System Wars word of the week: consolization.
789shadow
More like every week, sometimes 2nd to graphics king.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
System Wars word of the week: consolization.
789shadow
More like every week, sometimes 2nd to graphics king.
[QUOTE="789shadow"]
System Wars word of the week: consolization.
JangoWuzHere
More like every week, sometimes 2nd to graphics king.
Wasn't last week "Killzone 3 water?"
I knew I was gonna get jumped on for my statements.
[QUOTE="jerkface96"] wait console gamers dont give a damn about their games????? Who are the people on this system wars board then complaining about games and hyping games and saying how great games are? Surely its not just the pc gamers.... hell all I ever see in her from a PC gamer is Teh Crysis. ChubbyGuy40
All I ever hear from consolers are FPS games and Uncharted 2. How great they are and how inferior PC is because it costs more. You see console gamers complaining about visuals more than the actual game. We talk about a lot more games than Crysis. Its consolite's favorite game they never got to play.
Also notice how I never said console gamers don't care about their games.
Console gamers care about there games just the same, we are all gamers and care about games, what system you play on dosent matter.
Advid-Gamer
You see console gamers comparing graphics more than gameplay elements here. Over petty little things such as color difference. They're pretty much happy with whatever they're given to play with. You see our critcism as complaining and being elitist simply because "we can." We're trying to improve the games the developers put out. Consolers do not care about their games the same PC fans do. It doesn't matter what system you are on. PC users, like myself obivously, are much more vocal and outspoken about our opinions.
Exactly the type of elitist attitude that makes PC gamers look bad. Do you REALLY think that console gamers don't care about buying bad games? Games like Call of Duty are also a high selling game on PC, not just consoles, and the console gamers that buy them are just 10-13 year olds trying to blend in with the crowd.
I disagree with the majority with what you have stated there. The story in Crysis 2 is absolutely weaksauce.The gunplays better, the suit is far more flexible, there's still interaction (you can pick up pretty much anything and throw it, just like Crysis 1), the atmosphere is MUCH better, the sound design is better, the aliens are better, the animations are better, the story is better, the presentation is better, the ai is better, the level design is still open, maybe not to the extent of Crysis 1 but it's nowhere near a COD clone, but yeah, I can't blow a hut apart so it's instantly terrible. :roll:
DreamCryotank
[QUOTE="DreamCryotank"]I disagree with the majority with what you have stated there. The story in Crysis 2 is absolutely weaksauce. Really? Have you even glimpsed the trailers or bios on the EA website? The fact that they hired a renowned sci-fi author who is also doing a Crysis 2 novel proves you wrong. Oh and what else did you disagree with there?The gunplays better, the suit is far more flexible, there's still interaction (you can pick up pretty much anything and throw it, just like Crysis 1), the atmosphere is MUCH better, the sound design is better, the aliens are better, the animations are better, the story is better, the presentation is better, the ai is better, the level design is still open, maybe not to the extent of Crysis 1 but it's nowhere near a COD clone, but yeah, I can't blow a hut apart so it's instantly terrible. :roll:
-CheeseEater-
[QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"][QUOTE="DreamCryotank"]I disagree with the majority with what you have stated there. The story in Crysis 2 is absolutely weaksauce. Really? Have you even glimpsed the trailers or bios on the EA website? The fact that they hired a renowned sci-fi author who is also doing a Crysis 2 novel proves you wrong. Oh and what else did you disagree with there?The gunplays better, the suit is far more flexible, there's still interaction (you can pick up pretty much anything and throw it, just like Crysis 1), the atmosphere is MUCH better, the sound design is better, the aliens are better, the animations are better, the story is better, the presentation is better, the ai is better, the level design is still open, maybe not to the extent of Crysis 1 but it's nowhere near a COD clone, but yeah, I can't blow a hut apart so it's instantly terrible. :roll:
ocstew
Because this guaruntees the story will be EXCELLENT.
Really? Have you even glimpsed the trailers or bios on the EA website? The fact that they hired a renowned sci-fi author who is also doing a Crysis 2 novel proves you wrong. Oh and what else did you disagree with there?[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"] I disagree with the majority with what you have stated there. The story in Crysis 2 is absolutely weaksauce.789shadow
Because this guaruntees the story will be EXCELLENT.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1.[QUOTE="789shadow"][QUOTE="ocstew"] Really? Have you even glimpsed the trailers or bios on the EA website? The fact that they hired a renowned sci-fi author who is also doing a Crysis 2 novel proves you wrong. Oh and what else did you disagree with there? ocstew
Because this guaruntees the story will be EXCELLENT.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1.Again, no way dude.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1.[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="789shadow"]
Because this guaruntees the story will be EXCELLENT.
789shadow
Again, no way dude.
Give us reasoning, am I the only one here who backs up claims? There are way more characters in Crysis 2, they have depth and the story links to Crysis 1 in an intriguing way. Just because you can't be assed to look at the trailers or info on the Crysis website and keep on bleating about how consolized and crappy Crysis 2 is, doesn't change that fact.[QUOTE="789shadow"][QUOTE="ocstew"] Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1. ocstew
Again, no way dude.
Give us reasoning, am I the only one here who backs up claims? There are way more characters in Crysis 2, they have depth and the story links to Crysis 1 in an intriguing way. Just because you can't be assed to look at the trailers or info on the Crysis website and keep on bleating about how consolized and crappy Crysis 2 is, doesn't change that fact.I didn't say any such thing.
Give us reasoning, am I the only one here who backs up claims? There are way more characters in Crysis 2, they have depth and the story links to Crysis 1 in an intriguing way. Just because you can't be assed to look at the trailers or info on the Crysis website and keep on bleating about how consolized and crappy Crysis 2 is, doesn't change that fact.[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="789shadow"]
Again, no way dude.
789shadow
I didn't say any such thing.
Remove that line and my point still stands.[QUOTE="789shadow"][QUOTE="ocstew"] Give us reasoning, am I the only one here who backs up claims? There are way more characters in Crysis 2, they have depth and the story links to Crysis 1 in an intriguing way. Just because you can't be assed to look at the trailers or info on the Crysis website and keep on bleating about how consolized and crappy Crysis 2 is, doesn't change that fact.ocstew
I didn't say any such thing.
Remove that line and my point still stands.Why? That becuase they got a popular sci-fi writer to do the story, this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is physically impossible for Crysis 2's story to be anything less than epic and tearjerking, simply because of the author?
Let me collapse this logic in one go: every single phoned in performance in a game by a famous and talented voice actor.
Remove that line and my point still stands.[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="789shadow"]
I didn't say any such thing.
789shadow
Why? That becuase they got a popular sci-fi writer to do the story, this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is physically impossible for Crysis 2's story to be anything less than epic and tearjerking, simply because of the author?
Let me collapse this logic in one go: every single phoned in performance in a game by a famous and talented voice actor.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1. Did you read that? I never said that the story would be epic, I said that it couldn't be worse that Crysis 1, because from the leaked beta and everything it already has a much deeper and complex story.[QUOTE="789shadow"][QUOTE="ocstew"] Remove that line and my point still stands. ocstew
Why? That becuase they got a popular sci-fi writer to do the story, this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is physically impossible for Crysis 2's story to be anything less than epic and tearjerking, simply because of the author?
Let me collapse this logic in one go: every single phoned in performance in a game by a famous and talented voice actor.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1. Did you read that? I never said that the story would be epic, I said that it couldn't be worse that Crysis 1, because from the leaked beta and everything it already has a much deeper and complex story.Any story could conceivably be made to look good if you took just snippets of it.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1. Did you read that? I never said that the story would be epic, I said that it couldn't be worse that Crysis 1, because from the leaked beta and everything it already has a much deeper and complex story.[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="789shadow"]
Why? That becuase they got a popular sci-fi writer to do the story, this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is physically impossible for Crysis 2's story to be anything less than epic and tearjerking, simply because of the author?
Let me collapse this logic in one go: every single phoned in performance in a game by a famous and talented voice actor.
789shadow
Any story could conceivably be made to look good if you took just snippets of it.
Better than Crysis 1 is all I know.[QUOTE="789shadow"][QUOTE="ocstew"] Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1. Did you read that? I never said that the story would be epic, I said that it couldn't be worse that Crysis 1, because from the leaked beta and everything it already has a much deeper and complex story.ocstew
Any story could conceivably be made to look good if you took just snippets of it.
Better than Crysis 1 is all I know.No you don't......and you can't until you have the full game.
Well it proves it won't be as bad as MW2 or Crysis 1. Did you read that? I never said that the story would be epic, I said that it couldn't be worse that Crysis 1, because from the leaked beta and everything it already has a much deeper and complex story.[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="789shadow"]
Why? That becuase they got a popular sci-fi writer to do the story, this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is physically impossible for Crysis 2's story to be anything less than epic and tearjerking, simply because of the author?
Let me collapse this logic in one go: every single phoned in performance in a game by a famous and talented voice actor.
789shadow
Any story could conceivably be made to look good if you took just snippets of it.
yea like KZ3.... that was hyped to have a great story when It was simply mediocre.Better than Crysis 1 is all I know.[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="789shadow"]
Any story could conceivably be made to look good if you took just snippets of it.
789shadow
No you don't......and you can't until you have the full game.
Your suit mode is currently on: MAXIMUM NITPICK I was going to say the same thing, let's wait until we have the full game.The typical console gamer will be thrilled with the new Crysis - Can't get enough of generic shooters!
yellonet
The power of genericness compels you!
Diablo is hiring console devs, PC gamers ADVANCE!console kills another franchise.
up next : witcher and diablo, if they ever come out on consoles.
Jankarcop
Bad Company 2 was never meant to live up to BF2, it's always been a console focused BF series. BF3 has been in the planning for a long time, as a sequel to BF2. Complaining didn't do anything.Its called criticism. Get used to it. Its the best way to improve a product. Stop being so mad we don't have the standards of console gamers.
Criticize the hell out of Bad Company 2 and how it failed to live up to Battlefield 2 and look what you get. Battlefield 3.
ChubbyGuy40
[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]Diablo is hiring console devs, PC gamers ADVANCE!console kills another franchise.
up next : witcher and diablo, if they ever come out on consoles.
ocstew
old news. been hiring since last year, and its for a experiment.
we can only pray they fail.
Diablo has been on consoles beforeconsole kills another franchise.
up next : witcher and diablo, if they ever come out on consoles.
Jankarcop
I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
stiggy321
I firmly believe that this MP demo is not what we'll get in the final game. From Crytek's own screenshots and the leak, things like the hand look much smoother. Notice the hand. Also note the absence of the horrific bloom that's currently in the PC demo. Also notice, the lack of that crappy TAA, and how crisp the game looks. There will be better graphics in the final game.
There's a big difference, PC gamers should hope for the best, this MP demo doesn't have the graphics of the final game.
When you're in-game, go into the game options menu and you'll find a toggle zoom.I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
stiggy321
Diablo has been on consoles before[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]
console kills another franchise.
up next : witcher and diablo, if they ever come out on consoles.
spookykid143
Has anyone here played the PS1 version of Diablo? I did.
The only thing cool about it was co-op, 2 players killing their way trough the levels. The controls themselfs just felt so clunky and awkward, and the visuals looked blurry as hell. I wouldn't exactly call it a success.
What you see in the multiplayer demo is roughly what you're going to get graphically in the singleplayer and multiplayer components. Framerates may differ a bit, and the singleplayer may offer slightly more environment destruction, but it'll be similar.I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
stiggy321
[QUOTE="stiggy321"]What you see in the multiplayer demo is roughly what you're going to get graphically in the singleplayer and multiplayer components. Framerates may differ a bit, and the singleplayer may offer slightly more environment destruction, but it'll be similar. No way, the difference between single and multiplayer is huge in terms of graphics. Not only do reviewers say this but I've seen the beta myself and it's obvious.I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
KHAndAnime
I dont know about you guys but I kinda liked the demo for howerver long I was playing for it. Sure I need to change some of the controls (if possible I read somewhere that you couldnt I think). Comparing it to the first crysis and this demo I instantly almost preferred this one. I liked the graphics, sure they didnt look as real but the first crysis aside from the people never looked that special to me. Unless you throw a couple of mods at it crysis just doesnt look that special, if anything really kinda ugly in places. Maybe its my own prefernce and that I prefer the slightly more "coloured" look to the game where everything looks richer.
+ I am a multiplayer kinda person and fell out of love for playing single player games many many many years ago :P.
Don't worry, you're not the only one. This issue has probably split the community in half.I dont know about you guys but I kinda liked the demo for howerver long I was playing for it. Sure I need to change some of the controls (if possible I read somewhere that you couldnt I think). Comparing it to the first crysis and this demo I instantly almost preferred this one. I liked the graphics, sure they didnt look as real but the first crysis aside from the people never looked that special to me. Unless you throw a couple of mods at it crysis just doesnt look that special, if anything really kinda ugly in places. Maybe its my own prefernce and that I prefer the slightly more "coloured" look to the game where everything looks richer.
+ I am a multiplayer kinda person and fell out of love for playing single player games many many many years ago :P.
o0squishy0o
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"][QUOTE="stiggy321"]What you see in the multiplayer demo is roughly what you're going to get graphically in the singleplayer and multiplayer components. Framerates may differ a bit, and the singleplayer may offer slightly more environment destruction, but it'll be similar. No way, the difference between single and multiplayer is huge in terms of graphics. Not only do reviewers say this but I've seen the beta myself and it's obvious. You've seen it, and I've played it. I think I'm more of the authority here ;)I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
ocstew
LOL salary =/= videogames. good logic. jerkface96
Its about EXPECTATIONS. When you expect your salary to increase but it decreases what wouldbe your reaction? Same thing here. Pc gamers expected Crysis 2 to RAISE the bar. Not only does it not achieve that but it actually goes BELOW the bar.
I feel like Crysis 2 is mostly a tradeoff. We lost the massive openness, some freedom, some suit options, and having a significant jump in graphics compared to any other game. However we gained actually competent AI, enemies that aren't completely bulletproof at higher difficulty levels, a stronger narrative, multiplayer that isn't terrible, and the ability to customize your suit in single-player (unless it's just flat upgrades, I don't know).
While I would have loved them to keep everything I liked about the first game AND everything positive they added in the sequel, I still like this game enough to buy it. Some of the pros and cons I listed are subjective of course, but I feel it's pretty accurate for the most part. Overall I don't think this game deserves the hate it's getting, and a significant amount of it seems exaggerated.
Diablo has been on consoles before[QUOTE="spookykid143"]
[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]
console kills another franchise.
up next : witcher and diablo, if they ever come out on consoles.
Lucianu
Has anyone here played the PS1 version of Diablo? I did.
The only thing cool about it was co-op, 2 players killing their way trough the levels. The controls themselfs just felt so clunky and awkward, and the visuals looked blurry as hell. I wouldn't exactly call it a success.
This reminds me that Civ II also had a (late) PS1 version. A friend of mine, who had tried and loved it on my PC, bought it for his console. Man, that was painful. The game ran at a crawl, and the controls were so clunky it made things even slower. It took 10 times longer to finish a turn than it did on PC, and took all the fun away.
Oh, and the same friend also bought "Panzer General" for his PS1... Some people never learn, it seems.. Again he got punished, with a barely playable game.
In the end, though, he got himself a gaming rig...
Anyone that liked Crysis for more than its graphics and that it contained action will be disappointed with Crysis 2.
Compared to Crysis, Crysis 2 offers:
- Less freedom in the world - You're being herded from A to B with very little options.
- Less interactivity - Destructible objects and buildings are all but gone.
- Less control - Prone and lean are gone and replaced with a bunch of half-automatic cover and leaning functions.
- Less thought - You're constantly being guided and "helped" by the all mighty suit, "Look, there's the ammo! There are the enemies! Walk this way!".
All this put together makes it obvious that the game has lost its roots and have been completely dumbed and watered down to fit the consoles and their typical audience.
All in all this is a product that Crytek should feel shame for calling it Crysis 2.The typical console gamer will be thrilled with the new Crysis - Can't get enough of generic shooters!
The typical PC gamer that liked Crysis for its unique stregths will be very disappointed indeed - A franchise of great freedom, scale and interaction, is no more.yellonet
So was the original Crysis not a generic shooter, I need to get a PC quick I'm missing out on all these original and genre defining FPS games only possible on PC
Oh look I can go from A to B to C back to A and B over to D and then go onto the next mission, now thats how it should be done
Oh look I just blew up that garden shack, original gameplay to the max, I don't see one off the thousands off skyscrapers in New York falling down in Crysis 2
Oh look I went prone and shoot a guy in the head, did you see that only possible on high end PC's
Oh look I get a powersuit in Crysis, it helps me with its awesome powers, look theres ammo, there's enemies, walk this way or thats way or from A to B to C
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]I commend you for naming things outside of graphics. But at the same time nothing you stated is correct, some is simply your opinion others are just flat out wrong. In terms of gameplay there is nothing Crysis 1 does that Crysis 2 doesn't do. Not one thing. While at the same time Crysis 2 does many thing Crysis 1 doesn't. When has Crysis ever not given you information on your next objective/s? Instead now its the suit instead of Profit telling you where you need to go. You say you're being herded from point to point with little options, but compared to the original Crysis you actually have more options, all highlightable with your binoculars. Controls are preference, personally I like the new cover system much better. It's much easier to control how much or little of yourself you want to have in or out of cover at one time. Holding down Q or E while trying to zoom and move left or right all at the same time is awkward for me. I'll take the city gameplay of C2 over the jungle gameplay of C1 anyday. There is just more to see and do in a city environment. ChubbyGuy40
Crysis let you chose how to get to point a to point b, c, and d. You still went to the same point as in any game, but you didn't have to take the road laid out for you. Crysis 2 might as well be a roller-coaster ride considering how linear and lifeless it is.
What does Crysis 2 do that Crysis 1 doesn't? It holds your hand through the whole game because the player is apparently not smart enough to figure it out on his own (consolization.) It highlights every single point of "attack" that the developers deemed to be the best way. Crysis 1 didn't give you that information and there was an unlimited way to attack an encampment. You don't get to find anything secret, the suit highlights everything for you (consolization.)
The control is more locked down with lag (power jump.) Crysis 1 had way better usage of its powers besides energy depleition which is the only part of the suit I like.
There was way more to see in the jungles of Crysis 1, and it was a hell of a lot more interesting. And do? Whats there to do besides finding those collectables?
Exactly.I think basing your judgements on beta gameplay videos is a terrible way to judge this game.JangoWuzHereWhen a game is in the beta stage it is generally feature complete, what is left is polish and working out the bugs, so what you have in the beta in terms of gameplay and content is what you get with the final product.
[QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"][QUOTE="DreamCryotank"]I disagree with the majority with what you have stated there. The story in Crysis 2 is absolutely weaksauce. Really? Have you even glimpsed the trailers or bios on the EA website? The fact that they hired a renowned sci-fi author who is also doing a Crysis 2 novel proves you wrong. Oh and what else did you disagree with there? :lol: Must be a really crappy author then. The story is super generic garbage. And how does the hiring of an author "prove" anything?The gunplays better, the suit is far more flexible, there's still interaction (you can pick up pretty much anything and throw it, just like Crysis 1), the atmosphere is MUCH better, the sound design is better, the aliens are better, the animations are better, the story is better, the presentation is better, the ai is better, the level design is still open, maybe not to the extent of Crysis 1 but it's nowhere near a COD clone, but yeah, I can't blow a hut apart so it's instantly terrible. :roll:
ocstew
Crysis 2 novel...... :| :? ... :lol::lol::lol:
You didn't even read the first post in the thread. Good job making a fool of yourself :lol:I just want them to give me an option to click for zoom, not hold. And they can fix some things with air stomp and the guns and stuff... minor little adjustments that could evenbe done server side if we're allowed that option. We seemingly are with this "custom" deal.
So what is everyone complaining about? The graphical/visual settings? Bugs?
You are mentally retarded or insane if you honestly think that Crytek is stupid enough to release Crysis 2 with 3 graphical settings and encrypted config files. I actually laugh out loud when I think someone believes this beta is a reflection of any part of the technical aspects of Crysis 2. I mean, considering Crysis's multiplayer was ridiculously terrible for many, many reasons, I don't know what you guys are disapointed with. You actually think this beta is worse than Crysis's original multiplayer? WTF?
It's fornet codeand map fixing. There will be multiple settings to adjust in the PC version. You guys are nuts.
stiggy321
[QUOTE="yellonet"]
Anyone that liked Crysis for more than its graphics and that it contained action will be disappointed with Crysis 2.
Compared to Crysis, Crysis 2 offers:
- Less freedom in the world - You're being herded from A to B with very little options.
- Less interactivity - Destructible objects and buildings are all but gone.
- Less control - Prone and lean are gone and replaced with a bunch of half-automatic cover and leaning functions.
- Less thought - You're constantly being guided and "helped" by the all mighty suit, "Look, there's the ammo! There are the enemies! Walk this way!".
All this put together makes it obvious that the game has lost its roots and have been completely dumbed and watered down to fit the consoles and their typical audience.
All in all this is a product that Crytek should feel shame for calling it Crysis 2.The typical console gamer will be thrilled with the new Crysis - Can't get enough of generic shooters!
The typical PC gamer that liked Crysis for its unique stregths will be very disappointed indeed - A franchise of great freedom, scale and interaction, is no more.Supabul
So was the original Crysis not a generic shooter, I need to get a PC quick I'm missing out on all these original and genre defining FPS games only possible on PC
Yes, you're missing out.
Oh look I can go from A to B to C back to A and B over to D and then go onto the next mission, now thats how it should be doneSupabul
More or less what you could do in Crysis, it was a really big world that you had great freedom in.
Oh look I just blew up that garden shack, original gameplay to the max, I don't see one off the thousands off skyscrapers in New York falling down in Crysis 2SupabulOne is a player controlled happening, the other a scripted event and you don't see the differece.
Oh look I went prone and shoot a guy in the head, did you see that only possible on high end PC'sSupabulSo how many features is it ok to remove? I guess you'd be happy with a on-rails shooter where you don't even aim yoursely, just press a button when the enemy pops up, "but teh graphicz!1 and the big booms! teh scripted eventzors!11'".
Oh look I get a powersuit in Crysis, it helps me with its awesome powers, look theres ammo, there's enemies, walk this way or thats way or from A to B to CSupabulPersonally I used the suit as little as possible, and most of the time you did not have to.
Don't really understand why they call it Crysis at all when the only thing left is the suit.
so why did this happen? Crytek thought that "F*** Crysis fans. Mainstream has more money."
that's unfortunately the trend these days... games need to be more "accessible" (dumbed down) so that they would sell more. i'm not saying games should be complicated, but they should be ADDING instead of TAKING AWAY.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment