yes i agree CNN is very smart for telling this to the publicnaruto7777true, they also said iraq had wmd's.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
yes i agree CNN is very smart for telling this to the publicnaruto7777true, they also said iraq had wmd's.
How is it not going better. It's sold more worldwide this year than last year plus they're talking a smaller loss than last year. munu9they're continuing to lose money, in order to recover they need to make money.
[QUOTE="naruto7777"]yes i agree CNN is very smart for telling this to the publicZoomZoom2490true, they also said iraq had wmd's.
I think they reported what a certain administration claimed.
true, they also said iraq had wmd's.[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"][QUOTE="naruto7777"]yes i agree CNN is very smart for telling this to the publicdemoralizer
I think they reported what a certain administration claimed.
wrong, their own panel said the same.The RROD issue didn't hurt 360, it might have even helped sales. Because by your logic, the PS2 would have sold WAY better if it hadn't had DRE. Which is pretty much crazy.... True the PS3 hasn't been on track to overtake 360 sales but the only reason is because the 360 had a free year head start. Otherwise the PS3 is selling as well if not better than the 360. What's life support? Multiple games selling a million+? Selling about as much as the 360 overall? If you didn't notice, I added an extra link to my post, here it is again: http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=272074[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]]Even when you were outselling the 360, the PS3 has never outsold it enough to be tracking to overtake it before the end of NEXT gen...and that's selling against the RROD plagued 360. The RROD saved Sony from not being completely dead...now it is merely on life support. Also, if cows are going to continually claim these sales advantages, how about some links to back them up? The numbers cows throw around NEVER add up, and the PS3 would be millions ahead of the 360 if it sold the numbers cows say half the time. Somebody in this thread said the PS3 has sold 11 million consoles this year....where's the numbers to prove it?munu9
Also since when is "not being on track to overtake the 360" sinking ship status?
The RROD didn't hurt the 360? Are you insane? Also, life support is dropping your price by 100 bucks in its first year and having a larger money deficit to make up. Lastly, all your link showed was sony SHIPPING more units out in a quarter than MS did...coincidentally a quarter where MS was clearing inventory of the 20 gig premiums for the 60 gig. What IS interesting is that link has a link to sony's shipping numbers. As of Sept 31, sony had shipped 13.23 million consoles. As of Nov 30, MS had shipped 25+ million. Even if the PS3 shipped 3 million consoles in oct and Nov, that still puts it 9 million behind 360 shipped and still would have it shipping 750,000 units less than Cows have been claiming it's userbase to be for a couple months now(17 million) and that's if every single PS3 they shipped was sold to customers...judging from the number of PS3's I see in every store I go to, that is an impossibility.yeah.. i would have been happier with more games, and just having to swap a disk from time to time. i never bought a single bluray disk when i owned my ps3 - and never saw a game that proved it was necessary....[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]First and foremost, I dont think the PS3 is going anywhere soon. But it boggles the mind to think all of this could have been avoided by Sony if the PS3 just didnt include Blu Ray. Pretty crazy.Ninten007
This post proves you were never in the Killzone 2 beta. You never owned a PS3 too.
um - how? i owned a launch 60gig... and i never said 'i' had the beta, was my boss mate.. said i had access to it...dude, this was on like 4-5 different networks today, different stories - same tune. the news from NPD is abysmal. PS3 is tanking in terms of holiday sales, bluray is on life support... read ALL of the articles.CNN is full of it, and everyone knows it...
deciding a winner and a loser over one month sales is nothing to get excited about
ZoomZoom2490
[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"][QUOTE="_Brennan_"]Who cares? I have a PS3, I hate the 360, and I really don't care what others think. I like my PS3, and I enjoy the exclusives that I have for the console. As long as I'm happy, that's all that matters. :P_Brennan_How can anyone hate the 360? Oh, did I say that? How dare me say anything negative about the mighty 360. :roll: LOL
Hating a piece of plastic is pretty sad though.
[QUOTE="demoralizer"][QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"] true, they also said iraq had wmd's.ZoomZoom2490
I think they reported what a certain administration claimed.
wrong, their own panel said the same.The Kurds said the same too so what? This hardly discredits them. I hate CNN anyway, but not over that.
[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"][QUOTE="demoralizer"]wrong, their own panel said the same.I think they reported what a certain administration claimed.
demoralizer
The Kurds said the same too so what? This hardly discredits them. I hate CNN anyway, but not over that.
they DID NOT report that iraq had WMDs - they reported what the administration was saying, just like every other network... they even openly criticized powell at the UN meeting. gimme a break guys. you can just look this up on youtube or google, no need to post lies.[QUOTE="munu9"] How is it not going better. It's sold more worldwide this year than last year plus they're talking a smaller loss than last year. MarloStanfieldthey're continuing to lose money, in order to recover they need to make money.
Seriously, do people still believe this crap?
Cost of production is now about 400 USD.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/ps3-production-costs-halved-says-analyst
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jan2008/gb2008018_681920_page_2.htm
The 80 gig is priced at 399 USD which means that the PS3 is, more or less, breaking even.
Hurrrr PS3 is still losing money.
[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"][QUOTE="_Brennan_"]Who cares? I have a PS3, I hate the 360, and I really don't care what others think. I like my PS3, and I enjoy the exclusives that I have for the console. As long as I'm happy, that's all that matters. :P_Brennan_How can anyone hate the 360? Oh, did I say that? How dare me say anything negative about the mighty 360. :roll: LOL thats a bit fanboyish dont you think?
[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]dude, this was on like 4-5 different networks today, different stories - same tune. the news from NPD is abysmal. PS3 is tanking in terms of holiday sales, bluray is on life support... read ALL of the articles. are you aware that its only DEC 12? maybe you are confused with black friday that just passed.CNN is full of it, and everyone knows it...
deciding a winner and a loser over one month sales is nothing to get excited about
3picuri3
they're continuing to lose money, in order to recover they need to make money.[QUOTE="MarloStanfield"][QUOTE="munu9"] How is it not going better. It's sold more worldwide this year than last year plus they're talking a smaller loss than last year. Cu_sidhe
Seriously, do people still believe this crap?
Cost of production is now about 400 USD.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/ps3-production-costs-halved-says-analyst
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jan2008/gb2008018_681920_page_2.htm
The 80 gig is priced at 399 USD which means that the PS3 is, more or less, breaking even.
Hurrrr PS3 is still losing money.
I find it harder to believe that Sony isn't in the Red but they still refuse to drop the price of the PS3.
[QUOTE="Cu_sidhe"][QUOTE="MarloStanfield"] they're continuing to lose money, in order to recover they need to make money. demoralizer
Seriously, do people still believe this crap?
Cost of production is now about 400 USD.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/ps3-production-costs-halved-says-analyst
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jan2008/gb2008018_681920_page_2.htm
The 80 gig is priced at 399 USD which means that the PS3 is, more or less, breaking even.
Hurrrr PS3 is still losing money.
I find it harder to believe that Sony isn't in the Red but they still refuse to drop the price of the PS3.
Maybe they want to make a bit of money off of them at a higher price, for now?
I mean, if they lowered the cost, they would be losing money on each console again. Why would they do that?
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]dude, this was on like 4-5 different networks today, different stories - same tune. the news from NPD is abysmal. PS3 is tanking in terms of holiday sales, bluray is on life support... read ALL of the articles. are you aware that its only DEC 12? maybe you are confused with black friday that just passed. Also, companies having to re-think their marketing strategy =/= Blu-ray is on "life support". THey simply want to sell even more than they are now.CNN is full of it, and everyone knows it...
deciding a winner and a loser over one month sales is nothing to get excited about
ZoomZoom2490
Compared to 2007 sales Blu-Ray is up 300%
-http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=1222
-http://www.cdrlabs.com/News/blu-ray-sales-up-300-over-2007.html
-http://www.hollywoodinhidef.com/blog_detail.php?id=228
When it comes to CNN, I tend to lend a deaf ear to whatever they say you can call be bias or whatever and besides this is and editorial. CNN the news company that claims that Russia attacked georgia when it's the other way around and so many other things they got wrong.
C-SPAN FOR THE WIN
What signs? I could have sworn the PS3 was outselling the 360 a couple months ago. There were not significant "signs." Some months it sold less than 100k others it outsold the 360 by a lot. And that long list of things are just rehashed list from a year ago that I didn't hear about in the month that the PS3 outsold the 360 in every region. And when they released the figure that the PS3 outsold the 360 worldwide This whole teh ps3 is sinking because of relatively bad November sales is a gross over reaction and lemmings are having a field day with it.Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).Here are some links just in case you need a memory refresher:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=272074
munu9
[QUOTE="munu9"] What signs? I could have sworn the PS3 was outselling the 360 a couple months ago. There were not significant "signs." Some months it sold less than 100k others it outsold the 360 by a lot. And that long list of things are just rehashed list from a year ago that I didn't hear about in the month that the PS3 outsold the 360 in every region. And when they released the figure that the PS3 outsold the 360 worldwide This whole teh ps3 is sinking because of relatively bad November sales is a gross over reaction and lemmings are having a field day with it.Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).because it is incorrect. The 360 has sketchy reports of being profitable back in late 2006, and I believe was confirmed by MS back in late 2007. I know the hardware was profitable long before 2 weeks ago(which would be 3 years). Also, I already pointed out that he was using shipped numbers for a single quarter...a quarter in which MS was clearing out inventory of the 20 gig premium system(ie holding off shipments till the retail channel had cleared.Here are some links just in case you need a memory refresher:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=272074
TREAL_Since
[QUOTE="munu9"] What signs? I could have sworn the PS3 was outselling the 360 a couple months ago. There were not significant "signs." Some months it sold less than 100k others it outsold the 360 by a lot. And that long list of things are just rehashed list from a year ago that I didn't hear about in the month that the PS3 outsold the 360 in every region. And when they released the figure that the PS3 outsold the 360 worldwide This whole teh ps3 is sinking because of relatively bad November sales is a gross over reaction and lemmings are having a field day with it.Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).Here are some links just in case you need a memory refresher:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=272074
TREAL_Since
Just now began to break even!?
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="munu9"] What signs? I could have sworn the PS3 was outselling the 360 a couple months ago. There were not significant "signs." Some months it sold less than 100k others it outsold the 360 by a lot. And that long list of things are just rehashed list from a year ago that I didn't hear about in the month that the PS3 outsold the 360 in every region. And when they released the figure that the PS3 outsold the 360 worldwide This whole teh ps3 is sinking because of relatively bad November sales is a gross over reaction and lemmings are having a field day with it.Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).because it is incorrect. The 360 has sketchy reports of being profitable back in late 2006, and I believe was confirmed by MS back in late 2007. I know the hardware was profitable long before 2 weeks ago(which would be 3 years). Also, I already pointed out that he was using shipped numbers for a single quarter...a quarter in which MS was clearing out inventory of the 20 gig premium system(ie holding off shipments till the retail channel had cleared. No, console sales have been at a loss for 360 until 2008. They are now breaking even and starting to make profit. High game sales like Gears 1 and Halo 3 allowed them to make SOME profit in return in 2006 and 2007. Companies do this. They sell consoles at a loss, initially relying on software sales to hold them down until the hardware side breaks even or becomes profitable.Here are some links just in case you need a memory refresher:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=272074
Steppy_76
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="munu9"] What signs? I could have sworn the PS3 was outselling the 360 a couple months ago. There were not significant "signs." Some months it sold less than 100k others it outsold the 360 by a lot. And that long list of things are just rehashed list from a year ago that I didn't hear about in the month that the PS3 outsold the 360 in every region. And when they released the figure that the PS3 outsold the 360 worldwide This whole teh ps3 is sinking because of relatively bad November sales is a gross over reaction and lemmings are having a field day with it.Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).Here are some links just in case you need a memory refresher:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=272074
demoralizer
Just now began to break even!?
Actually they are beginning to make some profit just now. It's been 3 years. The PS3 has only been out 2 years. These things happen. Time is needed. Companies have research and development sectors that figure out ways to trim production costs all the time. Nintendo is best at this though.
-http://play.tm/news/10435/bach-promises-xbox-profit-in-2008/
-http://games.slashdot.org/games/07/05/04/185224.shtml?tid=211
[QUOTE="demoralizer"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"] Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).TREAL_Since
Just now began to break even!?
Actually they are beginning to make some profit just now. It's been 3 years. The PS3 has only been out 2 years. These things happen. Time is needed. Companies have research and development sectors that figure out ways to trim production costs all the time. Nintendo is best at this though.
-http://play.tm/news/10435/bach-promises-xbox-profit-in-2008/
-http://games.slashdot.org/games/07/05/04/185224.shtml?tid=211
Yeah true consoles release at a loss but what I think is in question is your date. And what does software sales have to do with selling hardware at a loss? Microsoft trimed 360 manufacturing cost by 40% in Nov 21 2006 and started gain small profits in 2007. But the with RROD MS once again changed hardware so it's iffy when they crawled out out of the black.
[QUOTE="Steppy_76"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"] Why does this continue to be ignored? And a reminder. The 360 just now began to break even in 2008 3 years of a loss. It's normal though for a console. They usually don't break even and make profit until 2-3 years after launch. Wii is another story though. It was manufactured to be sold at a profit and it sells like oxygen would (if we were forced to pay for it :P).TREAL_Sincebecause it is incorrect. The 360 has sketchy reports of being profitable back in late 2006, and I believe was confirmed by MS back in late 2007. I know the hardware was profitable long before 2 weeks ago(which would be 3 years). Also, I already pointed out that he was using shipped numbers for a single quarter...a quarter in which MS was clearing out inventory of the 20 gig premium system(ie holding off shipments till the retail channel had cleared. No, console sales have been at a loss for 360 until 2008. They are now breaking even and starting to make profit. High game sales like Gears 1 and Halo 3 allowed them to make SOME profit in return in 2006 and 2007. Companies do this. They sell consoles at a loss, initially relying on software sales to hold them down until the hardware side breaks even or becomes profitable.Those articles were just after MS wrote off a billion for RROD. They also they expect to reach break even in 2008, nowhere did they say END of 2008, and in order to cut prices in September and still be "breaking even" they would have had to have been making a profit selling them for 80-100 bucks more than that.
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="demoralizer"]Just now began to break even!?
demoralizer
Actually they are beginning to make some profit just now. It's been 3 years. The PS3 has only been out 2 years. These things happen. Time is needed. Companies have research and development sectors that figure out ways to trim production costs all the time. Nintendo is best at this though.
-http://play.tm/news/10435/bach-promises-xbox-profit-in-2008/
-http://games.slashdot.org/games/07/05/04/185224.shtml?tid=211
Yeah true consoles release at a loss but what I think is in question is your date. And what does software sales have to do with selling hardware at a loss? Microsoft trimed 360 manufacturing cost by 40% in Nov 21 2006 and started gain small profits in 2007. But the with RROD MS once again changed hardware so it's iffy when they crawled out out of the black.
MS didn't make profit with hardware sales until 2008. MS did not gain small profits from hardware sales in 2007. Great 1st party benefit the console maker. High sales in Halo 3 allowed MS to post some profit last year. The last quarter MSever made profit before thatwas during Halo 2's release.-http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/halo3/news.html?sid=6181753&mode=news
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]because it is incorrect. The 360 has sketchy reports of being profitable back in late 2006, and I believe was confirmed by MS back in late 2007. I know the hardware was profitable long before 2 weeks ago(which would be 3 years). Also, I already pointed out that he was using shipped numbers for a single quarter...a quarter in which MS was clearing out inventory of the 20 gig premium system(ie holding off shipments till the retail channel had cleared. Steppy_76No, console sales have been at a loss for 360 until 2008. They are now breaking even and starting to make profit. High game sales like Gears 1 and Halo 3 allowed them to make SOME profit in return in 2006 and 2007. Companies do this. They sell consoles at a loss, initially relying on software sales to hold them down until the hardware side breaks even or becomes profitable.Those articles were just after MS wrote off a billion for RROD. They also they expect to reach break even in 2008, nowhere did they say END of 2008, and in order to cut prices in September and still be "breaking even" they would have had to have been making a profit selling them for 80-100 bucks more than that. I never said the end of 2008 (well I didn't mean to imply the end of the year). I meant 2008 in general. I'm not trying to talk against the 360 in any way, I'm only trying to say the PS3 isn't a doomed console or "sinking ship" like some have suggested. The point is that it takes time for this to happen. Years. PS3 has only been out for two. I remember last year people were saying the PS3 would die soon. My whole point is that companies go through this. Sony is just catching it a bit harder than usual right now.
[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]poor sony, they deserve better. PS3 is the best system this gen IMOBioShockOwnz
Best system this gen? I'd agree.
Best online infrastructure this gen? I'd disagree.
Best games this gen? I'd disagree.
While the system is a winner, its other components are behind, imo.
So how is the PS3 the best system this gen in your opinion if you dont think it has the best games or the best online?
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]poor sony, they deserve better. PS3 is the best system this gen IMORepublican11
Best system this gen? I'd agree.
Best online infrastructure this gen? I'd disagree.
Best games this gen? I'd disagree.
While the system is a winner, its other components are behind, imo.
So how is the PS3 the best system this gen in your opinion if you dont think it has the best games or the best online?
The system itself and what it offers you for your money. The PS3 is a great buy. But I'm sure he likes the games more on 360.[QUOTE="Republican11"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Best system this gen? I'd agree.
Best online infrastructure this gen? I'd disagree.
Best games this gen? I'd disagree.
While the system is a winner, its other components are behind, imo.
TREAL_Since
So how is the PS3 the best system this gen in your opinion if you dont think it has the best games or the best online?
The system itself and what it offers you for your money. The PS3 is a great buy. But I'm sure he likes the games more on 360.I guess I can see that, but the two biggest points IMO for a system to be the best is games and online. Yes, blu-ray is nice, but I play games a lot more than I watch movies.
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="Republican11"]The system itself and what it offers you for your money. The PS3 is a great buy. But I'm sure he likes the games more on 360.So how is the PS3 the best system this gen in your opinion if you dont think it has the best games or the best online?
Republican11
I guess I can see that, but the two biggest points IMO for a system to be the best is games and online. Yes, blu-ray is nice, but I play games a lot more than I watch movies.
Yeah, games ultimately define a system IMO, not sales. Last gen I liked GCUBE the best.[QUOTE="Republican11"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"] The system itself and what it offers you for your money. The PS3 is a great buy. But I'm sure he likes the games more on 360.TREAL_Since
I guess I can see that, but the two biggest points IMO for a system to be the best is games and online. Yes, blu-ray is nice, but I play games a lot more than I watch movies.
Yeah, games ultimately define a system IMO, not sales. Last gen I liked GCUBE the best.Honestly last gen I couldn't really pick a best system. I loved the exclusives on the GCN and the PS2, but loved playing online on the xbox. This is really the first gen I can say I reallyfavor one system over another by a large margin, and I have been gaming since the NES era.
Lol really lems are desperate. They're playing sales now LOL. It's not our fault that almost all of you exclusives of '08 flopped. PS3 won ' 08, don't be jealous lemmins and stop the damage control.knight-kI think the cows are the ones who need to work on the damage control- face reality everyone form gaming sites, non-Cow fanboys and now even wbesites like CNN are saying the PS3 is not where to be at? It's so obvious Cows are dillusional
- The PS3's big bonus is its ability to double as a Blu-Ray player. Too bad no one seems to care about hi-def DVDs.The differences between Blu-Ray and DVD are hard to see on a TV less than 50".
Nisim19
This second claim is pure BS. Anyway -
I don't care if Sony sinks or not. I will sell PS3 If that is going to happen. Right now I'm happy with it and most of the time I play online but not every day. I play maybe 10 times in a month, sometimes even less.
So I'll buy X360 if Sony sink. Only thing what will bother me is paying for online because Gold card or whatever cost 100$ not 40-50$ Where I live. Sometimes I don't play for a month or two so is it possible to pay for a one month only.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment