Exactly, I mean they showed a video of MK7 but that's about it. They completely trivialized all the 3DS's strengths and, again, criticized it for essentially not being a Vita. Saying that 3D Land was the only game worth having the 3D on was inaccurate. The 3D creates a nice sense of speed in Mario Kart... I like it in just about every game. Also, they made it sound nobody can look at the 3D for more then 30 minutes when it doesn't even bother a lot of people.[QUOTE="Meinhard1"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] That's what I was thinking, if you compared DS and PSP last gen it would have been the same outcome, we all know what it comes down to and the fact that they don't even mention MK7 or RE:R explains everything. ;) The bias is strong in this one.R4gn4r0k
It seems like they didn't properly test the 3DS yeah. Also they complained about the 3-5 hours on Vita but still gave it a perfect 5 and they said 3-5 hours is bad for a nintendo handheld. That to me smells like different standards.
Anyway I think the Vita is the better device too (it's more expensive so it should be) but that is apart from the software because the 3DS wins in that respect. Vita still has to build up a strong software library and 3DS needs a hardware revision (better battery life, an extra control stick) imo.
Yeah I found this rather suspicious too about the scores for battery life.
On the other hand though I have seen plenty of reviewers give the 3DS a free pass in other areas just because it is Nintendo.
Log in to comment