CD Projekt Red: PC is most powerful platform "but that might change"

quake 2 had much more trouble running on consoles than quake 3.

Because it's more of a true pc game.

nextgenjoke

Again, wrong.

QII had to be redesigned on consoles because consoles back then had quite worse specs than the minimum required PC to run QII.

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

quake 2 had much more trouble running on consoles than quake 3.

Because it's more of a true pc game.

nameless12345

Again, wrong.

QII had to be redesigned on consoles because consoles back then had quite worse specs than the minimum required PC to run QII.

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

quake 2 had much more trouble running on consoles than quake 3.

Because it's more of a true pc game.

nextgenjoke

Again, wrong.

QII had to be redesigned on consoles because consoles back then had quite worse specs than the minimum required PC to run QII.

Bull.

Q3 was designed for faster pace gameplay.

You can't aim as good as with a mouse on a console pad so it's completely untrue that it was designed for consoles.

If anything, QII was more "noob friendly" becuase less complex levels. (i.e. no floating platforms, less height-depth aiming, ect.)

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

 

Again, wrong.

QII had to be redesigned on consoles because consoles back then had quite worse specs than the minimum required PC to run QII.

nameless12345

Bull.

Q3 was designed for faster pace gameplay.

You can't aim as good as with a mouse on a console pad so it's completely untrue that it was designed for consoles.

If anything, QII was more "noob friendly" becuase less complex levels. (i.e. no floating platforms, less height-depth aiming, ect.)

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"] quake 3 ps2 and dreamcast is a direct port compared to quake 2 on ps1/n64. quake 3 was more designed with console specs in mind. quake 3 maps are easier for console noobs to navigate.nextgenjoke

Bull.

Q3 was designed for faster pace gameplay.

You can't aim as good as with a mouse on a console pad so it's completely untrue that it was designed for consoles.

If anything, QII was more "noob friendly" becuase less complex levels. (i.e. no floating platforms, less height-depth aiming, ect.)

Q3 is significantly faster than QII. (faster movement, faster rockets, faster reloading, ect.)

Esp. with mods.

Some maps in Q3 are much more complex than QII maps and require precision platforming.

QII's level design is mostly blocky corridors and sewers.

The ps4 wil be stronger than the average pc so ports will raise hardware requirements. Finally people with old tech and xp will join modern pc gaming.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

eh, he doesn't give any hard evidence or facts or anything. Just mere speculation on his part and it sounds like PR crap to me to get everyone hyped for TW3 across all platforms. 

I would love if it were true cos then we would all have the same game and no compromises but PC will always have stronger hardware year in year out than a fixed system. He just sounds like he's pandering here

AlexKidd5000

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

You should, if you have a high end rig.  Because it means less games will take advantage of the hardware.  The fact DX11 cards have been out this long and so few games acutally use higher levles of geometry is baffling to me. 

crippledmachine

When I read over the word "GTX 260" something came up in my mind. It's an old card, right? I owned it before the 670 and it plays Crysis really well at High at 720p with AA at 2x (if I remember correctly), and yet PS3 and Xbox 360 struggles to run the game with Vaseline smeared all over the screen.

Bloody hell. Isn't it amazing? This is why I often chuckle when consolites still believe that console gaming is cheaper when you can play current generation games with an old card and that there's little difference between consoles and PC. I know that the GTX 260 came out at the time of Crysis, but still, I was playing on High settings with some at Medium. If I turned it down to Low, it would run at 60fps and this is where consoles struggle to run! If you just sit down and think about it, it's mindblowing how consoles are little wallet-looting buggers.

Now, that's the beauty of PC gaming. :)

You are amazed by a card that outperforms a console that came out 3 years after the console?  LOL i would say you are easily amazed.  

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"] quake 3 ps2 and dreamcast is a direct port compared to quake 2 on ps1/n64. quake 3 was more designed with console specs in mind. quake 3 maps are easier for console noobs to navigate.nextgenjoke

Bull.

Q3 was designed for faster pace gameplay.

You can't aim as good as with a mouse on a console pad so it's completely untrue that it was designed for consoles.

If anything, QII was more "noob friendly" becuase less complex levels. (i.e. no floating platforms, less height-depth aiming, ect.)

You're awesome, heewee.freedomfreak

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You're awesome, heewee.rjdofu

quake 3 arena was consoled the same.

nextgenjoke

So was Quake and Quake 2....and even the Doom games for that matter.

I wish CDPR would release more on Cyberpunk 2077. I don't think we enough RPGs with a futuristic setting.

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You're awesome, heewee.rjdofu

[QUOTE="rjdofu"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You're awesome, heewee.Tessellation

[QUOTE="AlexKidd5000"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

eh, he doesn't give any hard evidence or facts or anything. Just mere speculation on his part and it sounds like PR crap to me to get everyone hyped for TW3 across all platforms. 

I would love if it were true cos then we would all have the same game and no compromises but PC will always have stronger hardware year in year out than a fixed system. He just sounds like he's pandering here

lowe0

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

 

Bull.

Q3 was designed for faster pace gameplay.

You can't aim as good as with a mouse on a console pad so it's completely untrue that it was designed for consoles.

If anything, QII was more "noob friendly" becuase less complex levels. (i.e. no floating platforms, less height-depth aiming, ect.)

nameless12345

Q3 is significantly faster than QII. (faster movement, faster rockets, faster reloading, ect.)

Esp. with mods.

Some maps in Q3 are much more complex than QII maps and require precision platforming.

QII's level design is mostly blocky corridors and sewers.

Sometimes if u get a  direct hit you can someone with 1 shot both barrell shot sametime though with super shotgun in quake 2.

 

shotgun is just trash in quake 3 it's not even a relevant weapon.

nextgenjoke

[QUOTE="nextgenjoke"]

Sometimes if u get a  direct hit you can someone with 1 shot both barrell shot sametime though with super shotgun in quake 2.

 

shotgun is just trash in quake 3 it's not even a relevant weapon.

MonsieurX

I wonder do most of you go to sleep thinking of,PC's Vs Consoles.

3d games are a joke. It's about as hard as clicking icons on the desktop. Only 2d arcade games take skill. A single fatility on MKII takes more skill than kiddy games like Quake and The Witcher require in the entire series of both games...combined. 

3d games are a joke. It's about as hard as clicking icons on the desktop. Only 2d arcade games take skill. A single fatility on MKII takes more skill than kiddy games like Quake and The Witcher require in the entire series of both games...combined. 

gamecubepad

Quake is a joke. There's not even nazi gold hidden in the walls.

Only 2d arcade games take real skill. If you lose they take your money. There's no restart button or game saves for amatuer gamers. 

quake 3 is just not a real quake game.

It doesnt even have level traps like quake 1 & 2.

 

the fragpipe on quake 2 you can trap someone in this hallway and it fills with lava and kills them by pressing a button.

quake 1 maps had area's you could make the floor drop out from undernear them and they fall into lava by hitting a button.

nextgenjoke

There's no nazi gold and who's so stupid to make a game that let's you jump extra high by shooting a rocket into the ground? like shrapnel and fire up your butt cause an increase in vertical leap? 

Who actually buys this crap?

In MK you tear off the head and a spine hangs down. just like real life. 

There's hidden area's just wolfenstein 3d in quake 2 aswell lol.nextgenjoke

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

The part about 9800 GT is blatantly incorrect, Rocker6

Alright, so 11,45% of the Steam userbase run an iGPU. Since when is that a majority? :?

Not to mention those iGPU's come with i5's and i7's, and in some cases are better for running older games.

Well yeah, I mean this console IS supposed to last another 7 years. PC gamers here love to underestimate next gen hardware. Seriously, sometimes I think they're expecting another PS3 for the next 7 years.

everyone saying ps4 to destroy pc? What a poor time for hermits!campzor

It can't really destroy PC since that's such a general term. PC can mean anything from a $200 computer using Windows 2000 to a $30 000 monster computer using Windows 7 (lol at Windows 8).

Also keep in mind that the top PC games (indie crap and Laegue) don't even need high-end components, so its kinda LOL-worthy to even buy them unless you use your computer for design work.

Also keep in mind that the top PC games (indie crap and Laegue) don't even need high-end components, so its kinda LOL-worthy to even buy them unless you use your computer for design work.

EvanTheGamer

0/10 try harder