This topic is locked from further discussion.
running away with nothing worthwhile to say already lil coward? kaythnxbai Lol TCHBO. :cool:[QUOTE="infinite884"]
love messing with the nintendo drones. good night everyone oh and nintendo fanboys, take some butt hurt cream before you go to bed and in the morning you can go flood cnet and tell them how their wrong and all that. take care everyone
Bigboi500
your an idiot, when did i ever say macs sell more then pc's? I just said they sell like crazy and are giving microsoft a run for their money but i would never use that in an argument when comparing the two in terms of whats a better platform. good night foolinfinite884Then your argument would be useless :lol:
PCs > Mac in sales and quality. So what kind of parallel are you making here? 3DS > Vita?
[QUOTE="infinite884"] your an idiot, when did i ever say macs sell more then pc's? I just said they sell like crazy and are giving microsoft a run for their money but i would never use that in an argument when comparing the two in terms of whats a better platform. good night foolEponiqueThen you're argument would be useless :lol: PCs > Mac in sales and quality. So what kind of parallel are you making here? 3DS > Vita?He has no argument. His pathetic tactics are: lose an argument, change subject, throw out ridiculous insults, retreat.
Obviously I want the Vita to sell well so that developers take advantage of the platform and make it a priority to make quality games. However, worrying about the future is pointless.
As it stands, the Vita has exceeded my expectations and is my favorite handheld I have had already. Uncharted I think is a bit underscored because of a direct console comparison to a developer that had time to...well develop the product and refine it over the years. However the Vita version is very competent on it's own right.
The interface is extremely snappy and I think the launch games are great. It's all down to personal preferance. I couldn't justify having two portables (3 if I count my iphone but I cant stand gaming on it). The 3DS has very high quality fun games. However I am more for a console like experience and feel the Vita fits the bill for a longer term investment given how fast portable technology has come and the Pica200 just isn't forward thinking enough in my opinion.
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="finalstar2007"]Let's not insult the PS1 now. You guys have obsiously not played games like Revelations on the 3DS it looks fantastic and plays very well too. The 3DS software line up IS superior so that of the Vita, theres really no denying thatYou mad? face it 3DS and Vita is like comparing a PS1 to PS3.. huge diffrence
Kaze_no_Mirai
How is does it have the superior games ? i own a 3ds and so far only good games i played which i own around 12 of is Resident Evil R, and two remakes of N64 games. What games are you talking about? I had the 3Ds for a year with **** games, there was nothing to play, the launch was garbage and i regret paying $250 for it, now the Vita on the other hand has so many awesome games, to tell you the truth if i can turn back time i would of not bought the 3DS because im having so much fun with the Vita. And really there is no room for two handhelds, plus i got Galaxy S2 with a ton of games. 3DS just sits there after i beat RE, and MGS is coming but it looks like i wont be getting it afterall since there is a collection coming to Vita.
This^. It's a shame that some people let their inner fanboy take over and have to hate the other system because it's not the one they purchased. I have both and like you said, the Vita is clearly the winner. The games can be disputed but the fact that the Vita can already rival a 3DS game library of an entire year is impressive. It's a shame people will hate on the Vita without ever having played one.Its funny seeing all the butthurt from people on here when they haven't got a Vita. Pretty sure everyone who owns both knows the Vita is better in practically every way.
zarshack
You guys have obsiously not played games like Revelations on the 3DS it looks fantastic and plays very well too. The 3DS software line up IS superior so that of the Vita, theres really no denying that[QUOTE="Kaze_no_Mirai"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Let's not insult the PS1 now.telefanatic
How is does it have the superior games ? i own a 3ds and so far only good games i played which i own around 12 of is Resident Evil R, and two remakes of N64 games. What games are you talking about? I had the 3Ds for a year with **** games, there was nothing to play, the launch was garbage and i regret paying $250 for it, now the Vita on the other hand has so many awesome games, to tell you the truth if i can turn back time i would of not bought the 3DS because im having so much fun with the Vita. And really there is no room for two handhelds, plus i got Galaxy S2 with a ton of games. 3DS just sits there after i beat RE, and MGS is coming but it looks like i wont be getting it afterall since there is a collection coming to Vita.
Where are the games bro?!
What do you think about Super Mario 3D Land?
It's a 3D platformer, very rare genre nowadays.
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="finalstar2007"]Let's not insult the PS1 now. You guys have obsiously not played games like Revelations on the 3DS it looks fantastic and plays very well too. The 3DS software line up IS superior so that of the Vita, theres really no denying thatYou mad? face it 3DS and Vita is like comparing a PS1 to PS3.. huge diffrence
Kaze_no_Mirai
3DS and...good graphics?.. bahahaha now thatsa good one :P.. thats like saying Wii has good graphics.
no offense to any 3DS fans is intended :oops:
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]
stopped watching as soon as they got to the games category. What a bunch of bullsh*t
finalstar2007
You madd boyyy!
the more madness from 3DS fanboys the better imo :P
Im sure majority agree that if the 3DS should win any category, its the games. The 3DS has been out longer, has more games and has more critically acclaimed games. The only fanboy business here is from cows.
Every other category the Vita seems deserving.
[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]
stopped watching as soon as they got to the games category. What a bunch of bullsh*t
Shirokishi_
You madd boyyy!
the more madness from 3DS fanboys the better imo :P
Im sure majority agree that if the 3DS should win any category, its the games. The 3DS has been out longer, has more games and has more critically acclaimed games. The only fanboy business here is from cows.
Every other category the Vita seems deserving.
Software is a matter of opinion. In another person's perspective, the PSVita library might be just as good (and even better) than the 3DS.
The difference in software quality at the moment is not as huge as...PS2 vs GC or PS1 vs N64.
[QUOTE="Shirokishi_"]
[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]
You madd boyyy!
the more madness from 3DS fanboys the better imo :P
nitekids2004
Im sure majority agree that if the 3DS should win any category, its the games. The 3DS has been out longer, has more games and has more critically acclaimed games. The only fanboy business here is from cows.
Every other category the Vita seems deserving.
Software is a matter of opinion. In another person's perspective, the PSVita library might be just as good (and even better) than the 3DS.
The difference in software quality at the moment is not as huge as...PS2 vs GC or PS1 vs N64.
Well then look at if from a critical standpoint if you want. I said majority would probably agree the 3DS has a better library but critically the 3DS clearly winsSame. Kind of surprising to see the Vita win the games round, even though the consensus here says otherwise. Yeah. Cuz when I look for an "objective" consensus, I turn to System Wars. :roll:[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]I expected the Vita to win in everything but Value and Games. Bigboi500
[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]
stopped watching as soon as they got to the games category. What a bunch of bullsh*t
Shirokishi_
You madd boyyy!
the more madness from 3DS fanboys the better imo :P
Im sure majority agree that if the 3DS should win any category, its the games. The 3DS has been out longer, has more games and has more critically acclaimed games. The only fanboy business here is from cows.
Every other category the Vita seems deserving.
Speaking about myself i have yet to see a good software for the 3DS, RE game? f that there is a RE6 coming out later on in the year, Mario? the last time i played mario was like when i was 8 or 9 years old i dont need mario 500, zelda? never played the series and not interested to do so.
Vita is a dream handheld with some of the best games coming for it and knowing sony im sure they'll produce some mind blowing games not to mention the best FPS this generation is also coming to it :oops:
right now sony has sold over 1 million vita's world wide. Yeah no one's buying it alright[QUOTE="infinite884"][QUOTE="KBFloYd"]
yet no ones buying it...awww
KBFloYd
1million?
yea i think that would put food in the mouths of less than half of the people working at sony..
lol. Somebody's butthurt.
You guys have obsiously not played games like Revelations on the 3DS it looks fantastic and plays very well too. The 3DS software line up IS superior so that of the Vita, theres really no denying that[QUOTE="Kaze_no_Mirai"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"] Let's not insult the PS1 now.finalstar2007
3DS and...good graphics?.. bahahaha now thatsa good one :P.. thats like saying Wii has good graphics.
no offense to any 3DS fans is intended :oops:
Once again, you have never played it.This pretty much. After I played a demo Vita this week, I was really impressed by the hardware and technology in the thing. I mean, the 3DS is still a great piece of hardware for gaming, but the Vita clearly does have a couple of advantages and some better performance (like web browsing and multimedia features because of dat screen) in the other areas, but it's price is the null point. I'd wait for the iPad 3 or buy an iPad 2 if I wanted to spend money on a new "toy" or buy a smartphone that does more and better.The hardware is clearly better with the Vita, but it's the price and the fact that there are tablets and smartphone out there which put the Vita at a major disadvantage.
Wasdie
3DS and...good graphics?.. bahahaha now thatsa good one :P.. thats like saying Wii has good graphics.finalstar2007Both 3DS and Wii games can have good graphics in my book. They may not be Vita good, let alone top-of-the-line gaming PC good, but still good in my book. A pleasing art style goes a longer way than photorealistic technical fidelity, for starters.
Sony gets it right finally,but to late. Smartphones and lots of games/apps under a buck or even free, put the 3DS and VITA out to pasture.roulettethedogAnd just how much appeal do those smartphones have when you don't want to pay monthly for a phone plan? I certainly don't want to for a gaming device. This isn't even getting into the other issues with smartphone gaming: lack of good controls (barring the few games actually made with touch input in mind, but some of us like traditional gaming, this being GameSpot and all), lack of killer apps that tend to show up on dedicated gaming platforms (and full-fledged PCs), finding out you can't make phone calls anymore because you killed the battery playing games on it, getting interrupted mid-game by phone calls and messages, and so on.
Respectfully disagree. I have an Ipad 2 and there are very few games that feel close to a console experience. Sure, the games are cheap, but you get what you pay for. I've already been playing my vita way more than the ipad because it feels like I'm playing my Ps3. Now if they could just get battlefield 3 to work on my vita like in that one video I saw we'd be golden.The hardware is clearly better with the Vita, but it's the price and the fact that there are tablets and smartphone out there which put the Vita at a major disadvantage.
Wasdie
Incorrect. Smartphones/tablets with cheap casual games just get more people into video gaming. If they like what they see then they move onto a Vita, 3DS, or a console. If you love video games you don't go "man I'm gonna buy me an Ipad!". Why? Because none of the big games are on those devices. You gonna play Mass Effect 3 or Gran Turismo or Battlefield 3 on a table or smart phone? Nope. But you might be able to on a Vita some day.Sony gets it right finally,but to late. Smartphones and lots of games/aps under a buck or even free, put the 3DS and VITA out to pasture.
roulettethedog
[QUOTE="infinite884"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]believe it or not it was still selling better than the vita is now.sorry man, i can't read your post over all this butthurt on my screen. :) Damage control. 3DS sold 3.6+ million in the same time the Vita sold 1.2 million, at $250 to boot. Sheep aren't butthurt about anything ;)It's current sales are leaving it in the dust
Eponique
Wow........ talking about the sales of a handheld that released a year ago to another handheld that just released last week in NA and Europe is sad really.
[QUOTE="Meinhard1"] Nintendo never set out to make a high-tech, state of the art, portable console... they're judging the 3DS by the Vita's standards. nervmeisterPerhaps. But how cheap is it to implement glassesless 3D? Cheap? Nintendo sold the 3ds at a loss with the 170 dollar price cut. That is pretty expensive to manufacture for a handheld. However, if I am not mistaken, Sony is selling the Vita at a loss as well thus we have all these expensive games and accessories.
so much so that roid soothing cream sales have gone up 400% :P[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]
So are users still butthurt over this?...
Zaibach
:lol: Wow....Only the people able to judge the Vita should be the owners of the Vita....Same goes for non 3DS owners..
:lol: What a stupid video - they're comparing apples and oranges. Nintendo never set out to make a high-tech, state of the art, portable console... they're judging the 3DS by the Vita's standards. The DS and PSP were the same way. Also - saying that the Vita has better games... and by such a wide margin... that's just ridiculous. Meinhard1
They are both competiting products so you can judge them together. Ironically when he talked about games, at first I thought .. no way! But the more I thought about it the more I realize both systems are lacking so much that it could go either way, the difference is the 3DS had a one year head start.
[QUOTE="Meinhard1"]:lol: What a stupid video - they're comparing apples and oranges. Nintendo never set out to make a high-tech, state of the art, portable console... they're judging the 3DS by the Vita's standards. The DS and PSP were the same way. Also - saying that the Vita has better games... and by such a wide margin... that's just ridiculous. GD1551
They are both competiting products so you can judge them together. Ironically when he talked about games, at first I thought .. no way! But the more I thought about it the more I realize both systems are lacking so much that it could go either way, the difference is the 3DS had a one year head start.
Sure you can compare them; but judging the 3DS by not being a state-of-the-art portable console is silly.
No here is arguing the various points they make - the Vita has better graphics, the dual-sticks provide for a great, console-like experience, the Vita is the superior multimedia device, ect.
Nintendo didn't even try to make the 3DS a multimedia device.
I don't think it's fair to include the head start into the score though.
The highest rated PS Vita game right now is a multiplat - Rayman.
Uncharted actually got suprisngly low scores... it's barely averaging AA.
The 3DS has Mario Karty 7, Mario 3D Land, two great remakes (OoT 3D is basically a killer app and should not be overlooked), Resident Evil Revelations, a Street Fighter port, Metal Gear and even Rayman Origins is on the way.
Although I think the 3DS wins by a lot, could maybe see them making games a tie... but giving the PS Vita such a huge edge when it, in reality, has a fairly terrible launch lineup shows significant bias.
Cause it has much much better games?i stopped watching when psvita won the the game library fight...
like...seriously?
KBFloYd
[QUOTE="GD1551"]
[QUOTE="Meinhard1"]:lol: What a stupid video - they're comparing apples and oranges. Nintendo never set out to make a high-tech, state of the art, portable console... they're judging the 3DS by the Vita's standards. The DS and PSP were the same way. Also - saying that the Vita has better games... and by such a wide margin... that's just ridiculous. Meinhard1
They are both competiting products so you can judge them together. Ironically when he talked about games, at first I thought .. no way! But the more I thought about it the more I realize both systems are lacking so much that it could go either way, the difference is the 3DS had a one year head start.
Sure you can compare them; but judging the 3DS by not being a state-of-the-art portable console is silly.
No here is arguing the various points they make - the Vita has better graphics, the dual-sticks provide for a great, console-like experience, the Vita is the superior multimedia device, ect.
Nintendo didn't even try to make the 3DS a multimedia device.
I don't think it's fair to include the head start into the score though.
The highest rated PS Vita game right now is a multiplat - Rayman.
Uncharted actually got suprisngly low scores... it's barely averaging AA.
The 3DS has Mario Karty 7, Mario 3D Land, two great remakes (OoT 3D is basically a killer app and should not be overlooked), Resident Evil Revelations, a Street Fighter port, Metal Gear and even Rayman Origins is on the way.
Although I think the 3DS wins by a lot, could maybe see them making games a tie... but giving the PS Vita such a huge edge when it, in reality, has a fairly terrible launch lineup shows significant bias.
Yeah but as you said two of those games are remakes, so really the most worthy things are MK7, Mario Land, RE:R, SF4, Cave Story, Shinobi, MG, Rayman and that one Wii ware game.
PSVITA has Wipeout, Rayman, Uncharted (AA is still high), UMVC3, NG sigma plus, Lumines and Fifa. Again, when you look at it like this the difference in library is not great.
If we go by straight up scores the 3DS has 25 games over 7 and the vita has 11. With two of the 3DS being remakes and 3 being the same thing.
[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="Meinhard1"]:lol: What a stupid video - they're comparing apples and oranges. Nintendo never set out to make a high-tech, state of the art, portable console... they're judging the 3DS by the Vita's standards. The DS and PSP were the same way. Also - saying that the Vita has better games... and by such a wide margin... that's just ridiculous. Meinhard1That's what I was thinking, if you compared DS and PSP last gen it would have been the same outcome, we all know what it comes down to and the fact that they don't even mention MK7 or RE:R explains everything. ;) The bias is strong in this one. Exactly, I mean they showed a video of MK7 but that's about it. They completely trivialized all the 3DS's strengths and, again, criticized it for essentially not being a Vita. Saying that 3D Land was the only game worth having the 3D on was inaccurate. The 3D creates a nice sense of speed in Mario Kart... I like it in just about every game. Also, they made it sound nobody can look at the 3D for more then 30 minutes when it doesn't even bother a lot of people.
It seems like they didn't properly test the 3DS yeah. Also they complained about the 3-5 hours on Vita but still gave it a perfect 5 and they said 3-5 hours is bad for a nintendo handheld. That to me smells like different standards.
Anyway I think the Vita is the better device too (it's more expensive so it should be) but that is apart from the software because the 3DS wins in that respect. Vita still has to build up a strong software library and 3DS needs a hardware revision (better battery life, an extra control stick) imo.
The hardware is clearly better with the Vita, but it's the price and the fact that there are tablets and smartphone out there which put the Vita at a major disadvantage.
Wasdie
The thing is I cant get dedicated gamer experiance from those phone games. Same goes for controls. The two products are meant to give you different things. PSvita has more meat and control when it comes to games and since thats what matters from a gaming handheld that makes sense. While a smart phone is mainly used for a phone and all them aps and porobly a quick touch game while waiting on line or something. Which again makes sense for the product. I would never buy a smartphone with the thought of "man I cant wait to buy all these games"
Lol, the vita is just technologically better but the 3DS has better games hands down. Its not even worth discussion.
ActicEdge
Well the fact it been out longer there is no doubt it would have a slight edge over in libary though I havent seen much that intrest me for 3ds thats out now. I mean its just resident evil adn thats it.I dont care for mario anymore and probly will never play another one unless they make something like super paper mario for the wii again. I wouldint say its a hands down win in libary but it does have more options. However I will say PS vita had more launch games I was interested then what 3ds had.
Rofl. The 3DS is like 2 gens old with a current generation 3D effect. What a joke, the Vita completly destroys that crappy handheld.
This is like last gen when people said the PSP would come out on top because it was much more powerful than the DS. Instead the DS destroyed the PSP.RyviusARC
Let's be realistic here, if you let a first generation system sell 60+ million units in your backyard, that would hardly qualify as destroying the competition. The real world doesn't exist in absolutes, it's all about perspective.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment