[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]
No need for desperation because the game's visuals speaks for itself. :|
[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]
Digital Foundry:
"There's little doubt that the Xbox 360 is the cleaner, crisper experience and for the most part it commands a small but significant frame-rate advantage and fewer little glitches"
"On balance, 360 has the edge in terms of visuals and general performance, but PS3 more than holds its own, bettering the Microsoft platform in some areas."
IGN:
"The PS3 version of Crysis 2 has particular idiosyncracies. After playing both console versions, and playing through the same set of levels multiple times on both consoles, it became clear to a number of editors at IGN that the PS3 version is lacking somewhat in comparison to the 360 version of the game. The game still looks great on PS3, but the framerate is less consistent, the resolution is lower (in the neighborhood of 10% lower than the Xbox 360 release), and certain graphical effects and some lighting appear dialed back. In layman's terms, there are more jagged edges in the PS3 version of the game, and things get choppy more often than its 360 counterpart, which hurts controller response. The 360 is not immune to this, it just doesn't happen as often."
[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]I love how fanboys are forgetting all the performance issues that plague console crysis.T-razor1
Digital Foundry:
"Put simply, on certain stages, frame-rate varies rather drastically to the point where the game can feel almost unplayable. Thankfully these areas don't account for the majority of the gameplay by any stretch of the imagination"
I've beaten the game twice and only noticed a significant drop once! The game still runs smooth so stop with your nonsense exaggeration. Have you even played it on the 360? Now if the game played like Skyrim PS3 then you would have an argument but you really don't and are just grasping at straws to bash the game.
....but not only does U3 perform tons better then console crysis, U3 also looks better then console crysis TO BEGIN WITH.actionjunkie10
....in your opinion. Stop trying to state it as if it's a fact because it's not. To me....
This
doesn't look as impressive as this...
The Crysis 2 shot just looks cleaner to me. For cryin' out loud look at the nasty floor textures and jags in the UC3 pic. UC3 just has moments like this with poor AF mixed in with a pixelated, jaggy image. Seriously the color scheme and scenery really saves UC3 because when you look under the hood at things like aliasing, textures, AF, etc... it's not that impressive. Yes UC3 is uumm... pretty but I just think the level of detail in Crysis 2 is more impressive. And lets not ignore the pink elephant in the room and that's how UC3 is as linear as it gets relying on a heavy dose of set pieces, cinematics, cut scenes etc.. But even then it still has its moments where it just looks "messy" as in the screen above.
Some have stated how the game seems to play for you sometimes and I agree it does feel that way at times. But it's not just gamers that feel this way. There are some in the media that feel this way as well....
http://www.gamernode.com/the-failings-of-uncharted-3/
"There are many moments inUncharted 3that exist to drive the fiction to a place of resolution, and they are barely played at all. It's nearly impossible to screw up the key moments in the game by making a wrong turn or messing up the timing," Clark said. "When things go so badly that Nate ends up dead-that's all you. The developers are washing their hands of those moments. That never happened on their watch. They understand that you're doing your best; your best is just not good enough. You finish out the rest of the level, but it's not the same."'
The controller may be in your hands, Clark observed, "butUnchartedis directing your every move."
Like a film keeping the viewers' eyes where they need to be, our perception is narrowed. The game is caught in the shallow end of the pool, showing players how to swim. Because if we were to swim out into the deep end, we would see thatDrake's Deceptionhas nothing there."
So not only do I find the visuals of Crysis 2 on the 360 to be more impressive but also as an overall game considering how the game was designed. Crysis 2 is in no way shape or form an "open" game but it's levels are less linear with more broader playing levels.
They look equally impressive if you ask me, not to mention Crysis 2's lack of any sort of art direction what so ever, just a bunch of aquatic aliens and loads of tentacles, apart from that it's just tenchnical, no creativity.
Log in to comment