CNET UK Survey: 60% of Xbox 360s Have Broken

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="clone01"] you intentionally ignored my question...let's run a poll...who's the more credible, objective poster on system wars? right, that would be a statistically accurate poll, am i correct?

What does the opinion of me that other posters have have anything to do with a poll about console's failure rates? :|

well, its a poll, so its the best we have to go on, right? how do you know those people taking that survey aren't just using their opinion, because a friend's unit died. how do you know a person who's had a RROD isn't goading his friends into taking the survey to throw the results? you know how fanboys are: they'll do anything to make other fanboys look bad.

I have no way of knowing that and statisticians take all those things into account too. They still can make accurate predictions and explanations using those results. Sometimes polls could be the product of massive amounts of bias but those are the less. Most of the times polls work for a reason, even with biased people and boicoters participating.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"] What does the opinion of me that other posters have have anything to do with a poll about console's failure rates? :|

well, its a poll, so its the best we have to go on, right? how do you know those people taking that survey aren't just using their opinion, because a friend's unit died. how do you know a person who's had a RROD isn't goading his friends into taking the survey to throw the results? you know how fanboys are: they'll do anything to make other fanboys look bad.

I have no way of knowing that and statisticians take all those things into account too. They still can make accurate predictions and explanations using those results. Sometimes polls could be the product of massive amounts of bias but those are the less. Most of the times polls work for a reason, even with biased people and boicoters participating.

alright. i'll concede to attrition, because you apparently will keep going at this the rest of the day. at any rate, i highly disagree, and i really don't feel you've proven much of anything, except reinforced your sony bias.
Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="clone01"] you intentionally ignored my question...let's run a poll...who's the more credible, objective poster on system wars? right, that would be a statistically accurate poll, am i correct?

What does the opinion of me that other posters have have anything to do with a poll about console's failure rates? :|

well, its a poll, so its the best we have to go on, right? how do you know those people taking that survey aren't just using their opinion, because a friend's unit died. how do you know a person who's had a RROD isn't goading his friends into taking the survey to throw the results? you know how fanboys are: they'll do anything to make other fanboys look bad.

Also, a poll about my credibility is actually meassuring opinions. There's no objective way of meassuring my or yours credibility. In the end it depends on what a person subjectively thinks of me or you. The console failure poll is not about opinions.
Avatar image for pattyp77
pattyp77

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#204 pattyp77
Member since 2008 • 181 Posts

WoW!!! 60%!!!!

I know 3 guys with X360 and all of them have had the RROD... One has had 2x RROD but he really plays the **** outta his Box.

I have 2 PS3z in my house and one was DOA but Sony replaced for free and I scored a free Dual Shock outta the stuff up. I know 2 other guys with PS3 and theirs havent had any issues yet.

Fingers Crossed for all gamers... Consoles SHOULD NOT BREAK!!!!! PERIOD!!!!!

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="clone01"] well, its a poll, so its the best we have to go on, right? how do you know those people taking that survey aren't just using their opinion, because a friend's unit died. how do you know a person who's had a RROD isn't goading his friends into taking the survey to throw the results? you know how fanboys are: they'll do anything to make other fanboys look bad.

I have no way of knowing that and statisticians take all those things into account too. They still can make accurate predictions and explanations using those results. Sometimes polls could be the product of massive amounts of bias but those are the less. Most of the times polls work for a reason, even with biased people and boicoters participating.

alright. i'll concede to attrition, because you apparently will keep going at this the rest of the day. at any rate, i highly disagree, and i really don't feel you've proven much of anything, except reinforced your sony bias.

If an independent party makes a study where they count the number of existing 360s against the number of failed systems (let's say in a month in the US) without limiting the sample to two year old consoles and a particular warranty provider and find out that the numbers are much lower than the CNET poll then I'll concede that such a study would be more credible. But until then I still think the CNET poll is the best representative.
Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"] If there is no other kind of evidence then this is the best we have. Polls may not be always accurate but they are usually a good approximation. Right now we have polls against opinions and polls > opinions. CNET is a respectable enough site.clone01
there was actually a study done by squaresoft that was not an internet poll, which placed the failure rate around 24%, which is still unacceptably high. however, not 54%.

1. It's SquareTRADE, not Squaresoft.

2. SquareTRADE even stated explicitly in their study that they estimate the actual failure rate to be much higher since most people send in their broken 360s directly to M$ instead of going through SquareTrade.

3. SquareTRADE even admitted that the new 360 models that supposedly fixed RROD have barely been out for a year and are still too untested to reach any solid conclusions about reliability. Don't forget the massive influx of hardware failures that hit Xbox 360s when the launch 360s' 3 year warranty expired.

Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"] If there is no other kind of evidence then this is the best we have. Polls may not be always accurate but they are usually a good approximation. Right now we have polls against opinions and polls > opinions. CNET is a respectable enough site.clone01
there was actually a study done by squaresoft that was not an internet poll, which placed the failure rate around 24%, which is still unacceptably high. however, not 54%.

1. It's SquareTRADE, not Squaresoft.

2. SquareTRADE even stated explicitly in their study that they estimate the actual failure rate to be much higher since most people send in their broken 360s directly to M$ instead of going through SquareTrade.

3. SquareTRADE even admitted that the new 360 models that supposedly fixed RROD have barely been out for a year and are still too untested to reach any solid conclusions about reliability. Don't forget the massive influx of hardware failures that hit Xbox 360s when the launch 360s' 3 year warranty expired.

Avatar image for coupe_delacoupe
coupe_delacoupe

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 coupe_delacoupe
Member since 2009 • 28 Posts
[QUOTE="coupe_delacoupe"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"] It's still the best evidence we have. That's how statistics work and why polls are used for a lot of predictions and explanations. It's sometimes the best way we have to come close to reality even if it's flawed.clone01
i bet alot of 360 fanboys voted sony to fail just to tilt the results

just like PS3 fans might influence the result of a RROD poll. like i said, something like this lacks any sort of accuracy or credibility.

no just the 360 fanboys.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#209 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="coupe_delacoupe"] i bet alot of 360 fanboys voted sony to fail just to tilt the resultscoupe_delacoupe
just like PS3 fans might influence the result of a RROD poll. like i said, something like this lacks any sort of accuracy or credibility.

no just the 360 fanboys.

Yeah, keep thinking that. And that Santa Claus is where your christmas presents come from :roll:

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"] If there is no other kind of evidence then this is the best we have. Polls may not be always accurate but they are usually a good approximation. Right now we have polls against opinions and polls > opinions. CNET is a respectable enough site.TREY_FOR_LI4E

there was actually a study done by squaresoft that was not an internet poll, which placed the failure rate around 24%, which is still unacceptably high. however, not 54%.

1. It's SquareTRADE, not Squaresoft.

2. SquareTRADE even stated explicitly in their study that they estimate the actual failure rate to be much higher since most people send in their broken 360s directly to M$ instead of going through SquareTrade.

3. SquareTRADE even admitted that the new 360 models that supposedly fixed RROD have barely been out for a year and are still too untested to reach any solid conclusions about reliability. Don't forget the massive influx of hardware failures that hit Xbox 360s when the launch 360s' 3 year warranty expired.

1. i corrected my mistake later. 2. 25% higher? doubtful 3. still untested, yes. but how does that make the internet survey any more reliable, Martin_Keamy?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"] If there is no other kind of evidence then this is the best we have. Polls may not be always accurate but they are usually a good approximation. Right now we have polls against opinions and polls > opinions. CNET is a respectable enough site.TREY_FOR_LI4E

there was actually a study done by squaresoft that was not an internet poll, which placed the failure rate around 24%, which is still unacceptably high. however, not 54%.

1. It's SquareTRADE, not Squaresoft.

2. SquareTRADE even stated explicitly in their study that they estimate the actual failure rate to be much higher since most people send in their broken 360s directly to M$ instead of going through SquareTrade.

3. SquareTRADE even admitted that the new 360 models that supposedly fixed RROD have barely been out for a year and are still too untested to reach any solid conclusions about reliability. Don't forget the massive influx of hardware failures that hit Xbox 360s when the launch 360s' 3 year warranty expired.

what massive influx? do you have a link?
Avatar image for MizFitAwesome
MizFitAwesome

2745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 MizFitAwesome
Member since 2009 • 2745 Posts

Come on, we all know every cow is going to buy into these polls and act like they are accurate. All you have to do to prove polls are accurate is prove that John Kerry wonhis presidential election, sincehe wasleading the Gallup Polls up until election day

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#213 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

Come on, we all know every cow is going to buy into these polls and act like they are accurate. All you have to do to prove polls are accurate is prove that John Kerry wonhis presidential election, sincehe wasleading the Gallup Polls up until election day

MizFitAwesome

The funny thing about all this is that the only survey which would count are those done by Microsoft themselves, and the results are something which we know Microsoft won't divulge because it's embarassing. That's like saying that the only reliable news for a conspiracy theory of Armstrong landing on the moon is by NASA themselves. Get my drift?

Avatar image for drakecool1
drakecool1

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 drakecool1
Member since 2009 • 1145 Posts

Come on, we all know every cow is going to buy into these polls and act like they are accurate. All you have to do to prove polls are accurate is prove that John Kerry wonhis presidential election, sincehe wasleading the Gallup Polls up until election day

MizFitAwesome

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

Come on, we all know every cow is going to buy into these polls and act like they are accurate. All you have to do to prove polls are accurate is prove that John Kerry wonhis presidential election, sincehe wasleading the Gallup Polls up until election day

drakecool1

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#216 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

Come on, we all know every cow is going to buy into these polls and act like they are accurate. All you have to do to prove polls are accurate is prove that John Kerry wonhis presidential election, sincehe wasleading the Gallup Polls up until election day

CaseyWegner

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

Well, our assessment of the failure rate is as uncredible as any of the 3rd party surveyors out there. But I will say this. Out of the5 people or so whom i know owns a 360.....all of them have had an RROD at least once. You can claim that 5 people is an inadequate sample, just like how even 5000 people is relatively a small sample compared to the many many millions of 360 owners, but when everyone around had it at least once, we know something is not right.

Lemmings will continue to hide behind the 'unproven figures' trump card, because they know that there will never ever be a proven figure. How can you possibly prove that a product which has sold 30 over million unitshas a certain failure rate? No matter whether we take a sample of 10,000 100,000 or even 1,000,000 the sample is still less than 5% of the total amount and hence can be classified as a poor representation of actual conditions. The best thing any of us can do is ask around, and if the failure rate is as low as even 10% as Microsoft claims, then it's unlikely that you and everyone you know just happens to fall in that unlucky percentage.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

jhcho2

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

Well, our assessment of the failure rate is as uncredible as any of the 3rd party surveyors out there. But I will say this. Out of the5 people or so whom i know owns a 360.....all of them have had an RROD at least once. You can claim that 5 people is an inadequate sample, just like how even 5000 people is relatively a small sample compared to the many many millions of 360 owners, but when everyone around had it at least once, we know something is not right.

Lemmings will continue to hide behind the 'unproven figures' trump card, because they know that there will never ever be a proven figure. How can you possibly prove that a product which has sold 30 over million unitshas a certain failure rate? No matter whether we take a sample of 10,000 100,000 or even 1,000,000 the sample is still less than 5% of the total amount and hence can be classified as a poor representation of actual conditions. The best thing any of us can do is ask around, and if the failure rate is as low as even 10% as Microsoft claims, then it's unlikely that you and everyone you know just happens to fall in that unlucky percentage.

we should at least attempt to be realistic. 60% is just plain silly.

Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

Come on, we all know every cow is going to buy into these polls and act like they are accurate. All you have to do to prove polls are accurate is prove that John Kerry wonhis presidential election, sincehe wasleading the Gallup Polls up until election day

CaseyWegner

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

Approximately, yes.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

Approximately, yes.

do you believe the 16% ps3 failure rate?

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#220 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

CaseyWegner

Well, our assessment of the failure rate is as uncredible as any of the 3rd party surveyors out there. But I will say this. Out of the5 people or so whom i know owns a 360.....all of them have had an RROD at least once. You can claim that 5 people is an inadequate sample, just like how even 5000 people is relatively a small sample compared to the many many millions of 360 owners, but when everyone around had it at least once, we know something is not right.

Lemmings will continue to hide behind the 'unproven figures' trump card, because they know that there will never ever be a proven figure. How can you possibly prove that a product which has sold 30 over million unitshas a certain failure rate? No matter whether we take a sample of 10,000 100,000 or even 1,000,000 the sample is still less than 5% of the total amount and hence can be classified as a poor representation of actual conditions. The best thing any of us can do is ask around, and if the failure rate is as low as even 10% as Microsoft claims, then it's unlikely that you and everyone you know just happens to fall in that unlucky percentage.

we should at least attempt to be realistic. 60% is just plain silly.

And why is it unrealistic? Everybody i know who has a 360 has had an RROD. In fact, if I told a future 360 owner that the odds of getting a RROD were low....only then, would i be really unrealistic. Because the painful reality is that any 360 owner stands a higher chance of getting RROD than not. An inconvenient truth.

Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

CaseyWegner

Approximately, yes.

do you believe the 16% ps3 failure rate?

Approximately, yes.

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="drakecool1"]

well why hasn't microsoft given an accurate figure ? it's because they are too embarrassed to say the x360 has a 60% failure rate or more they would gladly give out the accurate figures if it was only 10-20% but they know it's alot more.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

Approximately, yes.

If ANY item sold in America was defective 60% of the time, consumer groups would be screaming, tons of lawsuits (not just a few) would have been filed and won by now, and the Goverment would have gotten involved. It's just not possibly that high.

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Approximately, yes.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

do you believe the 16% ps3 failure rate?

Approximately, yes.

And this one...

There has been no hint that the PS3 fails almost 1 out of every 5 units. 16% is too high, and about 3 times where it most likely is.

and on that note, the 360 number of 60% is ALSO about 3 times what is likely. Notice how they are both about 3 times higher than reasonable sources claim.

Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

TBoogy

Approximately, yes.

If ANY item sold in America was defective 60% of the time, consumer groups would be screaming, tons of lawsuits (not just a few) would have been filed and won by now, and the Goverment would have gotten involved. It's just not possibly that high.

I don't know what America you live in, but consumer groups have been screaming, and M$ has been sued.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="TBoogy"]

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Approximately, yes.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

If ANY item sold in America was defective 60% of the time, consumer groups would be screaming, tons of lawsuits (not just a few) would have been filed and won by now, and the Goverment would have gotten involved. It's just not possibly that high.

I don't know what America you live in, but consumer groups have been screaming, and M$ has been sued.

not to the extent that 60% would warrant.

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

[QUOTE="TBoogy"]

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Approximately, yes.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

If ANY item sold in America was defective 60% of the time, consumer groups would be screaming, tons of lawsuits (not just a few) would have been filed and won by now, and the Goverment would have gotten involved. It's just not possibly that high.

I don't know what America you live in, but consumer groups have been screaming, and M$ has been sued.

Yes, a few lawsuits have been filed. thats nothing. a few lawsuits were filed over DRE, and they lost. there would be an avalanche if 60% were true. they would have to stop selling it.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#227 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Glad i didn't go near that thing, the milkage also adds to the disdain.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#228 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

[QUOTE="clone01"] there was actually a study done by squaresoft that was not an internet poll, which placed the failure rate around 24%, which is still unacceptably high. however, not 54%.clone01

1. It's SquareTRADE, not Squaresoft.

2. SquareTRADE even stated explicitly in their study that they estimate the actual failure rate to be much higher since most people send in their broken 360s directly to M$ instead of going through SquareTrade.

3. SquareTRADE even admitted that the new 360 models that supposedly fixed RROD have barely been out for a year and are still too untested to reach any solid conclusions about reliability. Don't forget the massive influx of hardware failures that hit Xbox 360s when the launch 360s' 3 year warranty expired.

what massive influx? do you have a link?

ha can't, he's talking utter bull, there was no 'mass' breakdown of launch 360's when the 3 year warranty expired, there wasn't many launch zephyr's that lasted past the first year and a half, he's taliking out of his behind, i like to know everything about my consoles, and i have researched the RROD extensively, i bet he doesn't even know what the RROD actually is (whatch him say overheating)
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

[QUOTE="TBoogy"]

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Approximately, yes.

If ANY item sold in America was defective 60% of the time, consumer groups would be screaming, tons of lawsuits (not just a few) would have been filed and won by now, and the Goverment would have gotten involved. It's just not possibly that high.

I don't know what America you live in, but consumer groups have been screaming, and M$ has been sued.

sony got sued in the PS2 days, too, lolfaqs.
Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

CaseyWegner

Well, our assessment of the failure rate is as uncredible as any of the 3rd party surveyors out there. But I will say this. Out of the5 people or so whom i know owns a 360.....all of them have had an RROD at least once. You can claim that 5 people is an inadequate sample, just like how even 5000 people is relatively a small sample compared to the many many millions of 360 owners, but when everyone around had it at least once, we know something is not right.

Lemmings will continue to hide behind the 'unproven figures' trump card, because they know that there will never ever be a proven figure. How can you possibly prove that a product which has sold 30 over million unitshas a certain failure rate? No matter whether we take a sample of 10,000 100,000 or even 1,000,000 the sample is still less than 5% of the total amount and hence can be classified as a poor representation of actual conditions. The best thing any of us can do is ask around, and if the failure rate is as low as even 10% as Microsoft claims, then it's unlikely that you and everyone you know just happens to fall in that unlucky percentage.

we should at least attempt to be realistic. 60% is just plain silly.

it sounds more disastrous to me.

Almost to product recall levels.

Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

Glad i didn't go near that thing, the milkage also adds to the disdain. X360PS3AMD05

Well said.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
WHAT? Is this even true? If it really is then 360 wouldn't be selling as it is today.
Avatar image for skektek
skektek

6530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#233 skektek
Member since 2004 • 6530 Posts

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

do you believe it has a 60% failure rate?

TBoogy

Approximately, yes.

If ANY item sold in America was defective 60% of the time, consumer groups would be screaming, tons of lawsuits (not just a few) would have been filed and won by now, and the Goverment would have gotten involved. It's just not possibly that high.

I'm going to take you on a little "thought experiment" by asking you a series of questions beginning with: Who would sue and what exactly would they sue for?

Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

do you believe the 16% ps3 failure rate?

TBoogy

Approximately, yes.

And this one...

There has been no hint that the PS3 fails almost 1 out of every 5 units. 16% is too high, and about 3 times where it most likely is.

and on that note, the 360 number of 60% is ALSO about 3 times what is likely. Notice how they are both about 3 times higher than reasonable sources claim.

Which are those reasonable sources that you claim? And also, the 3 year warranty thing was put in place in order to avoid the massive lawsuits that evidently would have shown up. People are not suing because they get their machine repaired but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen often. When the majority of people I know with 360s have had theirs replaced sometimes more than once then I can see how those 60% estimates could be closer to the truth than those on the 20-ish and 30-ish percentage (which is still ridiculously high).
Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="TBoogy"]

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Approximately, yes.

RedruM_I

And this one...

There has been no hint that the PS3 fails almost 1 out of every 5 units. 16% is too high, and about 3 times where it most likely is.

and on that note, the 360 number of 60% is ALSO about 3 times what is likely. Notice how they are both about 3 times higher than reasonable sources claim.

Which are those reasonable sources that you claim?

Probably Google and Wikipedia, the same sources lots of lemmings are citing these days in debates.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#236 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17908 Posts

Why isnt this locked yet? Its obviously untrue, and flamebait :|

Avatar image for Wings_008
Wings_008

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 173

User Lists: 0

#237 Wings_008
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts
just one question, is the Jasper 360 included on that survey, because i heard it's very reliable compared to the older models
Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

just one question, is the Jasper 360 included on that survey, because i heard it's very reliable compared to the older models Wings_008

Jaspers have even been out for barely a year. There isn't enough data to reach any conclusions about any alleged increased reliability.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#239 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17908 Posts

[QUOTE="Wings_008"]just one question, is the Jasper 360 included on that survey, because i heard it's very reliable compared to the older models TREY_FOR_LI4E

Jaspers have even been out for barely a year. There isn't enough data to reach any conclusions about any alleged increased reliability.

There isnt any data backing up that crap you posted but you did it anyway didnt you??
Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

[QUOTE="RedruM_I"][QUOTE="TBoogy"]

And this one...

There has been no hint that the PS3 fails almost 1 out of every 5 units. 16% is too high, and about 3 times where it most likely is.

and on that note, the 360 number of 60% is ALSO about 3 times what is likely. Notice how they are both about 3 times higher than reasonable sources claim.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

Which are those reasonable sources that you claim?

Probably Google and Wikipedia, the same sources lots of lemmings are citing these days in debates.

No, this Squaretrade report for one. Also, a DailyTech retailer survey that got about 33% from multiple sources: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7892 So let me guess, analysis of a companies repair claims and a survey of retailers is not as good as one of the two online surveys making rounds that claim approx. 60%? (and FYI, Google is not a source of info. they just link you to sources of info. Smarty.)