :D
Not necessarily, standards don't stay the same. Some say Reach is much better than Halo 3, doesn't mean they are wrong just because Reach got lower scores than 3.[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
Then it would have scored higher than 8.5, wouldn't it? :D
FIipMode
I believe most would agree that Halo 3 is superior.
Bungie is a great developer, but after the trilogy ended, it almost felt that there should be no new Halo games.
While Reach is a good game, it is not as special as the previous three games with Master Chief.
Not necessarily, standards don't stay the same. Some say Reach is much better than Halo 3, doesn't mean they are wrong just because Reach got lower scores than 3.[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
Then it would have scored higher than 8.5, wouldn't it? :D
FIipMode
Standards don't just rise for no reason, games upping the bar raise standards so what game(s) in the FPS genre raised the bar enough that KZ3 failed to get AAA is the question.
Not necessarily, standards don't stay the same. Some say Reach is much better than Halo 3, doesn't mean they are wrong just because Reach got lower scores than 3.[QUOTE="FIipMode"]
[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
Then it would have scored higher than 8.5, wouldn't it? :D
SHR3DD3D
I believe most would agree that Halo 3 is superior.
Bungie is a great developer, but after the trilogy ended, it almost felt that there should be no new Halo games.
While Reach is a good game, it is not as special as the previous three games with Master Chief.
But I'm sure there is also people who think Reach is better. And they wouldn't be flat out wrong because it scored lower.
[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Not necessarily, standards don't stay the same. Some say Reach is much better than Halo 3, doesn't mean they are wrong just because Reach got lower scores than 3.
FIipMode
I believe most would agree that Halo 3 is superior.
Bungie is a great developer, but after the trilogy ended, it almost felt that there should be no new Halo games.
While Reach is a good game, it is not as special as the previous three games with Master Chief.
But I'm sure there is also people who think Reach is better. And they wouldn't be flat out wrong because it scored lower.
Reach didn't score lower then Halo 3 9.5 =9.5 :|
No way around it - GT5 is the biggest flop this gen
gensigns
I think the majority would agree on that one. There appears to be no way topping GT5 in the fail department.
Maybe if Halo 4 is announced, hyped for 6 years, with shiny graphics and a true sequel to Halo 3... and then scores like 7.5. Then maybe.
[QUOTE="FIipMode"]
[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
I believe most would agree that Halo 3 is superior.
Bungie is a great developer, but after the trilogy ended, it almost felt that there should be no new Halo games.
While Reach is a good game, it is not as special as the previous three games with Master Chief.
Ultra_Combo
But I'm sure there is also people who think Reach is better. And they wouldn't be flat out wrong because it scored lower.
Reach didn't score lower then Halo 3 9.5 =9.5 :|
:|:|:|:|:lol:
I'm not focusing on only one site, I'm talking universal here, Reach has around a 91 average last I checked and Halo 3 has a 94.
[QUOTE="gensigns"]
No way around it - GT5 is the biggest flop this gen
SHR3DD3D
I think the majority would agree on that one. There appears to be no way topping GT5 in the fail department.
Maybe if Halo 4 is announced, hyped for 6 years, with shiny graphics and a true sequel to Halo 3... and then scores like 7.5. Then maybe.
You fogot to mention that claiming it was taking so long for teh perfection that PD does LMAO how many AAA have they had 1? :lol:
[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
[QUOTE="gensigns"]
No way around it - GT5 is the biggest flop this gen
Ultra_Combo
I think the majority would agree on that one. There appears to be no way topping GT5 in the fail department.
Maybe if Halo 4 is announced, hyped for 6 years, with shiny graphics and a true sequel to Halo 3... and then scores like 7.5. Then maybe.
You fogot to mention that claiming it was taking so long for teh perfection that PD does LMAO how many AAA have they had 1? :lol:
True...
Forza simply destroys GT as a racing series.
Look at this thread, look at those entertaining fools.
Not if you look at it w/out any fanboy goggles. Seeing new IP's fail to reach their GS hype seems to be quite common, especially for AAA status. Whatever happened to Haze, Too Human, Lair, Spore, etc.? In the end, you weigh out which becomes a bigger flop: a long wait for a highly-anticipated new IP or a highly-anticipated sequel that took "2 steps forward, and 2 steps back" (according to KB)? Personally, this is a ridiculous claim to make especially when considering AW's review only mentioned 1 con (which is a bit debatable). I think you'd be more right in replacing Alan Wake with Crackdown 2.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment