CD Projekt Red: PC is most powerful platform "but that might change"

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

The only time console was more powerful than pc was n64 at launch because pc's didnt have graphics cards some months later they release and they can run star wars shadows of the empire and turok the dinosaur hunter  superior to n64 version.

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

When the next gen of consoles release we will have hit the margin of diminishing returns

Avatar image for tionmedon
tionmedon

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 tionmedon
Member since 2006 • 468 Posts

I have no idea what's he aiming at, PC will always have a power advantage over consoles, and the gap always becomes wider as the console gen goes on, but fine, won't fault him for his statement, it's very vague, and he hasn't even explained himself properly...

Rocker6
i like your sig......
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#54 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

When hardware becomes software. Sure

 

Anyways they most likely mean average user which can easily be true at the beginning of a console launch 

k2theswiss

True that. Xbox 360 was much more powerful in relation to PC at the time of it's release. Through the first year it saw a lot cutting-edge titles that matched the best PC had to offer(Fight Night, Oblivion, Gears). 

I'm no old fart, but I've been around long enough to know the envelope will continue to be pushed. I remember playing Max Payne 2 and thinking that gfx couldn't get much better. 

---

Concerning the idea that consoles are a some sort of pot of gold, this is the worst time to be selling out to consoles and big publishers. Console hardware will be minimum specs in 2yrs., and PC gaming will become even more dominant, while console hardware refreshes will be over, and Onlive-style streaming will become the end game.

It will be a pathetic end to console gaming. 

Avatar image for tionmedon
tionmedon

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 tionmedon
Member since 2006 • 468 Posts

would somebody xplane to me what is a average gaming pc machine is?

Avatar image for redskins26rocs
redskins26rocs

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 redskins26rocs
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts

would somebody xplane to me what is a average gaming pc machine is?

tionmedon
probably intel i5 with hd 3000 lol, here is steam stats http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]

When hardware becomes software. Sure

 

Anyways they most likely mean average user which can easily be true at the beginning of a console launch 

gamecubepad

True that. Xbox 360 was much more powerful in relation to PC at the time of it's release. Through the first year it saw a lot cutting-edge titles that matched the best PC had to offer(Fight Night, Oblivion, Gears). 

I'm no old fart, but I've been around long enough to know the envelope will continue to be pushed. I remember playing Max Payne 2 and thinking that gfx couldn't get much better. 

---

Concerning the idea that consoles are a some sort of pot of gold, this is the worst time to be selling out to consoles and big publishers. Console hardware will be minimum specs in 2yrs., and PC gaming will become even more dominant, while console hardware refreshes will be over, and Onlive-style streaming will become the end game.

It will be a pathetic end to console gaming. 

call of duty 2  on pc was 64 players and xbox360 version was only 8 players in 2005 and the pc version graphically pissed all over 360.

Avatar image for crippledmachine
crippledmachine

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 crippledmachine
Member since 2013 • 256 Posts

"That might change"

Wat? Are you trying to indicate that consoles are going to overtake the PC?

Oh my sides.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

lol consoles held back pc so much call of duty isnt even 64 players anymore.

Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

"Adam Badowski suggests the PCs dominance might change in the future as console hardware catches up."

Are they suggesting that PC multiplats won't see the jump that has been expected? Or is this some hidden sellout statement? I don't speak game industry.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
i wouldn't say no to ps4 outperforming pc for 1y or so. But that won't happen.
Avatar image for Zoza24
Zoza24

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Zoza24
Member since 2011 • 61 Posts

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

Avatar image for ladyblue
LadyBlue

4943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LadyBlue
Member since 2012 • 4943 Posts

This wont sit well with the master race.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

Zoza24
pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

Zoza24
more people have pc's you can make more money off pc.
Avatar image for Zoza24
Zoza24

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Zoza24
Member since 2011 • 61 Posts

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.

Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

Zoza24

pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.

Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.

No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

Everyone obsessed with dumbass eye candy and requiring video cards is the reason pc gaming market is smaller now than the 90s.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="Zoza24"]

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

nextgenjoke

pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.

Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.

No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game.

Man you really are something special.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

"Adam Badowski suggests the PCs dominance might change in the future as console hardware catches up."

Are they suggesting that PC multiplats won't see the jump that has been expected? Or is this some hidden sellout statement? I don't speak game industry.

whiskeystrike

He menas that the PC won't have as huge a gap in visual dominance that it has now, BUT it should also be noted that once the consoles come out and show similar experiences it won't be long before the PCs overtake again due to their nature. It happened last gen/current gen too. Games didn't look worlds apart (except for Crysis but that was special).

I don't imagine there will be colossal differences between say a PS4 version of TW3 and the PC version. PC version might be higher res and run at higher frames but PS4 will largely be the same. not as big as the huge difference between the 360 version of TW2 and the PC version. But then PC will excel again because it will get better hardware.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"][QUOTE="Zoza24"] pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.

Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.

clyde46

No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game.

Man you really are something special.

lol 20 million people downloaded doom and played it in 1993. you didnt need a goddamn graphics card and you didnt need one untill 1999 with quake 3 arena. video cards killed pc gaming.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts
I wonder how the responses would've been if Crytek said this.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

quake 3 arena 1999 is when idsoftware started making sucky games.

 

That's the honest truth i bought a a video card to play the game and i just went back to playing quake 2 because it sucked to previous game.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts
Good God, I love your posting style, nextgenjoke. GOAT poster.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

Good God, I love your posting style, nextgenjoke. GOAT poster.freedomfreak
requiring you to spend extra money to play a pc game besides just buying the game makes the amount of people who can play your game much smaller it's a fact of life and common sense.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

I wonder how the responses would've been if Crytek said this.freedomfreak
 

"cevat Yerli needs to shut the fvck up" like this probably  :P

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]I wonder how the responses would've been if Crytek said this.seanmcloughlin

 

"cevat Yerli needs to shut the fvck up" like this probably  :P

Honestly, I would've said the same.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Good God, I love your posting style, nextgenjoke. GOAT poster.nextgenjoke

requiring you to spend extra money to play a pc game besides just buying the game makes the amount of people who can play your game much smaller it's a fact of life and common sense.

That is indeed a fact of life. It's what we live by.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

nextgenjoke
It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful.
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
[QUOTE="Zoza24"]

And more and more PC Gamedevelopers are heading to consoles, its ''innevitable'' The amount of money they can make on the console markt beat PC anyday, and you cant argue about that.. (So dont come up with your stupid PC high end specs to start a troll war)

In the End, the nextgen consoles get probably most of the PC titles and PC get some console titles like Resident Evil 6 and DmC, but probably most of these games are consoles only.

But for the sake for money, CD Project and more independent Developers need to stay loyal to their PC fanbase to give them a good game to enjoy most probably in the ''graphics'' area.

nextgenjoke

pc developers heading to consoles is stupid because they gotta pay sony and microsoft licsensing fee's unlike pc.

Its not stupid, its brilliant, now we'll see more games and more developers on the console market.. and more money they can make on their IP's. And stop pretend you know anything about the Relationships between Developers and publishers. Or in other words, i sense a little depressive reaction in your comment.

No it's very stupid. You have more restrictions on a console and have to pay twice as much to develop the games. if developers started supporting software rendering again pc market could overtake console since you wouldnt need a video card to game.

lolno
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

freedomfreak
It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful.

It's not a great extra if it prevents people who dont have the money or smarts to install a video card from buying your pc game.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

nextgenjoke

It's not 1999, videogames are more about graphical horsepower these days. get over it

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

seanmcloughlin

It's not 1999, videogames are more about graphical horsepower these days. get over it

Developers are dumbasses these days and they need to get over it.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

software rendering makes pc like a console.

 

Buy the pc, buy the game, play it.

buy a console,buy the game,play it.

 

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

nextgenjoke
It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful.

It's not a great extra if it prevents people who dont have the money or smarts to install a video card from buying your pc game.

buy it on the 360 or ps3 then.
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

nextgenjoke
No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

faizan_faizan
No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games.

it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] It's a great extra though. I ran Crysis on low while my brother ran it on high. That was painful.

It's not a great extra if it prevents people who dont have the money or smarts to install a video card from buying your pc game.

buy it on the 360 or ps3 then.

could of played it on ur old pc instead.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts
could of played it on ur old pc instead.nextgenjoke
Nah, man. I ran it on low. Like low-low. I got AAx2 which was something.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

There hasnt even been one relevant first person shooter since 1999.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]could of played it on ur old pc instead.freedomfreak
Nah, man. I ran it on low. Like low-low. I got AAx2 which was something.

duke nukem 3d is still better than crysis. proves video cards=just graphics

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]could of played it on ur old pc instead.nextgenjoke

Nah, man. I ran it on low. Like low-low. I got AAx2 which was something.

duke nukem 3d is still better than crysis. proves video cards=just graphics

No nanosuit=fail.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

There hasnt even been one relevant first person shooter since 1999.

nextgenjoke
Call of Duty Black Ops 2.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Why does it always take until heewee gets 2000 posts before someone bans him? :(

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

There hasnt even been one relevant first person shooter since 1999.

freedomfreak

Call of Duty Black Ops 2.

call of duty and halo were never relevant to pc gamers  as far as multiplayer.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

nextgenjoke
No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games.

it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay.

They do. HL2's Physics couldn't be achieved with 1999 Cards, And the gameplay IS physics.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

Why does it always take until heewee gets 2000 posts before someone bans him? :(

wis3boi
I consider him part of the SW family. We need him. He's the social glue that holds us together.
Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"][QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games.

it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay.

They do. HL2's Physics couldn't be achieved with 1999 Cards, And the gameplay IS physics.

the physics is done on the cpu.
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

video cards are not required for gaming they are only for graphics whores who care more about graphics than gameplay.

 

nextgenjoke
No it's not, I upgrade my GCs to get better frames and play latest games.

it's just graphics video cards dont improve gameplay.

They do. HL2's Physics couldn't be achieved with 1999 Cards, And the gameplay IS physics.