Bioshock Infinite IGN review score is up PC definitive version confirmed

I'll be playing this on PC obviously...

Also, great to hear that it's getting good reviews so far, I was a bit concerned it wouldn't turn out well.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

PC gamers are the most desperate butthurt fanboys on SW.  You mean you got the best version of a game when its going against 7 year old hardware?  Congrats buddy

Jankarcop

Yeah man, we lose so many battles here. So butthurt and desperate.

You lose so many battles in the game of life you brag about things nobody cares about.  You get better graphics on a open ended platform over 7 year old hardware?  reallY?  

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

PC gamers are the most desperate butthurt fanboys on SW.  You mean you got the best version of a game when its going against 7 year old hardware?  Congrats buddy

AM-Gamer

Yeah man, we lose so many battles here. So butthurt and desperate.

You lose so many battles in the game of life you brag about things nobody cares about.  You get better graphics on a open ended platform over 7 year old hardware?  reallY?  

I lost 10 IQ points reading this thread.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]Looks at my sig.

 

Yeah man, we lose so many battles here. So butthurt and desperate.

MrYaotubo

You lose so many battles in the game of life you brag about things nobody cares about.  You get better graphics on a open ended platform over 7 year old hardware?  reallY?  

Im not getting owned in nothing, im just watching hermits having a circle jerk. 

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

PC gamers are the most desperate butthurt fanboys on SW.  You mean you got the best version of a game when its going against 7 year old hardware?  Congrats buddy

AM-Gamer

Yeah man, we lose so many battles here. So butthurt and desperate.

You lose so many battles in the game of life you brag about things nobody cares about.  You get better graphics on a open ended platform over 7 year old hardware?  reallY?  

Its called systemwars....

If you can't claim ownage over having more games, better gfx, and better performance.....than wtf is there even left to discuss?

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

No 240HZ is actually 240 hz , but you can play on a high res monitor with crushed blacks and tell me about gimicks. 

chunkowookie

He's proven quite conclusively in the last couple pages that he's exactly that. Someone who doesn't know a thing about technology, but thinks he does because he read some pamphlets while shopping for his TV.

I know more then you ever will but ill be happy to school you trolls . 

[QUOTE="MrYaotubo"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

You lose so many battles in the game of life you brag about things nobody cares about.  You get better graphics on a open ended platform over 7 year old hardware?  reallY?  

AM-Gamer

Im not getting owned in nothing, im just watching hermits having a circle jerk. 

Didn't IGN get exclusive rights to do an early review? I wouldn't exact rely on their word.

[QUOTE="chunkowookie"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] I seriously hope you don´t actually believe in the nonsense you´re typing,but if you do then the advertisements achieved their goal,wich was fooling the less tech knowledgeable people.

AM-Gamer

He's proven quite conclusively in the last couple pages that he's exactly that. Someone who doesn't know a thing about technology, but thinks he does because he read some pamphlets while shopping for his TV.

I know more then you ever will but ill be happy to school you trolls . 

I do imagine that you're a very happy guy. 

Ignorance is bliss, after all.

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

No 240HZ is actually 240 hz , but you can play on a high res monitor with crushed blacks and tell me about gimicks. 

seanmcloughlin

It isn't.

If it was, TV makers would put in D-DVI or DisplayPort inputs onto the HDTV in order to take advantage of the so called, true 240hz.

They don't, because it is NOT real.

:)

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

It isn't.

If it was, TV makers would put in D-DVI or DisplayPort inputs onto the HDTV in order to take advantage of the so called, true 240hz.

They don't, because it is NOT real.

:)

AM-Gamer

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

So, category A, B, and C, then? Really running the gamut of the derp.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

the_bi99man

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

So, category A, B, and C, then? Really running the gamut of the derp.

Show me one link of anyone talking about the benefits of running something in 200fps .  You trolls are so desperate for any technical advantage you get its hillarious. And as much as all you talk about fps none of it will matter as soon as DX11 becomes standard and will matter less when DX12 is released because then you will be back down to 30 to 60fps. 

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="MrYaotubo"] And as expected,when everything else fails and gets owned left and right,ad hominem starts. Pathetic.MrYaotubo

Im not getting owned in nothing, im just watching hermits having a circle jerk. 

You havent talked about anything troll. 

[QUOTE="campzor"]dat .1 dominationJankarcop

"Aging console graphics hardware lets down Infinite, too. When the original BioShock debuted on Xbox 360 in 2007, it was an eye-gasmic wonder a blissful marriage of Art Deco art direction with top-shelf graphics technology. Fast-forward almost six years, and Infinite is every bit as effective in the former area, but in the raw graphics department it fails to make anywhere near the same impact on either Microsoft or Sonys box."

"Its far from an ugly game (quite the opposite, really), but the low-quality textures, wooden NPCs (aside from Elizabeth), and occasional minor but noticeable framerate hitches are all maladies the first BioShock avoided. It seems Infinites stratospheric ambition is a bit too much, at least in the technology department, for the creaky hardware of the aging consoles. The PC version, as run on mid-range hardware, makes no such visual compromises, with gorgeous high-resolution textures, detailed faces, and smooth performance"

I can't believe Irrational pulled it off. This was such an ambitious game. They also seemed to have done a great job on the pc version.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

the_bi99man

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

So, category A, B, and C, then? Really running the gamut of the derp.

You want to argue with me that a 120hz monitor beats a high end HD tv?  Why because it pushes more frames and can do higher res yet gets stomped everywhere else. 

.1

PC Master Race  confirmed

We also got Xcom Enemy Unknown for free along with other extras! Well justified!

[QUOTE="campzor"]dat .1 dominationseanmcloughlin

Really makes me feel good about spending so many thousands of euro on my rig that's for sure :cool:

We also got Xcom Enemy Unknown for free along with other extras! Well justified!

kipsta77

That is if buy from steam only?

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

It isn't.

If it was, TV makers would put in D-DVI or DisplayPort inputs onto the HDTV in order to take advantage of the so called, true 240hz.

They don't, because it is NOT real.

:)

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps . Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it. Poor blacks, color accuracy and crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk). I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100. This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all.

AM-Gamer

So, category A, B, and C, then? Really running the gamut of the derp.

Show me one link of anyone talking about the benefits of running something in 200fps . You trolls are so desperate for any technical advantage you get its hillarious. And as much as all you talk about fps none of it will matter as soon as DX11 becomes standard and will matter less when DX12 is released because then you will be back down to 30 to 60fps.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIffvJaDaDE

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

It isn't.

If it was, TV makers would put in D-DVI or DisplayPort inputs onto the HDTV in order to take advantage of the so called, true 240hz.

They don't, because it is NOT real.

:)

AM-Gamer

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

You guys are having way too much fun screwing with AM Gamer :lol:

Oh, I'd just like to throw in that I also can tell the difference between 60fps and 120fps. Usually I have vsync on so I don't notice it, but with Dead Space 3, I didn't need to use it and was hitting upwards of 150fps. VERY big difference. It was so smooth than it weirded me out at first. 

This is also very relevant: "Can the Average Gamer Tell the Difference between 60Hz and 120Hz?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWEpIwNDeCA

Makes me feel like a low res peasant with bad hygiene and no education.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

So, category A, B, and C, then? Really running the gamut of the derp.

Cranler

Show me one link of anyone talking about the benefits of running something in 200fps . You trolls are so desperate for any technical advantage you get its hillarious. And as much as all you talk about fps none of it will matter as soon as DX11 becomes standard and will matter less when DX12 is released because then you will be back down to 30 to 60fps.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIffvJaDaDE

the advantages he talks about are no input lag and no screen tearing which casue a smoohter image. If you ahve 60fps thats Vsynced wouldnt it look virtually the same?  

You guys are having way too much fun screwing with AM Gamer :lol:

 

 

Oh, I'd just like to throw in that I also can tell the difference between 60fps and 120fps. Usually I have vsync on so I don't notice it, but with Dead Space 3, I didn't need to use it and was hitting upwards of 150fps. VERY big difference. It was so smooth than it weirded me out at first. 

 

This is also very relevant: "Can the Average Gamer Tell the Difference between 60Hz and 120Hz?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWEpIwNDeCA

cfisher2833

I just watched the video and half the time he got it wrong , so how is that helping there case  

You guys are having way too much fun screwing with AM Gamer :lol:

Oh, I'd just like to throw in that I also can tell the difference between 60fps and 120fps. Usually I have vsync on so I don't notice it, but with Dead Space 3, I didn't need to use it and was hitting upwards of 150fps. VERY big difference. It was so smooth than it weirded me out at first.

This is also very relevant: "Can the Average Gamer Tell the Difference between 60Hz and 120Hz?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWEpIwNDeCA

cfisher2833

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Comment sums it up 

"The problem with interpolation is that it adds images that aren't real.The TV doesn't understand physical objects and how they move or occlude other objects, it can only "blend" two discrete pictures and you end up with high speed mud."

clyde46

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

No Sh!t sherlock, but a 120hz monitor should be able to run frames higher then 60fps. 

[QUOTE="Cranler"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

Show me one link of anyone talking about the benefits of running something in 200fps . You trolls are so desperate for any technical advantage you get its hillarious. And as much as all you talk about fps none of it will matter as soon as DX11 becomes standard and will matter less when DX12 is released because then you will be back down to 30 to 60fps.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIffvJaDaDE

the advantages he talks about are no input lag and no screen tearing which casue a smoohter image. If you ahve 60fps thats Vsynced wouldnt it look virtually the same?  

[QUOTE="cfisher2833"]

You guys are having way too much fun screwing with AM Gamer :lol:

 

 

Oh, I'd just like to throw in that I also can tell the difference between 60fps and 120fps. Usually I have vsync on so I don't notice it, but with Dead Space 3, I didn't need to use it and was hitting upwards of 150fps. VERY big difference. It was so smooth than it weirded me out at first.

 

This is also very relevant: "Can the Average Gamer Tell the Difference between 60Hz and 120Hz?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWEpIwNDeCA

Cranler

So the host could tell the diffrence and the other gamer could not he only got 1 out of 5 right.  Although some can tell the diffrence i dont think its as massive as they made it out to be . I also think it goes back to my orginal point it really depends on the kind of game you are playing as well. 

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

I love how you act like you know something yet you have to let him tell you but ill happily explain it to you.

a 240hZ tv basically adds 3 frames in between every 60fps .  Although a true gaming monitor can push a true 120 fps , you sacrafice everything for it.  Poor blacks, color accuracy and  crappy viewing angles( I guess it doesnt matter if your hunched over your computer desk).  I had a 120HZ monitor ive never hooked my pc up to my new tv and I could tell no diffrence betweeen 60fps and over 100.  This last game I ran at those frames was RE5 and the diffrence was not noticeable at all. 

No Sh!t sherlock, but a 120hz monitor should be able to run frames higher then 60fps. 

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] Hertz does not add frames.Cranler

No Sh!t sherlock, but a 120hz monitor should be able to run frames higher then 60fps. 

I guess not but they beat the pants off those montiors in blacklevels, color accuracy and viewing angles , which to me is more important. 

[QUOTE="Cranler"]

[QUOTE="cfisher2833"]

You guys are having way too much fun screwing with AM Gamer :lol:

Oh, I'd just like to throw in that I also can tell the difference between 60fps and 120fps. Usually I have vsync on so I don't notice it, but with Dead Space 3, I didn't need to use it and was hitting upwards of 150fps. VERY big difference. It was so smooth than it weirded me out at first.

This is also very relevant: "Can the Average Gamer Tell the Difference between 60Hz and 120Hz?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWEpIwNDeCA

So the host could tell the diffrence and the other gamer could not he only got 1 out of 5 right.  Although some can tell the diffrence i dont think its as massive as they made it out to be . I also think it goes back to my orginal point it really depends on the kind of game you are playing as well. 

[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

No Sh!t sherlock, but a 120hz monitor should be able to run frames higher then 60fps. 

I guess not but they beat the pants off those montiors in blacklevels, color accuracy and viewing angles , which to me is more important. 

I bought it. Gonna play it AFTER the release.

[QUOTE="MrYaotubo"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

You lose so many battles in the game of life you brag about things nobody cares about.  You get better graphics on a open ended platform over 7 year old hardware?  reallY?  

AM-Gamer

Im not getting owned in nothing, im just watching hermits having a circle jerk. 

What's up with cow damage control these days?

Seems ever PC thread has at least one cow on permanent damage control duty, here it's you, in some other thread you have tormentos, then I saw some Quad4Life guy, etc...

You guys should honestly consider finding a more sensible activity to pass the time... ;)

Nice.  Looking forward to getting my free code through from AMD. :D

Was that .1 difference really worth the hundreds more dollars you spent for PC? Miketheman83

Of course. Unless you are cheap.

Was that .1 difference really worth the hundreds more dollars you spent for PC? Miketheman83

I (and anyone else who games on PC) game on PC because of the plethora of undeniable advantages and enhancements over the consoles' capabilities, besides the exclusive games, of course. We don't game on PC to get some kind of satisfaction out of arbitrary review scores. That would be stupid.

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Was that .1 difference really worth the hundreds more dollars you spent for PC? chunkowookie

I (and anyone else who games on PC) game on PC because of the plethora of undeniable advantages and enhancements over the consoles' capabilities, besides the exclusive games, of course. We don't game on PC to get some kind of satisfaction out of arbitrary review scores. That would be stupid.

[QUOTE="chunkowookie"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Was that .1 difference really worth the hundreds more dollars you spent for PC? Miketheman83

I (and anyone else who games on PC) game on PC because of the plethora of undeniable advantages and enhancements over the consoles' capabilities, besides the exclusive games, of course. We don't game on PC to get some kind of satisfaction out of arbitrary review scores. That would be stupid.

You shouldn't project your lack of technical knowledge on to other people. For a lot of people PC gaming is very easy.

Sweet score as expected. Will get on my new rig in July.

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="chunkowookie"]

I (and anyone else who games on PC) game on PC because of the plethora of undeniable advantages and enhancements over the consoles' capabilities, besides the exclusive games, of course. We don't game on PC to get some kind of satisfaction out of arbitrary review scores. That would be stupid.

tenaka2

You shouldn't project your lack of technical knowledge on to other people. For a lot of people PC gaming is very easy.

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="chunkowookie"]

I (and anyone else who games on PC) game on PC because of the plethora of undeniable advantages and enhancements over the consoles' capabilities, besides the exclusive games, of course. We don't game on PC to get some kind of satisfaction out of arbitrary review scores. That would be stupid.

tenaka2

You shouldn't project your lack of technical knowledge on to other people. For a lot of people PC gaming is very easy.

[QUOTE="chunkowookie"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Was that .1 difference really worth the hundreds more dollars you spent for PC? Miketheman83

I (and anyone else who games on PC) game on PC because of the plethora of undeniable advantages and enhancements over the consoles' capabilities, besides the exclusive games, of course. We don't game on PC to get some kind of satisfaction out of arbitrary review scores. That would be stupid.

Lol. The advantages are large and well known. It's no secret. It's no debate. Most publications don't even bother doing separate reviews, or rating the PC version different, because there's no point. The fact that IGN did this time is actually kind of weird. Troll harder.