The only time console was more powerful than pc was n64 at launch because pc's didnt have graphics cards some months later they release and they can run star wars shadows of the empire and turok the dinosaur hunter superior to n64 version.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The only time console was more powerful than pc was n64 at launch because pc's didnt have graphics cards some months later they release and they can run star wars shadows of the empire and turok the dinosaur hunter superior to n64 version.
i like your sig......I have no idea what's he aiming at, PC will always have a power advantage over consoles, and the gap always becomes wider as the console gen goes on, but fine, won't fault him for his statement, it's very vague, and he hasn't even explained himself properly...
Rocker6
When hardware becomes software. Sure
Â
Anyways they most likely mean average user which can easily be true at the beginning of a console launchÂ
k2theswiss
True that. Xbox 360 was much more powerful in relation to PC at the time of it's release. Through the first year it saw a lot cutting-edge titles that matched the best PC had to offer(Fight Night, Oblivion, Gears).Â
I'm no old fart, but I've been around long enough to know the envelope will continue to be pushed. I remember playing Max Payne 2 and thinking that gfx couldn't get much better.Â
---
Concerning the idea that consoles are a some sort of pot of gold, this is the worst time to be selling out to consoles and big publishers. Console hardware will be minimum specs in 2yrs., and PC gaming will become even more dominant, while console hardware refreshes will be over, and Onlive-style streaming will become the end game.
It will be a pathetic end to console gaming.Â
probably intel i5 with hd 3000 lol, here is steam stats http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurveywould somebody xplane to me what is a average gaming pc machine is?
tionmedon
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]
When hardware becomes software. Sure
Â
Anyways they most likely mean average user which can easily be true at the beginning of a console launchÂ
gamecubepad
True that. Xbox 360 was much more powerful in relation to PC at the time of it's release. Through the first year it saw a lot cutting-edge titles that matched the best PC had to offer(Fight Night, Oblivion, Gears).Â
I'm no old fart, but I've been around long enough to know the envelope will continue to be pushed. I remember playing Max Payne 2 and thinking that gfx couldn't get much better.Â
---
Concerning the idea that consoles are a some sort of pot of gold, this is the worst time to be selling out to consoles and big publishers. Console hardware will be minimum specs in 2yrs., and PC gaming will become even more dominant, while console hardware refreshes will be over, and Onlive-style streaming will become the end game.
It will be a pathetic end to console gaming.Â
call of duty 2Â on pc was 64 players and xbox360 version was only 8 players in 2005 and the pc version graphically pissed all over 360."That might change"
Wat? Are you trying to indicate that consoles are going to overtake the PC?
Oh my sides.
"Adam Badowski suggests the PCs dominance might change in the future as console hardware catches up."
Are they suggesting that PC multiplats won't see the jump that has been expected? Or is this some hidden sellout statement? I don't speak game industry.
And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
Zoza24
more people have pc's you can make more money off pc.And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
Zoza24
pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.
No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game.pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
Zoza24
Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.
Everyone obsessed with dumbass eye candy and requiring video cards is the reason pc gaming market is smaller now than the 90s.
[QUOTE="Zoza24"]No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game. Man you really are something special.pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
nextgenjoke
Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.
"Adam Badowski suggests the PCs dominance might change in the future as console hardware catches up."
Are they suggesting that PC multiplats won't see the jump that has been expected? Or is this some hidden sellout statement? I don't speak game industry.
whiskeystrike
He menas that the PC won't have as huge a gap in visual dominance that it has now, BUT it should also be noted that once the consoles come out and show similar experiences it won't be long before the PCs overtake again due to their nature. It happened last gen/current gen too. Games didn't look worlds apart (except for Crysis but that was special).
I don't imagine there will be colossal differences between say a PS4 version of TW3 and the PC version. PC version might be higher res and run at higher frames but PS4 will largely be the same. not as big as the huge difference between the 360 version of TW2 and the PC version. But then PC will excel again because it will get better hardware.
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"][QUOTE="Zoza24"] pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game. Man you really are something special. lol 20 million people downloaded doom and played it in 1993. you didnt need a goddamn graphics card and you didnt need one untill 1999 with quake 3 arena. video cards killed pc gaming.Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.
clyde46
quake 3 arena 1999 is when idsoftware started making sucky games.
Â
That's the honest truth i bought a a video card to play the game and i just went back to playing quake 2 because it sucked to previous game.
Good God, I love your posting style, nextgenjoke. GOAT poster.freedomfreakrequiring you to spend extra money to play a pc game besides just buying the game makes the amount of people who can play your game much smaller it's a fact of life and common sense.
I wonder how the responses would've been if Crytek said this.freedomfreakÂ
"cevat Yerli needs to shut the fvck up" like this probably  :P
Â[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]I wonder how the responses would've been if Crytek said this.seanmcloughlin
"cevat Yerli needs to shut the fvck up" like this probably  :P
Honestly, I would've said the same.requiring you to spend extra money to play a pc game besides just buying the game makes the amount of people who can play your game much smaller it's a fact of life and common sense. That is indeed a fact of life. It's what we live by.[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Good God, I love your posting style, nextgenjoke. GOAT poster.nextgenjoke
video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
nextgenjoke
[QUOTE="Zoza24"]No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game. lolnopc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)
In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.
But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.
nextgenjoke
Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful. It's not a great extra if it prevents people who dont have the money or smarts to install a video card from buying your pc game.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
freedomfreak
video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
nextgenjoke
It's not 1999, videogames are more about graphical horsepower these days. get over it
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]
video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
seanmcloughlin
It's not 1999, videogames are more about graphical horsepower these days. get over it
Developers are dumbasses these days and they need to get over it.software rendering makes pc like a console.
Â
Buy the pc, buy the game, play it.
buy a console,buy the game,play it.
Â
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful. It's not a great extra if it prevents people who dont have the money or smarts to install a video card from buying your pc game. buy it on the 360 or ps3 then.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
nextgenjoke
No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
nextgenjoke
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games. it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
faizan_faizan
could of played it on ur old pc instead.nextgenjokeNah, man. I ran it on low. Like low-low. I got AAx2 which was something.
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]could of played it on ur old pc instead.freedomfreakNah, man. I ran it on low. Like low-low. I got AAx2 which was something. duke nukem 3d is still better than crysis. proves video cards=just graphics
Nah, man. I ran it on low. Like low-low. I got AAx2 which was something. duke nukem 3d is still better than crysis. proves video cards=just graphics No nanosuit=fail.[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]could of played it on ur old pc instead.nextgenjoke
Call of Duty Black Ops 2.There hasnt even been one relevant first person shooter since 1999.
nextgenjoke
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]Call of Duty Black Ops 2. call of duty and halo were never relevant to pc gamers as far as multiplayer.There hasnt even been one relevant first person shooter since 1999.
freedomfreak
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games. it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay. They do. HL2's Physics couldn't be achieved with 1999 Cards, And the gameplay IS physics.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
nextgenjoke
I consider him part of the SW family. We need him. He's the social glue that holds us together.Why does it always take until heewee gets 2000 posts before someone bans him? :(
wis3boi
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games. it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay. They do. HL2's Physics couldn't be achieved with 1999 Cards, And the gameplay IS physics.video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.
Â
nextgenjoke
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment